1. Introduction
Vitamin A is essential for vision, reproduction, growth, and development [1,2,3]. Vitamin A deficiency can result in blindness, incoordination, reproductive disorders, and reduced growth performance [4,5]. In animal production, vitamin A is usually added to a complete diet to avoid vitamin A deficiency and promote the growth of farm animals. In addition, vitamin A is in the largest proportion in premixes and is the highest cost component of premixes, but vitamin A is the most sensitive to degradation by chemical and physical factors [6,7,8]. Therefore, the improvement of vitamin A product stability is the main challenge faced by vitamin manufactures. Several commercial vitamin A products are currently available in the Chinese market. These vitamin A products are produced from various vitamin manufactures that may have varying stabilities.
Currently, little published research exists evaluating the stability of commercial vitamin A products during storage. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to determine the storage stability of five commercial sources of vitamin A in premix, and provide a guideline for product formulation and application.
2. Materials and Methods
This study was conducted at the State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition at the China Agricultural University (Beijing, China). The Ethics Committee of Animal Care and Use was not consulted for this study because no animals were used.
2.1. Vitamin A Sources
This experiment used five commercially available vitamin A products: Xinhecheng Co., Ltd., Zhejiang, China; Zhejiang medicine Co., Ltd., Zhejiang, China; Kingdomway Group, Xiamen, China; DSM Nutritional Products, Heerlen, Netherlands; BASF, Ludwigshafen, Germany. Additionally, the specific vitamin A manufacturers are not disclosed in the results to protect proprietary information; thus, each vitamin A source in results is presented as manufacturer A to E. The manufacturing dates of all products were obtained from the original suppliers to ensure that the vitamin A products were within 6 months of manufacture and were not expired. These vitamin A products declared a potency of 500,000 IU/g. One IU vitamin A is equivalent to 0.30 μg retinol or 0.344 μg retinyl acetate [1].
2.2. Premix, Sampling, and Analysis
Each vitamin A product was added and mixed with either three vitamin premixes or three vitamin-trace mineral (VTM) premixes (Table 1). The amount added for each vitamin A product was determined such that including 0.30% vitamin premix or 1% VTM premix in the diet would provide the activity of vitamin A commonly used in pig diets (15,000 IU/kg for suckling pig, 12,000 IU/kg for weanling pig, and 8,000 IU/kg for finishing pig). Vitamin or VTM premixes were mixed at the designed levels with each vitamin A source, which were mixed using a paddle mixer for 5 min. The preparations of vitamin and VTM mineral premixes are described previously [9]. This process was repeated to yield six replicates per treatment. Vitamin premixes were stored in a controlled environment chamber setting at 25 °C and 60% relative humidity. The VTM premixes were stored in a storage room (approximately 22 °C). At sampling, each sample bag was pulled out at d 0, 90, 180, 270, and 360, and samples were sent immediately after collection to the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Feed Efficacy and Safety Evaluation Center (Beijing, China) for vitamin A analysis using a slight modification of the AOAC official method (AOAC 2012.10) [10]. The stability of vitamin A in vitamin premixes and VTM premixes during storage was reported as the residual vitamin activity (% of initial) at each sampling point.
2.3. Data Analysis
Normality of the data was verified using the UNIVARIATE procedure of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The BOXPLOT procedure of SAS was used to check for outliers. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA) to determine the interactive and main effects of storage time and vitamin A source on the activity of vitamin A in vitamin and VTM premixes. The LSMEANS statement was used to calculate treatment means, and the means were separated using the Tukey test. Results were considered significant at p ≤ 0.05 and a tendency at p ≤ 0.10. Residual vitamin A activity data are presented as means ± SD, which was generated by Office 2019 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) and Adobe Illustrator 2020 (Adobe Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).
3. Results
There was no significant interaction or main effects of storage and vitamin A source on the stability of vitamin A in the vitamin premixes (Table 2; Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3). There was no significant interaction between storage time and vitamin A source on the stability of vitamin A in the VTM premixes (Table 2). The main effect of vitamin A source was not significant, but the main effect of storage time significantly affected the activity of vitamin A in the VTM premixes (p ≤ 0.01). The loss of vitamin A activity in VTM premixes was increased during prolonged storage periods (Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6).
4. Discussion
Zhuge and Klopfenstein conducted a study on vitamin stability under room temperature storage and they reported that 56–57% of vitamin A was lost after one month of storage [11]. The BASF company (BASF 1994, cited by Whitehead) reported that the retention of vitamin A in VTM premix was 85% and 58% after one month and six months of storage, respectively [12]. Mooney and Aldrich investigated the stability of vitamin premixes under the conditions of 20 °C and 50% humidity [13], and they observed that after six months of storage, the retention of vitamin A was 76%. The loss activity of vitamin A during storage reported in previous studies is higher than the results from the present experiment. The high loss of vitamin A after stability testing reported in the previous study may be easily explained by a limitation in production processes decades ago that affected vitamin A stability. In the present study, it was observed that the loss of vitamin A in the premixes did not exceed 10% after 12 months of storage, which indicates that the commercially available vitamin A products have good stability. Shurson et al. [14] reported that vitamin A activity in vitamin and VTM premixes decreased with prolonged storage time. Additionally, the vitamin A stability in vitamin premix was 86% after 120 days of storage, while vitamin A activity in VTM premix decreased to 64.12% [14]. In the current study, the retention of vitamin A in vitamins and VTM premixes is higher than the results of Shurson’s study [14]. This may be caused by the vitamin A production process, but on the other hand, these differences may be due to the composition of the premix in the study by Shurson, as well as the use of vitamin A in the free alcohol form. The current study indicated that extended storage time reduces the stability of vitamin A in the VTM premix, which is in agreement with the previous study [8,9].
The pure product of retinol has poor stability and cannot be used directly in feed production [15]. Feed-grade vitamin A mostly uses vitamin A acetate with better stability, but oily vitamin A acetate is usually processed into dry powder for feed processing. The commercially available vitamin A (dry powder) in the Chinese feed additive market is 500,000 IU/g. The dry powdered vitamin A sources vary in their susceptibility to degradation by chemical and physical factors, such as light, oxygen, temperature, and humidity [6]. The degradation of vitamin A is accelerated by trace minerals in the presence of a premix [6,9,12]. However, the present study observed that there was no significant effect of vitamin source on the stability of vitamin A in vitamins and VTM premixes and the retention of vitamin A was over 90% after one year of storage. This may be due to commercially available vitamin A products providing stability far superior to the raw vitamin product. On the other hand, this may be that different manufacturers are homogeneous in their technological development, reducing the difference in vitamin A stability. Coatings (e.g., carbohydrate, protein, ethyl cellulose) or encapsulation gives vitamins such as vitamin A greater protection against moisture, heat, and pressure during storage and processing [16]. Spray drying is a technique where a liquid product is atomized in a hot gas which instantaneously leads to the formation of powders. With the advantages of low cost, high productivity, good continuity, and rapid processing, this spray drying method is often used to prepare microencapsulation to protect vitamin A. Modified starch and gelatin are usually used as coating materials [17]. Currently, Xinhecheng, Zhejiang medicine, and Kingdomway have applied a spray drying approach for vitamin A production. DSM uses cross-linking coating technology to create a matrix of a cross-linked beadlet generally composed of gelatin, sugar, gum, starch or some similar type of hydrocolloid. The inclusion of antioxidants such as ethoxyquin, beta hydroxy acid, or butylated hydroxytoluene offers additional protection against oxidizing agents [16,18]. The BASF company also introduces the microencapsulation of vitamin A to produce microencapsulated vitamin A with sucrose, gelatin, modified starch, butylated hydroxytoluene, and sodium aluminosilicate. The vitamin manufacturer has developed vitamin A products with high quality and stability. Today’s vitamin A product forms have marked advantages when they are used in feed manufacturing.
5. Conclusions
The stability of commercially available vitamin A during storage is affected by storage time regardless of vitamin A source. Vitamin A stored in a vitamin premix was the most stable. In VTM premixes, longer storage times reduced vitamin A activity, but vitamin A sources from different manufacturers have the same stability during storage.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, P.Y., H.W., and Y.M.; methodology, Y.M.; validation, P.Y., H.W., and Y.M.; formal analysis, P.Y. and H.W.; investigation, P.Y., L.L., and H.W.; writing—original draft preparation, P.Y.; writing—review and editing, Y.M.; supervision, N.Z. and Y.M.; funding acquisition, Y.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work is supported by Evaluation of Bioavailability of New Feed Additives, a project that has received funding from China Agricultural University (grant number: 201705510410056) and Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (grant number: 21178259).
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures and Tables
Figure 1. Mean (± standard deviation), n = 6 per treatment group. Effects of storage time and vitamin A source on residual vitamin A activity (% of initial) in vitamin premixes for suckling pigs. The p values relate to vitamin premix (time × source, NS; time, NS; source, NS). NS represents not significant.
Figure 2. Mean (± standard deviation), n = 6 per treatment group. Effects of storage time and vitamin A source on residual vitamin A activity (% of initial) in vitamin premixes for weanling pigs. The p values relate to vitamin premix (time × source, NS; time, NS; source, NS). NS represents not significant.
Figure 3. Mean (± standard deviation), n = 6 per treatment group. Effects of storage time and vitamin A source on residual vitamin A activity (% of initial) in vitamin premixes for finishing pigs. The p values relate to vitamin premix (time × source, NS; time, NS; source, NS). NS represents not significant.
Figure 4. Mean (± standard deviation), n = 6 per treatment group. Effects of storage time and vitamin A source on residual vitamin A activity (% of initial) in vitamin-trace mineral premixes for suckling pigs. The p values relate to vitamin premix (time × source, NS; time, p = 0.01, source, NS). NS represents not significant.
Figure 5. Mean (± standard deviation), n = 6 per treatment group. Effects of storage time and vitamin A source on residual vitamin A activity (% of initial) in vitamin-trace mineral premixes for weanling pigs. The p values relate to vitamin premix (time × source, NS; time, p < 0.01 source, NS). NS represents not significant.
Figure 6. Mean (± standard deviation), n = 6 per treatment group. Effects of storage time and vitamin A source on residual vitamin A activity (% of initial) in vitamin-trace mineral premixes for finishing pigs. The p values relate to vitamin premix (time × source, NS; time, p < 0.01; source, NS). NS represents not significant.
The composition of vitamin and vitamin-trace mineral (VTM) premixes.
Item 1 | Vitamin Premixes | VTM Premixes | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Suckling | Weanling | Finishing | Suckling | Weanling | Finishing | |
Vitamin A, 104 IU/kg | 500 | 400 | 267 | 150 | 120 | 80 |
Vitamin D3, 104 IU/kg | 67 | 67 | 50 | 20 | 20 | 15 |
Vitamin E, IU/kg | 50,000 | 33,333 | 25,000 | 10,000 | 3000 | 7000 |
Vitamin K3, mg/kg | 3333 | 1000 | 1333 | 1000 | 300 | 400 |
Vitamin B1, mg/kg | 167 | 133 | 67 | 50 | 40 | 20 |
Vitamin B2, mg/kg | 667 | 333 | 333 | 200 | 100 | 100 |
Vitamin B3, mg/kg | 23,333 | 15,000 | 10,000 | 7000 | 3000 | 4000 |
Vitamin B5, mg/kg | 13,333 | 11,667 | 10,000 | 4000 | 2000 | 4500 |
Vitamin B6, mg/kg | 1667 | 1000 | 667 | 500 | 300 | 200 |
Folic acid, mg/kg | 5000 | 3333 | 3333 | 1500 | 1000 | 1000 |
Biotin, mg/kg | 2333 | 2333 | 1000 | 700 | 500 | 300 |
Vitamin B12, mg/kg | 20 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
Choline, mg/kg | - | - | - | 80,000 | 40,000 | 20,000 |
Copper, mg/kg | - | - | - | 1500 | 1500 | 500 |
Iodine, mg/kg | - | - | - | 12,000 | 10,000 | 4000 |
Iron, mg/kg | - | - | - | 3500 | 3000 | 1500 |
Manganese, mg/kg | - | - | - | 12,000 | 10,000 | 5000 |
Selenium, mg/kg | - | - | - | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Znic, mg/kg | - | - | - | 30 | 30 | 30 |
1 Vitamin sources: Vitamin A, retinyl acetate; Vitamin D3, cholecalciferol; Vitamin E, D,L-α-tocopherol acetate; Vitamin K3, menadione sodium bisulfite; Vitamin B1, thiamine mononitrate; Vitamin B2, riboflavin; Vitamin B3, nicotinic acid; Vitamin B5, D-calcium pantothenate; Vitamin B6, pyridoxine hydrochloride; Vitamin B7, biotin; Vitamin B9, folic acid; Vitamin B12, cyanocobalamin; Choline, choline chloride. Trace mineral source: Copper, CuSO4; Iodine, Ca(IO3)2; Iron, FeSO4; Manganese, MnO; Selenium, NaSeO2; Znic, ZnSO4.
Table 2The interaction effect and main effect probability of storage time and vitamin A source on the stability of vitamin A in vitamin and vitamin-trace mineral (VTM) premixes.
Item | Time × Source | Time | Source |
---|---|---|---|
Vitamin premix (Suckling) | 0.999 | 0.961 | 0.936 |
Vitamin premix (Weanling) | 0.999 | 0.844 | 0.972 |
Vitamin premix (Finishing) | 0.907 | 0.903 | 0.802 |
VTM premix (Suckling) | 0.988 | 0.010 | 0.969 |
VTM premix (Weanling) | 0.943 | <0.01 | 0.877 |
VTM premix (Finishing) | 0.984 | <0.01 | 0.925 |
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate the stability of five commercial vitamin A products in vitamin premixes and vitamin-trace mineral premixes. The five commercial products used were: Xinhecheng, Zhejiang medicine, Kingdomway, DSM, and BASF. The vitamin A products were stored in three vitamin premixes (for suckling, weanling, and finishing pigs) or in vitamin-trace mineral (VTM) premixes (for suckling, weanling, and finishing pigs). Vitamin premixes were stored in an environmentally controlled chamber set at 25 °C and 60% humidity. The VTM premixes were stored at room temperature (approximately 22 °C). Sampling was performed on d 0, 90, 180, 270, and 360. Stability was reported as the residual vitamin A activity (% of initial) at each sampling point. For the stability of vitamin premixes, all interactive and main effects of storage time and vitamin A product were not significant. For the stability of VTM premixes, there was no significant interaction effects between storage time, vitamin A product and main effect of vitamin A product, but the main effect of storage time was significant (p < 0.01). In conclusion, a longer storage time reduced vitamin A activity in VTM premixes but there was no difference in the stability of commercially available vitamin A.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;
2 State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;