Abstract.
The investigation of the dissociation equilibrium of fluorescein in aqueous micellar solution was determined spectrophotometrically at 25 °C and at ionic strength of 0.1 mol dm^sup -3^. For this purpose, the effect of nonionic (TX100), cationic (CTAB) and anionic (SDS) surfactants on the absorption spectra of fluorescein at different pH values were studied. To evaluate the pH-absorbance data, a resolution based on the combination of soft- and hard-modeling is applied. The acidity constants of all related equilibria are estimated using the whole spectral fitting of the collected data to an established factor analysis model. DATAN program was applied for determination of acidity constants. Results show that the pK^sub a^ values of fluorescein are influenced as the percentages of an anionic and a cationic surfactant such as SDS and CTAB, respectively, are added to the solution of this reagent. Also, neutral surfactant such as TX100 only affects pK^sub a1^. Effects of surfactant on acidity constants and pure spectrum of each component are also discussed.
Keywords: fluorescein, acidity constants, TX100; SDS, CTAB, DATAN, spectrophotometric
INTRODUCTION
Dissociation constants are important parameters to indicate the extent of ionization of molecules in solution at different pH values. The acidity constants of organic reagents play a fundamental role in many analytical procedures such as acid-base titration, solvent extraction, complex formation, and ion transport. It has been shown that the acid-base properties affect the toxicity, chromatographic retention behavior, and pharmaceutical properties of organic acids and bases. Much of the theoretical foundation of modern organic chemistry is based on the observation of the effects on acid-base equilibrium of changing molecular structure.1 Various methods for the determination of dissociation constants, such as potentiometric titration, spectrophotometric determination, conductometry, and spectroscopic methods, have been reported. Among these, potentiometric titration2 and spectrophotometric determination3 are the most useful and widely used methods. For potentiometric titration, the dissociation constants of extremely acidic or basic compounds cannot be accurately determined because of their instability in an extreme pH range or because of the limitations of pH meters. Another essential requirement of this method is that the initial concentration of the samples must be accurately determined, it means, the samples must be pure and dry.
Aqueous micellar media are widely used in different areas of analytical chemistry and several reviews have been published related to them.4-7 One important property of micelles is their ability to solubilize a wide variety of compounds which are insoluble or slightly soluble in water. The incorporation of a solute into micellar systems can lead to important changes in its molecular properties. Another important effect of micellar systems is that they can modify reaction rates and, to some extent, the nature of the products. Micelles can inhibit or accelerate reaction rates (by up to several orders of magnitude) and also shift the equilibria (acidbase). Surfactants usually affect spectral parameters: the intensity and shifts in the absorption bands can be increased, and shifts, in the absorption maxima of reagents are observed.8,9 Micelles can affect the apparent pKa values of the reagents due to a combination of electrostatic nd microenvironmental variations of the micelle. 10-12 Moreover, the acid-base equilibria involved in these systems are also influenced by surfactant.13-17
The fluorescein dye is probably the most common fluorescent probe today. Fluorescein is commercially available in many derivatives, such as isothiocyanate and fluorescein succinimidyl ester, that can be covalently attached to macromolecules and to amino acids. Fluorescein (Figure 1) in aqueous solution exists in cationic, neutral, anionic and dianionic forms making its absorption properties strongly pH dependent.18 The protolytic constants relating the concentrations of protolytic forms have been difficult to determine, because their spectra overlap substantially and the different pKa values are quite close. Using chemometrics methods, one can analyze whole spectra, thereby utilizing all spectrum information. 19,20 The approach is superior to any single-point measurement since several hundreds data points per spectrum can be treated simultaneously.21 The predefined model, known as hard-modeling analysis, cannot be applied if crucial information is missing. Softmodeling or model free approaches are based on much more general prerequisites, such as positive molar absorbance, positive concentration of all species, unimodality of concentration profiles, and closure (concentration of all species are the same for all solutions). Naturally, if the strengths of hard-modeling and softmodeling methodologies are combined, a much more powerful method of data analysis can be expected.22,23 Data analysis was carried out by DATAN package that is developed by Kubista group,24-30 the outputs of the fitting processes were acidity constants, spectral profiles of pure forms and other factor analysis data. The theory and application of physical constraints method were discussed in previous studies in several papers.17,31-39
In this study, we applied the DATAN program to determine the acidity constants of fluorescein in pure water, water-TX100, water-SDS and water-CTAB micellar media solutions at 25 "aC and an ionic strength of 0.1 mol dm.3 spectrophotometrically. The effects of pol(oxyethylene)(9.5)p-(1,1,3,3-tetramethyl) (TX100) as nonionic surfactant, sodium n-dodecyl sulfate (SDS) as anionic surfactant and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) were studied on the dissociation constants and pure spectrum of fluorescein.
EXPERIMENTAL
Materials
Fluorescein, TX100, SDS, CTAB, hydrochloric acid, sodium hydroxide and potassium nitrate were analytical grade commercial products from Merck (Darmstad, Germany). These reagents were used without further purification. Standard stock solution of 9.0 × 10-4 mol dm-3 of fluorescein was prepared by dissolving appropriate amounts of fluorescein in water. The stock solutions of surfactants were prepared by dissolving weighted amounts of substances in appropriate amounts of water. All the solutions were prepared in deionized water.
Instrumentation and software
A Perkin Elmer (Lambda 25) spectrophotometer controlled by a computer and equipped with a 1-cm path length quartz cell was used for UV-Vis spectra acquisition. Spectra were acquired between 300 and 600 nm. A HORIBA M-12 pH-meter furnished with a combined glass-saturated calomel electrode was calibrated with at least two buffer solutions at pH 3.00 and 9.00. All absorption spectra where digitized at five data points per nanometer in the wavelength 300-600 nm and transferred (in ASCII format) to an AMD 2000 XP (256 Mb RAM) computer for subsequent analysis by MATLAB software, version 6.5 (The MathWorks) or for processing by using DATAN package.
Spectrophotometric titrations
For the fluorescein (2.3 × 10-5 mol dm-3) in pure water, water-TX100, water-SDS and water-CTAB mixtures titrations, absorption spectra were measured with a titration set-up consisting of a computer interfaced to a spectrophotometer. After each pH adjustment by hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide, solution was transferred into the cuvette and the absorption spectra were recorded. Ionic strength was maintained at 0.1 mol dm.3 by adding appropriate amounts of KNO3. All measurements were carried out at the temperature (25 ± 0.5 °C).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Figure 1, which describes the interconversions of protolytic species, has been discussed in previous reports,40 implies low acidity for different groups. In previous reports value of acidity constants are obtained in pure water.18 The protolytic constants relating the chemical activity of the cation, neutral form, anion and dianion are pKa1 = 2.08, pKa2 = 4.31 and pKa3 = 6.43. Song et al.41 and Biswas et al.42 investigated the absorption and fluorescence spectra of fluorescein in SDS, CTAB and TX100 micelles. Hadjianestis and Nikokavouras43 have reported the absorption and fluorescence spectra of fluorescein in CTAB micelles. Also, Mchedlov- Petrossyan et al.44,45 and Kibblewhite et al.46 have reported of fluorescein ionization in different media.
The absorption spectra of fluorescein in pure water at various pH values at 300-550 nm intervals were recorded. In order to determine the influence of the nonionic surfactant (TX100), the anionic surfactant (SDS) and the cationic surfactant (CTAB) on acidity constants, a series of experiments were run at different TX100, SDS and CTAB concentrations. Figures 2-5 show the absorption spectra of fluorescein at different pH values in pure water, water-TX100, water-SDS and water-CTAB. The shape of absorption spectra of fluorescein in TX100 micelles is very close to that in aqueous solution. But, the red shifts in absorption spectra of fluorescein in cationic (CTAB) and anionic (SDS) micelles are observed. Singular value decomposition (SVD) analysis performed on all absorption data matrices obtained at various pH values for fluorescein gives the number of components that best represent the system. SVD is the preferred algorithm because it has the most stability under the widest range of application. 21 The SVD algorithm decomposes an arbitrary data matrix, A, with more rows than columns, into three matrices, A=USVT. The column of the matrix U (which has the same dimensions as A), constitutes the so-called basis spectra of A. SVD has the very useful property of compressing the information contained in A into the first few columns of U, such columns are mutually orthogonal (linearly independent) and their importance decreases as rapidly as possible after the first column. The importance of each column of U in representing A is given by the squares of nonnegative diagonal values (singular values) of S.VT (where T means the transpose) describes the composition of A in terms of basis spectra. V and S have dimensions equal to the number of columns of A. Four significant factors are also supported by the statistical indicators of Elbergali et al.30 These factors could be attributed to the three dissociation equilibria of a triprotic acid such as fluorescein. The pKa values of fluorescein were investigated in pure water, different water-TX100, water-SDS and water-CTAB mixtures spectrophotometrically at 25 °C and an ionic strength of 0.1 mol dm-3.
Acidity constants of fluorescein in several mixtures were evaluated using the DATAN program with the corresponding spectral absorption-pH data. From inspection of the experimental spectra, it is hard to guess even the number of protolytic species involved. The most four calculated significant projection vectors with clear spectral features (as compared to noise) evidence the presence of four spectroscopically distinguishable components. Their shapes, however, are clearly unphysical and cannot be directly related to the spectral response of the four protolytic forms. The outputs of the program are pKa values, their standard deviation, the number of principal components, projection vectors (loadings) and the pure spectrum of each assumed species.
The results obtained by the application of the DATAN program are summarized in Tables 1-3. These pKa values clearly show the different behavior of fluorescein in these different charge-type micellar systems, pKa values are also shown in Figure 6. As can be seen from Figure 6, it can be concluded that the surfactant TX100, only causes a decrease in pKa1. According to the increases of acidity constant of Ka1, it can be obtained that a neutral surfactant such as TX100, has larger interaction with H2F. And ionic species of fluorescein does not have considerable interaction with TX100. According to the pH changes in the region of H2F production, absorption is observed. It can be thought that the species H2F which has the lactone form is not formed in solution and tautomeric reaction does not proceed. When the effect of the SDS is studied (Table 2), it is observed that all pKa's are increased (decrease of acidity constants), and it shows that anionic surfactant such as SDS, interacts with cationic species (H3F+) or species which are less anionic. And finally, effect of CTAB (Table 3) causes a decrease in pKa1 and increases pKa2 and pKa3, which can be concluded that CTAB has more interaction with H2F.
The pKa values depend on absorption spectrum variation at different pH in all micelles systems. One of the very important outputs of the DATAN program is the calculated spectrum of different forms of fluorescein in each micellar media. Sample spectrum of the calculated spectra of all species in pure water, 0.025 w/v % TX100, 0.05 w/v % SDS and 0.05 w/v % CTAB to water are shown in Figure 7. It is interesting to note that the nature of the surfactant has a fundamental effect on each pure spectrum. As it is clear from Figure 7, this effect is apparently observed in different species of fluorescein. The surfactant effect on this spectrum is very interesting. Many papers and reviews have discussed the effect of micelle on the apparent pKa values of the acids.4-17 In the present work we observed the changes of spectrum in TX100, SDS and CTAB micelles systems and then we calculated the pKa values of this reagent in these media. As it is clear from Figure 7, when the TX100 surfactant is used, it causes higher intensity in spectra of H3F+. The pKa1 is decreased and pKa2 and pKa3 values are increased slightly in different percentages of TX100. By using SDS surfactant, the most changes are observed in spectra of H2F and HF-. The acidity constant values are increased with the increase of SDS percentages. In the case of CTAB surfactant, changes in spectra cause: pKa1 is unchanged up to 0.01 % (w/v) and then decreases, pKa2 increases slightly till 0.01 % (w/v) and then increases more and finally in the case of pKa3 there is an increase. Absorption maxima positions for different species of fluorescein in different micellar media are shown in Table 4. It is interesting to note that the nature of the micelle composition has a fundamental effect on pure spectrum intensities and not on maxima positions of spectrum. According to the results of Table 4, the most changes of maxima position of spectrum is related to SDS.
The difference between the pKa calculated by presented method, and the pKa exist in literature can be because of, experimental errors and the oldness of last methods, in comparison with chemometrics methods in which, all of the spectrum is used for analysis. So the obtained acidity constants by DATAN are more reliable and precise than previous methods. These changes are due to the hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions of reactants with micellar aggregates.4-17,40-48
CONCLUSION
In this work, we distinguish the behavior of acidity constants of fluorescein in pure water, water-TX100, water-SDS and water-CTAB micellar media systems at 25 "aC and an ionic strength of 0.1 mol dm.3 that are studied by multiwavelength spectrophotometric method. Results show that the pKa values of fluorescein are influenced as the percentages of an anionic and a cationic surfactant such as SDS and CTAB, respectively, added to the solution of this reagent. Also, neutral surfactant such as TX100 only affects pKa1. DATAN is a useful tool for resolution of the different species present in equilibria systems. By using this method and without any prior knowledge about the system, we can obtain the acidity constants and pure spectra from the experimental data. In conclusion, interaction with micellar aggregates induces significant pKa shifts which can be rationalized in terms of partitioning of species and electrostatic contribution.
Acknowledgements. The authors are gratefully acknowledging the support of this work by the Islamic Azad University, Arak Branch research council.
SAZETAK
Spektrofotometrijsko odredivanje konstanti disocijacije flouresceina u micelarnom mediju
Ali Niazi,a,b Ateesa Yazdanipour,a Jahanbakhsh Ghasemi,c Mikael Kubista,d Azemat Sheydaa i Mahtab Alikhaha
a Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Arak Branch, Arak, Iran
b Yong Researches Club, Islamic Azad University, Arak Branch, Arak, Iran
c Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
d Institute of Biotechnology AS CR, v.v.i, Videnska 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech
Ravnotezna disocijacija fluoresceina u vodenoj micelarnoj otopini je istrazivana spektrofotometrijski pri 25 °C i pri ionskoj jakosti 0.1 mol dm^sup -3^. Za to je istrazivan ucinak neionskih (TX100), kationskih (CTAB) i anionskih (SDS) surfaktanata na apsorpcijske spektre fluoresceina pri razlicitim pH vrijednostima. Da se procijene podaci pH-absorbancija, upotrijebljeno je razlucivanje temeljeno na kombinaciji mekog i tvrdog modeliranja (engl. softand hard-modeling). Konstante kiselosti svih odgovarajuæ ih ravnoteza su odredene koristenjem ugadanja cijelih spektara na uspostavljeni faktorski model. DATAN program je upotrijebljen za odredivanje konstanti kiselosti. Rezultati pokazuju da na pKa vrijednosti fluoresceina utjecu cak i postoci dodanih anionskih i kationskih surfaktanata poput SDS-a i CTAB-a. Neutralni surfaktant, poput TX100 utjece samo na pKa1. Takoder su istrazeni utjecaji surfaktanata na konstante kiselosti i cistog spektra svake komponente.
REFERENCES
1. D. Alimasifar, A. Forghaniha, Z. Khojasteh, J. Ghasemi, H. Shargi, and M. Shamsipur, J. Chem. Eng. Data 42 (1997) 1212-1215.
2. I. T. Ahmed, E.S. Soliman, and A. A. A. Boraei, Annali di Chimica 94 (2004) 847.
3. A. Safavi and H. Abdollahi, Talanta 53 (2001) 1001.
4. W. L. Hinze, Solution Chemistry of Surfactants, in: W.L. Mittal (Ed.), Vol. 1, Plenum Press, New York, 1979, p. 79.
5. E. Pellezzeti and E. Pramauro, Anal. Chim. Acta 117 (1980) 403-406.
6. D. Myers, Surfactant Science and Technology, Chapter One, VCH Publishers, New York, 1988, p. 17.
7. E. Pellezzeti and E. Pramauro, Anal. Chim. Acta 128 (1981) 273-275.
8. E. Pramauro and E. Pellezzeti, Anal. Chim. Acta 126 (1981) 253-257.
9. J. L. Beltran, R. Codony, M. Granados, A. Izquierdo, and M. D. Prat, Talanta 40 (1993) 157-165.
10. G. S. Hartley and J. W. Roe, Trans. Faraday Soc. 36 (1940) 101-109.
11. E. Pellizzetti and E. Pramauro, Anal. Chim. Acta 169 (1985) 1-29.
12. D. G. Hall, J. Phys. Chem. 91 (1987) 4287-4297.
13. Z. Yuanqin, L. Fan, L. Xiaoyan, and L. Jing, Talanta 56 (2002) 705-710.
14. A. L. Underwood, Anal. Chim. Acta 140 (1982) 89-97.
15. A. Abbaspour and M.A. Kamyabi, J. Chem. Eng. Data 46 (2001) 623-625.
16. N. Pourreza and S. Rastegarzadeh, J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (2005) 206-210.
17. A. Niazi, M. Ghalie, A. Yazdanipour, and J. Ghasemi, Spectrochim. Acta Part A 64 (2005) 660-664.
18. R. Sjoback, J. Nygren, and M. Kubista, Spectrochim. Acta Part A 51 (1995) L7-L21.
19. A. I. Ridorsa, J. Saurina, S. H. Cassou, and R. Tauler, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Systs. 38 (1997) 183-196.
20. J. Saurina, S. H. Cassou, R. Tauler, and A. I. Ridrosa, Anal. Chim. Acta 408 (2000) 135-143.
21. E. R. Malinowski, Factor Analysis in Chemistry, John Wiley, New York, 1991.
22. A. de Juan, M. Madear, M. Martinez, and R. Tauler, Anal. Chim. Acta 442 (2001) 337-350.
23. B. A. Hendriksen, M. V. Sunchez-Flix, and K. Y. Tam, Spectrosc. Lett. 35 (2002) 9-19.
24. M. Kubista, R. Sjoback, and B. Albinsson, Anal. Chem. 65 (1993) 994-998.
25. I. Sacrminio and M. Kubista, Anal. Chem. 65 (1993) 409-416.
26. M. Kubista, R. Sjoback, and J. Nygren, Anal. Chim. Acta 302 (1995) 121-125.
27. M. Kubista, J. Nygren, A. Elbergali, and R. Sjoback, Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 29 (1999) 1-28.
28. J. Nygren, J. M. Andrade, and M. Kubista, Anal. Chem. 68 (1996) 1706-1710.
29. N. Svanvik, G. Westman, D. Wang, and M. Kubista, Anal. Biochem. 281 (2000) 26-35.
30. A. Elbergali, J. Nygren, and M. Kubista, Anal. Chim. Acta 379 (1999) 143-158.
31. J. Nygren, N. Svanvik, and M. Kubista, Biopolymers 46 (1998) 39-51.
32. N. Svanvik, J. Nygren, G. Westman, and M. Kubista, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123 (2001) 803-809.
33. M. Kubista, I.H. Ismail, A. Forootan, and B. Sjogreen, J. Fluorescence 14 (2004) 139-144.
34. J. Ghasemi, A. Niazi, M. Kubista, and A. Elbergali, Anal. Chim. Acta 455 (2002) 335-342.
35. J. Ghasemi, A. Niazi, G. Westman, and M. Kubista, Talanta 62 (2004) 831-841.
36. J. Ghasemi, A. Niazi, and M. Kubista, Spectrochim. Acta Part A 62 (2005) 649-656.
37. A. Niazi, A. Yazdanipour, J. Ghasemi, and M. Kubista, Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 71 (2006) 1-14.
38. A. Niazi, A. Yazdanipour, J. Ghasemi, and M. Kubista, Spectrochim. Acta Part A 65 (2006) 73-78.
39. A. Niazi, A. A. Rezaei, and F. Shahhosseini, Ann. Chim. 97 (2007) 199-211.
40. N. O. Mchedlov-Petrossyan and V. N. Kleshchevnikova, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 90 (1994) 629-640.
41. A. Song, J. Zhang, M. Zhang, T. Shen, and J. Tang, Colloids Surf. A 167 (2000) 253-262.
42. S. Biswas, S. Ch. Bhattacharya, P. K. Sen, and S. P. Moulik, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 123 (1999) 121-128.
43. J. Hadjianestis and J. Nikokavouras, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 69 (1993) 337-343.
44. N. O. Mchedlov-Petrossyan, M. I. Rubtsov, and L. L. Lukatskaya, Ukrainian Chem J. 56 (1990) 69-75.
45. N. O. Mchedlov-Petrossyan and V. N. Kleshchevnikova, Russian J. General Chem. 60 (1990) 900-911.
46. J. Kibblewhite, C. J. Drummond, F. Grieser, and P. J. Thistlethwaite, J. Phys. Chem. 93 (1989) 7464-7473.
47. R. K. Dutta, R. Chowdhury, and S. N. Bhat, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 91 (1995) 681-686.
48. B. Gohain, P. M. Saikia, S. Sarma, N. Bhat, and R. K. Dutta, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 4 (2002) 2617-2620.
Ali Niazi,a,b,* Ateesa Yazdanipour,a Jahanbakhsh Ghasemi,c Mikael Kubista,d Azemat Sheyda,a and Mahtab Alikhaha
a Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Arak Branch, Arak, Iran
b Yong Researches Club, Islamic Azad University, Arak Branch, Arak, Iran
c Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
d Institute of Biotechnology AS CR, v.v.i, Videnska 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech
RECEIVED OCTOBER 4, 2006; REVISED APRIL 7, 2007; ACCEPTED DECEMBER 3, 2008
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. (E-mail: [email protected])
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright Croatica Chemica Acta, Croatian Chemical Society 2009
Abstract
The investigation of the dissociation equilibrium of fluorescein in aqueous micellar solution was determined spectrophotometrically at 25 °C and at ionic strength of 0.1 mol dm^sup -3^. For this purpose, the effect of nonionic (TX100), cationic (CTAB) and anionic (SDS) surfactants on the absorption spectra of fluorescein at different pH values were studied. To evaluate the pH-absorbance data, a resolution based on the combination of soft- and hard-modeling is applied. The acidity constants of all related equilibria are estimated using the whole spectral fitting of the collected data to an established factor analysis model. DATAN program was applied for determination of acidity constants. Results show that the pK^sub a^ values of fluorescein are influenced as the percentages of an anionic and a cationic surfactant such as SDS and CTAB, respectively, are added to the solution of this reagent. Also, neutral surfactant such as TX100 only affects pK^sub a1^. Effects of surfactant on acidity constants and pure spectrum of each component are also discussed. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer