It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
One of the most important variables to consider in physical education (PE) is motivation. The self-determination theory (SDT) represents an essential theoretical perspective to examine and understand adolescents’ learning and motivation in PE. Based on this theory, the Situational Motivational Scale (SIMS) measures students’ situational motivation related to a subject like PE. The aim of the present study is to examine the dimensionality, reliability, and construct validity of the Norwegian version of the SIMS among adolescents in PE. In total, 318 students from six schools completed the SIMS in their PE classes during the spring of 2016. Explorative and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted, suggesting the fourteen-item version of the SIMS to be superior to the sixteen-item version. The SIMS measurement model of adolescents’ situational motivation in PE showed satisfactory reliability and construct validity.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Department of Teacher Education, Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
2 Department of Teacher Education, Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; NTNU Center for Health Promotion Research, Trondheim, Norway
3 NTNU Center for Health Promotion Research, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway