Content area
Full Text
Ancient Learning, an approach to overcoming Zhu Xi Neo-Confucian metaphysics, emerged and developed as an intellectual track at about the same time in Korea, China, and Japan. This school was introduced to Choson via Korean elites who visited Japan as members of diplomatic embassies. Upon returning, these Sirhak elites wrote commentaries on the Japanese Ancient Learning school text. This article discusses the historical interaction between Sirhak and the Japanese Ancient Learning school and examines Sirhak commentaries on Japanese Ancient Learning writers.
Introduction
Entering the early modern period, a major issue in intellectual circles in East Asia was overcoming Zhu Xi Neo-Confucian metaphysics, which was the pillar of education and scholarship. Ancient Learning (K. Kohak; J. Kogaku), which refers to a school and to a scholarly approach that criticized the doctrines of Zhu Xi and Wang Yangming for straying from the original spirit of Confucianism, appeared as one logical method for overcoming Zhu Xi Neo-Confucian metaphysics. It asserted that scholars should return to the classical texts of Confucianism and inherit directly the ancient meanings of Confucius and Mencius. Although called by different names in Korea, China, and Japan, this intellectual current emerged and developed around the same time in these countries.1 Further, there was a constant exchange of ideas among scholars of Ancient Learning in each country, and they influenced each other.
Comparing phases in the development of Ancient Learning in these countries is a difficult task. If one acknowledges that research on Practical Learning should treat East Asian history rather than focus on a single country, then the necessity of the history of interaction and of comparative research need not be stated. The comparative and reciprocal relationships between Sirhak (or, Practical Learning) in the late Choson period and Ancient Learning in early modern Japan, schools that display many similarities, is an especially interesting subject. However, problems in conducting comparative studies include the inadequacy of empirical research, the lack of consensus on terminology and concepts, and the ambiguity of a standard of comparison in each country. In this article, I will undertake an empirical study of this history of interaction, such a project being a precondition for comparative study.
Korean Neo-Confucian metaphysics was conveyed to Japan early in the Edo period and greatly influenced the...