It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Lovell Fernandez discusses the reparations policy of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa. In terms of the founding Act, the commission merely has the power to make recommendations on reparations while Parliament is to decide on it. The commission recommended five forms of reparations: urgent interim reparation, individual reparation grants, symbolic reparation and community rehabilitation, community rehabilitation programmes, and institutional reform. Although some urgent interim reparation payments were made, many applicants are still waiting. No money for individual reparation grants were earmarked in the Budget and no government ministry was given responsibility for implementing the process. No clear reason can be identified why government is failing to meet its obligations to the 22 000 victims identified by the commission.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer