-
Abbreviations
- Cdc42
- cell division control protein 42 homolog
- Co-IP
- co-immunoprecipitation
- GAP
- GTPase-activating protein
- GAPDH
- glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
- GDP
- guanosine diphosphate
- GEF
- guanine nucleotide exchange factor
- GTP
- guanosine triphosphate
- KO
- knockout
- PDAC
- pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
- Rac1
- Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1
- Ral
- Ras-like
- RalBP1
- Ral-binding protein 1
- RalGDS
- Ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator
- RalGPS
- RalGEF with pleckstrin homology domain and Src-homologous 3 binding motif
- Ras
- rat sarcoma
- RGL
- RalGDS-like
- Rho
- Ras homologous
- SEM
- standard error of the mean
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive cancers, with a poor prognosis. It is known that one of the triggers for its development is an activating mutation of KRAS, followed by mutation of the tumor suppressor p53, which causes progression of the disease.1 Other factors affecting development and progression of PDAC have been extensively investigated, including the involvement of RalA and RalB, which belong to the Ras family of small GTPases.2,3
Ral proteins are found in GTP-bound active and GDP-bound inactive forms. The activation process is executed by a guanine nucleotide exchange reaction mediated by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), while inactivation is via the GTP hydrolysis reaction mediated by GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs).4,5 Thus far, six RalGEFs have been identified, four of them being direct effector molecules of Ras, which means Ras activation stimulates Ral activity.5 RalGAPs are complexes that consist of a catalytic RalGAPα1 or α2 subunit together with a common β subunit.6 Although the RalGAPβ subunit has no catalytic domain, it is indispensable for stability of RalGAPα subunits and the function of the complex.6 It has been demonstrated that Ral regulates multiple cellular functions such as endocytosis, exocytosis, cell growth, and cytoskeletal reorganization via its effectors, including the exocyst complex, Ral-binding protein 1 (RalBP1), and others.5-10
Ral plays an important role in cancer development and progression.3,10,11 The Ral pathway is indispensable for Ras-induced transformation of human cells.10,12 In an experimental chemically induced skin cancer model, it has been shown that carcinogenesis is essentially absent in mice deficient in RalGDS (one of the RalGEFs).13 We have shown that downregulation of RalGAP causes bladder cancer progression and enhances invasion and metastasis.11
It has been reported that Ral regulates PDAC progression.2,3 RalA function is critical for PDAC initiation, whereas RalB function is more important for its metastasis.2 Rgl2, one of the RalGEFs highly expressed in PDAC tumor tissue and cell lines, is essential for anchorage-independent growth and invasion of PDAC cells in vitro.3 The Ral GTPase pathway was also involved in pancreatic tumor chemo- and radio-resistance.14 However, there are few reports on the relationship between the level of expression of RalGAPs and malignancy in PDAC. Therefore, we investigated the effects of RalGAPβ suppression using RalGAPβ-deficient PDAC cells generated using CRISPR-Cas9 technology.
MATERIALS AND METHODSThe materials and methods used in this study are described in the “Supplementary Methods.”
Data are shown as means ± standard errors (SEM). A two-tailed unpaired Welch's t-test was used for comparisons between two groups (Figures 7A,B and 8C,E). One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test or Dunnett's multiple comparison test was performed for comparisons between three or more groups (Figures 2C,E,G, 3C,E,G, 4C,E and 5A,D). P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
All the genetic recombination experiments and the animal experiments were conducted with the approval by the relevant committees of Tohoku University.
RESULTS Ral activity is negatively regulated by RalGAPsWe examined the level of expression and activity of Ral in six PDAC cell lines. Total RalA protein levels were similar in all six lines, whereas RalB levels were higher in AsPC-1, BxPC-3, SUIT-2, and SW-1990 cells and very low in PANC-1 and MIA PaCa-2 cells shown by Western blotting (Figure 1A). The activity of RalA and RalB paralleled in each cell line although the activity levels were various (Figure 1A). RalA activity (GTP-RalA) was relatively strong in PANC-1 and MIA PaCa-2, intermediate in AsPC-1 and SW-1990, and low in BxPC-3 and SUIT-2 cells (Figure 1A). RalB activities (GTP-RalB) were difficult to compare among the cell lines due to their weak signals in the Western blot (Figure 1A).
FIGURE 1. Ral activity is associated with downregulated expression of RalGAPs. A, GTP-bound active RalA and RalB analyzed by the pull-down assay. GTP-bound RalA and RalB, total RalA and RalB, RalGAPα1, RalGAPα2, RalGAPβ, and GAPDH in six pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cell lines was evaluated by Western blotting. B, Relative levels of RalGAPα1 and RalGAPα2 in the six PDAC cell lines, showing RalGAPβ complexed with RalGAPα1 and RalGAPα2 after immunoprecipitation with anti-RalGAPα1, anti-RalGAPα2 antibody, or control immunoglobulin. C, RalGAPα1, RalGAPα2, RalGAPβ, and RalGEFs including RalGDS, RalGPS1, RalGPS2, RGL1, RGL2, and RGL3 mRNA from the PDAC cell lines was quantified using GAPDH as the reference. Means of the mRNA levels in PANC-1 cells are set at unity. Data are representative of three independent experiments with similar results
KRAS mutation is a well-known driver of pancreatic cancer development.15 We therefore examined KRAS, HRAS, and NRAS sequences in the six PDAC cell lines because Ral is activated downstream of Ras.14 As shown in Table 1, activating mutations in KRAS (G12C or G12D) were found in all lines, with the exception of BxPC-3 that had wild-type KRAS. We found no mutations in HRAS or NRAS in all PDAC cells lines analyzed.
TABLE 1 RAS mutation status in six PDAC cell lines. Amino acid mutations in hot spots, including G12, G13, A59, Q61, K117, A146 in HRAS, NRAS, and KRAS were evaluated. Activating mutations in KRas (G12C or G12D) were found in all lines except BxPC-3
Cell lines | SNP | AA mutation | SNP | AA mutation | SNP | AA mutation |
HRAS | HRAS | NRAS | NRAS | KRAS | KRAS | |
PANC-1 | H27H homo, CAT→CAC | wild | wild | wild | G12D hetero, GGT→GAT | G12D hetero |
MIA PaCa-2 | H27H hetero, CAT→CAC | wild | wild | wild | G12C homo, GGT→TGT | G12C homo |
AsPC-1 | wild | wild | wild | wild | G12D homo, GGT→GAT | G12D homo |
BxPC-3 | H27H homo, CAT→CAC | wild | wild | wild | wild | wild |
SUIT-2 | H27H homo, CAT→CAC | wild | wild | wild | G12D hetero, GGT→GAT | G12D hetero |
SW-1990 | wild | wild | wild | wild | G12D homo, GGT→GAT | G12D homo |
Abbreviations: AA, amino acid; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism.
The activity of small GTPase is regulated by GEFs and GAPs. Therefore, we analyzed expression levels of these molecules. Western blotting showed that PANC-1, MIA PaCa-2, and SW-1990 cells possessed low levels of each subunit of RalGAP and tended to exhibit high RalA activity. The mRNA levels of RalGAP subunits matched well with their protein levels (Figure 1A,C).
RalGAPs are heterodimers consisting of either an α1 or an α2 catalytic subunit and a common β subunit.6 To analyze which catalytic subunit is dominant in PDAC cells, we performed co-immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti-RalGAPα1 or anti-RalGAPα2 antibody and evaluated the amounts of associated common RalGAPβ subunits. As shown in Figure 1B, in PANC-1, MIA PaCa-2, SUIT-2, and SW-1990 cells, the levels of RalGAPα1 were higher than those of RalGAPα2. On the other hand, RalGAPα1 was present at lower levels than RalGAPα2 in AsPC-1 and BxPC-3 cells. Thus, the dominant catalytic subunit of RalGAP was various in the different PDAC cell lines. No correlation was seen between the mRNA levels of each RalGEF (RalGDS, RalGPS1, RalGPS2, RGL1, RGL2, or RGL3) and RalA/B activity in the six PDAC cell lines examined (compare Figure 1A with Figure 1C).
RalGAPβ deficiency decreases expression of RalGAPα1 and RalGAPα2 and increases RalA and RalB activityWe generated RalGAPβ-deficient PANC-1 and MIA PaCa-2 clonal cell lines using the CRISPR/Cas9 system (Figure S1A). Genetic deletion of RalGAPβ was confirmed by genomic sequencing (Figure S1B) and Western blotting (Figures 2A and 3A).
FIGURE 2. RalGAPβ deficiency increases RalA and RalB activity and enhances migration and invasion of MIA PaCa-2. A, GTP-bound RalA and RalB of RalGAPβ-deficient (KO, knockout) and control MIA PaCa-2 cells assessed by the pull-down assay. Total RalA and RalB, RalGAPα1, RalGAPα2, RalGAPβ, and GAPDH evaluated by Western blotting. GTP-bound RalA and RalB was evaluated by the pull-down assay. The ratios of GTP-bound RalA/B to total RalA/B of control cells are set at unity. B-C, Motility of RalGAPβ-deficient and control MIA PaCa-2 cells evaluated using the wound healing assay. Representative images (B) and quantification (C) of the wounded area. D-E, Migration of RalGAPβ-deficient and control MIA PaCa-2 cells evaluated using transwell assays. Representative images (D) and quantification (E) in the form of cell numbers. F-G, Invasion by RalGAPβ-deficient and control MIA PaCa-2 cells evaluated using transwell assays. Representative images (F) and quantification (G) in the form of cell numbers. Scale bars represent 100 µm. Data are mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. *P [less than] 0.05. **P [less than] 0.01. ***P [less than] 0.001
FIGURE 3. RalGAPβ deficiency increases RalA and RalB activity and enhances migration and invasion of PANC-1 cells. A, GTP-bound RalA and RalB of RalGAPβ-deficient (KO) and control PANC-1 cells measured by the pull-down assay. Total RalA and RalB, RalGAPα1, RalGAPα2, RalGAPβ, and GAPDH in these cells and control cells was evaluated by Western blotting. GTP-bound RalA and RalB was evaluated by the pull-down assay. The ratios of GTP-bound RalA/B to total RalA/B of control cells were set at unity. B-C, Motility of RalGAPβ-deficient and control PANC-1 cells evaluated using the wound healing assay. Representative images (B) and quantification (C) of the wounded area. D-E, Migration by RalGAPβ-deficient and control PANC-1 cells evaluated using the transwell migration assay. Representative images (D) and quantification (E) in the form of cell numbers. F-G, Invasion by RalGAPβ-deficient and control PANC-1 cells evaluated using the transwell invasion assay. Representative images (F) and quantification (G) in the form of cell numbers. Scale bars represent 100 µm. Data are means ± SEM of three independent experiments. *P [less than]0 .05. **P [less than] 0.01. ***P [less than] 0.001
The expression levels of both RalGAPα1 and RalGAPα2 were also dramatically decreased in RalGAPβ-deficient MIA PaCa-2 (Figure 2A) and PANC-1 cells (Figure 3A). Reconstituting the expression of RalGAPβ in these RalGAPβ-deficient cells restored RalGAPα1 and RalGAPα2 protein levels (Figures 4A and 5B) because RalGAPβ is necessary for protein stability of RalGAPα1 and RalGAPα2 as shown previously.6 Accordingly, the activity of RalA and RalB was markedly increased in RalGAPβ-deficient cells relative to controls (Figures 2A and 3A). Ral activity of BxPC-3 cells without KRAS mutation were also increased by RalGAPβ knockdown (Figure S2A-C).
FIGURE 4. Rescue of RalGAPβ expression restores RalGAPα1 and RalGAPα2 expression and reduces migration (MIA PaCa-2). A, Full-length RalGAPβ was expressed in RalGAPβ-deficient MIA PaCa-2 cells using a lentiviral system (Rescue). Western blotting was performed to analyze the indicated proteins. B-C, Migration of the control, RalGAPβ-deficient (KO), and rescued MIA PaCa-2 cells analyzed in the wound healing assay. Representative images (B) and quantification (C) of the wounded area. Scale bars represent 100 µm. D-E, Cells were counted to evaluate the proliferation rate of RalGAPβ-deficient and control MIA PaCa-2 cells on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 after seeding. Cell numbers on each day (D) and day 7 (E). Data are mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. ns, not significant. ***P [less than] 0.001
FIGURE 5. Rescue of RalGAPβ expression restores RalGAPα1 and RalGAPα2 expression and reduces migration of the rescued cells. RalGAPβ-deficient cells exhibit Rac1 and Cdc42 activity (PANC-1). A, Cells counted to evaluate the proliferation rate of RalGAPβ-deficient and control PANC-1 cells on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 after seeding. B, Full-length RalGAPβ was expressed in RalGAPβ-deficient PANC-1 cells using a lentiviral system (Rescue). Western blotting was performed to analyze the indicated proteins. The ratios of GTP-bound RalA/B to total RalA/B of control cells were set at unity (C-D) Migration of the control, RalGAPβ-deficient (KO), and rescued PANC-1 cells analyzed in the wound healing assay. Representative images (C) and quantification (D) of the wounded area. E, GTP-bound active Ras, Rac1, RhoA, and Cdc42 measured by the pull-down assay in control, RalGAPβ-deficient (KO), and rescued PANC-1 cells. The ratios of GTP-bound small GTPase to total small GTPase of control cells were set at unity. F, E-cadherin, Vimentin, and GAPDH in the control, RalGAPβ-deficient (KO), and rescued PANC-1 cells was evaluated by Western blotting. Scale bars represent 100 µm. Data are means ± SEM of three independent experiments. ns, not significant. ***P [less than] 0.001
We next examined the effect of RalGAPβ deficiency on the migration and invasion capacity of PDAC cells. In the wound healing assay, all three RalGAPβ-deficient MIA PaCa-2 cells exhibited enhanced cell migration relative to control cells in vitro (Figure 2B-C). Likewise, these cells also exhibited enhanced cell migration in the transwell migration assay (Figure 2D-E) and higher invasive activity in the Matrigel invasion assay (Figure 2F-g). When we reconstituted RalGAPβ expression in RalGAPβ-deficient MIA PaCa-2 cells to a similar level to the control cells (Figure 4A), both Ral activity and cell migration capacity levels returned nearly to the levels observed in control cells (Figure 4A-C). Proliferation rates of the RalGAPβ-deficient MIA PaCa-2 cells in the culture dishes were not altered compared with the controls (Figure 4D-E). These findings, namely enhanced cell migration and invasion and no change in cell proliferation in vitro, were observed in RalGAPβ-deficient PANC-1 cells as well (Figures 3B-G and 5A-D).
As epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), in addition to cell motility, is also involved in the acquisition of invasive phenotypes of cancer cells, we analyzed the expression levels of EMT markers, E-cadherin and vimentin, in RalGAP-deficient cells. The expression of E-cadherin was markedly decreased in RalGAPβ-deficient PANC-1 cells compared with control or rescued cells (Figure 5F), while there was no difference in the expression level of vimentin among these cells (Figure 5F).
We next examined cellular morphology by rhodamine-phalloidin staining of actin fibers. We found that RalGAPβ-deficient cells exhibited spindle-like shape with filopodia and lamellipodia-like structures in contrast to the round shape of both control cells and RalGAPβ-rescued cells (Figure 6A).
FIGURE 6. Morphology of RalGAPβ-deficient cells and RalGAPβ rescued cells, and activity of Rac1 and Cdc42. A, Rhodamine-phalloidin staining of actin fibers in control, RalGAPβ-deficient (KO), and rescued MIA PaCa-2 cells. Scale bars represent 50 µm. B, GTP-bound active Ras, Rac1, RhoA, and Cdc42 measured by the pull-down assay in control, RalGAPβ-deficient (KO), and rescued MIA PaCa-2 cells. Ratios of GTP-bound small GTPase to total small GTPase of control cells are set at unity. Data are representative of three independent experiments with similar results
It is well known that cell migration and cell shape are regulated by the Rho family small GTPases.17 We next analyzed activities of various small GTPases in the cells. We found that the activity of Rac1 and Cdc42, but not RhoA or Ras, was increased in the RalGAPβ-deficient cells, as shown in Figures 5E and 6B.
RalGAPβ deficiency increases tumorigenesis and metastasis in vivoIn the final set of experiments in this study, we investigated the effect of RalGAPβ deficiency on the growth, invasion, and metastasis of MIA PaCa-2 cells in vivo. RalGAPβ-deficient and control cells were injected subcutaneously into nude mice. The sizes and weights of tumors derived from RalGAPβ-deficient cells were significantly increased relative to tumors formed by control cells (Figure 7A-C).
FIGURE 7. RalGAPβ deficiency increases tumorigenesis in vivo. RalGAPβ-deficient (KO) and control MIA PaCa-2 cells were used in a subcutaneous injection model. Cells were injected into the bilateral thorax of 12 nude mice, euthanized 9 weeks later. A, Subcutaneous tumor volume (mm3) versus time (wk). B, Weight (g) of subcutaneous tumor. C, Typical macroscopic image of subcutaneous tumor. Scale bars represent 10 mm. *P [less than] 0.05
Next, RalGAPβ-deficient and control cells stably expressing firefly luciferase were injected into the spleens of nude mice and analyzed after 6 weeks. In vivo imaging revealed that the luminescence signals reflecting the presence of the tumor were stronger not only in the spleen but also in the liver of mice injected with the RalGAPβ-deficient cells compared with those injected with control cells (Figure 8A). At 6 weeks after injection, mice were sacrificed, and the tumors in the abdominal cavity were evaluated. The spleens of mice injected with RalGAPβ-deficient cells were significantly heavier than those injected with control cells (1.24 ± 0.31 g with the RalGAPβ-deficient cells vs 0.22 ± 0.02 g with control cells; P < .01, Figure 8B-C). We then examined the livers and found far more metastatic foci on their surface of mice injected with RalGAPβ-deficient cells than those with control cells (P < .01, Figure 8D-E). Furthermore, eight of 16 mice injected with RalGAPβ-deficient cells exhibited peritoneal dissemination foci while none with control cells did (Figure 8F-g). Thus, RalGAPβ-deficient PDAC cells exogenously implanted in spleen exhibited faster local growth with more liver metastases and peritoneal dissemination than control cells.
FIGURE 8. RalGAPβ deficiency increases tumorigenesis and metastasis in vivo. RalGAPβ-deficient (KO) and control MIA PaCa-2 cells stably expressing firefly luciferase were injected into the spleens of 34 nude mice (control, n = 18; RalGAPβ KO, n = 16), euthanized 6 weeks later. A, Typical luminescence image in vivo. B, Typical macroscopic image of spleen. C, Weight (g) of spleen. D, Typical macroscopic image of the liver surface. E, Number of metastatic foci on the liver surface. F, Typical macroscopic image of peritoneal dissemination. G, Presence of peritoneal dissemination. Scale bars represent 10 mm. **P [less than] 0.01
In this study, we utilized RalGAPβ-deficient cells to study the role of Ral and RalGAPs in the invasion and metastasis of PDAC cells. When the RalGAPβ subunit, the common subunit of the RalGAP complexes, was disrupted, the expression of both RalGAPα1 and RalGAPα2 was markedly reduced (Figure 2A and 3A). On the other hand, when the α2 subunit was knocked out, the expression of RalGAPβ was reduced as shown previously.11 Thus, both the α and β subunits are necessary for stable expression of each other. Ral activity was increased by several times in both RalGAPβ-deficient PANC-1 and MIA PaCa-2 cells, compared with their control cells. Because active mutations of RAL genes are rare in cancer, Ral activity may be controlled to a high degree by varying levels of its regulatory proteins, such as RalGEFs and RalGAPs.16
It is well known that most PDACs possess activating mutations in KRAS genes 1 and that Ral is activated downstream of Ras. We analyzed KRAS gene sequence in six PDAC cell lines (Table 1) and detected KRAS activating mutations in five of the cell lines, except for BxPC-3. The low activity of Ral in BxPC-3 cells could be due to lack of KRAS mutation in this cell line.
However, Ral activity in cells with KRAS mutations were various (Figure 1A), suggesting that KRAS mutation is not only a factor that determines the activity of Ral. Despite harboring KRAS mutation, SUIT-2 cells showed low Ral activity comparable to that of BxPC-3 cells. This suggests that the activating mutation of KRAS may have less impact on Ral activity than expected.
It has been reported that the high expression of Rgl2, a RalGEF, induces strong Ral activity in pancreatic cells.3 However, we did not detect any specific RalGEFs including Rgl2 in the mRNA levels, which were correlated with Ral activity in the six PDAC cell lines examined. (Figure 1A,C).
We performed the wound healing assay of six PDAC cell lines and found that the migration rates were highly various among cell lines (Figure S3A-B). SUIT-2 cells with low RalA activity exhibited high migration activity, and MIA PaCa-2 cells with high RalA activity showed low migration activity. Thus, the migration activity did not seem simply associated with Ral activities among various cell lines. This could be due to many factors involved in the regulation of migration capacity. Nevertheless, in a specific cell line such as PANC-1 cells or MIA PaCa-2 cells, the migration activity is clearly associated with Ral activity, shown by experiments with RalGAPβ cells (Figures 1A and S3A-B). Thus, we consider that Ral activity plays an important role in the regulation of migration of PDAC cells. Although PANC-1 cells and MIA PaCa-2 cells, with which we examined the cell motility as described above, possess KRAS mutation, KRAS of BxPC-3 cells was wild-type. Ral activity and migration capacity of BxPC-3 cells were also increased by RalGAPβ knockdown (Figure S2A-C), suggesting that these phenotypes are not specific to PDAC cells with KRAS mutation.
In the RalGAPβ-deficient PDAC cells, activity of Rac1 and Cdc42, both implicated in cell motility,17 was increased (Figure 5E and 6B). This could stimulate the cell migration and invasion capacity in RalGAPβ-deficient PDAC cells. RalBP1, a Ral effector, has been reported to regulate the activity of Rac and Cdc42,18-20 and therefore the increased activity of Rac and Cdc42 activities in RalGAPβ-deficient cells might be mediated by RalBP1. In addition, Ral also regulates membrane traffic through another effector, the exocyst complex.21 This Ral-activated membrane traffic may also contribute to enhanced cell motility and invasion capacity by providing membrane into the leading edge of the migrating cells. Further investigation is required to elucidate the mechanism.
In invasion and metastasis of cancer cells, it is well understood that one of the critical processes is EMT. We examined the expression levels of representative EMT markers, E-cadherin and vimentin, in RalGAP-deficient cells. The expression levels of E-cadherin were markedly decreased in RalGAPβ-deficient PANC-1 cells compared with control or rescued cells although the levels of vimentin were not altered (Figure 5F) suggesting that RalGAPβ-deficiency may lead cells toward EMT. This may contribute to the higher invasion and metastasis capacity in RalGAPβ-deficient cells.
The anchorage-dependent cell growth in culture dishes has not been affected by Ral activity, demonstrated by Lim et al22 and us (Figures 4D-E and 5A). In contrast, RalGAPβ-deficient PDAC cells exhibited much faster local growth than control cells when implanted subcutaneously as well as when introduced into the spleen (Figure 7A-C and 8B-C). Previously, we had shown that the sizes of chemically induced bladder tumors in RalGAPα2-deficient mice are much larger than in wild-type mice.11 The precise mechanism is unclear, although it may be due to Ral-enhanced tumor angiogenesis because it has been reported that mice deficient in RalBP1 (one of the Ral effectors) exhibit impaired tumor angiogenesis.23,24
RalGAPβ-deficient PDAC cells formed significantly more liver metastases and peritoneal dissemination when injected into the spleen (Figure 8D-G). Although the association between low RalGAP expression levels and liver metastasis remains unclear, the lower mRNA expression of RalGAPα1 in the pancreas cancer tissues is correlated with worse prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (
In conclusion, RalGAPβ deficiency in PDAC cells enhances RalA and RalB activity, cell migration, and invasion in vitro, and tumor growth and metastasis in vivo. Ral inhibitors have been developed for use as antitumor drugs in PDAC.25 For the further development of such drugs, our RalGAPβ-deficient PDAC cell implantation models could be useful for evaluating how such drugs affect Ral-dependent tumor growth and metastasis.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSWe also thank Bryan Welm and Feng Zhang for providing the plasmids.
DISCLOSUREAll the authors have no conflict of interest related to the study.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
The small GTPases RalA and RalB are members of the Ras family and activated downstream of Ras. Ral proteins are found in GTP‐bound active and GDP‐bound inactive forms. The activation process is executed by guanine nucleotide exchange factors, while inactivation is mediated by GTPase‐activating proteins (GAPs). RalGAPs are complexes that consist of a catalytic α1 or α2 subunit together with a common β subunit. Several reports implicate the importance of Ral in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, there are few reports on the relationship between levels of RalGAP expression and malignancy in PDAC. We generated RalGAPβ‐deficient PDAC cells by CRISPR‐Cas9 genome editing to investigate how increased Ral activity affects malignant phenotypes of PDAC cells. RalGAPβ‐deficient PDAC cells exhibited several‐fold higher Ral activity relative to control cells. They had a high migratory and invasive capacity. The RalGAPβ‐deficient cells grew more rapidly than control cells when injected subcutaneously into nude mice. When injected into the spleen, the RalGAPβ‐deficient cells formed larger splenic tumors with more liver metastases, and unlike controls, they disseminated into the abdominal cavity. These results indicate that RalGAPβ deficiency in PDAC cells contributes to high activities of RalA and RalB, leading to enhanced cell migration and invasion in vitro, and tumor growth and metastasis in vivo.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan; Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
2 Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
3 Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan; State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Department of General and Emergency Dentistry, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
4 Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan