Key-words: Killing, Fluids
To kill a production well means to perform some technical and technological processes for establishing the static hydraulic balance in the well with no additional surface pressures. The standard procedure of the well killing process as adopted in Croatia, is described. Further, the procedures of how to locate the spot where there is a leakage on production equipment and how to determine the level of fluid in tubing or annulus is explained. Finally, the aim of this paper is also to point out the importance in selection of killing fluids considering a possibility of formation damage.
Kljucne rijeci: Gusenje, Fluidi
Pod pojmom gusenja proizvodnih busotina, podrazumijevaju se tehnicki i tehnoloski postupci kojima je cilj uspostavljanje staticke hidraulicke ravnotese u bufotini, odnosno otklanjanje pretlaka na uftu bugotine. Opisano je provodenje standardnog postupka gufenja usvojenog u Hwatskoj. Prikazan je nacin odredivanja mjesta propuftanja proizvodne opreme i utvrdivanja nivoa fluida u tubingu i prstenastom prostoru. Posebno je ukazano na vdnost izbora fluida za uguSivanje s obzirom na moguce osteavanje formacije.
(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)
Methods for Production Well Killing
The most frequent reason for killing production wells is a necessity to eliminate formation pressures so as to enable certain procedures or removal of some parts of production equipment. Sometimes, however, the killing is necessary due to some undesirable occurrences in the well (leakage or damage of the production equipment). This is known as emergency killing. In the process of well killing it must be taken care not to: cause formation damage, additionally damage subsurface or surface production equipment, exceed the allowed stresses of production or other equipment. The methods for well killing can be devided into four groups considering their applications: (I) well killing by injecting the format~onf luids into production layer; (2) circulating methods; (3) gravitation methods; (4) combined methods (Rehm, 1976) The structure of most gas producing wells in Croatia anticipate the method of injecting the formation fluids from the well into the production layer. All other methods have turned to be less efficient and are mostly applied to drilling phase in well constructon. Killing procedure consists of the following phases:
- the formation and service fluids are being injected by killing fluid from the wellbore (tubing) into the formation;
- the fluid injection is terminated when the killing fluid reaches the layer;
- the static balance have to be checked at particular parts of the wellbore (tubing/annulus);
- the packer fluid must be replaced if it does not meet the required density or characteristics.
The injection pressure at the perforation level depends on the formation production properties, physical properties of the fluid to be injected into the formation and on the killing fluid pumping rate. The injection pressure at the surface also depends on the flow regime and properties of the fluid used for well killing. It is also necessary to be acquainted with the formation ressure sensitive range for particular volume o Pa cceptance, as well as with the pressure values of formation fracture.
When killing a well, the hydrostatic pressure must be established to balance the formation pressure. This condition of the hydrostatic balance is valid for the static conditions. When there is a circulation in the wellbore, the pressure will grow equivalently to the pressure drop created by fluid circulation. When the circulation stops, the total pressure value will decline in the equivalent amount. The pressure drop when pulling out the production equipment is up to 1 MPa in the production wells -of Drava Region. As a complementary safety value, it is necessary to over pressure the formation, which usually amounts from 1 to 2 MPa. The necessary killing fluid density is then derived as:
... (1)
... (2)
The over pressure can cause the loss of well killing fluid which may penetrates into formation. To prevent this, it is necessary to inject a so called gel plug before circulating the killing fluid. The gel plug composition is based ori well killing fluid with addition of materials for increasing viscosity and sometimes plugging material is added. The differential pressures that can be endured by such gels are from 3 to 4 MPa of difference between the total hydraulic pressure of killing fluid and formation pressure. The volume of the injected gel amounts from 1 to 10 m3 and depends on the length of the uncovered interval.
Killing Fluids
All porous formations are likely to be damaged to certain rate. The damage can be caused due to filtrate influence on clay component in formation, or particles invasion into formation, or interaction occurring between drilling and formation fluids.
The zone of production can be protected from damage if the killing fluid is properly chosen (non polluting fluid). In choosing the killing fluid it is necessary to take into account: fluid properties, well conditions, and formation parameters.
To achieve that fluid meets its purpose at the best possible manner, the following should be take into consideration:
- fluid density must comply with formation pressure,
- fluid must not have negative impact on uncovered production formation, and
- fluid must be compatible with formation fluid and formation itself.
Table 1 lists potential killing fluids and their properties.
At killing well an overbalanced column must be maintained (p^sub k^ > p^sub f^), and prevention of impairment requires the use of non-damaging fluid. Dadage to water-sensitive formations may be prevented by using brine fluids (sodium, potassium and calcium chloride brines). Calcium and potassium chlorides have about the same inhibiting power, but calcium chloride suffers from the disadvantage that it may cause impairment by precipitating carbonates or sulphates, which are often present in formation waters. Therefore, unless high densities are required, potassium chloride is preferred (Martinko, 1991).
All field brines contain solids, although the amount may be very small. In wells with low permeability reservoirs, these solids filter out on the bore hole wall, causing a little, if any, impairment. In wells with medium to high permeability reservoirs, the particles are camed into the reservoir with the brine, and Fay cause severe impairment, because the volume of brine entering the formation is very high (owing to the lack of filtration control), although their concentration in the brine is low. The particles contaminating the brine may come from the source water or from the sacked salt, or they may be picked up in tank trucks or rig pits. A 2 pm cotton filter may reduce the content of solids. The killing fluid should have filter-loss control whenever necessary to prevent substantial invasion into formation. Damage caused by killing fluid can be avoided if all solid components of the fluid (gel plug), including filtration control agents and viscosifiers, bridging solids, and particular weighting materials are degradable. Various types of soluble or degradable materials are available commercially, and choice between them depends on reservoir conditions and type of operation.
Long chain polymers are used in killing fluids to obtain rheological properties, and, in some cases, filtration control. The bridging agents added to the suspension prevent deep invasion of polymer into the formation. The bridging particle sizes must be from 1/3 to 1/2 of the size of pore openings, The most often used polymers are hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC , derivates of guar gum and starch derivatives. I-! EC is almost completely soluble in acid. Derivates of guar gum, such as hydroxyethyl and hydroxypropyl are degradable, leaving only from l to 2% residue. Starch derivatives, such as hydroxyalkylated and esterified starches are almost completely acid soluble.
Sized particles of oil-soluble resins or waxes may be used as bridging agents for oil reservoirs. Any particles left in or on the formation are dissolved when the well is brought into production.
Ground calcium carbonate is commonly used as a bridging agent, and may be used in any type of reservoir. It is completely soluble in acid, and on completion of the job, it can be removed with acid if necessary. CaCO^sub 3^ is available in a wide range of particle sizes, from several milimetres down to hundredths of micrometer, and may be used at any temperature encountered in an oil well.
Density control can best be achieved with soluble salts. Maximum densities are as follows: sodium chloride, 1200 kg/m^sup 3^; calcium chloride, 1390 kg/m^sup 3^; calcium bromide, 1820 kg/m^sup 3^; and combined with CaCl^sub 2^, 1810 kg/m^sup 3^; or with CaCl^sub 2^/ZnBr^sub 2^, 2300 kg/m^sup 3^. When the high cost of CaBr^sub 2^ cannot be justified, densities up to about 1680 kg/m^sup 3^ may be obtained with ground CaCO^sub 3^. If densities greater than 1680 kg/m^sup 3^ are required, they can be obtained with ferrous carbonate (siderite) - FeCO,. A fluid which uses sized grains of sodium chloride as bridging and weigthing agents may be also used in well killing procedure. The grains are suspended in saturated brine by a polymer and a dispersant (both unspecified). Densities up to 1680 kg/m^sup 3^ are attainable. When the well is brought into production, the salt grains are removed by formation water, or the well can be cleaned by flushing wit under saturated brines (Mond s hin e, 1977). In our practice, this type of fluid has not been used yet.
The Well Killing Procedure
The killing procedure depends on wellbore conditions and the set in production equipment. According to the direction of killing fluid circulation, the killing is considered direct or indirect. In case the fluid is injected back into the formation, it is necessary to establish the communication between the inside of the tubing and annulus after the fluid and gel have been injected, which enables a complete replacement of workover fluid when necessary. This communicaton is possible through the installed circulation tools, or by inactivating the packer, or disconnecting at the safety joint, and similar, relative to the installed production equipment.
Relative to the pressures at the wellhead before killing and the allowed working pressure of the equipment used in the killing procedure the fluid volume is established upon which the circculation pressure depends. The killing volume must be constant for the time unit in the course of the procedure. Pressure fluctation during the killing procedure can cause the inflow of formation fluid into the killing fluid which may end with udesirable problems. Everybody who deals with gas well killing must all the time bear in mind characteristic gas behaviour as presented in Fig. 1.
The amount of gas that penetrates into the killing fluid in the mishandled killing procedure, changes the volume during gravity lifting in the closed wellbore. Coming to the surface the pressure of,fluid column compressing the gas drops and gas volume grows retaining the formation pressure. When gas reaches the surface, the gas- /formation pressure is added to the hydrostatic pressure of killing fluid. So added these two pressures may fracture formation, cause loss of killing fluid and severe accidents with possible loss of wellbore and equipment as well. Fig. 2 shows the diagram of pressure on the wellbore bottom in the course of killing. Fig. 3 shows the pressure changes at the killing line at the wellhead regardless to circulation direction.
Wellhead static pressure which in accordance with the circulation direction may occur in tubing or annulus (read off from the pressure gauge), describes equation (3):
... (3)
The diagram area from point 2 to point 3 represents the filling of tubing or annulus with killing fluid relative to direction of fluid circulation. The pressure at the killing line must be adjusted all the time by accurately observing the injected volume in the course of time or number of pump motions.
The filling of tubing or annulus, overcomes the pressure in the wellhead that results from insuficient fluid pressure column as it previously existed in the wellbore. When killing fluid reaches the hde bottom, it is necessary to further maintain the final circulation pressure constant (point 3 to 4), during which time the outlet side is being filled up with the killing fluid. Final circulation pressure describes equation (4):
... (4)
Fig. 4 presents a diagram of the pressure change at the hole outlet at the wellhead. Diagram area from point 2 to point 3 represents time of filling the upward side with maintaining the pressure at the outlet constant. Area from point 3 to point 4 indicates the lifting of brine at the outlet, what reduces pressure at the surface to the point of complete fluid replacemet.
Determination of Leading Spot (Damage) on Production Equipment
At and ongoing production the values of pressure and temperature are constant in annulus and tubing in the wellhead. The abrupt disturbance of these values shows that there has been a damage on production equiment, what calls for an emergency killing. When possible, it is useful to locate the place of leakage on production equip- ment, or least the fluid levels in the hole after the static hydraulic balance has been established.
The graphical method of determining the place where there is a leakage on the production equipment is illustrated in the Fig. 5. (Pavic and Om- rcen, 1992).
The indicated line of pressure along the tubing can be determined upon the measured value of dynamic pressure and value of dynamic pressure at the tubing on the surface (p,,). The grade of killing fluid hydrostatic pressure and dynamic pressure value at the production formation level is obtained by measurements at the hole bottom.
The line of pressure in annulus is calculated upon the measured value at the annulus on the surface (p,,) and the gradient of hydrostatic pressure of packer fluid.
The line of leakage on the production equipment is obtained upon dynamic pressure value at tubing outlet and the value of equivalent formation fluid density (ρ^sub c^). The line is the sum of actual formation fluid density and the one derived from pressure gradient of friction produced by fluid circulation through production equipment. The equivalent density can be determinated from :
... (5)
... (6)
... (7)
At the spot of leakage on production equipment the pressures inside annulus (p^sub pp^) and tubing (p^sub pt^) will come to balance. To determine the spot ofleakage on production equipment, the pressure observed at annulus outlet at the moment of lea kage is relevant figure. The spot of leakage on production equipment is determined by equation:
... (8)
The leakage line on production equipment is designed upon complementary values of annulus pressure at the moment of leakage on the equipment ...
...
It will cause the change in pressure which could be observed in annulus and at the wellhead. Since leakage occurs in a closed hole, the pressure changes wtll last until the establishment of static hydraulic balance of the fluid in the hole, which means until the gravity displacement ends. In Fig. 6 there is a schematic illustration of hydraulic balance restoration in a closed hole after occurrence of leakage on production equipment accompanied with relevant designations.
The pattern for determining the fluid distribution in tubing is as follows:
... (9)
... (10)
The pattern for determining distribution of flu- id in casing is as follows:
... (11)
... (12)
Description of Killing Procedure of Gas Production Well Stari Gradac-5
The Stari Gradac-5 is a gas production well of Podravina sedimentary basin. In Fig. 7 there is its schematic presentation (M rSi 6, 1992).
Reason for killing the CRO-1 producton well was iin the fact that formation pressure dropped, and that in order to enhance the recovery it was necessary to replace the tubing, wellhead and packer fluid. The killing procedure method applied in that case was injecting the formation fluid from the tubing back into the formation. The density of brine used in the killing process amounted to 1170 kg/m^sup 3^.
In Fig. 8 there is a diagram obtained upon registered values in the killing process. Observing the diagram it is possible to monitor the sequence and efficiency of killing process. For the subject well, before the separating gel plug was injected, the pressure of 15.5 1 MPa had been pumped up, after which the main valve was opened. At the moment of opening the pressure at the wellhead amounted to 17.24 MPa. The killing started by injecting 1.3 m3 of gel which was further circulated by brine. In the course of injection the pressure on the pressure gauge grows due to the resistance occurring during killing fluid circulation. At the point where formation fracturing pressure was reached, the formation fluid was injected back into formation, Next pressure grow was registered at the moment when gel plug passed through perforations. The continuation of killing process include implicity establishment of communication between tubing and annulus as well as continuation of packer fluid replacement by killing fluid. After the pure killing fluid emerge at the wellhead outlet, the circulation should be stopped. If the well rests, killing process may be considered well done.
Conclusion
The procedure of well killing is considered to be a very complex. Irregularities in its performance may cause many disturbances which are lately difficult to restore. First of all, formation can be damaged what results in reduced permeability of a reservoir and consequently reduced production. The damage of production equipment is also possible. In order to prevent those damages, in cases the damages are identified, it is necessary to thoroughly plan the procedure of killing process, once it has been decided the procedure should be performed.
One of the basic prerequisites in succeding in the killing procedure is the adequate selection of killing fluid. From this point, the most important is that chosen fluid is possible to create necessary pressure and that it is compatible with formation fluids and reservoir rocks.
In the course of process, all changes of values relevant for the process should be observed so that they do not overcome allowed amounts. First of all, it is meant for amounts of pressures that exist at certain portions of the wellbore or in certain parts of equipment.
Received: 12.1. 1994.
Accepted: 9. VZ. 1994.
Symbols/Popis simbola
g - gravity / u b m j e sile teie, m/s^sup 2^
H^sub dam^ - depth of leakage on production equipment/dubina propugtanja proizvodne opreme, m
H^sub pft^ - the height of packer fluid column in tubing/visina paker fluida u tubingu, m
H^sub f^ - formation depth/dubina formacije, m
H^sub pc^ - the height of formation fluid column in annulus/visina stupca proizvodnog fluida u prstenastom prostom, m
HP^sub fc^ - the height of packer fluid column in annulus/visina stupca paker fluida u prstenastom prostom, m
H^sub pk^ - packer depth/dubina pakera, m
H^sub pt^ - the height of formation fluid column in tubing/visina stupca proizvodnog fluida u tubingu, m
p^sub c^ - circulation pressure at defined capacity/tlak cirkuliranja kod odredenog kapaciteta sisaljke, Pa
p^sub cf^ - final circulation pressure/konaCni tlak utiskivanja, Pa
p^sub ci^ - initial circulation pressure/potetni tlak utiskivanja, Pa
p^sub chok^ - resistance pressure to flow through choke/tlak otpora protjecanju kroz sapnicu, Pa
p^sub d^ - dynamic pressure at formation level/dinamiEki tlak na razini sloja, Pa
p^sub dt^ - dynamjc pressure at tubing outlet/dinamiEki tlak na gla- Vi tubinga, Pa
p^sub i^ - formation pressure/tlak formacije, Pa
p^sub fp^ - pressure drop created by friction when pulling out the equipment/pad tlaka zbog trenja kod izvlaEenja aJatki, Pa
p^sub fcirc^ - pressure of fluid friction in production equipment during production/tlak ostvaren trenjem pri protoku fluida kroz proizvodnu opremu, Pa
p^sub k^ - hydrostatic pressure of killing fluid column/hidrostati2ki tlak stupca fluida za guienje, Pa
p^sub pp^ - pressure in annulus at the spot of leakage/tlak u prstenastom prostoru na mjestu propustanja, Pa
p^sub pk^ - annulus pressure at packer level/tlak u prstenastom prostoru na razini pakera, ...
P^sub pt^ - pressure in tubing at the spot of leakage/tlak u tubingu na mjistu propuStanja,-Pa
p^sub pl^ pressure at annulus outlet at the moment of leakage/tlak na izlazu iz tubinga u trenutku propuitanja, Pa
p^sub plf^ - pressure at the tubing bottom at the moment of leakage for ... na dnu tubinga u trenutku propugtanja za ...,Pa
p^sub t^ - safety value - over pressure/sigurnosna vnijednost pretlaka, Pa
p^sub up^ - pressure at annulus outlet/tlak na uSCu u prstenastom prostoru, Pa
p^sub lst^ - wellhead static pressure which in accordance with the circulation direction may occur in tubing or annulus, read off from the pressure gauge/statiEki tlak na uSCu, koji ovisno o smjem utiskivanja moie bit; u tubingu ili prstenastom prostom, oeitan na manometru, Pa
p^sub 2st^ - static pressure at the fluid outflow from the hole/staticki flak fluida na izlaznoj strani, Pa
v^sub i^ - initial gas volume/poEetni volumen plina, m^sup 3^
v^sub f^ - final gas volume/konaEni volumen plina, m^sup 3^
ρ^sub c^ - equivalent formation fluid density/ekvivalentna obujamska masa slojnog fluida, kg/m^sup 3^
p^sub f^ - density derived from pressure gradient produced by fluid friction when producing/obujamska masa odredena iz gradijenta tlaka ostvarenof trenjem pri protoku fluida kroz proiz- vodnu opremu, kg/m
p^sub k^ - killing fluid density/obujamska masa fluida za guSenje, kg/m^sup 3^
p^sub p^ - wellbore fluid density/obujamska masa slojnog fluida, kg/m^sup 3^
p^sub pf^ - packer fluid density/obujamska masa paker fluida, kg- /m^sup 3^
REFERENCES
Martinko, B. (1991): OSteCenje naslaga pri radovima u bu- Sotini, Nafia, 42 (7-g), 287-294, Zagreb.
Mondshine. T.C. (1977): Com~letionF luid Uses Salt for Bridging, weighting, h e Oil h d Gas Journal, Aug. 22, 124- 128, Tulsa.
Mrsic Z. (1992): UguSivanje proizvodnih buSotina primjenom oteianih voda, Diplomski rad, RGN fakultet (Faculty of Mining, Geology and Petroleum Engineering), 109 pp, Zagreb.
Pavic, V., OmrEen, B. (1992): Tehnologija izvodenja interventnog guienja proizvodnih plinskih iplinsko kondenzatnih buiotina, Tehnitka dokumentaci-ia., INA-Naftaplin, 53 pp, zagreb (Unpublished).
Rehm, B. (1976): Pressure Control in Drilling, The Petroleum Publishnig Co, 75 pp, Tulsa.
Davorin MATANOVIC, Nediljka GAURINA-MEDIMUREC and Zdenko KRISTAFOR
Faculty of Mining, Geology, and Petroleum Engineering, University of Zagreb, Pierottfieva 6, 41000 Zagreb, Croatia
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright University of Zagreb Dec 1994
Abstract
To kill a production well means to perform some technical and technological processes for establishing the static hydraulic balance in the well with no additional surface pressures. The standard procedure of the well killing process as adopted in Croatia, is described. Further, the procedures of how to locate the spot where there is a leakage on production equipment and how to determine the level of fluid in tubing or annulus is explained. Finally, the aim of this paper is also to point out the importance in selection of killing fluids considering a possibility of formation damage. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer