Summary. The morphology and infraciliature of three marine cyrtophorid ciliates, Dysteria lanceolata Claparède and Lachmann, 1859, Lynchella nordica Jankowski, 1968 and Chlamydonyx paucidentatus Deroux, 1976, collected from the coastal waters of Qingdao, China, were investigated using live observations and the protargol impregnation method. D. lanceolata was oval in body outline, about 65 x 45 µm in vivo, with a subcaudally positioned podite, six to seven right kineties, two or three frontoventral kineties, and two ventral contractile vacuoles. The improved diagnosis for L. nordica and a key to all known Lynchella species are supplied. The rediscovery of C. paucidentatus enables us to accept its taxonomic identification (e.g., separation from a morphologically similar species Trochilioides recta). The genus Trochilioides Deroux, nov. gen., which was a nomen nudum according to ICZN (1999), is re-established.
Key words: Cyrtophorida, Dysteriidae, Lynchellidae, Hartmannulidae, new genus, taxonomy.
INTRODUCTION
Cyrtophorids are highly specialized ciliates often occurring in the periphyton, biofilm and benthic surface of freshwater and marine habitats. Morphologically, cyrtophorid ciliates are highly compressed in body shape, with a buccal basket and reduced ciliature restricted to ventral side (Kahl 1931, Dragesco 1966, Wilbert 1971, Borror 1972).
Since Deroux 's contribution (Deroux 1965, 1970, 1975, 1976a, b, c), new cyrtophorid taxa have been described using silver staining method, for instance, by Agamaliev (1978), Foissner et al. (1981, 1991), Dragesco and Dragesco-Kernéis (1986), Aliev (1987, 1991), Blatterer and Foissner (1990), Agatha et al. (1993), Alekperov and Asadullayeva (1997), Petz et al. (1995), Song and Packroff (1997), Song and Wilbert (2002), Song (2003), and Hu and Suzuki (2005). Based on the survey conducted for the last one decade on culate fauna in the Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea, northern China, over 40 cyrtophorid species have been identified e.g., Gong et al. 2002, 2003, 2005b, 2007, 2009a; Gong and Song 2004, 2006; Shao et al. 2008).
The current work reports a part of the result of the faunistic study of marine ciliates in the north China seas performed recently (Chen et al. 2008, 2009, 2010; Ji et al 2009; Gong et al 2009b; Gao et al 2010; Pan et al. 2010; Zhang et al 2010). Three poorly described cyrtophorid species, collected from mariculture waters near Qingdao are redescribed following examination using modern techniques.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sample collection, observation, and identification
All samples were collected from mariculture waters of Qingdao (N36°08'; E120°43'), China, using artificial substrates in the form of glass slides, which were immersed in water till the biofilm is formed (Gong et al. 2005 a). Subsequently after ten days exposure, the slides were carefully taken out and transferred to Petri dishes with marine waters from the sampling site. Dysteria lanceolata and Chlamydonyx paucidentatus were isolated (March 2006) from an indoor tank for culturing marine fish Psetta maxima). The water temperature was about 16°C, salinity was approximately 31[per thousand] and pH about 7.8. Two populations of Lynchella nordica were collected (May 2005, June 2006) from scallop-culturing waters (Argopecten irradions irradians). The water temperature was about 18°C, salinity 30[per thousand] and pH ca. 8.0.
Living cells were observed by differential interference microscopy. The infraciliature was revealed using the protargol impregnation method according to Wilbert (1975). Living individuals were examined and measured at 1,000 × magnification; drawings of stained specimens were performed at 1250 × with the aid of a camera lucida. Systematic scheme and terminology are mainly according to Corliss (1979), Petz et al. (1995) and Gong et al. (2003).
Deposition of slides
Protargol-impregnated voucher slides were deposited in the Laboratory of Protozoology, OUC, China, with registration numbers: D. lanceolata, CXR-20060324-01, CXR-20060324-02; L. nordica, CXR-200505 19, CXR-2006061 1; C. paucidentatus, CXR-20060322.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Dysteria lanceolata Claparède and Lachmann, 1859 (Tables 1, 2 and Figs 1-34)
Since the original report by Claparède and Lachmann (1859) and redescription by Kahl (1931), Dysteria lanceolata has never been examined using modern methods. We, therefore, supply a detailed description of both living morphology and infraciliature of the population found in Qingdao.
Improved diagnosis. Marine Dysteria with oval body outline, about 65 × 45 µm in vivo; with six to seven right kineties, two or three frontoventral kineties; macronucleus 25 × 20 um in size; two ventral contractile vacuoles; podite subcaudally positioned.
Description. Size range about 60-80 × 30-60 µm in vivo, usually about 65 × 35 µm, body bilaterally flattened about 1:2. When viewed from lateral aspect, most of the cells are nearly oval in outline, dorsal side usually are more convex than ventral, anterior margin is evenly rounded, and posterior region slightly narrowed (Figs 1, 9, 10); few individuals are approximately rectangular in outline, ventral and dorsal sides slightly convex, both anterior and posterior margin bluntly rounded (Figs 2, 11). Right plate is conspicuously wider than the left plate by about 1/4 body width. A inconspicuous groove, about 2 µm in width and 20 µm in length is present in vivo, which is longitudinally arranged near ventral border of left plate (Figs 1, 2, 9, 12). Surface of two plates is covered with many rod-shaped ectosymbiotic bacteria (Fig. 12). Podite about 10 µm long, subcaudally positioned (Figs 1, 2, 9-12). Cytoplasm colourless to grayish, usually containing numerous tiny granules and several food vacuoles (up to 10 µm in diameter). Cytostome is in anterior 1/6 of cell and is ventrally located. Cytopharynx is conspicuous in vivo, longitudinally oriented and extending to posterior end of cell, supported by two relatively strong nematodesmal rods, tipped with one complex tooth measuring about 6 µm in cross (Fig. 11). Two ventral contractile vacuoles, each 2-4 µm in diameter are present, usually one in anterior third and the other in posterior third of the body (Figs 1, 2, 10, 11). Macronucleus is ovoid, about 25 × 18 µm in vivo, centrally positioned, characteristically heteromerous. Micronucleus is not detected. Cilia are about 10 µm long. Movement is usually slow, crawling on substrate and occasionally swimming in water.
Infraciliature as shown in Figs 4-8, 14-19. Usually seven right (seldom six) kineties. Two or three rightmost rows of right kineties (i.e., frontoventral kineties) are almost equal in length (each composed of about 170 basal bodies, see Table 1), and extending anteriorly to dorsal margin; other right kineties are progressively shortened from right to left; and the inmost right kinety terminates anteriorly near cytostome. About six to eleven left kineties with densely arranged basal bodies are positioned around equator and close to right kineties (Figs 4-8, 18, 19). One hook-like terminal fragment is antero-dorsally positioned, comprising of six to eight basal bodies (Figs 4, 14, 15). Equatorial fragment is composed of six to twenty seven basal bodies. Constantly two short rows are positioned near and parallel to the anterior ends of the rightmost right kineties; outer row consisting of about five to ten kinetosomes, and inner three to five kinetosomes (Figs 4-8, 15).
Two circumoral kineties are parallel to each other and almost equal in length, transversely positioned; preoral kinety is relatively short, located anteriorly with orientation almost orthogonal to, circumoral kineties; left frontal kineties are in three short rows, almost longitudinally oriented, positioned between circumoral and preoral kineties (Figs 4-8, 16, 17). Many fine and straight stripes on the surface of plates are recognized after protargol impregnation (Fig. 20).
Comparison with congeners. In the original description of Dysteria lanceolata by Claparède and Lachmann (1859), only a few living features (body shape and size, two contractile vacuoles, macronucleus shape) were described, Kahl (193 1) did not supply new data of the species in his review either. In the absence of any information of infraciliature, we identify the test organism as D. lanceolata, on the basis of its body shape and size, presence of two contractile vacuoles and its marine habitat.
Dysteria pectinata (Nowlin, 1911) Kahl, 1931 is very similar to D. lanceolata in terms of body size, having two contractile vacuoles, 6 or 7 right kineties, 2 or 3 frontoventral kineties and marine habitat (Table 2). However, these two taxa can be separated by the pattern of oral ciliature: two parallel rows of circumoral kineties obliquely (vs. transversely) positioned; three left frontal kineties positioned right of circumoral kineties (vs. between circumoral and preoral kineties, almost longitudinally oriented) (Figs 4, 25). In addition, D. pectinata is also different from D. lanceolata in body shape (semi-oval vs. oval) and macronucleus shape (elongate vs. ovoid) (Figs 1, 24; Gong et al. 2007).
Among the well-investigated Dysteria spp., D. semilunaris (Gourret and Roeser, 1886) Kahl, 1931 and D. cristata (Gourret and Roeser, 1888) Kahl, 1931 resemble D. lanceolata in terms of the oval body shape and marine habitat (Gourret and Roeser 1886, 1888; Kahl 1931; Gong et al. 2002, 2007). However, D. semilunaris differs from D. lanceolata in having smaller body size (20-40 ? 12-20 vs. 60-80 ? 30-60 um), four right kineties (vs. six or seven) and 57-86 (vs. 137-220) basal bodies in each row of frontoventral kinety (Table 2; Figs 22, 23). D. cristata can be distinguished from D. lanceolata in having smaller body size (40-50 ? 25-30 vs. 60-80 ? 30-60 um), three right kineties (six or seven) and five to seven left kineties (six to eleven) (Table 2; Figs 26, 27).
Dysteria ovalis (Gourret and Roeser, 1886) Kahl, 1931 and D. parovalis Wilbert et Song, 2005 more or less resemble D. lanceolata in body shape (Gourret and Roeser 1886, Kahl 1931, Fauré-Fremiet 1965, Wilbert and Song 2005). However, D. ovalis has four (vs. six or seven) right kineties, one (vs. two) contractile vacuole, and D. parovalis has nine (vs. six or seven) right kineties, three (vs. two) contractile vacuoles, therefore, these two taxa can be clearly separated from D. lanceolata (Table 2; Figs 30-32).
In terms of oval body shape, body size and marine habitat, Dysteria lanceolata is similar to D. proraefrons James-Clark, 1866 and D. reesi Kahl, 1931, the infraciliature of which remain unknown (Kahl 1931). Nevertheless, Kahl (1931) presented two illustrations of D. proraefrons showing that ribs might be present or absent on the left plate of the cell, while the dorsal margin in the posterior portion of the cell appears to be slightly sigmoid (vs. convex in D. lanceolata) (Table 2; Figs 28, 29). D. reesi differs from D. lanceolata mainly in the following two features: (1) two plates are almost equal in size (vs. the right plate is obviously the left in D. lanceolata), (2) a conspicuous pigment spot in the left anterior end (Table 2; Fig. 34).
Dysteria navícula Kahl, 1928, whose infraciliature has to be revealed, may resemble D. lanceolata in the body shape and marine habitat. However, D. navicula can be separated from D. lanceolata by the body length:width ratio (about 5:2 vs. 3:2), and having several (vs. two) contractile vacuoles (Table 2; Fig. 33; Kahl 1928).
Lynchella nordica Jankowski, 1968 (Tables 3, 4 and Figs 35-59)
In general, the Qingdao population corresponds well with the original description (Jankowski 1 968) and the redescription (Deroux 1970). The following redescription emphasizes on details of the living morphology, updates the species definition as well as species separation within the genus.
Improved diagnosis. Marine Lynchella, size about 50 × 35 µm in vivo; with consistently four preoral and 23-31 postoral kineties, three circumoral kineties; 12-16 nematodesmal rods; usually three finger-like tentacles on the ventral side; macronucleus ovoid; two contractile vacuoles diagonally located.
Description. Size 45-60 × 30-45 µm in vivo. Body outline oval or slightly kidney shaped when viewed dorsoventrally; both ends broadly rounded, left margin straight to slightly concave, right distinctly convex (Figs 35, 50). Distinctly dorsoventrally flattened about 3:1. Ventral side flat, usually with inconspicuous depression, dorsal slightly vaulted (Figs 36, 54). Perimeter between ventral and dorsal surfaces with two distinct grooves (3 µm in width): anterior one C-shaped, positioned around anterior 3/4 of body perimeter, posterior one relatively shorter (Figs 35, 50, 51, 55). Pellicle rather robust. Resting extrusomes granule-like, each about 0.4-0.5 µm across in vivo (ca. 1.5 µm long after protargol impregnation), sparsely distributed on dorsal surface (Figs 37, 53). Usually three finger-like tentacles, each about 4 urn long; two tentacles located left posterior and one always located on right of equator (Figs 35, 52). Cytoplasm is colourless and hyaline with several to many differently sized granules and food vacuoles measuring 2-3 µm across (Fig. 35). Cytostome is prominent about 5 µm in diameter, positioned sub-apically and slightly left of midline. Cytopharyngeal basket is hook-like, about 70% of cell length after protargol impregnation is diagonally oriented, and composed of twelve to fourteen toothed nematodesmal rods (Figs 38, 39, 59). Two contractile vacuoles are diagonally positioned (Figs 35, 55). Macronucleus is ovoid and heteromerous, on average 13 ? 12 um in vivo, positioned in body centre. Micronuclei are oval, three to five in number, adjacent to macronucleus. Most cilia are about 8 urn long, while those in posterior end of the body are longer (12-15 urn). Movement is by gliding on substratum or swimming. Feeds mainly on seaweed debris and microalgae.
Somatic kineties of monokinetids, distinctly separated into preoral and postoral regions at cytostome level. Consistently four preoral rows, arched along anterior margin of cell; 23-26 postoral rows, slightly curved, anteriorly terminating at about cytostome level, Postoral kineties in left and right field making an inconspicuous suture (Figs 39, 56). Kinetosomes in posterior portion of right kineties relatively densely arranged (Fig. 39). Two terminal fragments: one antero-dorsally positioned, slightly left of midline, composed of about eight kinetosomes (Figs 39, 57, arrows); the other on anterior left margin of cell, with about ten kinetosomes (Figs 39, 56). Equatorial fragment consisting of about twenty kinetosomes, positioned near the right-most postoral ciliary row (Figs 39, 56). Two contractile vacuole pores usually recognizable after protargol impregnation. Circumoral kineties of dikinetids, comprising one anterior and two posterior rows, all transversely positioned. Anterior one is relative longer and parallel to posterior two rows. (Figs 39, 56).
Remarks. Lynchella nordica was originally described by Jankowski (1968) with notes of some important characters, such as body size and shape, the pattern of grooves in body perimeter, and the numbers of postoral somatic kineties and nematodesmal rods (Fig. 41). Subsequently, Deroux (1970) redescribed a French population in detail with additional information including somatic and perioral ciliary pattern (Fig. 40). We supply some living features of the species based on observations of the Qingdao population, e.g., the number and positions of contractile vacuoles, the finger-like tentacles, the granule-like extrusomes, which could be helpful for species identification during ecological surveys.
Our rediscovery of Lynchella nordica in Qingdao has confirmed that the species indeed has no cross-striated band (CSB) in its lateral grooves. The absence or presence of CBS in grooves can, therefore, be a consistent character for species (or higher rank) separation, which further supports the re-establishment of the genus Coeloperix that highly resembles Lychella but differs in having a CSB (Gong and Song 2004).
Since several CSB-bearing "Lynchella" species (e.g. Coeloperix dirempta (Deroux, 1 970) and C. aspidisciformis (Kahl, 1933)) have been transferred into the Coeploperix (Figs 45^7), a key to Lynchella spp. is here updated:
1 potenor end distinctly pointed
1' poterior end rounded
2 three circumoral kineties parallel and almost equal in length
2' three circumoral kineties comprising one longer anterior and two shorter posterior rows
3 fewer postoral kineties
3' more than 35 postoral kineties
4 with five to seven ventral tentacles
4' without ventral tentacle
L. gradata
2
L. cypris
3
L. nordica
4
L. tentaculata
L. fencheli
Chlamydonyx paucidentatus Deroux, 1976 (Table 5 and Figs 60-72)
The infraciliature of the Qingdao population corresponds well to the original description (Deroux 1976c). We here provide a brief redescription of the population.
Improved diagnosis. Marine Chlamydonyx with oval body shape, size about 40-75 ? 30-50 µp? in vivo; five to six right, seven postoral and nine to eleven left kineties; two circumoral and one preoral kineties; macronucleus ellipsoidal; three contractile vacuoles.
Description. Size usually 60 ? 40 um in vivo; body oval in outline when viewed from ventral side. Dorsoventrally flattened about 3:2, ventral side flat and dorsal side humped. Cytostome oval, ventrally located in anterior 1/5 of cell. About six nematodesmal rods are conspicuous in vivo. Cytoplasm is colourless and contains numerous small, greasily shinning globules and food vacuoles, which often render cells slightly grayish. Three contractile vacuoles are each about 3 urn in diameter, of which two lie on the right margin of the ventral side, and one is caudally positioned (Fig. 60). Podite is about 8 urn long and subcaudally positioned (Figs 60, 61, 66, 67). Cilia is about 4-5 urn. Movement is slow gliding.
Infraciliature as shown in Figs 63, 64, 69, 71. Somatic kineties of monokinetids. Five to six rows in right field, nine to eleven rows in left field, and consistently seven rows in postoral area. Rightmost two kineties are almost equal in length, extending anteriorly to anterior margin; other right kineties are progressively shortened from right to left, the innermost right kinety terminate anteriorly near cytostome. One terminal fragment consisting of about ten kinetosomes, always positioned at anterior ends of two rightmost kineties (Figs 64, 71). Postoral and left kineties are progressively shortened in their posterior ends from right to left in most specimens (Fig. 64), whereas in a few individuals, leftmost four postoral kineties are almost equal in length, and posterior terminated at same level with left kineties (Fig. 63). Equatorial fragment composed of about seven to twenty three closely spaced kinetosomes (Figs 64, 69). Eight to thirteen kinetosome-like granules are invariably present near the base of podite (Figs 64, 72). Macronucleus is ellipsoidal, heteromerous, 22 ? 17 µ?? after protargol impregnation. Micronucleus is not detected. Two circumoral kineties and one preoral kinety, all composed of dikinetids and are obliquely transverse positioned (Figs 64, 71). Cytopharyngeal basket is conspicuous after protargol impregnation (Fig. 70).
Remarks. Chlamydonyx paucidentatus is the only species known for this genus. The Qingdao population is identified mainly based on the body shape and size, the number of somatic kineties and the pattern of buccal ciliature, and the marine habitat (Deroux 1 976c).
The nominal species Trochilioides recta (Kahl, 1928) must be mentioned, as it has similar body shape, body size (40-75 urn vs. 45-75 urn), and perhaps also general pattern of infraciliature with Chlamydonyx paucidentatus (see Fig. 63). However, the generic name Trochilioides is a nomen nudum according to ICZN (1999), because the type species has not been designated, since Kahl (1931) transferred four Trochilia species into the new taxon Trochilioides. Meanwhile, although species (e.g., T. recta) have been described using silver impregnation (Deroux 1976c), a diagnostic description of Trochilioides is still needed for generic/species separation of Trochilioides and Chlamydonyx.
Re-establishment of Trochilioides Kahl, nov. gen.
Improved diagnosis: Hartmannulids with one preoral and two circumoral kineties, number of nematodesmal rods generally six; postoral and left kineties short, roughly equal in length and positioned anterior of equator.
Type species: Trochilioides recta (Kahl, 1928), nov. comb, (basionym: Trochilia recta Kahl, 1928).
Species assignable: Trochilioides recta (Kahl, 1928), nov. comb., T. trivialis (Fenchel, 1965) nov. comb., T. littoralis (Jankowski, 1967) nov. comb., T. bathybius (Jankowski, 1967) nov. comb., T. tenuis (Deroux, 1976) nov. comb., T. dispar (Fauré-Fremiet, 1965) nov. comb., T. crassa (Levander, 1894) nov. comb., T. striata (Buddenbrock, 1920) nov. comb, and T. dubia (Wallengren, 1903) nov. comb.
Compared with related genera: Within the family Hartmannulidae, features like the number and patterns of oral kineties, the number of nematodesmal rods, and the pattern of postoral and left kineties have been considered important for generic separation (Foissner 1984, Deroux 1994, Gong et al. 2009a). Trochilioides most resembles to Chlamydonyx, but differs in the pattern of postoral and left kineties (short, roughly equal in length and positioned anterior of equator vs. usually progressively shortened in posterior ends, and not all of them are positioned anterior of equator).
Based on our study and previously described forms of T. recta, we agree with Foissner et al. (1991) that the freshwater morphospecies T. fimbriatus Foissner, 1984 should be a junior synonym of T. recta, because of their exactly matched morphology and infraciliature (Deroux 1976c, Foissner 1984, Foissner et al. 1991).
Microxysma Deroux, 1976 is similar to Trochilioides with respect to their short postoral and left kineties (Deroux 1976c). However, these two genera can be separated by the number of nematodesmal rods (four vs. six). Trochilioides has three (vs. two) oral kineties, of which two are anterior to cytostome and one is in anterior left (vs. one is anterior left and one is anterior right to cytostome).
Acknowledgements. This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Project number:4 1006086, 40976099), a grant from FANEDD (No. 2007B27) to JG, the Center of Biodiversity Research, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia, Ningbo Natural Science Foundation (No. 201 1A6 10014), Scientific Research Fund of Zhejiang Provincial Education Department (No. Y201017789), the Discipline Project of Ningbo University (No. xkc 11006), the Key Laboratory of Mariculture of Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China (No. 2009002) and K. C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University. Thanks are due to Mr. Hongan Long for his help in sampling and kindly reading the first draft.
REFERENCES
Agamaliev F. G. (1978) Morphology of some free-living ciliates of the Caspian Sea. Acta Protozoo!. 17: 419-444
Agatha S., Spindler M., Wilbert N. (1993) Ciliated protozoa (CiIiophora) from Arctic sea ice. Acta Protozool. 32: 261-268
Alekperov I. K., Asadullayeva E. S. (1997) New and little-known ciliates (orders Nassulida-Oligotrichida) from the Caspian Sea Apsheronian coast. Communication 2. Zool. Zh. 76: 141 1-1417 (in Russian)
Aliev A. R. (1987) New species of infusoria (Cyrtophorida, ChIamydodontidae) from hyperhaline water reservoirs of the Apsheron Peninsula. Zool. Zh. 66: 1736-1738 (in Russian)
Aliev A. R. (1991) New infusorian species from the genus Cyrtophoron (Ciliata, Hypostomata) from hyperhaline and mineralized water bodies of Azerbaijan. Zool. Zh. 70: 126-130 (in Russian)
Blatterer H., Foissner W. (1990) Beiträge zur Ciliatenfauna (Protozoa: Ciliophora) der Amper (Bayern, Bundesrepublik Deutschland). Arch. Protistenkd. 138: 93-115
Borror A. C. (1972) Tidal marsh ciliates (Protozoa): morphology, ecology, systematics. Acta Protozool. 31: 29-71
Chen X., Song W., Warren A., Al-Rasheid K A. S., Al-Farraj S. A., Al-Quraishy S. A., Gong J. (2008b) Redefinition of two marine suctorian ciliates, Ephelota gemmipara (Hertwig, 1876) Bütschli, 1889 and E. crustaceorum Haller, 1880 (Ciliophora, Suctoria), with a brief description of the asexual reproduction process in E. gemmipara. Acta Protozool. 47: 1 13-124
Chen X., Wang Y., Long H., Al-Rasheid K A. S., Warren A., Song W. (2010) Morphological studies on two marine colepid ciliates from Qingdao, China, Nolandia orientalis spec. nov. and Pinacocoleps similis (Kahl, 1933) comb. nov. (Ciliophora, Colepidae). Eur. J. Protistol 46: 254-262
Chen X., Warren A., Song W. (2009) Taxonomic studies on a new marine ciliate, Apocopleps magnus gne. nov, spec. nov. (Ciliophora, Colepidae), isolated from Qingdao, China. J. Ocean. Univ. China. 8: 317-321
Claparède E., Lachmann J. (1859) Études sur les infusoires et les rhizopodes. Mém. Inst. natn. Genèv. 5: 1-260
Corliss J. O. (1979) The ciliated protoza. Characterization, classification and guide to the literature. 2nd ed. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
Deroux G. (1965) Origine des cinéties antérieures, gauches et buccales dans le genre Dysteria Huxley. Compi. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris 260: 6689-6691
Deroux G. (1970) La série «Chlamydonellienne» chez les Chlamydodontidae (Holotriches, Cyrtophrdina Fauré-Fremiet). Protistologica6: 155-182
Deroux G. (1975) Les dispositifs adhesives ciliaires chez les Cyrtophorida et la famile des Hypocomidae. Protistologica 10: 379-396
Deroux G. (1976a) Le plan cortical des Cyrtophorida unité d'expression et marges de variabilité. I. Le cas des plesiotrichopidae, Fam. Now., dans la nouvelle systématique. Protistologica 12:469-481
Deroux G. (1976b) Le plan cortical des Cyrtophorida unité d'expression et marges de variabilité. ?. Cyrtophorida a thigmotactisme ventral generalize. Protistologica 12: 483-500
Deroux G. (1976c) Plan cortical des Cyrtophorida EQ. Les structures différenciatrices chez les Dysterina. Protistologica 12: 505-538
Deroux G. (1994) Sous-Classe des Cyrtophorida Fauré-Fremiet in Corliss, 1956. Traité Zool. 2: 401-431
Dragesco J. (1966) Observations sur quelques ciliés libres. Arch. Protistenkd. 109: 155-206
Dragesco J., Dragesco-Kernéis A. (1986) Ciliés libres de l'Afrique intertropicale. Faune Tropicale 26: 1-559
Fauré-Fremiet E. (1965) Morphologie des Dysteriidae (Ciliata Cyrtophorina). Compi. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris 260: 6679-6684
Foissner W. (1984) Morphologie und Infraciliature einiger limnischer Ciliaten (Protozoa: Ciliophora). Schweiz. Z. Hydro!. 46: 210-223
Foissner W., Blatterer H., Berger H., Kohmann F. (1991) Taxonomische und ökologische Revision der Ciliaten des Saprobiensystems Band I: Cyrtophorida, Oligotrchida, Hypotricha, Colpodea. Informat Bayer Land. Wasserwirt 1/91: 1-478
Foissner W., Czapic, A., Wiackowski K. (1981) Die Infraciliatur und das Silberliniensystem von Sagittaria hyalina nov. spec, ChIamydonella polonica nov. spec, und Spirozona caudata Kahl, 1926 (Protozoa, Ciliophora). Arch. Protistenkd. IIA'. 361-377
Gao S., Strüder-Kypke M. S., Al-Rasheid K. A. S., Lin X., Song W. (2010) Molecular phylogeny of three ambiguous ciliate genera: Kentrophoros, Trachelolophos and Trachelotractus (Alveolata, Ciliophora). Zool. Scr. 39: 305-313
Gong J., Lin X., Song W. (2003) Redescription of a poorly-known marine cyrtophorid ciliate, Dysteria pusilla (Claparède and Lachmann, 1859) (Protozoa: Ciliophora: Cyrtophorida) from Qingdao, China. Acta Protozool. 42: 215-221
Gong J., Song W. (2004) Morphology and infraciliature of two marine species of Hartmannula (Protozoa, Ciliophora, Cyrtophorida), from scallop farming waters off Qingdao (Tsingtao), China. J. Nat. Hist. 38: 1327-1337
Gong J., Song W. (2006) Redescriptions of three cyrtophorid ciliates from marine biofilm, with establishment of a new genus, Wilbertella nov. gen. (Ciliophora: Crytophorida: Lynchellidae). Acta Protozool. 45: 153-165
Gong J., Song W., Warren A. (2002) Redescriptions of two marine cyrtophorid ciliates, Dysteria cristata (Gourret and Roeser, 1888) and Dysteria monostyla (Ehrenberg, 1838) Kahl, 1931 (Protozoa, Ciliophora, Cyrtophorida), from China. Europ. J. Protistol. 38:213-222
Gong J., Song W., Warren A. (2005a) Periphytic ciliate colonization: annual cycle and responses to environmental conditions. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 39: 159-170
Gong J., Song W, Warren A. (2005b) Updating the ciliate genus Chlamydodon Ehrenberg, 1835, with redescriptions of three species (Ciliophora, Cyrtophorida). Acta Protozoo!. 44: 19-32
Gong J., Song W, Warren A. (2009a) CYRTOPHORIDS. In: Freeliving Ciliates in the Bohai and Yellow Seas, China, (Eds. W Song, A. Warren, X. Hu). Science Press, Beijing, 49-93
Gong J., Song W, Warren A., Lin X., Roberts D. M. (2007) Microscopical observations on four marine Dysteria species (Ciliophora, Cyrtophorida). Eur. J. Protistol. 43: 147-161
Gong J., Stoeck X, Yi Z., Miao M., Zhang Q., Roberts D., Warren A., Song W (2009b) Small subunit rRNA phylogenies show that the class Nassophorea is not monophyletic (Phylum Ciliophora). J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 56: 339-347
Gourret P, Roeser P (1 886) Les protozoaires du Vieux-Port de Marseille. Arch. Zool. Expér. Gen. 4: 507-511
Gourret P, Roeser P (1888) Contribution à l'étude des protozoaires de la Corse. Archs Biol. 8: 173-204
Hu X., Suzuki T. (2005) Light microscopical observations on two marine dysteriid ciliates from Japan, including a description of Dysteria yagiui no v. spec. (Ciliophora, Cyrtophorida). Eur. J. Protistol. 41: 29-36
ICZN [The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Fourth edition adopted by the International Union of Biological Sciences. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London
Jankowski A. W. (1968) Morphology, phylogeny and position in the system of Lynchella Kahl, 1933 (Ciliophora). Gidrobiol. Zh. [=Hydrobiol. J.] 4:9-15
Ji D., Xu H., Choi J. K., Warren A., Song W (2009) Taxonomic characterization of three marine peritrichous ciliates from China: Zoothamnium alrasheidi spec, nov, Z. marinum Khal, 1933 and Z. vermicola Precht, 1935 (Ciliophora: Peritrichia). Acta Protozoo!. 48: 171-183
Kahl A. (1928) Die Infusorien (Ciliata) der Oldesloer Salzwasserstellen. Arch. Hydrobiol. 19: 50-246
Kahl A. (1931) Urtiere oder Protozoa I: Wimpertiere oder Ciliata (Infusoria) 2. Holotricha ausser den im 1. Teil behandelten Prosternata. Tierwelt DtI. 21: 181-398
Kahl A. (1933) Ciliata libera et ectocommensalia. In: Grimpe, G., Wagler, E. (Eds.), Die Tierwelt der Nord- und Ostsee, 26: 147-183
Pan H., Gao F., Li J., Lin X., Al-Farraj S. A., Al-Rasheid K. A. S. (2010) Morphology and phylogeny of two new pleurostomatid ciliates, Epiphyllum shenzhenensen. sp. and Loxophyllum spirellum n. sp. (Protozoa, Ciliophora) from a mangrove wetland, south China. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 57: 421^128
Petz W, Song W, Wilbert N. (1995) Taxonomy and ecology of the ciliate fauna (Protozoa, Ciliophora) in the endopagial and pelagial of the Weddell Sea, Antarctica. Stapfia 40: 1-223
Shao C, Song W., Gong J. (2008) Morphology and morphogenesis of a new marine cyrtophorid ciliate, Hartmannula sinica nov. spec. (Protozoa, Ciliophora, Cyrtophorida) from China. Eur. J. Protistol. 44: 1-12
Song W (2003) On two marine cyrtophorid ciliates from China, with description of Chlamydonella derouxi nov. spec, and Orthotrochilia pilula (Deroux, 1976) nov. comb., and reestablishment of the genus Orthotroc hilia nov. gen. (Protozoa, Ciliophora, Cyrtophorida). Hydrobiologia 499: 169-177
Song W, Packroff G. (1997) Taxonomische Untersuchungen an marinen Ciliaten aus China mit Beschreibungen von zwei neuen Arten, Strombidium globosaneum nov. spec, und S. platum nov. spec. (Protozoa, Ciliophora). Arch. Protistenkd. 147: 331-360
Song W., Wilbert N. (2002) Faunistic studies on marine ciliates form the Antarctic benthic area, including descriptions of one epizoic form, 6 new species and, 2 new genera (Protozoa, Ciliophora). Acta Protozoo!. 41: 23-61
Wilbert N. ( 1 97 1) Morphologie und Ökologie einiger neuer Ciliaten (Holotricha, Cyrtophorina) des Aufwuchses. Protistologica 7: 357-363
Wilbert N. (1975) Eine verbesserte Technik der Protargolimprägnation für Ciliaten. Mikrokosmos 64: 171-179
Wilbert N., Song W (2005) New contributions to the marine benthic ciliates from the Antarctic area, including description of seven new species (Protozoa, Ciliophora). J. Nat. Hist. 39: 935-973
Zhang Q., Yi Z., Song W, Al-Rasheid K A. S., Warren A. (2010) The systematic position of Paraspathidium Noland, 1937 (Ciliophora, Litostomatea?) inferred from primary SSU rRNA gene sequences and predicted secondary rRNA structure. Eur. J. Protistol. 46: 280-288
Received on 2nd December, 2010; revised on 17* February, 2011; accepted on 3rd March, 201 1
Xiangrui CHEN1, Jun GONG2^, Khaled A. S. AL-RASHEID4, Saleh A. FARRAJ4, Weibo SONG5
1 College of Life Science and Biotechnology, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China; 2 College of Life Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China; 'Vantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yantai, China; 4 Zoology Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 5 Laboratory of Protozoology, Institute of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China
Address for correspondence: J. Gong, College of Life Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, China; E-mail: [email protected]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright Jagiellonian University-Jagiellonian University Press 2011