Measurement of cochlear power gain in the sensitive gerbil ear

Abstract

The extraordinary sensitivity of the mammalian ear is commonly attributed to the cochlear amplifier, a cellular process thought to locally boost responses of the cochlear partition to soft sounds. However, cochlear power gain has not been measured directly. Here we use a scanning laser interferometer to determine the volume displacement and volume velocity of the cochlear partition by measuring its transverse vibration along and across the partition. We show the transverse displacement at the peak-response location can be >1,000 times greater than the displacement of the stapes, whereas the volume displacement of an area centred at this location is approximately tenfold greater than that of the stapes. Using the volume velocity and cochlear-fluid impedance, we discover that power at the peak-response area is >100-fold greater than that at the stapes. These results demonstrate experimentally that the cochlea amplifies soft sounds, offering insight into the mechanism responsible for the cochlear sensitivity.

ARTICLE

Received 4 Nov 2010 | Accepted 3 Feb 2011 | Published 1 Mar 2011 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1226

The extraordinary sensitivity of the mammalian ear is commonly attributed to the cochlear amplier, a cellular process thought to locally boost responses of the cochlear partition to soft sounds. However, cochlear power gain has not been measured directly. Here we use a scanning laser interferometer to determine the volume displacement and volume velocity of the cochlear partition by measuring its transverse vibration along and across the partition. We show the transverse displacement at the peak-response location can be > 1,000 times greater than the displacement of the stapes, whereas the volume displacement of an area centred at this location is approximately tenfold greater than that of the stapes. Using the volume velocity and cochlear-uid impedance, we discover that power at the peak-response area is > 100-fold greater than that at the stapes. These results demonstrate experimentally that the cochlea amplies soft sounds, offering insight into the mechanism responsible for the cochlear sensitivity.

Measurement of cochlear power gain in the sensitive gerbil ear

Tianying Ren1,2, Wenxuan He1 & Peter G. Gillespie1,3

1 Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Hearing Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA. 2 Department of Physiology, Xian Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Xian, Shaanxi 710061, China. 3 Vollum Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to T.R. (email: [email protected]).

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 2:216 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1226 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications

2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.

ARTICLE

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1226

Excitation of auditory sensory hair cells within the inner ear requires a sequence of mechanical steps, which commence when external airborne sounds pass through the ear canal and vibrate

the exible eardrum. This vibration reaches the cochlea via the middle-ear ossicular chain, displacing cochlear uid and consequently vibrating the cochlear partition (Fig. 1a). The cochlear partition includes the exible acellular basilar membrane and the cellular organ of Corti, which houses the sensory hair cells. A travelling wave of excitation starts at the base of the cochlear partition and propagates towards the apex. As the wave travels along the basilar membrane, its magnitude increases and speed decreases. The wave reaches its maximal magnitude at the best-frequency location, then quickly dies away beyond that place (Fig. 1b,c)1. Hair cells at the best-frequency location encode time, frequency and magnitude information of sounds and send them to the brain. In living cochleae, the vibration at the best-frequency site saturates as stimulus level is increased and displays sharp tuning as frequency is modulated27. Cochlear high sensitivity, sharp tuning and nonlinearity have been attributed to the cochlear amplier, an active process derived from outer hair cells that has been proposed to amplify the basilar membrane response to so sounds816.

The gain of cochlear amplication is oen estimated by comparing the ratio of basilar membrane-to-stapes vibration magnitude at low sound levels to that at high sound levels2 (typically > 100-fold or > 40 dB). However, vibration magnitude at a single basilar membrane location does not provide information on the longitudinal and radial extent of the response nor indicates the energy of the vibration. Despite discovery of active force generation by outer hair cells through somatic motility and active bundle motion17,18 and

experimental studies of power ow in the cochlea1922, the expected cochlear-amplier power gain has yet to be demonstrated experimentally. By measuring the volume displacement and volume velocity, here we show that the cochlea, indeed, can generate energy and amplify basilar membrane vibration in response to so sounds. We thus directly demonstrate power amplication in mammalian cochleae, which support the theory that the cochlear amplier is responsible for the remarkable hearing sensitivity.

ResultsConsistency of the data. To quantify the energy gain of the basilar membrane vibration, we used a scanning laser interferometer to measure vibration not only at a single spot at the best-frequency location, but also along and across the basilar membrane. Because of the invasive surgery, extremely low reectance of the cochlear partition23, vulnerability of cochlear sensitivity and time-consuming data collection, the productivity of the scanning measurements was low. Among 28 animals used in this study, 12 were excluded because of > 8-dB hearing loss before data collection. No vibration data were collected from six animals because the poor transparency of the perilymph reduced the carrier signal and increased the noise oor. Incomplete longitudinal or radial data were collected from ve cochleae due to deteriorating hearing during data acquisition. The sensitive scanning data presented here are thus from ve cochleae, which had similar basilar membrane responses (Fig. 2).

Basilar membrane vibration at a single location. A typical data set of the basilar membrane vibration measured at a single location ~2,500 m from the base is presented in Figure 3. Magnitude transfer functions, the ratio of the basilar membrane-to-stapes vibration magnitude as a function of frequency, are plotted in Figure 3a. At low and intermediate sound levels (2060 dB SPL, wherein 0 dB SPL is 20 Pa), the basilar membrane vibrated maximally near 16 kHz, that is, the best frequency of the measured location. At sound levels of 2040 dB SPL, the basilar membrane vibration at the best frequency was > 1,000-fold greater than the stapes vibration. As the stimulus level increased from 20 to 90 dB SPL, the ratio decreased by > 40 dB, indicating a compressive nonlinear growth. As the sound

level increased, the response peak at ~16 kHz becomes broader and shied towards low frequencies. The green curves in Figure 3 show the response at 40 dB SPL, the level used for quantifying the volume displacement in ve sensitive cochleae. The corresponding phase decreased progressively with frequency (Fig. 3b). The data in Figure 3 demonstrate that the sensitive cochlear preparations used in this study showed the same high sensitivity, nonlinearity and sharp tuning as reported previously2.

Longitudinal patterns of basilar membrane vibration. Scanning measurements of basilar membrane vibration at and around the best-frequency location are shown in Figure 4. The magnitudes of cochlear partition vibrations measured at longitudinal locations ~2,200 to ~2,800 m from the cochlear base are shown in Figure 4a.

Stapes

Round window

Tympanic membrane

Magnitude Phase

BF

Longitudinalpattern Radial

pattern

BF

t forward

Out Down

In

Base

BM

Toward apex

Up

BF

z

(nm)

d

a

x

y

c

/2 (m)

b

BM width (m)

Figure 1 | Measurement of the volume displacement. (a) When a toneis presented to the ear, vibrations are measured along and across the basilar membrane through the round window and at the stapes footplates. (b) Magnitude and phase longitudinal and radial patterns of basilar membrane vibration. (c) The relationship between the stapes vibration and the cochlear forward travelling wave. (d) Volume displacement of basilar membrane vibration, measured as the volume bounded by the instantaneous waveform with a maximum displacement centred at the best-frequency location and the in-phase vibrating area on the xy plane (area abcd). The length of this area is a half-wavelength and its width is approximately the basilar membrane width at the best-frequency location. BM, the basilar membrane; BF, best frequency; tforward, the forward delay;

, the wavelength. Blue and red colours in panels c and d show the low and high magnitude of the basilar membrane vibration, respectively.

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 2:216 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1226 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications

2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1226

ARTICLE

10

a

20 dB SPL

90 dB SPL

b

1,000

Ratio (BM/stapes)

0

Displacement (nm)

Phase (radians)

1

100

10

10

0.1

20

Mean s.e.

1

0.01

5 6 7 8 910

4 2

Frequency (Hz)

BF

>40 dB

30 5 6 7 8 910

4 2

Frequency (Hz)

0

Figure 3 | Single-point basilar membrane vibration. The magnitude and phase of the basilar membrane vibration were measured at a single longitudinal location as a function of frequency. The ratio of basilar membrane-to-stapes vibration magnitude (BM/stapes) and phase difference between the stapes and basilar membrane are presented ina and b. (a) At 2060 dB SPL, the magnitude increases with frequency and reaches the maximum at ~16 kHz. The magnitude and sharpnessof the peak decreased with the sound level and the peak shifted to low frequencies from ~16 to ~11 kHz (horizontal dotted arrowed line). The magnitude at the peak frequency decreased > 40 dB as the sound level increased from 20 to 90 dB SPL (indicated by vertical dotted arrowed lines). (b) The corresponding phase decreased progressively with frequency. The green curves show the responses at 40 dB SPL, the level used for quantifying the volume displacement in ve sensitive cochleae.

Phase (radians)

5

10

15

2,200

Distance from base (m)

2,400

2,600

2,800

0

Distance from OSL (m)

50

100

150

200

Figure 2 | Grouped magnitude and phase data of basilar membrane vibration. (a) The longitudinal magnitude pattern of the basilar membrane response to a 40-dB SPL 16-kHz tone, presented by means (blue solid line) and range of the standard error (red dotted lines) from ve cochleae. (b) Corresponding longitudinal phase data. (c) Displacement magnitude as a function of the radial location. Standard errors near the osseous spiral lamina (OSL) are smaller than those in the region between 80 to 240 m due to the relatively high reectivity. (d) Corresponding radial phase data show little change across the basilar membrane.

For a 16-kHz tone at intensities below 50 dB SPL, the best-frequency location was ~2,500 m from the base. As the stimulus magnitude increased 10,000-fold from 10 to 90 dB SPL, the displacement magnitude at the best-frequency location only increased about 100-fold, from ~0.1 to ~10 nm, indicating nonlinear compression of the response. At intensities below 50 dB SPL, the displacement- longitudinal location curves showed an approximately symmetrical peak centred at the best-frequency location. As the sound level increased, the response increased more in the basal direction than towards the apex, shiing the peak towards the base24,25.

The phase of the basilar membrane response decreased with distance from the cochlear base (Fig. 4b), which indicated that waves travelled in the apical direction, that is, they formed a forward travelling wave1,26. At the basal side of the best-frequency

location, the rate of phase decrease was small, indicating that the wave travelled rapidly through this region. As the observed location was moved through the best-frequency location towards the apex, the phase progressively decreased, indicating that the wave slowed. As sound level increased, the phaselongitudinal distance relation attened modestly, indicating that wave travelled faster at high sound levels.

Radial patterns of basilar membrane vibration. Radial measurements of basilar membrane vibrations are shown in Figure 4cd. As the sound level increased, the basilar membrane response increased in magnitude (Fig. 4c) but changed little in phase along the radial direction (Fig. 4d), consistent with previous reports25,27,28. The radial

pattern of basilar membrane vibration magnitude was asymmetric across all sound levels (Fig. 4c); locations near the osseous spiral lamina vibrated at signicantly higher magnitudes than those near the spiral ligament. At low levels ( < 30 dB SPL), basilar membrane vibration was mainly located over the region of ~2575 m, where

the hair cells are located. With increased sound level, the vibration spread both centrally and laterally.

Spatial patterns of basilar membrane vibration. To determine the volume displacement of the area of the cochlear partition centred at the best-frequency location (area abcd in Fig. 1d), we measured the spatial patterns of basilar membrane vibration. Figure 4e shows the spatial envelope of the basilar membrane response to a 40-dB SPL 16-kHz tone; we calculated the instantaneous waveform (Fig. 4f) using magnitude and phase data (see Methods). The basilar membrane volume displacement is the volume bounded by the instantaneous waveform and the in-phase vibrating area centred at the best-frequency location (Figs 1d and 4f). The half-wavelength centred at the best-frequency location across sound levels was only 183 m (Fig. 4b), which is ~1.5% of the basilar membrane length (Fig. 4g). The size of this area suggests that fewer than 100 outer hair cells work in-phase for a 16-kHz tone at the best-frequency location.

Volume displacement and power gain. By measuring basilar membrane vibration at dierent sound pressure levels, we found that the volume displacement (solid line, Fig. 5a) showed nonlinear compressive growth with stimulus level, whereas the growth of the stapes volume displacement (dotted line, Fig. 5a) was linear. At 10 dB SPL, the cochlear volume displacement was approximately ten times greater than that of the stapes vibration; this ratio decreased as the sound level increased, and was unity at ~80 dB SPL.

The energy associated with basilar membrane vibration at the best-frequency location and near the stapes was calculated from the volume velocity and characteristic impedance of cochlear uids (see Methods) and is displayed in Figure 5b. Although the shape of the energy inputoutput function of the basilar membrane at the best-frequency area (solid blue line, Fig. 5b) was similar to that of the volume displacement (solid red line, Fig. 5a), because energy depends on the square of the volume velocity, energy increased much more than the volume displacement when the sound level increased.

As shown in Figure 5c, at low sound levels, the single-point basilar membrane vibration magnitude (solid line) was ~1,000-fold greater than that of the stapes vibration (dotted line). Although the ratio decreased signicantly at high sound levels, the basilar

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 2:216 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1226 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications

2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.

ARTICLE

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1226

90 dB SPL

10

1

0.1

0.01

0

5

10

15

20 2,200 2,400 2,600 2,800 0 50 100 150 200

100

Displacement (nm)

Volume (m3 )

0.1

Energy (joule)

1020

1022

1024

1026

10

1

10 dB SPL

1,000

Phase (radians)

90 dB SPL

10 dB SPL

Displacement (nm)

10

10.10.010.0010.0001

20 20

40 40

60 60

80 80 Sound level (dB SPL) Sound level (dB SPL)

Gains

100

1

10

/2=183 m

Distance from base (m)

Distance from OSL (m)

Displacement (nm)

Displacement (nm)

Figure 5 | Power gain of basilar membrane vibration. (a) Volume displacements of the basilar membrane (solid line) and stapes (dotted line) vibration as a function of the sound level. (b) Energy input and output functions of the basilar membrane (solid line) and stapes (dotted line) vibration. (c) Point displacements of the basilar membrane (solid line) and stapes (dotted line) vibration. (d) Energy (blue), volume- (red) and point-(black) displacement gains as a function of the sound level. Green circles show energy gains from ve sensitive cochleae (mean = 61, s.e. = 11, n = 5).

3

2

1

0

3

membrane vibration remained > 10 times greater than the stapes vibration. The single-point data in Figure 5c is consistent with that in Figure 3a; both show 3040 dB compression.

Ratios of the basilar membrane single-point displacement (black), volume displacement (red) or energy (blue) to the corresponding measures at the stapes (gains) are presented as a function of the sound level in Figure 5d. Green circles show energy gains from ve sensitive cochleae (mean = 61, s.e. = 11, n = 5). As the sound level increased from 10 to 90 dB SPL, single-point and volume displacement gains decreased by ~30 dB, whereas the energy gain decreased as much as 60 dB; the energy gain of the cochlear partition vibration in response to low-level tones can be > 100, yet dropped below 1 at high sound levels.

Discussion

Cochlear amplication was originally predicted by Gold29 and was found to be possible by the ground-breaking discovery of otoacoustic emissions by Kemp30. In vitro experiments have indicated that electrical motility of outer hair cells16,17,3137 and active hair-bundle

movement16,17,3137 can generate mechanical energy, whereas modelling studies38 and accumulated experimental results2 have supported the existence of cochlear amplication. Nevertheless, the expected cochlear power gain has not been demonstrated experimentally. Here, we measured the volume displacement and velocity of basilar membrane vibration, which, along with the cochlear-uid impedance, allowed us to determine the associated energy. We found a power gain of ~100 from cochlear base to best-frequency location, which provides the rst direct experimental evidence of power amplication in the sensitive living cochlea.

The principle for measuring the volume displacement or energy gain is the same as that for the conventional method for determining the single-point displacement gain2. In either case, the gain is quantied by the ratio of basilar membrane vibration magnitude at the best-frequency location to that of the stapes; the current and conventional methods are distinguished by dierent units, one of volume or energy and the other of length. Figure 1b,c shows the temporal and spatial relationships between the stapes and basilar membrane

2

1

0

3,000 2,500 2,000

100 200

Distance from OSL (m)

Distance from base (m)

Distance from base (m)

/2=183 m

Base Apex

0 2 4 6 8 10 12103

Figure 4 | Spatial patterns of basilar membrane vibration. Magnitude and phase of the basilar membrane vibration were measured as functions of the longitudinal and radial locations (ad). The spatial pattern (e) and volume displacement (f) were calculated from the longitudinal and radial data. (a) At low sound levels from 10 to 40 dB SPL, the vibration increases with the distance from the cochlear base and forms a peak at ~2,500 m. As the stimulus increased ~10,000-fold from 10 to 90 dB SPL, the response peak increased only ~100-fold, from ~0.1 to ~10 nm and shifted towards the base (left). (b) Phase decreased with longitudinal location. The phase slope became atter at high sound levels. (c) Magnitude as a function of radial location, indicated by the distance from the osseous spiral lamina (OSL). The displacement magnitude varied signicantly radially. (d) Phase show no signicant change across the basilar membrane. Cartoon inset indicates the cross-section of the cochlear partition, with one inner hair cell (left) and three outer hair cells in red. (e) Magnitude spatial pattern of basilar membrane response to a 40-dB SPL 16-kHz tone. (f) Instantaneous waveform of the basilar membrane vibration. Blue and red colours in e and f show the low and high magnitude of the basilar membrane vibration, respectively. (g) Spatial relationship of the quantied half wavelength and the basilar membrane length.

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 2:216 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1226 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications

2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1226

ARTICLE

vibration. For a sinusoidal vibration, the volume displacement by the stapes footplates (Vs) varies with time t and frequency f and is given by Vs = Vs + cos(t), where = 2f. Vs + is the absolute value of Vs at t = n/ (n = 0, 1, 2, ), which is determined by multiplying the area of the stapes footplate with its point displacement1. As the vibration of the cochlear partition travels from the cochlear base to its best-frequency location, the magnitude may be reduced by damping or increased by the cochlear amplier8,9,1114,16,39.

The volume displacement at the best-frequency location (Vbm) is described by Vbm = Vbm + cos[(t + tforward)], where tforward is the forward delay of the basilar membrane vibration from the base to the best-frequency location (Fig. 1b,c). Similar to Vs + , Vbm + is the absolute value of Vbm at tforward + n/ (n = 0, 1, 2, ), which is dened

by the instantaneous waveform of basilar membrane vibration with the maximal volume displacement centred at the best-frequency location. The longitudinal extent of Vbm is dened by the half-wavelength distance because the cochlear partition displaces in the same direction over this region, and the radial extent by the basilar membrane width (see Fig. 1d and Methods). This volume displacement diers from the net volume displacement over the basilar membrane length, which occurs simultaneously with the stapes vibration. The former is a measure of the travelling wave, whereas the later is related to the fast longitudinal wave40.

At low sound levels, cochlear vibration is mostly restricted to the outer hair cell region (Fig. 4c) at the best-frequency area (Fig. 4a). Steep longitudinal phase slopes (Fig. 4b) indicate shorter wavelengths and smaller in-phase-vibration areas at low sound levels. For a given volume displacement or velocity, a smaller in-phase-vibration area results in a larger vibration in the transverse direction. Thus, in addition to level-dependent power amplication, the cochlea can increase the transverse vibration at the best-frequency location by focusing energy on the spatially restricted best-frequency region41. In turn, maximal transverse vibration optimally stimulates auditory sensory cells. Reective of this focusing mechanism, the point-displacement gain (black line in Fig. 5d) is about 100-fold greater than that of the volume displacement gain (red line in Fig. 5d) at the low and intermediate sound levels. Because sharp cochlear tuning prots from a limited longitudinal extent of basilar membrane vibration24, the narrow longitudinal restriction of vibration contributes to cochlear sharp tuning.

One may wonder whether the interferometer signal is from the basilar membrane or from deeper structures. Reected light from a very reective surface out of the focus might contribute to or even dominate the interferometer signal due to the large coherent length of lasers4244. However, because of the dierence in refraction index of the perilymph and the basilar membrane, incident light is reected on the perilymph-basilar membrane interface in the current experiment. As a consequence of this reection, the surface of the basilar membrane is visible through the microscope under the white light illumination. Because of the diusion of the tissue, the structures on the scala-vestibuli side of the basilar membrane are not readily visible. Because the interferometer laser light is in the visible range of the spectrum, it too is subject to the same reectivity as white light. Indeed, the carrier signal is optimized when the object beam is focused on the surface of the basilar membrane. Thus, the focal plane of the object beam was indicated by the optimal carrier signal and the sharpest image of the surface of the basilar membrane at the scala-tympani side. This was conrmed when we measured sound-induced vibration of the cochlear partition as a function of the transverse position using a low coherence interferometer with a visible light source. We found that the carrier signal was largest when the object beam was focused on the basilar membrane.

In most classical cochlear mathematical models26,39,40, the coch-

lear travelling wave is presented by a series of independent sections along the longitudinal direction, and acoustic energy is transmitted dominantly through the cochlear uid. According to these theories,

the energy of the cochlear partition vibration at the best-frequency location can be quantied by measuring the power in the cochlear uid surrounding the partition. Here, the uid energy was quantied from the volume velocity and characteristic impendence of the cochlear uid (see Methods). Because cochlear uids may move radially and longitudinally, this method may underestimate the energy; our measured power gain of ~100 should therefore be considered to be a lower bound.

When the membrane potential of an outer hair cell changes as a result of sound-induced hair-bundle deection, the cell body changes length and produces force due to a voltage-dependent conformational change in the membrane protein prestin16,17,3137. Hair

bundles of mammalian outer hair cells can also produce mechanical force14,15,18,4547. In either case, outer hair cell-generated forces can enhance basilar membrane responses to so sounds when the timing of force generation is appropriate48. The energy gain we observed in the living cochlea likely resulted from energy generated by somatic motility and/or active bundle motion of outer hair cells.

Methods

Materials and general methods. Twenty-eight young healthy Mongolian gerbils (4080 g) were used in this study. Anaesthesia was induced by intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (30 mg kg 1) followed by intramuscular xylazine (5 mg kg 1)24. The animal use protocol was approved by the Oregon Health and Science University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

The method for measuring the basilar membrane vibration at a single longitudinal location was the same as previously49. Cochlear sensitivity was measured by recording the compound action potential and estimated by the nonlinear compression of basilar membrane responses.

Scanning measurement of basilar membrane vibration. The sensitivity of the laser interferometer was improved by increasing optical efficiency, which was achieved by removing the original collimating and focusing lenses and by precisely aligning dierent optical components24,50. The alignment result of each optical component was monitored using a compact laser power meter, and the optical sensitivity of the system was measured by the carrier signal levels when the object beam was focused on a low reective (~0.0001%) surface. The minimized noise oor of the instrument was achieved by maximizing the carrier signal level. For scanning measurements of the basilar membrane vibration, the transparency of the perilymph in the optical path signicantly aected the carrier signal level and the noise oor. Blood cells suspended in the perilymph oen prevented the interferometer from detecting the basilar membrane vibration. Great care was taken to minimize bleeding and to avoid blood cells entering the cochlea.

Approximately 1 mm of basilar membrane in the rst turn was exposed through the round window. The object beam of a scanning interferometer was focused on the basilar membrane through a glass coverslip and the perilymph. The scanning paths were determined by 10 to 20 reference points using a three-dimensional positioning system. The longitudinal scanning path was approximately underneath the second row of outer hair cells; the radial scanning path was at the best-frequency location. As the longitudinal position of the laser focus spot was changed at 5.0 m s 1, magnitudes and phases of the basilar membrane vibration velocity in response to a continuous best-frequency tone were collected at two samples per second, giving 0.4 sample per m. The scanning rate along the radial direction was 2.0 m s 1, giving one sample per m. The displacement magnitude (D) in nm and phase () in radians at each location was calculated from the velocity magnitude (V) and phase () according to D = V/2f and = /2, where f is the stimulus frequency in Hz.

Volume displacement measurement. Because radial phase patterns were approximately constant over a half-wavelength region along the longitudinal direction, we quantied the volume displacement of the basilar membrane vibration (Vbm) as follows. The measured magnitude-radial location function was normalized with the maximum magnitude as 1.0; the radial magnitude pattern at each longitudinal location was obtained by multiplying the normalized radial magnitude patternby the measured displacement at the given longitudinal location. The surfaceplot consisting of all displacement values over the in phase vibrating area shows the vibration magnitude in the space (Fig. 4e). The phase value at each location inside the in-phase vibrating area was obtained from the longitudinal and radial phase. To calculate the amplitude of the maximum volume displacement of the basilar membrane Vbm + , the phase value at the best-frequency location was shied to n (n = 0, 1, 2) by adding a constant to all phase values over the in-phase vibrating area. The instantaneous waveform (Fig. 4f) consists of the real value (R) at each location, which was derived from magnitude (Mp) and phase (p) using

R = Mp*cos(p). Vbm + was quantied by integrating R over the in-phase vibration area, which was dened by the basilar membrane width in the radial direction and a half-wavelength distance in the longitudinal direction (area abcd in Fig. 1d).

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 2:216 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1226 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications

2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.

ARTICLE

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1226

Vs + , the amplitude of the volume displacement of the stapes vibration was obtained from the product of Dps, the single-point displacement amplitude and As, the area of the stapes footplate. Dps was taken approximately from the centre of the stapes footplate. Although complex stapes vibration has been reported51, our pilot experiments showed that vibrations from four distributed locations on the stapes footplate were in phase and that their mean was very close to the measured single-point displacement from the centre. In addition, the single-point vibration of the stapes has been commonly used for calculating the basilar membrane vibration transfer function2.

To quantify As, the stapes were collected and mounted using bone wax, with the perilymphatic surface of the stapes footplate in an approximately horizontal plane. The image of the stapes footplate was captured using a digital camera through a stereomicroscope. The edge of the stapes footplate was detected and As was calculated by multiplying the number of pixels of stapes footplate image with the area of each pixel.

The volume displacement gain of the basilar membrane vibration (Gvol) was

obtained according to Gvol = Vbm + /Vs + at dierent intensities. The displacement

gain measured from a single location (Gp) was calculated using Gp = Dpbm/Dps, where Dpbm and Dps are displacements at the best-frequency location and at the stapes.

Measurement of energy and energy gain. Despite a recent study52, most classical cochlear mathematical models26,39,40 present the cochlear travelling wave using a series of independent sections along the longitudinal direction, and neglect longitudinal coupling. According to these theories, the relevant energy of the cochlear partition vibration can be quantied by measuring power in the cochlear uid surrounding the partition. As energy in uid can be quantied based on the volume velocity and uid characteristic impedance53, the sound energy passing through the in-phase vibrating area centred at the best-frequency site in 1 s (Ibf)

was quantied according to the equation Ibf = (VbfV)2 c, where VbfV is the volume velocity measured centred at the best-frequency location (VbfV = 2 f Vbm + ,

where f is frequency and Vbm + is the volume displacement), is the density of the cochlear uid (1,000 kg m 3) and c is the speed of sound in water (c 1,500 m s 1). Similarly, the energy in the cochlear uid near the stapes (Is) was quantied according to equation Is = (VsV)2 c, where VsV is the volume velocity of the stapes vibration (VsV = 2f Vs + , where f is frequency and Vs + is volume displacement of the stapes vibration.

The energy gain (Ge) was obtained from equation Ge = Ibf/Is. According to the above relationship between energy and volume displacement, Ge = Gvol2, where Gvol is the volume displacement gain.

References

1. von Bksy, G. Experiments in Hearing (McGraw-Hill, 1960).2. Robles, L. & Ruggero, M. A. Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. Physiol. Rev. 81, 13051352 (2001).

3. Rhode, W. S. Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mossbauer technique. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49, 12181231 (1971).

4. Ruggero, M. A. & Rich, N. C. Application of a commercially-manufactured Doppler-shi laser velocimeter to the measurement of basilar-membrane vibration. Hear. Res. 51, 215230 (1991).

5. Nuttall, A. L., Dolan, D. F. & Avinash, G. Laser Doppler velocimetry of basilar membrane vibration. Hear. Res. 51, 203213 (1991).

6. Cooper, N. P. & Rhode, W. S. Basilar membrane mechanics in the hook region of cat and guinea-pig cochleae: sharp tuning and nonlinearity in the absence of baseline position shis. Hear. Res. 63, 163190 (1992).

7. Russell, I. J. & Nilsen, K. E. The location of the cochlear amplier: spatial representation of a single tone on the guinea pig basilar membrane. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 26602664 (1997).

8. de Boer, E. Power amplication in an active model of the cochlea--short-wave case. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 73, 577579 (1983).

9. Davis, H. An active process in cochlear mechanics. Hear. Res. 9, 7990 (1983).

10. Neely, S. T. & Kim, D. O. A model for active elements in cochlear biomechanics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79, 14721480 (1986).11. Dallos, P. The active cochlea. J Neurosci 12, 45754585 (1992).12. Hudspeth, A. Mechanical amplication of stimuli by hair cells. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 7, 480486 (1997).

13. Fettiplace, R. Active hair bundle movements in auditory hair cells. J. Physiol. 576, 2936 (2006).

14. Ricci, A. J., Crawford, A. C. & Fettiplace, R. Mechanisms of active hair bundle motion in auditory hair cells. J. Neurosci. 22, 4452 (2002).

15. Hudspeth, A. J. Making an eort to listen: mechanical amplication in the ear. Neuron 59, 530545 (2008).

16. Ashmore, J. Cochlear outer hair cell motility. Physiol. Rev. 88, 173210 (2008).

17. Brownell, W. E., Bader, C. R., Bertrand, D. & de Ribaupierre, Y. Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells. Science 227, 194196 (1985).

18. Martin, P. & Hudspeth, A. J. Active hair-bundle movements can amplify a hair cells response to oscillatory mechanical stimuli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 1430614311 (1999).

19. Allen, J. B. & Fahey, P. F. Using acoustic distortion products to measure the cochlear amplier gain on the basilar membrane. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92, 178188 (1992).

20. Olson, E. S. Intracochlear pressure measurements related to cochlear tuning. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 349367 (2001).21. de Boer, E., Nuttall, A. L., Hu, N., Zou, Y. & Zheng, J. The Allen-Fahey experiment extended. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 12601266 (2005).

22. Lukashkin, A. N., Walling, M. N. & Russell, I. J. Power amplication in the mammalian cochlea. Curr. Biol. 17, 13401344 (2007).

23. Khanna, S. M., Willemin, J. F. & Ulfendahl, M. Measurement of optical reectivity in cells of the inner ear. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 467, 6975 (1989).

24. Ren, T. Longitudinal pattern of basilar membrane vibration in the sensitive cochlea. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 1710117106 (2002).

25. Rhode, W. S. & Recio, A. Study of mechanical motions in the basal region of the chinchilla cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 33173332 (2000).

26. Zwislocki, J. J. Wave motion in the cochlea caused by bone conduction. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 25, 986989 (1953).27. Cooper, N. P. in Recent Developments in Auditory Mechanics (eds H. Wada, T. Takasaka, K. Ikeda, K. Ohyama & T. Koike) 109115 (World Scientic, 2000).28. Ren, T. et al. in Biophysics of the Cochlea from Molecules to Models (ed. A.W. Gummer) 211219 (World Scientic, 2003).

29. Gold, T. Hearing. II. The physical basis of the action of the cochlea. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 135, 492498 (1948).

30. Kemp, D. T. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64, 13861391 (1978).

31. Dallos, P., Zheng, J. & Cheatham, M. A. Prestin and the cochlear amplier. J. Physiol. 576, 3742 (2006).32. Zheng, J., Madison, L. D., Oliver, D., Fakler, B. & Dallos, P. Prestin, the motor protein of outer hair cells. Audiol. Neurootol. 7, 912 (2002).

33. He, D. Z., Jia, S. & Dallos, P. Prestin and the dynamic stiness of cochlear outer hair cells. J. Neurosci. 23, 90899096 (2003).

34. Liberman, M. C. et al. Prestin is required for electromotility of the outer hair cell and for the cochlear amplier. Nature 419, 300304 (2002).

35. Gao, J. et al. Prestin-based outer hair cell electromotility in knockin mice does not appear to adjust the operating point of a cilia-based amplier. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 1254212547 (2007).

36. Santos-Sacchi, J. Asymmetry in voltage-dependent movements of isolated outer hair cells from the organ of Corti. J. Neurosci. 9, 29542962 (1989).

37. Mellado Lagarde, M. M., Drexl, M., Lukashkina, V. A., Lukashkin, A. N. & Russell, I. J. Outer hair cell somatic, not hair bundle, motility is the basis of the cochlear amplier. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 746748 (2008).

38. de Boer, E. & Nuttall, A. L. The mechanical waveform of the basilar membrane. III. Intensity eects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 14971507 (2000).39. Neely, S. T. & Kim, D. O. An active cochlear model showing sharp tuning and high sensitivity. Hear. Res. 9, 123130 (1983).

40. Peterson, L. C. & Bogert, B. P. A dynamic theory of the cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 22, 369381 (1950).

41. Ren, T. & Gillespie, P. G. A mechanism for active hearing. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 17, 498503 (2007).

42. Ren, T. & Nuttall, A. L. Recording depth of the heterodyne laser interferometer for cochlear vibration measurement. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 826829 (2001).

43. Dalho, E., Gartner, R., Zenner, H. P., Tiziani, H. J. & Gummer, A. W. Remarks about the depth resolution of heterodyne interferometers in cochlear investigations. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 17251728 (2001).

44. de La Rochefoucauld, O., Khanna, S. M. & Olson, E. S. Recording depth and signal competition in heterodyne interferometry. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 12671284 (2005).

45. Hudspeth, A. J., Choe, Y., Mehta, A. D. & Martin, P. Putting ion channels to work: mechanoelectrical transduction, adaptation, and amplication by hair cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 1176511772 (2000).

46. Kennedy, H. J., Evans, M. G., Crawford, A. C. & Fettiplace, R. Fast adaptation of mechanoelectrical transducer channels in mammalian cochlear hair cells. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 832836 (2003).

47. Fettiplace, R. & Hackney, C. M. The sensory and motor roles of auditory hair cells. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 1929 (2006).

48. Nilsen, K. E. & Russell, I. J. Timing of cochlear feedback: spatial and temporal representation of a tone across the basilar membrane. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 642648 (1999).

49. He, W., Fridberger, A., Porsov, E., Grosh, K. & Ren, T. Reverse wave propagation in the cochlea. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 27292733 (2008).

50. Ren, T. Reverse propagation of sound in the gerbil cochlea. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 333334 (2004).

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 2:216 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1226 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications

2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1226

ARTICLE

51. Decraemer, W. F., Khanna, S. M. & Funnell, W. R. A method for determining three-dimensional vibration in the ear. Hear. Res. 77, 1937 (1994).

52. Meaud, J. & Grosh, K. The eect of tectorial membrane and basilar membrane longitudinal coupling in cochlear mechanics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127, 14111421 (2010).

53. Crocker, M. J. Handbook of Acoustics (John Wiley & Sons, 1998).

Acknowledgments

We thank E. Porsov, S. Matthews and Y. Zou for technical help; and A.L. Nuttall, S. Neely, C.R. Steele, and A. Fridberger for valuable discussion on an early version of the manuscript. This work was supported by the National Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01 DC04554 to T.R. and R01 DC02368 to P.G.).

Author contributions

T.R. designed and performed the experiments; T.R., W.H. and P.G. analysed the data; T.R. and P.G. wrote the paper.

Additional information

Competing nancial interests The authors declare no competing nancial interests.

Reprints and permission information is available online at http://npg.nature.com/ reprintsandpermissions/

How to cite this article: Ren, T. et al. Measurement of cochlear power gain in the sensitive gerbil ear. Nat. Commun. 2:216 doi: 10.1038/ncomms1226 (2011).

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 2:216 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1226 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications

2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.