Introduction
Peripheral T‐cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (PTCL, NOS) is one entity of the non‐Hodgkin lymphomas referenced in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification . It is a heterogeneous group of nodal and extra‐nodal mature T‐cell lymphomas that do not belong to any of the recognized entities in the T‐cell lymphoma subtypes. Patients with PTCL, NOS have poor prognosis, although they do better than patients with adult T‐cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL). It is reported that a high score for the international prognosis index (IPI) and a large number of transformed cells following histopathological analysis are related to poor prognosis . ATLL is a peripheral T‐cell neoplasm caused by human T‐cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV‐1). Among its four clinical subtypes , acute and lymphoma types show extremely poor prognosis. Clinically, the IPI score is thought to have predictive value for patients with ATLL .
We have previously shown that approximately 70% of patients with acute‐type ATLL have multiple subclones, which are derived from a common original clone . The multiple subclones with accumulated different genomic aberrations were most likely produced in the lymph node as a result of clonal evolution. Our previous study using custom‐made bacterial‐artificial chromosome (BAC) array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) revealed that PTCL, NOS with genomic aberrations resembles lymphoma‐type ATLL not only in its genomic aberration patterns but also in terms of histopathology, cell surface marker, and prognosis. Thus, we demonstrated that a part of PTCL, NOS exhibits similar clinicopathological characteristics to ATLL . In this study, we investigated in detail whether PTCL, NOS with genomic aberrations also has multiple subclones as in ATLL by performing high‐resolution oligo‐array CGH (Agilent Technologies, CA) using a 44000 probe set.
Materials and Methods
PTCL , NOS patients and samples
PTCL, NOS samples of lymph node with genomic aberrations detected by BAC array CGH in our previous study were used for this study . Among the 29 cases with genomic aberrations, 13 were available for 44K high‐resolution array CGH analysis. This study was performed under a protocol approved by the institutional review board of the Aichi Cancer Center. The clinical and pathological characteristics of patients are summarized in Table . Nuclear size was determined as comprising small, medium, large, anaplastic, or pleomorphic nuclei by two expert hematopathologists . The 13 samples analyzed in this study have been proven to be monoclonal by Southern blot analysis as described in the previous report .
Patients information and results of arrayPTCL no. | Age (y.o.) | Sex | IPI | TCR rearrangement | Nuclear size, | Genomic aberrations | Genomic imbalance |
27 | 64 | Male | 3 HI | R | 2 | Positive | Positive |
29 | 76 | Female | 3HI | R | 4 | Positive | Positive |
33 | 70 | Male | 4 HI | R | 5 | Positive | Positive |
35 | 69 | Female | 2 LI | R | 4 | Positive | None |
36 | 43 | Female | N | R | 5 | Positive | Positive |
39 | 48 | Male | 3 HI | R | 4 | Positive | Positive |
43 | 57 | Male | 3 or 4 | R | 5 | Positive | Positive |
44 | 53 | Male | 3 LI | R | 5 | Positive | Positive |
46 | 56 | Male | 2 HI | R | 4 | Positive | Positive |
47 | 46 | Male | 1 L | R | 5 | Positive | Positive |
48 | 79 | Male | 4 HI | R | 5 | Positive | Positive |
50 | 80 | Female | 4 HI | R | 2 | Positive | None |
51 | NA | Female | 2 LI | R | 5 | Positive | Positive |
IPI, International Prognostic Index; PTCL, peripheral T‐cell lymphoma; NA, not available; R, rearrangement; NE, not evaluable; y.o., years old.
3Representations in previous Nakagawa et al. [7] paper were used.
4Numbers with 1–5 indicating small, medium, large, anaplastic, and pleomorphic nuclei, respectively.
Oligo‐array CGH and CGH data analysis
We performed Agilent 44K Whole Human Genome CGH analysis on these 13 samples. Normal human male genomic DNA obtained from a pool of eight normal male peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was used in all experiments as a reference sample. Analysis of the log2 ratio was conducted in accordance with our previous report . Briefly, raw data text files were transferred to the Genomic Workbench v5.0 software (Agilent Technologies) and aberration regions were analyzed. Among these aberrations, we obtained average log2 ratios of regions where aberrations continued over 400 probes and showed a linear average ratio of >0.1 or <−0.1. The log2 ratio imbalance was defined when a patient had a different average log2 ratio for gain or loss regions. Gain regions with a ratio >0.6 and loss regions with a ratio <−1.0 were excluded because they are likely regions with high copy number amplification or homozygous loss.
We also analyzed the existence of multiple subclones in PTCL using previous results evaluated by BAC aCGH . As previously reported, we defined a region of gain or loss as three contiguous probes showing gain (log2 ratio = 0.2–1.0) or loss (log2 ratio = −1.0 to −0.2) in the BAC array CGH . Among these aberrations, we obtained average log2 ratios from regions where aberrations continued over 10 probes.
Statistical analysis
Differences in average log2 ratios and the relationship between pathological findings and the existence of subclones were evaluated using a Welch test and Fisher's exact test, respectively. The correlation between prognosis and the existence of multiple subclones was determined by overall survival (OS). OS was defined as the time (months) from diagnosis to death from any cause, and the estimate of OS distribution was calculated using the Kaplan and Meier method. A P‐value <0.05 was considered statistically significant in these tests.
Microarray data accession number
The microarray data obtained in this study have been submitted to ArrayExpress and the assigned accession number is E‐MTAB‐998.
Results
Existence of multiple subclones in PTCL , NOS
As expected, genomic aberrations were detected by 44K array CGH as previously detected by our custom‐made BAC array CGH in all of the 13 PTCL, NOS samples analyzed (Fig. S1). Eleven (84.6%) of these samples showed log2 ratio imbalances (Table ). Representative cases with log2 ratio imbalances are shown in Figures and . In order to avoid complexity, the two cases in Figure were evaluated by loss regions and the two cases in Figure were evaluated by gain regions. The regions of loss were detected on chromosomes 3, 13, 16, and 17 in Case 36 (Fig. A). The log2 ratios of chromosomes 3 and 13 were −0.61, while those of chromosomes 16 and 17 were −0.51 and −0.33, respectively (Fig. A, arrows). The different log2 ratios suggest a log2 ratio imbalance in this case. Additionally, Figure B shows another case that had a more complex log2 ratio and imbalance.
In Case 33, there are regions of gain on chromosomes 2, 3, 7, and 14 (Fig. A). In this case, the log2 ratio average of 3q was 0.42 (arrowhead), while it was 0.23 (arrows) for other regions. Figure B shows representative genomic profiles of Case 43 with a more complex log2 ratio.
Clonal evolution in PTCL , NOS
As previously demonstrated, the average log2 ratio of aberrant regions reflected the ratio of tumors . In Case 36, all tumor cells have regions of loss on chromosomes 3 and 13. Fifty‐four percent of tumor cells have a region of loss on chromosome 16, and 83% of tumor cells have loss on chromosome 17 (Fig. A). It is therefore speculated that clonal evolution took place as shown in Figure B.
Histopathological features
Seven of the 13 patients had pleomorphic nuclei in tumor cells (Table ). These patients tended to have a log2 ratio imbalance, although it did not reach a significant level (P = 0.192).
Prognostic impact
As only 13 cases could be analyzed in this study, it was difficult to evaluate the relationship between prognosis and the existence of multiple subclones. We therefore used previous results obtained by BAC array CGH for analysis of this relationship in PTCL, NOS . The clinical data of patients analyzed by BAC array CGH are summarized in Table S1 . BAC array CGH consisted of 2304 probes for the genome, while 44K oligo‐array CGH consisted of 44,000 probes. The results of both arrays were compared and found to be well correlated (Fig. S2) . We evaluated the log2 ratio imbalance using the average log2 ratio of aberrations that continued over 10 probes for BAC array CGH. As a result, 12 of 29 PTCL, NOS samples had multiple subclones (Table S1). The OS of cases with multiple subclones was significantly inferior to that of cases without subclones in PTCL, NOS with genomic aberrations (Fig. ) (P = 0.0279).
Discussion
In this study, we found that the majority of patients with PTCL, NOS with genomic aberrations had multiple subclones in their lymph nodes. The majority of patients with ATLL also had multiple subclones in their lymph nodes . The identification of multiple subclones in lymph nodes of PTCL, NOS as found in ATLL may further indicate the similarity between these diseases. It is therefore difficult to distinguish these two categories when HTLV‐1 information is not available.
We detected the existence of subclones based on log2 ratio data. Both gain and loss regions are useful for the evaluation. Normal cells can make the absolute value of the log2 ratio lower, although they do not produce a log2 ratio imbalance. Thus, log2 ratio imbalances in cases that have been shown to be of monoclonal origin as identified by Southern blot analyses indicate the existence of multiple subclones. The fact that the log2 ratio average of aberrant regions reflects the ratio of tumors can help us follow the progression process of tumor cells . For example, we could speculate that clonal evolutions in Case 36 took place as shown in Figure B on the basis of the log2 ratio imbalance and all of the subclones exist at diagnosis.
In this study, we found that samples with pleomorphic nuclei tended to have multiple subclones. It remains to be explored whether PTCL, NOS with a log2 ratio imbalance reflects the morphological features that resemble ATLL lymph node legions. The data analyzed by BAC array CGH were also useful for the detection of subclones in PTCL, NOS (Fig. S2). These results indicate the possibility that the existence of multiple subclones was associated with poor prognosis.
In the current WHO classification, PTCL, NOS represents a histologically and clinically heterogeneous group. Several studies have tried to categorize PTCL, NOS and suggested the presence of distinct subgroups . It is known that both ATLL and PTCL, NOS with genomic aberrations express CC chemokine receptor (CCR) 4, while PTCL, NOS without genomic aberrations expresses CCR3. Anti‐CCR4 antibody therapy for ATLL has now been applied to CCR4‐positive PTCL, NOS . Thus, our finding of the presence of multiple subclones in PTCL, NOS and ATLL suggests that these two disease categories partly share common clinicopathological features.
Recent whole‐genome sequencing investigation of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has revealed two possible scenarios . One scenario indicates that the same original clone exists at diagnosis, while the other suggests that multiple subclones exist that were derived from the original clones with new mutations. At the relapse state after chemotherapies, one of these clones in tumor cells at diagnosis expanded. The same scenario may work in patients with PTCL, NOS with genomic aberrations and ATLL. It would therefore be important to analyze the relapsed samples of these diseases in detail. Thus, our finding of the presence of multiple subclones in PTCL, NOS and ATLL would be a great help in revealing the mechanism of lymphoma development, progression, and drug resistance in these diseases.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Harumi Kato and Kiyoko Yamamoto for discussions and encouragement throughout this study. The outstanding technical assistance of Kyoko Hirano, Seiko Sato, and Yumiko Kasugai is very much appreciated. This work was supported by a grant‐in‐aid for the second term comprehensive 10‐year strategy for cancer control from the Ministry of Health and Welfare; a grant‐in‐aid for scientific research from The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology; and a grant‐in‐aid for scientific research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
Conflict of Interest
None declared.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2012. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Peripheral
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Division of Molecular Medicine, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan; Department of Cancer Genetics, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
2 Division of Molecular Medicine, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan; Hematology and Oncology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan
3 Division of Molecular Medicine, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan
4 Division of Molecular Medicine, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan; Third Department of Internal Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
5 Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Kurume University, Fukuoka, Japan