Fetal RHD Genotyping Using Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis of Cell-Free Fetal DNA in Pregnancy of RhD Negative Women in South of Iran

Headnote

Abstract

Background: Maternal-fetal RhD antigen incompatibility causes approximately 50% of clinically significant alloimmunization cases. The routine use of prophylactic anti-D immunoglobulin has dramatically reduced hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Recently, fetal RHD genotyping in RhD negative pregnant women has been suggested for appropriate use of anti-D immunoglobulin antenatal prophylaxis and decrease unnecessary prenatal interventions.

Materials and Methods: In this prospective cohort study, in order to develop a reliable and non-invasive method for fetal RHD genotyping, cell free fetal DNA (cffDNA) was extracted from maternal plasma. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for detection of RHD exons 7, 5, 10 and intron 4 was performed and the results were compared to the serological results of cord blood cells as the gold standard method. SRY gene and hypermethylated Ras-association domain family member 1 (RASSF1A) gene were used to confirm the presence of fetal DNA in male and female fetuses, respectively.

Results: Out of 48 fetuses between 8 and 32 weeks (wks) of gestational age (GA), we correctly diagnosed 45 cases (93.75%) of RHD positive fetuses and 2 cases (4.16%) of the RHD negative one. Exon 7 was amplified in one sample, while three other RHD gene sequences were not detected; the sample was classified as inconclusive, and the RhD serology result after birth showed that the fetus was RhD-negative.

Conclusion: Our results showed high accuracy of the qPCR method using cffDNA for fetal RHD genotyping and implicate on the efficiency of this technique to predict the competence of anti-D immunoglobulin administration.

Keywords: Prenatal Diagnosis, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Cell-Free Fetal DNA

Introduction

Rh is systematically the most polymorphic blood group and clinically the most important group after ABO. RH complex is formed by two highly homologous RHD and RHCE genes, both of which are located on chromosome 1, and consist of 10 exons (1). Although complete deletion of RHD gene is found to be dominant in Caucasian D-negatives, there is a large diversity in other populations especially in Japanese and African blacks (2). About 66% of the RhD-negative African population carry a non-functional RHD gene named RHD pseudogene (RHD ?), and 15% of RhD-negative Africans have a special rearrangement of RHD and RHCE genes, named the hybrid allele RHD-CE-Ds (3, 4).

The D-negative phenotype has a wide range frequency in different ethnic populations. With regards to literatures, the frequency of RhD-negative is 3-7% in Africans,15-20% in Caucasians and less than 1% (0.3-0.5) in the far east (5). In a study conducted in Fars province of Iran, the frequencies of RhD negative phenotype were 13.05 and 9.62% in 1982 and 2001, respectively (6). Maternal-fetal RhD antigen incompatibility causes approximately 50% of clinically significant maternal alloimmunization cases. Since1960s, the routine use of prophylactic anti-D immunoglobulin has dramatically decreased the hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (7). Fetal RHD genotyping in RhD negative antenatal women can be effective for the appropriate use of anti-D antenatal prophylaxis, facilitating to reduce unnecessary prenatal interventions. In an immunized pregnant woman, the prediction of fetal RhD blood group is helpful for the appropriate management of the pregnancy and avoiding unnecessary invasive tests. At the same time, this reduces the concerns about the pregnancy outcome (8-11). For many years, prenatal diagnosis has been performed by chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and amniocentesis. These invasive tests increase the risk of feto-maternal hemorrhage and enhance the severity of alloimunization. In addition, performing these tests before 11 weeks (wks) of pregnancy is not recommended. Although CVS provides the result in the first trimester, it is associated with higher risk of miscarriage than amniocentesis: 1in 100-200 vs. 1 in 200-400, respectively (12-14).

Lo et al. (15) suggested the existence of cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) in the maternal plasma. Their hypothesis provided a new possibility for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis. Bianchi proposed three possibilities for cffDNA origin: hematopoietic cells, direct feto-maternal transfer of DNA molecules, and trophoblastic cells (16). Detection of cffDNA in anembryonic pregnancies demonstrated that the placental tissue is the main source of cffDNA in maternal circulation (17).

Detection of low fetal DNA concentration in maternal plasma (3% in early to 6% in late pregnancy) and distinguishing cffDNA from maternal DNA are the two major challenges that limit the use of cffDNA for non-invasive prenatal tests (NIPT) (18, 19).

Different methods have been used to confirm the presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma, in previous studies. The most common system is to trace SRY sequence in maternal plasma; it also provides the possibility of determining the sex of the fetus, but this strategy is not applicable for female fetuses (4). Another possible method is an evaluation of polymorphic microsatellites and insertion/deletion markers in maternal plasma and buffy coat. Failure to detect a specific allele in maternal buffy coat together with its presence in maternal plasma is the basis for diagnosis. Such methods are not able to provide sufficient information and also have low sensitivity (20, 21). In a recent method, introduced as a universal marker, tracking is performed based on different methylation of the RASSF1A gene in maternal and fetal DNA (8, 22). The aim of our study was to set up a novel reliable protocol for non-invasive determination of fetal RhD status using cffDNA extracted from maternal plasma.

Materials and Methods

In this prospective cohort study, the plasma samples were collected from 50 RhD-negative women with singleton pregnancy at Hafez Hospital, Shiraz, Iran. Gestational age was between 8 and 32 wks, based on the last menstrual period (LMP). 10 blood samples were taken at 8-16 wks of gestation age (GA), 35 samples at 17-28 wks and 5 samples at ≥28 wks of GA. The participants were healthy women without any serious pregnancy complications, and their husbands were serologically RhD-positive.

Sample preparation

Peripheral blood samples were collected in a 6 ml tube containing Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA, INTERLAB Laboratory Products, Turkey) and processed within 6 hours. The samples were centrifuged at 2000 ×g for 10 minutes to separate the plasma, which were subsequently centrifuged at 3000 ×g for 10 minutes. The supernatants were then separated and stored at -80°C for further processing.

DNA extraction

QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was used to extract cffDNA from plasma with minor modification. DNA was isolated from 200 μl of plasma according to manufacturer's instruction, but eluted in a final volume of 30 μl Buffer AE (INTERLAB Laboratory Products, Turkey). To minimize the risk of contamination, DNA was isolated under laminar airflow and aerosol-resistant tips were used.

Real-time polymerase chain reaction

Real-time PCR was performed on Rotor-Gene Q (Qiagen, USA) using SYBR Green Master Mix (2x Maxima SYBR Green/ROX qPCR Master Mix, Thermo Scientific, Lithuania). To determine the fetal RhD status, the presence of RHD exons 5, 7, 10 and intron 4 were evaluated. The AlleleID 7.5 primer software (PREMIER Biosoft, USA) was employed to design SRY primers using the SRY gene sequence obtained from GenBank nucleotide database (accession number: L08063). All other primers were selected according to previous studies presented in the Table 1 (23-28).

All quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) reactions were performed in a final volume of 25 μl containing 5 μl of DNA. The final concentration of primers in each qPCR reaction was 300 nmol.L-1. The qPCR cycling condition was two-step holding temperatures: 50°C for 2 minutes, 95°C for 10 minutes followed by 50 cycles of 94°C for 60 seconds, 55°C for 60 seconds, and 72°C for 60 seconds. Two replicates were performed for the tested gene.

The fetuses were labeled either as a D-positive, when all RHD target sequences (exons 5, 10, 7 and intron 4) were properly amplified, or D-negative, when no amplification signal was detected. Fetuses were predicted to be inconclusive when one, two or three specific RHD sequences were amplified. The cycle threshold (Ct) values of 30-42 were considered positive.

Quality control

10-fold serial dilutions were prepared to determine the sensitivity of the test, the quality of primers, and qPCR reagents using DNA extracted from plasma of a male human. To rule out the possible contamination, positive controls, negative controls and no-template controls (NTCs) were also included in each PCR run, using sterile H2O. The β-globin gene, as a reference gene, was tested to confirm the presence of cell free DNA (cfDNA).

Validating presence of the cell-free fetal DNA in RhD-negative female fetuses

SRY gene was used for all samples to confirm the presence of cffDNA. In the predicated samples as RhD negative female, the presence of hypermethylated RASSF1A gene was also tested. Investigations show that the RASSF1 gene promoter is hypermethylated in DNA with placenta origin, but hypomethylated in maternal DNA (29). The cfDNA samples were initially treated with BstUI, a methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme. At this experiment, digestion reactions contained 0.5 μg DNA and 5 U BstUI restriction enzyme (New England Biolabs, England) were incubated at 60°C for 2 hours followed subsequently by adding to qPCR reactions. Each run included three different controls: undigested non-pregnant control (DNA from a non-pregnant woman), digested non-pregnant control (DNA from a non-pregnant woman), and undigested pregnant control (DNA obtained from a pregnant woman).

RhD phenotype of newborns

Blood samples were collected at birth from cord blood. The direct agglutination test was carried out with anti-RhD reagents (CinnaGene, Iran). The concordance of test was determined by comparing the data from the prenatal genetic tests with serological results obtained from cord blood.

Statistical analysis

The this study, simple random sampling (SRS) method was used to collect clinical samples. As analytical values, limit of detection in qPCR test in clinical samples was defined. Using serology and neonate sex, as two gold standard test to respectively confirm RHD and SRY gene results, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and concordance were reported. Roc curve analysis was employed and P value>0.05 was reported as statistically significant level. All the statistical analyses were performed by SPSS, version 16.0.(Ltd, Hong Kong)

Ethical considerations

All procedures for this study were approved by the Ethics Committee (ec-p-90-3311) of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (Shiraz, Iran). Informed consent was obtained from pregnant women who participated in this research project.

Results

Non-invasive prenatal determination of fetal RhD status, as well as gender analysis, was performed in 48 cases of RhD-negative pregnant women, while their husbands were RhD-positive. The mean gestational age was 26 wks at the time of blood sampling (ranging from 8 to 32 wks). Serological tests were performed on the cord blood sample, and the fetal gender was confirmed after delivery.

The minimum detection level of DNA in clinical samples was 4.2 (pg/μl). qPCR was performed on the samples in duplicates and the results were interpreted as positive, provided detection of the specific amplicons in both replicates.

Analysis of the standard curves of qPCR demonstrated a wide dynamic range and high efficiency for the investigated genes (Fig.1). The Ct value ranges in maternal plasma of clinical samples are presented in the Table 2. Figure 2 represents the qPCR results of RHD exon 7 in the controls and clinical samples.

Analysis of two fetuses were not terminated and they were excluded from our samples due to abortion and hydrops fetalis. Following the amplification of all RHD gene target sequences, the fetuses were classified in different RhD positive groups. Out of 48 samples, the results of 45 cases (93.75%) were determined as RhD-positive, and 2 cases (4.16%) were detected as RhD-negative. Exon 7 was amplified in one sample (2.08%) while no signal was determined for the other three RHD gene fragments. The results obtained from this sample were considered to be inconclusive (Table 3) while serologic finding distinguished the fetus as Rh negative.

Serology of the cord blood indicated 45 RhD positive neonates (93.75%) and 3 RhD negative ones (6.25%). Based on a prenatal test for SRY gene, 5 cases (10.41%) were predicted to be male and 43 cases (89.58%) female (Table 3). There was complete concordance between SRY qPCR results and neonate gender after delivery. The Diagnostic concordance of the test was 100% for the SRY gene and 97.91% for the RHD gene (Table 4).

Three samples out of the 48 showed negative qPCR result for RHD and SRY genes. In order to confirm the presence of fetal DNA, RASSF1A qPCR was performed after methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme digestion. The obtained result confirmed the presence of cffDNA in all three samples.

Discussion

Our findings confirmed the reliability of non-invasive prenatal testing to predict the fetal RhD status. This prediction can be helpful to determine the necessity of close fetal monitoring and the need of more invasive procedures in isoimmunized mothers. Another positive outcome of fetal RHD prediction is preventing unnecessary anti-D immunoglobulin injection in non- isoimmunized mothers with RhD negative fetuses. A study, performed in UK, showed that 38% of RhD-negative pregnant women bear RhD-negative fetus. Therefore, employing non-invasive prenatal test can reduce the cost of the health care system and risks of viral infection pertaining to anti-D administration (30).

Based on previous experiences, there are several important steps in developing NIPT including: blood sample preparation (31), cffDNA extraction (32) and confirming presence of cffDNA (33). Additionally, regarding the reported genetic diversity at RH system within different ethnic groups, selection of RHD gene sequences for qPCR test and defining specific rules for interpretation of genotype are inevitable (34). Therefore, we developed a novel non-invasive prenatal diagnostic test using cffDNA in our laboratory, to evaluate the fetal RhD status within pregnant populations obtained from south of Iran. Previous studies have recommended the use of at least 2 RHD specific regions to avoid false positive results, although using multi-sequences to trace RHD diversity have recently become more widespread. In this study, all samples were tested for the presence of RHD exon 10 and intron 4 to distinguish between two homologous RHD and RHCE genes. In addition, exon 5 analysis was applied to identify the point mutations leading to RHD?. Moreover, in order to cover different types of partial D categories, especially DVI partial D as the most common hybrid RHD-CE-Ds, selected areas of RHD gene (intron 4, exons 5, 7 and 10) were included (35-38).

In this study, the false negative and false positive results were not observed, except in one sample that RHD exon 7 was amplified, while intron 4, exon 5 and exon 10 did not identify. This case was classified in the inconclusive group, and serology results showed the fetus as RhD negative. The possible cause of these findings was an RHD variant gene in the mother or fetus, but there was no access to maternal or newborn DNA for subsequent analysis. Comparison of three previously published studies (39, 35, 13) showed similar findings to our results.

Although the presence of fetal DNA was not confirmed in most of previously published studies (40, 41), our strategy was using SRY gene for all the samples and in cases that were negative for SRY and RHD genes, hypermethylation of RASSF1 gene by BstUI restriction enzyme was evaluated. In order to avoid false-negative results followed by mismanagement of the pregnancy, analyzing RASSF1A gene is essential for the cases with RHD negative female fetuses.

Conclusion

In this study, diagnostic concordance of the predicted fetal gender (100%) and RhD status (97.91%) from free fetal DNA in the maternal plasma of 48 RHD negative women were obtained. With regards to observing no different Rh variants in this experiment, a large study from different region of our country- Iran- is suggested. Thus, this study can be helpful to find possible RHD variants as well as the cause of inconclusive cases. Conducting larger-scale studies will be the first step in establishing a guideline for running non-invasive RHD genotype testing on all RHD negative mothers in Iran.

Acknowledgements

The present article was based on the biotechnology M.Sc. thesis, and was financially supported by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences grants, (grant No. 90-10-45-3311). We highly appreciate laboratory and midwifery staffs of the Hafez Hospital for their eager cooperation and also Mr Faramarz Aminlari for editing our manuscript .There are no relevant conflicts of interest.

Sidebar

Citation: Moezi L, Keshavarz Z, Ranjbaran R, Aboualizadeh F, Behbahani AB, Abdullahi M, Ramezani A, Samsami A, Sharifzadeh S. Fetal RHD genotyping using real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis of cell-free fetal DNA in pregnancy of RhD negative women in south of Iran. Int J Fertil Steril. 2016; 10(1): 62-70.

References

References

1.Daniels G. The molecular genetics of blood group polymorphism. Transpl immunol. 2005; 14(3-4): 143-153.

2.Avent ND, Martin PG, Armstrong-Fisher SS, Liu W, Finning KM, Maddocks D, et al. Evidence of genetic diversity underlying Rh D-, weak D (Du), and partial D phenotypes as determined by multiplex polymerase chain reaction analysis of the RHD gene. Blood. 1997; 89(7): 2568-2577.

3.Gunel T, Kalelioglu I, Gedikbasi A, Ermis H, Aydinli K. Detection of fetal RHD pseudogene (RHDΨ) and hybrid RHD-CE-Ds from RHD-negative pregnant women with a free DNA fetal kit. Genet Mol Res. 2011; 10(4): 2653-2657.

4.Dovc-Drnovsek T, Klemenc P, Toplak N, Blejec T, Bricl I, Rozman P. Reliable determination of fetal RhD status by RHD genotyping from maternal plasma. Transfus Med Hemother. 2013; 40(1): 37-43.

5.Singleton BK, Green CA, Avent ND, Martin PG, Smart E, Daka A, et al. The presence of an RHD pseudogene containing a 37 base pair duplication and a nonsense mutation in Africans with the Rh D-negative blood group phenotype. Blood. 2000; 95(1): 12-18.

6.Pourfathollah AA, Oody A, Honarkaran N. Geographical distribution of ABO and Rh (D) blood groups among Iranian blood donors in the year 1361 (1982) as compared with that of the year 1380 (2001). Scientific Journal of Iran Blood Transfus Organ. 2004; 1(1): 11-17.

7.Perry GH, Xue Y, Smith RS, Meyer WK, Çaliskan M, Yanez-Cuna O, et al. Evolutionary genetics of the human Rh blood group system. Hum Genet. 2012; 131(7): 1205-1216.

8.Hyland CA, Gardener GJ, Davies H, Ahvenainen M, Flower RL, Irwin D, et al. Evaluation of non-invasive prenatal RHD genotyping of the fetus. Med J Aust. 2009; 191(1): 21-25.

9.Gautier E, Benachi A, Giovangrandi Y, Ernault P, Olivi M, Gaillon T, et al. Fetal RhD genotyping by maternal serum analysis: a two-year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 192(3): 666-669.

10.Tiblad E, Wikman AT, Ajne G, Blanck A, Jansson Y, Karlsson A, et al. Targeted routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis in the prevention of RhD immunisation-outcome of a new antenatal screening and prevention program. PLoS One. 2013; 8(8): e70984.

11.Faas BH, Beuling EA, Christiaens GC, von dem Borne AE, van der Schoot CE. Detection of fetal RHD-specific sequences in maternal plasma. Lancet. 1998; 352(9135): 1196.

12.Rouillac-Le Sciellour C, Puillandre P, Gillot R, Baulard C, Métral S, Le Van Kim C, et al. Large-scale pre-diagnosis study of fetal RHD genotyping by PCR on plasma DNA from RhD-negative pregnant women. Mol Diagn. 2004; 8(1): 23-31.

13.Bombard AT, Akolekar R, Farkas DH, VanAgtmael AL, Aquino F, Oeth P, et al. Fetal RHD genotype detection from circulating cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma in non-sensitized RhD negative women. Prenat Diagns. 2011; 31(8): 802-808.

14.Swanson A, Sehnert AJ, Bhatt S. Non-invasive prenatal testing: technologies, clinical assays and implementation strategies for women's healthcare practitioners. Curr Genet Med Rep. 2013; 1(2): 113-121.

15.Lo Y, Corbetta N, Chamberlain PF, Rai V, Sargent IL, Redman CW, et al. Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum. Lancet. 1997; 350(9076): 485-487.

16.Bianchi DW. Circulating fetal DNA: its origin and diagnostic potential-a review. Placenta. 2004; 25: S93-S101.

17.Alberry M, Maddocks D, Jones M, Abdel Hadi M, Abdel-Fattah S, Avent N, et al. Free fetal DNA in maternal plasma in anembryonic pregnancies: confirmation that the origin is the trophoblast. Prenat Diagn. 2007; 27(5): 415-418.

18.Huang DJ, Zimmermann BG, Holzgreve W, Hahn S. Improvement of Methods for the Isolation of Cell-Free Fetal DNA from Maternal Plasma. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006; 1075(1): 308-312.

19.Lo YM. Fetal DNA in maternal plasma: biology and diagnostic applications. Clin Chem. 2000; 46(12): 1903-1906.

20.Tang NL, Leung TN, Zhang J, Lau TK, Lo YM. Detection of fetal-derived paternally inherited X-chromosome polymorphisms in maternal plasma. Clin Chem. 1999; 45(11): 2033-2035.

21.Page-Christiaens GC, Bossers B, VAN DER Schoot CE, DE Haas M. Use of bi-allelic insertion/deletion polymorphisms as a positive control for fetal genotyping in maternal blood. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006; 1075(1): 123-129.

22.Zejskova L, Jancuskova T, Kotlabova K, Doucha J, Hromadnikova I. Feasibility of fetal-derived hypermethylated RASSF1A sequence quantification in maternal plasm-Next step toward reliable non-invasive prenatal diagnostics. Exp Mol Pathol. 2010; 89(3): 241-247.

23.Brojer E, Zupanska B, Guz K, Orzinska A, Kalinska A. Noninvasive determination of fetal RHD status by examination of cell-free DNA in maternal plasma. Transfusion. 2005; 45(9): 1473-1480.

24.Hromadnikova I, Houbova B, Hridelova D, Voslarova S, Kofer J, Komrska V, et al. Replicate real-time PCR testing of DNA in maternal plasma increases the sensitivity of non-invasive fetal sex determination. Prenat Diagn. 2003; 23(3): 235-238.

25.Finning KM, Martin PG, Soothill PW, Avent ND. Prediction of fetal D status from maternal plasma: introduction of a new noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping service. Transfusion. 2002; 42(8): 1079-1085.

26.Legler TJ, Lynen R, Maas JH, Pindur G, Kulenkampff D, Suren A, et al. Prediction of fetal Rh D and Rh CcEe phenotype from maternal plasma with real-time polymerase chain reaction. Transfusion Apher Sci. 2002; 27(3): 217-223.

27.Lo YM, Hjelm NM, Fidler C, Sargent IL, Murphy MF, Chamberlain PF, et al. Prenatal Diagnosis of fetal RhD status by molecular analysis of maternal plasma. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339(24): 1734-1738.

28.Chan KA, Ding C, Gerovassili A, Yeung SW, Chiu RW, Leung TN, et al. Hypermethylated RASSF1A in maternal plasma: a universal fetal DNA marker that improves the reliability of noninvasive prenatal diagnosis. Clin Chem. 2006; 52(12): 2211-2218.

29.White HE, Dent CL, Hall VJ, Crolla JA, Chitty LS. Evaluation of a novel assay for detection of the fetal marker RASSF1A: facilitating improved diagnostic reliability of noninvasive prenatal diagnosis. PLoS One. 2012; 7(9): e45073.

30.Finning K, Martin P, Daniels G. The use of maternal plasma for prenatal RhD blood group genotyping. Methods Mol Biol. 2009; 496: 143-157.

31.Clausen FB, Jakobsen TR, Rieneck K, Krog GR, Nielsen LK, Tabor A, et al. Pre-analytical conditions in non-invasive prenatal testing of cell-free fetal RHD. PLoS One. 2013; 8(10): e76990.

32.Legler TJ, Liu Z, Mavrou A, Finning K, Hromadnikova I, Galbiati S, et al. Workshop report on the extraction of foetal DNA from maternal plasma. Prenat Diagn. 2007; 27(9): 824-829.

33.Liao GJ, Chiu RW, Lo YM. Prenatal assessment of fetal chromosomal and genetic disorders through maternal plasma DNA analysis. Pathology. 2012; 44(2): 69-72.

34.Avent ND. High variability of the RH locus in different ethnic backgrounds. Transfusion. 2005; 45(3): 293-294.

35.Wang XD, Wang BL, Ye SL, Liao YQ, Wang LF, He ZM. Non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping via real-time PCR of foetal DNA from Chinese RhD-negative maternal plasma. Eur J Clin Invest. 2009; 39(7): 607-617.

36.Rouillac-Le Sciellour C, Sérazin V, Brossard Y, Oudin O, Le Van Kim C, Colin Y, et al. Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping from maternal plasma: Use of a new developed Free DNA Fetal Kit RhD. Transfusion Clin Biol. 2007; 14(6): 572-527.

37.Hromadnikova I, Vechetova L, Vesela K, Benesova B, Doucha J, Kulovany E, et al. Non-invasive fetal RHD exon 7 and exon 10 genotyping using real-time PCR testing of fetal DNA in maternal plasma. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2005; 20(4): 275-280.

38.Wagner FF, Frohmajer A, Flegel WA. RHD positive haplotypes in D negative Europeans. BMC Genet. 2001; 2: 10.

39.Oliveira J, Osorio N, Rocha J, Cruz B, Figueiredo J, Armando C, et al. Fetal RHD and RHCE genotyping in plasma of Rh negative pregnant women. IFBLS. 2012; 1(2): 50-58.

40.Van der Schoot CE, Soussan AA, Koelewijn J, Bonsel G, Paget-Christiaens LG, de Haas M. Non-invasive antenatal RHD typing. Transfus Clin Biol. 2006; 13(1-2): 53-57.

41.Clausen FB, Christiansen M, Steffensen R, Jorgensen S, Nielsen C, Jakobsen MA, et al. Report of the first nationally implemented clinical routine screening for fetal RHD in D- pregnant women to ascertain the requirement for antenatal RhD prophylaxis. Transfusion. 2012; 52(4): 752-758.