Content area
Full Text
This research investigates the conceptualization and application of the fam ily fundamental interpersonal relations orientation (FIRO) model to an at-risk family population. The relationships between the family FIRO domains of inclusion, control, and intimacy and family functioning indices, as measured by the Family Assessment Device (FAD) subscales, were explored. Art at-risk family population (N = 43 primary caretakers) was assessed at four time intervals, using an ex post facto design with multiple linear regression model testing. The results indicated significant relationships between FIRO model domains and FAD subscales. A case example further explored the application of the fancily FIRO model with at risk families.
In 1984, Doherty and Colangelo proposed the use of the family fundamental interpersonal relations orientation (FIRO) model as a way to better understand relationship patterns in families. The Family FIRO model evolved from their modification of Schutz's (1958) FIRO theory concerning group interactions. The foundation of the family FIRO model was based on how families organized and interacted around inclusion, control, and intimacy needs. These three relationship needs domains were theorized as being the templates for all family interactional processes.
The inclusion (1) needs domain refers to interactions in the family that concern membership and organization. In order for family members to satisfy inclusion relationship needs, they must have an organized structure, connectedness, and a shared belief system. Structure addresses how a family interacts around issues of roles and boundaries. Connectedness focuses on the ability of parents to nurture their children and the commitment of family members for each other. Having a shared belief system allows family memhers to interact in ways that support common values and a shared world view.
The control (C) needs domain refers to family interactional processes that reveal how power and influence impact conflict and conflict resolution in families. Relationship needs are usually met in the control domain with dominating, reactive, or collaborative types of interactions. The family's management of various content issues such as discipline, role negotiations, and problem solving show how satisfactorily control relationship issues are beg ins met.
A family's relationship intimacy (I) needs are met through interactions that allow members to share their feelings and vulnerabilities with one another. Satisfying relationship needs in this domain is characterized by mutual, emotional closeness....