Diet reveals links between morphology and foraging in a cryptic temperate reef fish

Abstract

Predators select prey so as to maximize energy and minimize manipulation time. In order to reduce prey detection and handling time, individuals must actively select their foraging space (microhabitat) and populations exhibit morphologies that are best suited for capturing locally available prey. We explored how variation in diet correlates with habitat type, and how these factors influence key morphological structures (mouth gape, eye diameter, fin length, fin area, and pectoral fin ratio) in a common microcarnivorous cryptic reef fish species, the triplefin Helcogrammoides cunninghami. In a mensurative experiment carried out at six kelp-dominated sites, we observed considerable differences in diet along 400 km of the Chilean coast coincident with variation in habitat availability and prey distributions. Triplefins preferred a single prey type (bivalves or barnacles) at northern sites, coincident with a low diversity of foraging habitats. In contrast, southern sites presented varied and heterogeneous habitats, where triplefin diets were more diverse and included amphipods, decapods, and cumaceans. Allometry-corrected results indicated that some morphological structures were consistently correlated with different prey items. Specifically, large mouth gape was associated with the capture of highly mobile prey such as decapods, while small mouth gape was more associated with cumaceans and copepods. In contrast, triplefins that capture sessile prey such as hydroids tend to have larger eyes. Therefore, morphological structures co-vary with habitat selection and prey usage in this species. Our study shows how an abundant generalist reef fish exhibits variable feeding morphologies in response to the distribution of potential habitats and prey throughout its range.

REFERENCES Ackerman, J. D., Sim, B., Nichols, S. J., & Claudi, R. (1994). A review of the early life history of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha): Comparisons with marine bivalves. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 72, 1169–1179. https://doi.org/10.1139/z94-157 Anderson, M. J. (2001). A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology, 26, 32–46. Angel, A., & Ojeda, F. P. (2001). Structure and trophic organization of subtidal fish assemblages on the northern Chilean coast: The effect of habitat complexity. Marine Ecology-Progress Series, 217, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps217081 Bellwood, D. R., & Wainwright, P. C. (2001). Locomotion in labrid fishes: Implications for habitat use and cross-shelf biogeography on the Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs, 20, 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003380100156 Binning, S. A., & Roche, D. G. (2015). Water flow and fin shape polymorphism in coral reef fishes. Ecology, 96, 828–839. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-0426.1 Connell, S. D. (2003). Negative effects overpower the positive of kelp to exclude invertebrates from the understorey community. Oecologia, 137, 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1312-6 Connell, S. D., & Irving, A. D. (2008). Integrating ecology with biogeography using landscape characteristics: A case study of subtidal habitat across continental Australia. Journal of Biogeography, 35, 1608–1621. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.2008.35.issue-9 Feary, D. A., Wellenreuther, M., & Clements, K. D. (2009). Trophic ecology of New Zealand triplefin fishes (Family Tripterygiidae). Marine Biology, 156, 1703–1714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-009-1205-2 Ferry, L. A., & Cailliet, G. M. (1996). Sample size and data analysis: Are we characterizing and comparing diet properly? In D. MacKinlay, & K. Shearer (Eds.), Feeding ecology and nutrition in fish (pp. 71–80). San Francisco, CA: International Congress of the Biology of Fishes, American Fisheries Society. Ferry-Graham, L. A., Bolnick, D. I., & Wainwright, P. C. (2002). Using functional morphology to examine the ecology and evolution of specialization. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 42, 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/42.2.265 Ferry-Graham, L. A., Wainwright, P. C., & Bellwood, D. R. (2001). Prey capture in long-jawed butterflyfishes (Chaetodontidae): The functional basis of novel feeding habits. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 256, 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(00)00312-9 Fitzpatrick, S., Gerberich, J., Kronenberger, J., Angeloni, L., & Funk, W. (2015). Locally adapted traits maintained in the face of high gene flow. Ecology Letters, 18, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.2014.18.issue-1 Flaxman, S. M., & Lou, Y. (2009). Tracking prey or tracking the prey's resource? Mechanisms of movement and optimal habitat selection by predators. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 256, 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.09.024 Fortin, D., Beyer, H. L., Boyce, M. S., Smith, D. W., Duchesne, T., & Mao, J. S. (2005). Wolves influence elk movements: Behavior shapes a trophic cascade in Yellowstone National Park. Ecology, 86, 1320–1330. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0953 Fulton, C. J., & Bellwood, D. R. (2005). Wave-induced water motion and the functional implications for coral reef fish assemblages. Limnology and Oceanography, 50, 255–264. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2005.50.1.0255 Fulton, C. J., Bellwood, D. R., & Wainwright, P. C. (2001). The relationship between swimming ability and habitat use in wrasses (Labridae). Marine Biology, 139, 25–33. Goatley, C. H. R., & Bellwood, D. R. (2009). Morphological structure in a reef fish assemblage. Coral Reefs, 28, 449–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-009-0477-9 Goecker, M. E., & Kåll, S. E. (2003). Grazing preferences of marine isopods and amphipods on three prominent algal species of the Baltic Sea. Journal of Sea Research, 50, 309–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2003.04.003 Hammond, J. I., Luttbeg, B., & Sih, A. (2007). Predator and prey space use: Dragonflies and tadpoles in an interactive game. Ecology, 88, 1525–1535. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1236 Hegrenes, S. (2001). Diet-induced phenotypic plasticity of feeding morphology in the orangespotted sunfish, Lepomis humilis. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 10, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0633.2001.100105.x Holbrook, S. J., & Schmitt, R. J. (1984). Experimental analyses of patch selection by foraging black surfperch (Embiotoca jacksoni Agazzi). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 79, 39–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(84)90029-7 Holbrook, S. J., Schmitt, R. J., & Ambrose, R. F. (1990). Biogenic habitat structure and characteristics of temperate reef fish assemblages. Australian Journal of Ecology, 15, 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.1990.15.issue-4 Horn, M. H., & Ferry-Graham, L. A. (2006). Feeding mechanisms and trophic interactions. In I. G. Allen, D. J. Pondella, & M. H. Horn (Eds.), The ecology of marine fishes: California and adjacent waters (pp. 387–410). Berkeley, CA: University of California. Huckins, C. J. F. (1997). Functional linkages among morphology, feeding performance, diet, and competitive ability in molluscivorous sunfish. Ecology, 78, 2401–2414. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[2401:FLAMFP]2.0.CO;2 Hynes, H. B. N. (1950). The food of fresh-water sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus and Pygosteus pungitius), with a review of methods used in studies of the food of fishes. Journal of Animal Ecology, 19, 36–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/1570 Hyslop, E. J. (1980). Stomach contents analysis- a review of methods. Journal of Fish Biology, 17, 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.1980.17.issue-4 Iwasa, Y. (1982). Vertical migration of zooplankton: A game between predator and prey. The American Naturalist, 120, 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1086/283980 Job, S. D., & Bellwood, D. R. (2000). Light sensitivity in larval fishes: Implications for vertical zonation in the pelagic zone. Limnology and Oceanography, 45, 362–371. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2000.45.2.0362 Kotrschal, K., & Thomson, D. A. (1986). Feeding patterns in eastern tropical Pacific blennioid fishes (Teleostei: Tripterygiidae, Labrisomidae, Chaenopsidae, Blenniidae). Oecologia, 70, 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379499 Krebs, C. J. (1999). Ecological methodology. San Francisco, CA: Benjamin Cummings. Langerhans, R. B. (2009). Trade-off between steady and unsteady swimming underlies predator-driven divergence in Gambusia affinis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 22, 1057–1075. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.2009.22.issue-5 Liem, K. F., & Sanderson, S. L. (1986). The pharyngeal jaw apparatus of labrid fishes: A functional morphological perspective. Journal of Morphology, 187, 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4687 Lleonart, J., Salat, J., & Torres, G. J. (2000). Removing allometric effects of body size in morphological analysis. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 205, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2000.2043 MacArthur, R. H., & Pianka, E. R. (1966). On optimal use of a patchy environment. The American Naturalist, 100, 603–609. https://doi.org/10.1086/282454 Melville, A. J., & Connell, S. D. (2001). Experimental effects of kelp canopies on subtidal coralline algae. Austral Ecology, 26, 102–108. Palma, Á. T., & Ojeda, F. P. (2002). Abundance, distribution and feeding patterns of a temperate reef fish in subtidal environments of the Chilean coast: The importance of understory algal turf. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 75, 189–200. Pérez-Matus, A., Ferry-Graham, L. A., Cea, A., & Vasquez, J. A. (2007). Community structure of temperate reef fishes in kelp-dominated subtidal habitats of northern Chile. Marine and Freshwater Research, 58, 1069–1085. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF06200 Pérez-Matus, A., Pledger, S., Diaz, F. J., Ferry, L. A., & Vasquez, J. A. (2012). Plasticity in feeding selectivity and trophic structure of kelp forest associated fishes from northern Chile. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 85, 29–48. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0716-078X2012000100003 Pérez-Matus, A., Sánchez, F., González-But, J. C., & Lamb, R. W. (2016). Understory algae associations and predation risk influence broad-scale kelp habitat use in a temperate reef fish. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 559, 147–158. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11892 Pinkas, L., Oliphant, M. S., & Iverson, L. R. (1971). Food habits of albacore, bluefin tuna, and bonito in California waters. Fishery Bulletin, 152, 1–105. Platell, M. E., & Potter, I. C. (2001). Partitioning of food resources amongst 18 abundant benthic carnivorous fish species in marine waters on the lower west coast of Australia. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 261, 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(01)00257-X Poore, A. G. (1994). Selective herbivory by amphipods inhabiting the brown alga Zonaria angustata. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 107, 113–123. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps107113 Protas, M., Conrad, M., Gross, J. B., Tabin, C., & Borowsky, R. (2007). Regressive evolution in the Mexican cave tetra, Astyanax mexicanus. Current Biology, 18, 27–29. Ramírez, F., Pérez-Matus, A., Eddy, T. D., & Landaeta, M. F. (2013). Trophic ecology of abundant reef fish in a remote oceanic island: Coupling diet and feeding morphology at the Juan Fernandez Archipelago, Chile. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 93, 1457–1469. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315413000192 Scharf, F. S., Juanes, F., & Rountree, R. A. (2000). Predator size-prey size relationships of marine fish predators: Interspecific variation and effects of ontogeny and body size on trophic-niche breadth. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 208, 229–248. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps208229 Sih, A., & Christensen, B. (2001). Optimal diet theory: When does it work, and when and why does it fail? Animal Behaviour, 61, 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1592 Silberschneider, V., & Booth, D. J. (2001). Resource use by Enneapterygius rufopileus and other rockpool fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 61, 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011032514604 Sunila, I. (1981). Reproduction of Mytilus edulis L. (Bivalvia) in a brackish water area, the Gulf of Finland. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 18, 121–128. Taylor, R. B. (1998). Density, biomass and productivity of animals in four subtidal rocky reef habitats: The importance of small mobile invertebrates. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 172, 37–51. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps172037 Vogel, S. (1994). Life in moving fluids: The physical biology of flow. Princeton, NE: Princeton University Press. Wainwright, P. C., Bellwood, D. R., & Westneat, M. W. (2002). Ecomorphology of locomotion in labrid fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 65, 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019671131001 Wainwright, P., Osenberg, C., & Mittelbach, G. (1991). Trophic polymorphism in the pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus Linnaeus): Effects of environment on ontogeny. Functional Ecology, 5, 40–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/2389554 Wainwright, P. C., & Richard, B. A. (1995). Predicting patterns of prey use from morphology of fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 44, 97–113. Walker, J. A., & Westneat, M. W. (2000). Mechanical performance of aquatic rowing and flying. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 267, 1875–1881. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1224 Williams, J. T., & Springer, V. G. (2001). Review of the south American-Antarctic triplefin fish genus Helcogrammoides (Perciformes: Tripterygiidae). Revista De Biologia Tropical, 49, 117–124. Wimberger, P. H. (1992). Plasticity of fish body shape. The effects of diet, development, family and age in two species of Geophagus (Pisces: Cichlidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 45, 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.1992.45.issue-3