1. Introduction
Bioaerosols exist extensively in human living and natural environments, predominantly including bacteria, fungi, archaea, viruses, pollen, and endotoxins [1,2,3]. As an important component of atmospheric particulate matter, bioaerosols play an important role in atmospheric chemistry and climate change [4,5,6,7]. Bacteria are the primary component in bioaerosols, accounting for 80% of the atmospheric microbial components [3]. Exposure to high concentrations of airborne bacteria, particularly pathogenic bacteria, can cause a series of diseases, such as respiratory, digestive system, and cardiovascular diseases [8,9]. As a result, the impact of bacteria in the atmosphere on human health is gradually being valued.
In recent years, the abuse of antibiotics has led to an increase in antibiotics in the environment, which has created a challenge to life-saving antibiotic therapy [10]. China is the largest global user of antibiotics, with an annual usage of approximately 92,700 tons, about 58% of which were eventually discharged into the environment [11]. Mao et al. [12] found that the abuse of antibiotics can promote the development of bacterial resistance in the environment. They reported that bacteria in Beijing’s atmosphere have a high proportion of antibiotic resistance to penicillin and cephalosporins. The infections by antibiotic-resistant bacteria significantly increase the difficulty of treatment processes. Li et al. [13] estimated that approximately 700,000 people die from antibiotic resistance each year, globally. If the current trend continues, this number will increase to 10 million people by 2050 [13]. The atmosphere is an important pathway for the transmission of antibiotic-resistant bacteria to the public. Therefore, exploring the distribution characteristics and influencing factors of antibiotic resistance in atmospheric microorganisms is of vital importance to people’s health.
Airborne bacteria often contain a variety of pathogenic bacteria and their presence poses a significant threat to human health. For example, airborne transmission of Acinetobacter baumannii in hospitals can lead to respiratory infections, bacteremia, and meningitis, among other diseases [14,15]. As an important human pathogen, Staphylococcus are widely present in wastewater treatment plant bioaerosols, which can cause bacteremia and skin infections in humans [16,17]. Several recent studies have reported that a large number of pathogenic bacteria have also been detected in the outdoor atmospheric environment [18,19,20]. Pathogenic bacteria with antibiotic resistance can lead to increased difficulty in treating bacterial infections and prolonged hospital stays, in addition to an increase in the cost of treatment [21]. Thus, research on the community structures of pathogenic bacteria with antibiotic resistant is of significance.
Four antibiotics with relatively high usage in China were selected for this study: tetracycline (tetracyclines), ciprofloxacin (quinolones), erythromycin (macrolides), and ampicillin (β-lactams) [11]. The concentrations and size distribution of culturable airborne total bacteria (TB), and four antibiotic-resistant bacteria (tetracycline-resistant bacteria (TRB), ciprofloxacin-resistant bacteria (CRB), erythromycin-resistant bacteria (ERB), and ampicillin-resistant bacteria (ARB)) were investigated for about one year to explore their variations under different seasons, diurnal periods, and air quality levels. The effects of meteorological factors on the airborne bacteria and four antibiotic-resistant bacteria were analyzed. The microbial community structures and pathogens of the four antibiotic-resistant bacteria were further identified. The exposure risk of humans to airborne bacteria during the sampling period was also calculated. The purpose of this study was to provide meaningful data on the distribution characteristics and influencing factors of bacteria and resistant bacteria in the atmosphere, and to assess the potential hazards of bioaerosols to human health.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Sites and Sample Collection
Bioaerosol samples in this study were collected from November 2017 to December 2018 in Xinxiang, China (113.9° E, 35.3° N) (Figure S1). The bioaerosol samples were obtained from a total of 41 days over four seasons (spring: 9 days; summer: 9 days; autumn: 10 days; winter: 13 days). The sampling site was on the roof of the School of Environment Building at Henan Normal University about 30 m above the ground. The site is surrounded by trees and residential and school buildings, with no large pollution source nearby. The samples were collected using a six-stage Andersen Sampler (Applied Technical Institute of Liaoyang, China) with an average flow rate of 28.3 L/min for 3 min. The specific parameters are shown in Table 1. The sampler was sterilized with 75% ethanol before sampling. At each sampling time, the experiment was repeated three times to ensure reliability. To explore diurnal variation, the samples were collected at 9:00, 14:00, and 19:00, respectively, at each sampling day.
The air quality index (AQI), PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2, CO, and meteorological factors, including relative humidity (RH), temperature (T), and wind speed (WS), were obtained from the Department of Ecology and Environment of Henan Province (
The airborne total bacteria were cultured on Beef-Peptone media (3 g beef extract, 10 g peptone, 5 g NaCl, 16 g agar, 1 L distilled H2O, pH 7.2–7.6). Tetracycline (16 µg/L), ciprofloxacin (4 µg/L), erythromycin (32 µg/L), and ampicillin (32 µg/L) were added to four separate Beef-Peptone media to cultivate the corresponding antibiotic-resistant bacteria [24,25,26]. The culture media were prepared under aseptic conditions and cultured at 37 °C for 24 h, and the sterile media were selected for sampling. Blank culture media without collection used as the negative controls were also brought to the sampling site during the experiments. After sampling, the culture media and negative controls were incubated at 37 °C for 48 h and counted manually. The concentrations of the total bacteria and the four antibiotic-resistant bacteria were calculated using Equation (1):
(1)
where C is the concentration of bacteria or antibiotic-resistant bacteria (CFU/m3), N is the number of colonies at each stage, t is the sampling duration (min), and Q is the gas flow rate [27].In addition, the positive-hole method was used to correct the number of CFUs [27]. After incubation, 1 mL 1 × phosphate buffer solution (PBS) was used to wash the culturable bacteria, and a sterile spatula was employed to transfer the bacteria on different media into a corresponding 10 mL sterile centrifuge tube. The bacterial solution was stored in a sealed environment at −20 °C for further analysis.
2.2. DNA Extraction, DNA Amplification, and Illumina Sequencing
DNA from culturable bacterial samples was extracted using an E.Z.N.A.® soil DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The final DNA concentration and purity were determined by a Nano Drop ND-2000 (Nano Drop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA) spectrophotometer. The DNA quality was examined by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, and the extracted DNA was then amplified by PCR. The forward primer 338F (5-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3) and the reverse primer 806R (5-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3) were used to amplify the V3-V4 hypervariable region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. Thermal cycling consisted of initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 27 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, 30 s for annealing at 55 °C, and extension at 72 °C for 45 s, with a final extension of 10 min at 72 °C. Finally, the PCR products were sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq platform at Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
2.3. Health Risk Assessment
To assess the hazards of bacterial aerosols to human health, a non-carcinogenic risk assessment model of inhalation and dermal contact pathway was used in this work [28].
(2)
(3)
(4)
HI = ΣHQi(5)
where ADDinh is the daily mean inhalation dose of bioaerosol [CFU/(kg·d)]; ADDder is the daily mean dermal contact dose of bioaerosol [CFU/(kg·d)]; AC is the mean concentration of bioaerosols (CFU/m3); IR is the average daily inhalation rate (m3/d); EF is the exposure frequency (d/yr); ET denotes the exposure time (yr); SA is the exposure of the skin surface area (m2); SL represents the skin adherence factor [kg/(m3·d)]; ABS denotes the factor of dermal adsorption; BW represents the body weight (kg); AT is the average life expectancy (d); HQ is the hazard quotient for non-carcinogenic pollutants; RfD represents the reference dose (CFU/m3) of bacteria, and HI is the sum of the hazard index, which represents the sum of the hazard quotients of each pollutant from multiple exposure pathways. The detailed parameters are shown in Table S1.When HQ or HI ≤ 1, the non-carcinogenic effect can be ignored. However, when HQ or HI > 1, non-carcinogenic effects should be taken seriously [29].
2.4. Statistical Analysis
Spearman’s correlation analysis was used in this study. Significant differences in data were analyzed using the t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). A p-value of less than 0.05 or less than 0.01 represents a statistically significant difference at the 95% or 99% confidence level, respectively. These methods were performed using SPSS Statistics 24. Data visualization was conducted using Origin 2018 software.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Concentrations of Airborne Bacteria and Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria during Sampling Days
The daily average concentration of culturable airborne bacteria during the sampling period is shown in Figure 1. Samples were collected from November 2017 to December 2018, covering different seasons. The concentrations of TB, TRB, CRB, ERB, and ARB samples were in the range of 1.11 × 103–1.29 × 104 CFU/m3, 2.06 × 102–4.65 × 103 CFU/m3, 5.95 × 102–4.62 × 103 CFU/m3, 3.13 × 102–4.41 × 103 CFU/m3, and 2.76 × 102–6.41 × 103 CFU/m3, respectively. The highest concentrations of TB, TRB, and ERB were detected on 14 January 2018. The maximum concentrations of CRB and ARB were detected on 22 December 2018 and 27 December 2017, respectively. On these three days, the concentrations of PM2.5 were relatively high, with concentrations of 131 ± 13 µg/m3, 105 ± 30 µg/m3, and 138 ± 21 µg/m3, respectively. The maximum concentration of PM2.5 (i.e., 209 μg/m3) was detected on 3 December 2017, on which, however, the concentrations of bioaerosols were very low (TB: 2563 ± 268 CFU/m3, TRB: 1837 ± 612 CFU/m3, CRB: 1931 ± 173 CFU/m3, ERB: 2563 ± 268 CFU/m3, ARB: 1677 ± 581 CFU/m3). A reasonable explanation is that fine particles can adsorb more toxic chemical components that are harmful to the organisms in the air [30]. In addition, Lu et al. [31] thought that there was not enough surface area for microorganisms to attach to fine particles. A similar phenomenon was also found in Gao et al. [32] in Beijing.
Antibiotic-resistant bioaerosols are a part of the total airborne bacteria with a relatively stable ratio. The mean aerosol concentrations of culturable TRB, CRB, ERB, and ARB accounted for 49.7%, 55.8%, 49.5%, and 53.8% of the culturable bacterial aerosols, respectively. Mao et al. [12] found that over 70% of culturable bacteria were resistant to penicillin in Beijing’s atmospheric environment. Given such high rates of antibiotic resistance in culturable bacteria, aerosol, especially opportunistic pathogenic bacteria and pathogenic bacteria, can cause a range of human respiratory diseases [20,33].
3.2. Bioaerosols Concentration and Size Distribution at Different Air Quality Levels
The concentrations and size distribution of TB and the four culturable antibiotic-resistant bacteria are shown in Figure 2, and exhibited a unimodal distribution pattern under different AQI classes. Particles with sizes less than 4.7 µm are defined as respirable particles, whereas those less than 2.1 µm are defined as fine particles [34]. When the air quality deteriorated from excellent to heavy pollution, the concentrations of TB and the four antibiotic-resistant bacteria first increased and then decreased. The maximum concentrations of TB (6673 ± 6242 CFU/m3) and ERB (2821 ± 2737 CFU/m3) were detected when the air quality was moderately polluted. The maximum concentrations of TRB (2795 ± 1766 CFU/m3), CRB (3135 ± 1377 CFU/m3), and ARB (3030 ± 1677 CFU/m3) were detected when the air quality was classified as heavy pollution. The concentrations of TB and the four kinds of antibiotic-resistant bacteria under excellent air quality conditions were significantly lower than those under good, slight, and moderate pollution air quality (p < 0.05). The concentrations of TRB and ARB were significantly lower under good air quality than those under heavy pollution (p < 0.05).
Air quality conditions have a significant effect on the concentrations of microbial aerosols [35]. As a carrier for microorganisms, the concentration of particulate matter in the atmosphere is very low at an excellent level. When the air quality changed from excellent to heavy pollution, the concentrations of TB and four culturable antibiotic-resistant bacteria increased first, with the peak values appearing at slight or moderate pollution levels, and then decreased at heavy pollution. Xie et al. [35] also found that the bioaerosol concentration was the highest under moderately polluted air quality and, when the pollution increased, the bioaerosol concentration decreased. This was because, with the deepening of the haze, the concentrations of toxic substances attached to the particulate matter also increased, which led to an inhibition of the growth of microorganisms [31,36,37]. It is interesting to note that the concentrations of TRB and ARB under good air quality conditions were significantly lower than those under heavy pollution (p < 0.05). However, under heavy pollution, the concentration of ARB slightly increased compared to that under moderate pollution air quality levels. A reasonable speculation is that antibiotic-resistant bacteria, especially pathogenic bacteria, have a strong tolerance to toxic and harmful substances in the atmosphere [38]. With the increase in atmospheric pollution, the bacterial community structure in the atmospheric environment changes significantly. Under heavy pollution air quality, some bacteria that can resist the hostile environment gradually become the predominant genera and lead to an increase in bacterial aerosol concentration [37].
Figure 2 also indicates the differences in the size distribution of bioaerosols between the five air quality levels. Under excellent air quality, the highest concentrations of TB and the four antibiotic-resistant bacteria appeared in stage IV (2.1–3.3 µm), whereas under other air conditions, the highest concentrations occurred in stage V (1.1–2.2 µm). The relative abundance of respirable particles under different air quality conditions is shown in Figure S3. The highest relative abundances of TB (91.1%), TRB (89.7%), and ERB (92.3%) in respirable particles were found under moderate pollution air quality, and the highest relative abundances of CRB (87.5%) and ARB (90.2%) were observed under heavy pollution conditions. Figure S3 shows the relative abundance of fine particles under different air quality conditions. The maximums in TB (55.4%) and ERB (55.9%) of fine particles were found under moderate pollution air quality, and those in CRB (49.3%) and ARB (56.5%) were found under heavy pollution conditions. The highest value of TRB (56.0%) was found under slight pollution. Moreover, all TB and the four antibiotic-resistant bacteria had the minimum abundance of respirable and fine particulates under excellent air quality.
As a key factor affecting public health, the size of the particle determines the sedimentation location of airborne bacteria in the respiratory system. When the particle size is less than 5 µm, the bioaerosol can be deposited in the lower respiratory tract through respiration and induce asthma or allergies [39]. In this study, the proportion of respirable bioaerosol particles was more than 80%, and the percentage of fine particles was more than 45%, when AQI was higher than 50. In a previous study, the particle size distribution of bioaerosols exhibited a bimodal distribution pattern under haze conditions in Qingdao. The results show that one peak appeared at 1.1–2.1 µm, which is consistent with our results, whereas the other peak was at 4.7–7.0 µm [7]. Gong et al. [40] also found a similar phenomenon in Qingdao, where one peak was at 1.1–2.1 µm and the other peak was at >7 µm. In this study, the particle size distribution of the four antibiotic-resistant bacteria was similar to that of TB. Mao et al. [12] found that the peak concentration of cultivable bacterial aerosols in Beijing’s outdoor atmospheric environment under polluted weather conditions was at stage IV (2.1–3.3 µm). Under non-polluting weather conditions, the relative abundance of cultivable bacterial aerosol concentration in stage IV (2.1–3.3 µm) was also relatively high. Among the bioaerosols, penicillin-resistant bacteria accounted for 72.4% and 83.3% of cultured bacteria, under polluted and non-polluting air quality conditions, respectively. Li et al. [13] found that the relative abundance of quinolone, macrolide, and tetracycline antibiotic-resistant genes in PM2.5 at Xi’an in 2014 was significantly higher than that in the past decade (p = 0.041). Hu et al. [41] reported that the tetracycline-resistant genes in the atmospheric environment during haze have the highest relative abundance and the resistant gene abundance in fine particles is greater than that in non-smog weather. In brief, the results of this study indicate that the largest percentages of inhalable and fine particulate matter occurred in moderately or heavily polluted air quality levels. Therefore, we speculate that, under conditions of polluted air quality, especially moderately polluted conditions, a large number of pathogenic bacteria having an inhalable particle size will pose a greater threat to human health.
3.3. Effect of Time Factor on Bioaerosol Concentration and Particle Size Distribution
The temporal variation in the concentrations of airborne bacteria and the four antibiotic-resistant bacteria during the sampling period is shown in Figure 3. The differences in the concentrations were observed between the three diurnal periods at different size stages. The highest concentrations of cultivable bacteria and four antibiotic-resistant bacteria all appeared at night (TB: 5500 ± 4289 CFU/m3, TRB: 2701 ± 1750 CFU/m3, CRB: 3145 ± 1923 CFU/m3, ERB: 2774 ± 1954 CFU/m3, and ARB: 2904 ± 1771 CFU/m3), and were significantly higher than those at noon (p < 0.05). The lowest concentrations were observed at noon, with TB values of 2850 ± 2432 CFU/m3, TRB: 1514 ± 1406 CFU/m3, CRB: 1595 ± 1103 CFU/m3, ERB: 1520 ± 1114 CFU/m3, and ARB: 1622 ± 1444 CFU/m3.
Similar results have also been found in previous studies. Fang et al. [42] found that the lowest and highest concentrations of bacterial aerosols in the atmospheric environment of Hangzhou appeared at noon and night, respectively. Gao et al. [43] also found that the concentrations of bacterial aerosols in Beijing’s atmospheric environment at noon were lower than those in the morning and evening. The variation in solar radiation intensity during the daytime was considered the primary reason for this phenomenon, because strong solar radiation can cause the death of microorganisms and reduce the concentration of bioaerosols [44,45,46,47]. The solar radiation intensity at noon was greater than that in the morning and evening. Human activity is another potential reason for the changes in bioaerosol concentrations, and leads to an increase in bioaerosol concentrations during morning and evening rush hours [40,42,47].
The bacterial aerosols and the four antibiotic-resistant bacteria were mainly distributed in stage V (1.1–2.2 µm) (Figure 4). In addition, the proportion of fine particles of bacterial aerosol and the four antibiotic-resistant bacteria during the night period were higher than those in the morning and noon. According to the diameter of the effective cross-sectional particle at each level of the Anderson microbiological sampler and the cumulative percentage of each level, a logarithmic regression fitting process was carried out. The dynamics of d50 are shown in Figure 3, showing that the d50 values varied under different sampling periods. For the bacterial aerosols and the four antibiotic-resistant bacteria, the largest and smallest d50 values appeared at noon and at night, respectively. The size of the particulate matter determines the location of the deposition in the respiratory tract and poses varying degrees of threat to human health [48]. Previous studies revealed that particulate matter adversely affects human health, primarily at particle sizes less than 10 μm, because particles in this range can be inhaled into the human respiratory system through the nasal cavity, and even deposited in the respiratory system. In addition, the particles with a size less than 1 μm can puncture the alveoli and enter the body’s fluid circulation system [49,50]. Thus, according to these results, safeguard procedures for people are suggested when taking part in outdoor activities at night.
3.4. Meteorological Factors of Airborne Bacteria and Four Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria
This study used Spearman’s correlation analysis to explore the relationship between bioaerosol concentrations and meteorological factors (Table 2). The results showed that the concentrations of culturable bacterial aerosol and the four antibiotic-resistant bacteria had a statistically extremely significant positive correlation with AQI, PM2.5, PM10, SO2, and NO2 (p < 0.01). In contrast, the concentration of O3 showed an extremely significant negative correlation with the concentrations of TB, TRB, CRB, and ARB (p < 0.01) and had a significantly negative correlation with the concentration of ERB (p < 0.05). WS also showed an extremely significant negative correlation with the concentration of TB (p < 0.01) and a significantly negative correlation with the four antibiotic-resistant bacteria (p < 0.05).
In this study, PM2.5 and PM10, as the parameters characterizing the concentration of atmospheric particulate matter, showed a positive correlation with the concentrations of bacterial aerosols. The increase in PM concentration leads to an increase in AQI and contributes more carriers for the attachment of microorganisms. A similar phenomenon was observed in Xi’an [31,35,47]. It is worth noting that the correlation coefficients between TB and the four antibiotic-resistant bacteria and PM10 were all greater than those of PM2.5. Previous studies have shown that, compared with fine particles, coarse particles have a larger specific surface area, which provides better adhesion of microorganisms. In addition, coarse particles can protect microorganisms and reduce damage from solar radiation, and provide the corresponding carbon sources and energy for bacteria in the atmosphere [20,31,46]. SO2 and NO2 in the atmosphere can be converted into sulfates and nitrates, which are nutrients for the microorganisms [7]. Similarly, a positive correlation between bioaerosol concentration and SO2 and NO2 has also been found in other studies [31,37,40,51]. The influence of RH on bacterial aerosols is complex [45]. Microbes like to live in environments with high humidity, so higher RH can increase the concentration of bioaerosols [47]. However, no significant correlation between RH and bioaerosol concentration was found in this study. A similar phenomenon was also observed in the atmospheric environments of the Seoul subway station and Qingdao [7,52]. Therefore, it is necessary to further explore the exact relationship between RH and bacterial aerosol concentrations. In a previous study, ozone was shown to penetrate and rupture the bacterial cell membrane, change the permeability of the cell, and eventually lead to cell death [53]. Moreover, the reaction of ozone with olefins and “open air factors” will lead to increased toxicity [54,55]. Therefore, it is generally believed that ozone has a bactericidal effect and is negatively correlated with the concentration of bacterial aerosols. A large number of studies have observed this corresponding phenomenon [7,31,38]. In this study, the negative correlation coefficient between TB and ozone was the most significant, indicating that antibiotic-resistant bacteria have strong environmental tolerance. Wind can dilute biological aerosols in the atmosphere and showed a negative correlation with the concentration of bacterial aerosols. Previous studies have found a similar phenomenon [31,43]. In this study, a negative correlation between bacterial aerosols and temperature was observed. A possible reason is that the increase in temperature may accelerate atmospheric convection and the chemical reaction rate of toxic substances, which ultimately leads to a negative correlation between temperature and bacterial concentration [40,56].
3.5. Community Structure of Four Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria
After quality trimming, 175,228 effective sequences of the 16S rRNA genes were identified from the four antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Almost all of the trimmed sequence lengths ranged from 421 to 460 bp (99.78%) with a median length of 443 bp. The diversity and relative abundance of the top 50 bacterial genera of the four antibiotic-resistant bacteria are shown in Figure 5. The differences between the community structures of the four antibiotic-resistant bacteria can clearly be observed.
Bacillus was the dominant genus of ARB (75.97%) and accounted for a large proportion in CRB (25.67%). Staphylococcus, Streptomyces, and Macrococcus were the dominant genera of TRB (46.05%), CRB (27.29%), and ERB (47.67%), respectively. These results indicate that Bacillus spp. are not sensitive to ampicillin. Ampicillin is a β-lactam antibiotic that is widely used in China [11,57]. Researchers have observed the β-lactam-resistant gene blaTEM in the global PM. Moreover, Li et al. [58] also found Bacillus to be an ARB harboring the blaTEM gene in the airborne bacterial community around a municipal solid waste treatment system. It is worth noting that Staphylococcus was not only the dominant genera of TRB (46.05%), but also accounted for a large proportion in CRB (21.89%) and ERB (5.08%). Previous studies have also found that airborne Staphylococci were resistant to more than two types of antibiotics in a metro (mean, 2.64), park (mean, 2.03), and hospital (mean, 2.94) [59]. Similarly, several previous studies reported that Bacillus and Staphylococcus were the dominant genera in the air [20,31,38,60,61]. In some special environments, such as the atmosphere of hospitals, wastewater treatment plants, and municipal solid waste treatment systems, Bacillus or Staphylococcus were also found to be the dominant bacterial genera [39,58,62]. Notably, the genera Bacillus and Staphylococcus contain many kinds of pathogenic bacteria, such as Bacillus cereus, Bacillus anthracis, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, and Staphylococcus aureus. These pathogenic bacteria pose potential risks to human health. For example, Bacillus anthracis is the pathogen of anthrax, and Bacillus cereus can cause wound infections, pneumonia, septicemia, and meningitis [58,63]. Staphylococcus saprophyticus can cause urinary tract infections in humans [64]. Staphylococcus aureus can cause bacteremia and bacterial meningitis [65,66]. As a human pathogenic, the bacterium Corynebacterium also has a large relative abundance in TRB (33.68%), ERB (14.56%), and CRB (4.08%). Lu et al. [31] reported that Corynebacterium diphtheriae can cause diphtheria and skin infections. Nudel et al. [67] reported that, as an emerging pathogen, Corynebacterium striatum can cause infections in patients with immunodeficiency and chronic diseases, and contains aminoglycoside-, macrolide-, and tetracycline-resistant genes. Therefore, a large quantity of Bacillus, Staphylococcus and Corynebacterium in the atmosphere may pose a greater potential risk to human health.
This study also identified some opportunistic pathogens, such as Micrococcus, Sphingomonas, Enterococcus, Rhodococcus, and Stenotrophomonas. The composition of opportunistic pathogens varies in different regions and places. Fan et al. [18] found that Enterobacter, Lactococcus, and Pseudomonas dominate opportunistic pathogenic bacteria in the atmosphere of Xi’an. Opportunistic pathogenic bacteria, such as Xanthobacter, Dermatophilus, Ledionella, Enterobactor, and Colinsella were found in the aerosols of a wastewater treatment plant [68]. Although opportunistic pathogens are pathogenic only when there are specific conditions or multiple pathogens occur at the same time [69], they are also a potential threat to public health and should be paid attention to.
Overall, this study found that many pathogens and opportunistic pathogens in the atmospheric environment had multiple antibiotic resistances. Infection with antibiotic-resistant bacteria is difficult to treat [62]. Therefore, people should take corresponding protective measures under polluted air conditions, especially those with immunodeficiency or respiratory diseases [70].
3.6. Human Health Risk Assessment
Exposure to high bacterial aerosol concentrations, especially those containing pathogenic bacteria or opportunistic pathogens, poses a serious health threat to humans. In this study, the risk indices of inhalation and skin contact under different sampling periods, air quality levels, and seasons were calculated (Figure 6).
The results show that the risk of skin contact is negligible compared to that of inhalation, suggesting that inhalation is the major exposure pathway for the intake of bioaerosols in the atmosphere. The HQ values for children were obviously higher than those for adults, which indicates that the health threats from microbial aerosols for children are more serious. The highest diurnal exposure risk was found at night, and the highest annual exposure risk was observed in winter. Under different air quality levels, the exposure risk increased with the AQI, and the highest was observed at moderate pollution air quality, then decreased at heavy pollution (Figure 6).
Based on this study, the health threats from bioaerosols in the atmosphere should be paid more attention, especially when the AQI is higher than 100. Inhalation of high concentrations of bacterial aerosols can potentially cause a series of respiratory diseases [71]. In addition, the abundance of pathogenic bacteria and resistant genes increased during haze weather conditions in winter [72]. In this study, although the exposure risk calculated for adults was < 1 (non-carcinogenic effect can be ignored), the results revealed the bacterial aerosols contain a large number of pathogenic bacteria with antibiotic resistance, and more than 60% of the bioaerosol particles were smaller than 4.7 μm (respirable particles). Even under relatively low concentrations, prolonged exposure to bioaerosols can also threaten human health [73]. Guo et al. [74] found that bacterial aerosols in the atmosphere during heavy haze events were closely related to the incidence of pneumonia. Hence, the necessary protective measures should be taken for the susceptible population, such as children, the elderly, and patients with respiratory diseases, when under polluted air quality conditions.
4. Conclusions
This study investigated the concentrations and particle size distribution of culturable airborne TB and the four antibiotic-resistant bacteria of TRB, CRB, ERB, and ARB under different seasons, diurnal periods, and air quality levels. The concentrations of airborne bacteria and antibiotic-resistant bacteria in winter and night were higher than those in other seasons and diurnal periods. They were closely related to AQI, and the maximum concentrations were observed when the AQI was higher than 150 (moderate pollution and heavy pollution). Meteorological factors of PM2.5, PM10, SO2, and NO2 were positively related to the concentration of TB and four antibiotic-resistant bacteria, whereas O3 and wind WS were negatively related. Bacillus was the dominant genus of ARB and accounted for a large proportion of CRB. Staphylococcus and Macrococcus were the dominant genera of TRB and ERB, respectively. Inhalation was the major exposure pathway for the intake of bioaerosols, and the risk of skin contact was negligible.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, X.Y.; methodology, Y.H.; software, J.M. and D.Q.; formal analysis, J.M. and L.G.; investigation, J.R., M.C., X.C., D.Q., M.L. and T.L.; data curation, J.M.; writing—original draft preparation, J.M.; writing—review and editing, X.Y.; supervision, C.C.; project administration, X.Y.; funding acquisition, X.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51408199), the Science Foundation of Henan Normal University (No. 2019QK09), the Training Plan of Young Backbone Teachers in Colleges and Universities of Henan Province (No. 2020GGJS066) and the Key Scientific Research Projects of Colleges and Universities in Henan Province (No. 21A610007).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful for financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51408199), the Science Foundation of Henan Normal University (No. 2019QK09), the Training Plan of Young Backbone Teachers in Colleges and Universities of Henan Province (No. 2020GGJS066) and the Key Scientific Research Projects of Colleges and Universities in Henan Province (No. 21A610007).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures and Tables
Figure 1. Variation of airborne bacteria, antibiotic-resistant bacteria, and PM2.5 during sampling days.
Figure 2. Size distribution of culturable bacteria and four antibiotic-resistant bacteria under different air quality levels.
Figure 3. Diurnal variation in size distribution and median diameter of culturable bacteria and four antibiotic-resistant bacteria (the diameter corresponding to a cumulative percentage of 50% is the median diameter (d50)).
Figure 4. Diurnal variation in particle size distribution of the culturable bacteria and the four antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Figure 5. The diversity and relative abundance of the top 50 bacterial genera of four antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Figure 6. HQ and HI of airborne bacteria under different diurnal periods, air quality levels, and seasons. (MO: morning; NO: noon; NI: night; EX: excellent; GO: good; SLP: slight pollution; MOP: moderate pollution; HEP: heavy pollution; SP: spring; SU: summer; AU: autumn; WI: winter).
Range of bioaerosol particles captured.
Stage | Aerodynamic Diameter |
---|---|
Ⅰ | >7.0 μm |
Ⅱ | 4.7–7.0 μm |
Ⅲ | 3.3–4.7 μm |
Ⅳ | 2.1–3.3 μm |
Ⅴ | 1.1–2.1 μm |
Ⅵ | 0.65–1.1 μm |
Spearman correlation coefficients between culturable bacteria and the four antibiotic-resistant bacteria concentrations and main influencing factors.
AQI | PM2.5 | PM10 | SO2 | NO2 | O3 | T (°C) | RH (%) | WS (m/s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TB | 0.335 ** | 0.347 ** | 0.382 ** | 0.352 ** | 0.634 ** | −0.392 ** | 0.319 * | 0.086 | −0.477 ** |
TRB | 0.372 ** | 0.389 ** | 0.434 ** | 0.406 ** | 0.677 ** | −0.336 ** | −0.184 | 0.070 | −0.430 * |
CRB | 0.334 ** | 0.347 ** | 0.373 ** | 0.373 ** | 0.663 ** | −0.379 ** | 0.294 * | 0.035 | −0.374 * |
ERB | 0.376 ** | 0.394 ** | 0.419 ** | 0.366 ** | 0.648 ** | −0.307 * | −0.147 | 0.069 | −0.404 * |
ARB | 0.384 ** | 0.396 ** | 0.428 ** | 0.418 ** | 0.677 ** | −0.367 ** | −0.234 | 0.086 | −0.392 * |
** p < 0.01(2-tailed). * p < 0.05(2-tailed).
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2021 by the authors.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance is considered an important threat to global health and has recently attracted significant attention from the public. In this study, the concentrations and size distribution characteristics of culturable airborne total bacteria (TB) and four antibiotic-resistant bacteria (tetracycline-resistant bacteria (TRB), ciprofloxacin-resistant bacteria (CRB), erythromycin-resistant bacteria (ERB), and ampicillin-resistant bacteria (ARB)) were investigated for approximately one year to explore their variations under different seasons, diurnal periods, and air quality levels. The concentrations of TB and four antibiotic-resistant bacteria in winter and night were higher than during other seasons and diurnal periods. Their maximum concentrations were detected from air under moderate pollution or heavy pollution. PM2.5, PM10, SO2, and NO2 were positively related to TB and four antibiotic-resistant bacteria (p < 0.01), whereas O3 and wind speed were negatively related to them (p < 0.05). The particle size of TB and four antibiotic-resistant bacteria were mainly distributed in stage V (1.1–2.2 µm). Bacillus was the dominant genus of ARB (75.97%) and CRB (25.67%). Staphylococcus and Macrococcus were the dominant genera of TRB (46.05%) and ERB (47.67%), respectively. The opportunistic pathogens of Micrococcus, Sphingomonas, Enterococcus, Rhodococcus, and Stenotrophomonas were also identified. This study provides important references for understanding the threat of bioaerosols to human health.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Key Laboratory for Yellow River and Huai River Water Environment and Pollution Control, Ministry of Education, Henan Key Laboratory for Environmental Pollution Control, School of Environment, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China;
2 Henan Environmental Monitoring Center, Henan Key Laboratory of Environmental Monitoring Technology, Zhengzhou 450046, China;
3 Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China;