It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
This study analyzes factors affecting the efficiency (profitability) of enterprises in foreign, joint and domestic ownership in countries with unstable economy. The novelty of the study is that for the first time this kind of analysis has been carried out for the manufacturing industry in Russia, whose economy is characterized by the instability (crisis), external sanctions, and the internal trend for import substitution. Using a panel data on 6134 enterprises operating across several industries in Russia over the period of 2012–2016, the article suggests that generally production efficiency and scale efficiency positively affect profitability, whereas the share of borrowed capital, share of fixed assets and rising interest rates exert negative effects. The contribution of external financial factors is minimal, except for foreign and jointly owned firms. Production efficiency has a particularly pronounced effect for the automotive industry, machinery and equipment manufacturing, and in the metal industry. In contrast, in the chemical, electrical and optical manufacturing, and in food processing industries, internal financial factors emerge as a powerful predictor of performance. Firm ownership does not exert a significant effect on the relationship between the variables of interest when the share of borrowed funds is below 50%. When the share of borrowed capital exceeds 50%, internal financial factors emerge as a particularly prominent predictor of profitability.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, School of Engineering Entrepreneurship, Tomsk, Russia (GRID:grid.27736.37) (ISNI:0000 0000 9321 1499); Tomsk State University of Control, Systems and Radioelectronics, Department of Economics, Tomsk, Russia (GRID:grid.440738.c) (ISNI:0000 0000 9460 4294)
2 National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, School of Engineering Entrepreneurship, Tomsk, Russia (GRID:grid.27736.37) (ISNI:0000 0000 9321 1499); National Research Tomsk State University (Russia), Economics Department, Institute of Economics and Management, Tomsk, Russia (GRID:grid.77602.34) (ISNI:0000 0001 1088 3909)
3 People’s Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Finance and Credit Department, Faculty of Economics, Moscow, Russia (GRID:grid.77642.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0645 517X); Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts (SASA), Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić”, Belgrade, Serbia (GRID:grid.419269.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2146 2771)
4 National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, School of Engineering Entrepreneurship, Tomsk, Russia (GRID:grid.27736.37) (ISNI:0000 0000 9321 1499); St. Cloud State University, Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, Herberger Business School, St. Cloud, USA (GRID:grid.264047.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 0738 3196)