Abstract

Anaerobic digestion of abattoir wastes under mesophilic conditions was carried out to investigate how different modeling tools affect biogas yield in order to be subsequently used for process optimization. Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) were employed to optimize the process, and to assess the individual and interactive effect of incubation time, temperature, and pH on biogas yield. The digester used in this study produced an average biogas yield of 0.00103 m3/kg VS daily from cow-dung. Gas chromatographic analysis of the produced biogas showed the methane content to be 66.8%. The conditions for optimum biogas yield as predicted by RSM were incubation time of 28.98 days, temperature and pH of 30.16°C, and 7.43, respectively. For ANNs, the incubation time, temperature, and pH for optimum biogas yield were 26.76 days, 30.94°C, and 7.27, respectively. With these conditions, biogas yield by RSM was Olayomi Abiodun Falowo m3/kg VS while that of ANNs was Olayomi Abiodun Falowo m3/kg VS. Model validation by experimental tests showed that ANN is better in terms of prediction and accuracy than the RSM, though, the two techniques complemented each other in interpreting the interactive effects of the input variables on the biogas production.

Details

Title
Anaerobic digestion of abattoir wastes for biogas production: optimization via performance evaluation comparison
Author
Oludare Johnson Odejobi 1 ; Ebenezer Leke Odekanle 2 ; Bamimore, Ayorinde 1 ; Olayomi Abiodun Falowo 3 ; Akeredolu, Funso 1 

 Department of Chemical Engineering, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria 
 Department of Chemical and Resource Engineering, First Technical University, Ibadan, Nigeria 
 Department of Chemical Engineering, Landmark University, Omu-Aran, Kwara, Nigeria 
Publication year
2022
Publication date
Jan 2022
Publisher
Taylor & Francis Ltd.
e-ISSN
23311916
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2755975493
Copyright
© 2022 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.