1. Introduction
In the contemporary digital landscape, journalism is undergoing transformational change driven by the coexistence of two distinct models: “viral journalism” and “quality journalism”. Scholars such as Anderson (2011), Boczkowski et al. (2018), and Jenkins et al. (2013) have contributed significantly to defining these terms. “Viral journalism”, exemplified by clickbait, sensationalism, and rapid online dissemination, thrives on the power of social media algorithms and the lure of instant gratification. In contrast, “quality journalism” remains true to its commitment to rigorous investigation, fact-checking, and ethical responsibility, embodying core values of credibility, accuracy, and honesty. This paper will examine the characteristics, multifaceted implications, and complex challenges associated with each approach, explaining their profound impact on the media ecosystem and social discourse.
The tension between these models goes beyond simple editorial choices and includes complex issues such as trade-offs between virality and accuracy, manipulation of public discourse by misinformation bias, and the erosion of trust in news organizations. This paper will highlight the integral role of “quality journalism” in balancing these distortions, promoting informed citizenship, and defending fundamental principles of democracy. A harmonious coexistence between virality and accuracy can be built through a collaborative effort between media organizations, digital platforms, and regulators. By dissecting the dichotomy between “viral journalism” and “quality journalism”, this paper will not only try to enrich our understanding of the contemporary media environment but also will argue for a radical approach. The focus is on balancing the appeal of virality with people’s demands for truth, accountability, and the well-being of democratic societies. More specific, the following paper employs a qualitative textual analysis of news articles from four Greek news organizations, examining media coverage of Stefanos Kasselakis’ election. By analyzing these articles, the study aims to elucidate the balance between “viral” and “quality” journalism.
2. Navigating the Digital Landscape
News and journalism practices are undergoing complex changes under the influence of technology (Touri et al. 2017). The digital landscape has revolutionized the way we consume information. Online platforms, social media, and smartphones have made information more accessible and immediate than ever. This digital domain has blurred the lines between traditional journalism and new media, creating both opportunities and challenges for journalists and consumers.
News agencies have had to adapt to the digital age, integrating multimedia elements into news reporting and interacting with audiences in real-time through social media. The 24/7 news cycle requires constant updates, but it can also spread unverified or sensational information, challenging the principles of good and responsible journalism.
Recent insights from the 2024 Digital News Report by the Reuters Institute reveal shifts in digital media consumption, emphasizing the role of multimedia elements in engaging audiences. The report identifies several key developments shaping the media landscape. Although traditional text-based content has long been a cornerstone of online journalism, there are noticeable changes in audio and video formats. This shift is driven by new devices, platforms specializing in multimedia, and a growing preference among younger audiences for these formats. In 2024, news organizations plan to increase the production of videos, podcasts, and newsletters while maintaining a steady volume of written content. This shift is partly driven by declining social media engagement, with a need for more immersive and authentic strategies, such as audio and video. Short videos on platforms like TikTok and YouTube Shorts are an important focus for engaging younger audiences. Publishers need to incorporate these storytelling techniques into their websites and apps to connect with their audience. Video content, especially vertical video, is expected to play an important role in attracting audiences. This format is increasingly being used to reach young people on platforms, and publishers are bringing these formats back to their own platforms. In many legacy newsrooms, the move to multimedia production represents a fundamental cultural shift away from text-based content. This transformation is considered the “second stage” of digital transformation. In response to the decline in social media referrals, publishers are increasingly focusing on engaging directly with consumers through websites, apps, newsletters, podcasts, etc. Alternative platforms like WhatsApp and LinkedIn are also being explored to drive more referrals. As these trends continue to evolve, they are expected to determine a more digital future media consumption (Newman 2024).
As Steensen (2009) mentioned, the introduction of technology into journalism has given rise to a sea of different concepts that describe similar or even identical phenomena or content—concepts such as convergence, transparency, hypermedia, user-generated content (UGC), participatory journalism, citizen journalism, wiki journalism, and crowdsourcing. He claims that this has boosted the media and journalism profession and brought entirely new skills to professional journalists, such as immediacy in reporting, flexibility and multitasking, copy-paste mentality, and 24/7 deadlines (Steensen 2009, p. 702).
Boczkowski (2009) discussed two clearly related changes in journalistic practice: the first is the increasing use of technology by journalists for research and reporting, and the second is the greater use of technology involves increased surveillance and expanded imitation in the newsrooms.
However, here the focus is not so much on users, as we argue about “viral journalism”, but on cross-platform journalism. Media content is available on many platforms, but this type of journalism does not engage users as an important part of message distribution and circulation. In the concept of “viral journalism”, we include the concept of convergence by embracing technological innovation and accessibility, but we also involve users in the communication process through their interests and their ability to distribute content within their network. As a result, technology is an important element of virality as well as users’ ability to disseminate information.
When talking about the transition from online journalism to multimedia journalism, content is overlooked because multimedia journalism is mainly concerned with the visual components of news. In the term “viral journalism”, we increasingly include multimedia features, such as videos, photos, GIFs, and memes, which are also technical components but also provide a new perspective on the story (with news created as quizzes, lists, questions with titles, etc.) and news broadcasting (making the news more interesting for users so they can broadcast it on their social networks). According to Deuze (2004), multimedia journalism is defined by the convergence of text, graphics, audio, and video on a single platform. Although the goal of this convergence is to improve the narrative by making it more dynamic and captivating, it may also overwhelm the significance of textual content that has been thoroughly researched. Deuze argues that the visual and interactive elements take the lead in drawing in and holding the audience’s interest, often at the cost of in-depth reporting and journalistic research. In support of this theory, Pavlik (2001) examined how journalism has changed in the digital era and points out that the popularity of multimedia forms has increased the focus on visual storytelling methods. While these methods might make news more approachable and compelling, Pavlik pointed out that they also run the risk of oversimplifying complicated issues to fit visual formats, missing the nuanced analysis that comes with traditional text-based journalism. The impact of digital media on news production and consumption was further examined by Boczkowski (2005). According to his research, news companies frequently choose visually striking material that increases user engagement when multimedia elements are integrated. Because of the emphasis on visuals, there may be less in-depth reporting and analysis because resources are being directed toward creating multimedia material that has a higher chance of becoming viral.
2.1. “Quality Journalism”: Core Principles and Challenges
The question of why we should care about “quality journalism” begins with the question of why we should care about journalism at all. The obvious answer is that a free and independent press serves informed citizenship. This defense reflects a fundamental assumption that aggregated individual decisions to elect officials are optimal when voters have access to large amounts of information and opinions. News media provide this information and opinions. More generally, by making information more transparent in society, journalism is an essential component of democratic autonomy (Lacy and Rosenstiel 2015).
If one accepts the definition that quality represents the ability of journalism to perform its functions, then improving the quality of journalism will improve people’s ability to make sense of the chaotic world around us. Quality journalism interprets, analyses, and strives to give meaning to all the babbling that is going on (Vehkoo 2010).
“Quality journalism” measurements are important, but they become more complex when we try to measure and define “quality journalism”. The are no global criteria established, and often, the meaning of the term “quality journalism” varies from individual to individual based on their cultural, social, economic, or educational backgrounds (Bachmann et al. 2022).
Vehkoo (2010) discussed three main perspectives from where we can look at and examine quality. Through the public’s view—to what extent do the media inform, educate, and entertain audiences, through the perspective of media companies and what they do to understand better the needs of their audiences and, of course, from journalists’ point of view.
However, this paper, in order to explore the concept of “quality journalism,” will focus on the academic and journalistic perspectives. We will try to define what quality means in a commonly acceptable way, at least to most journalists.
“Quality journalism” adheres to basic principles such as accuracy, objectivity, and ethical reporting. It serves as a watchdog, providing in-depth analysis and contextual information. However, the challenges of maintaining “quality journalism” in a rapidly changing digital environment are enormous. There have been a number of theoretical contributions from recent years worth mentioning, which have tried to define “quality journalism”, such as Bogart’s (2004), Picard’s (2000), McQuail’s (2005), and Ramírez de la Piscina et al. (2015) among others. This study synthesizes these perspectives to define and measure quality journalism comprehensively.
Picard (2000) implements that you know quality when you see it, or you will definitely know when it’s not there. He believes that the way to measure quality in journalism is by evaluating journalistic practices, like conducting interviews, gathering information, attending events and meetings, reading, or organizing material.
Most recently, Bogart (2004) points out three measures for quality journalism: (1) a high ratio of staff-written articles, (2) a high amount of editorial content, and (3) a high proportion of interpretation and background of news.
McQuail (1992) approached the concept of media quality from a normative democratic perspective. He defined media quality as “the independent assessment of mass media provision according to alternative ‘public interest’ criteria, by way of an objective and systematic method of research, taking account of other relevant evidence and the normal operating conditions and requirements of the media concerned” (McQuail 1992, p. 17, as cited in de la Piscina Martínez et al. 2014). Later, he identified five basic values of media quality: freedom, equality, diversity, truth, information quality, and social order and solidarity (McQuail 2005). For McQuail, freedom applies to the ability to express oneself publicly without government or economic system restrictions. The second value, media equality, refers to access to media and being open and equal to all, not only accessible to elite groups. For diversity, he suggested a number of dimensions (McQuail 2005, p. 198): “genre, style of the format in culture or entertainment; news and information topics covered; political viewpoints; and so on”. For the fourth value, McQuail used the term “objectivity”, acknowledging the limitations of the concept, while his final value is connected with media quality, which is social order and solidarity and relates to the role of the media to create “harmony and “integration”.
Bill Kovach and Tom Rosenstiel, in their book “The Elements of Journalism” (Kovach and Rosenstiel 2014), they enumerated nine principles that are fundamental to the journalism profession after a three-year study. In Western countries, this list of nine principles is currently regarded as the industry standard. So, for a journalist, in order to provide people with the information they need, journalism must deliver the following: (1) the truth is journalism’s first duty, (2) its citizens are its top priority, (3) it is fundamentally a verification discipline, (4) its practitioners need to remain apart from the people they are covering, (5) it needs to function as a stand-alone power meter, (6) it needs to offer a forum for citizen compromise and criticism, (7) it should aim to make the noteworthy engaging and pertinent, (8) the news must remain balanced and complete, (9) its practitioners need to be permitted to follow their own conscience. Terms like objectivity, fairness, and balance are not on this list because the writers felt that they were too ambiguous and debatable for everyone to agree upon. They believe that this list is essential to clarifying the fundamental principles of journalism, even though many journalists may find it self-evident. Although this notion of journalism is frequently required of journalists, it is rarely stated.
According to Meijer (2001), the public’s level of engagement with journalism should be the determining factor in its quality. Engagement is more than just attracting big audiences; it also entails developing deep relationships with audience members, provoking thought, and advancing civic engagement. Relevance is the most important factor when it comes to public quality standards. Journalism needs to cover themes that have an impact on people’s everyday lives as well as larger societal challenges. It also needs to handle issues that the public finds important. Additionally, inclusivity is essential since it guarantees the representation of a range of voices in journalism. In order to present a comprehensive picture of society’s concerns, this entails incorporating viewpoints from various demographic groups, socioeconomic backgrounds, and marginalized communities. Credibility is increased when journalistic methods are transparent. This requires being transparent about the sources used, the journalistic method, and the information’s limits. Social media and interactive platforms can facilitate active audience interaction, which will improve journalism’s public quality even more. This interaction includes responding to audience comments and incorporating them into the creation of news. The limits between information and entertainment are frequently blurred in popular journalism. Although this may draw in larger audiences, it is crucial to strike a balance so that entertainment does not detract from journalism’s importance and informational value. Complex subjects can be made more approachable and interesting for the general audience by using storytelling techniques. The reporting’s depth and factual integrity should not be jeopardized, though. “Popular journalism” can serve the public interest more effectively and promote informed and involved citizens by abiding by these ideals. These highlightings offer an overview of the key points covered in Meijer’s work, illustrating her belief that journalism should empower and educate the audience in addition to providing entertainment.
Foundational research by Urban and Schweiger (2014) provided a comprehensive review of “quality journalism”, emphasizing its essential role in democracy and informed citizenship. Given that today’s media landscape is characterized by greater competition, commercialization, and economic constraints that may force media firms to compromise on standards of journalistic quality, the study is especially pertinent.
Media consumers are frequently exposed to news that is partial, prejudiced, or factually incorrect, as noted by Urban and Schweiger. In order to combat the forces that push media companies to compromise on quality, they emphasize how critical it is for recipients to be able to assess news quality with accuracy. Their research attempts to examine the assumption made by communication researchers, who typically claim that recipients lack the expertise necessary to evaluate news quality. Their study identified six essential components of normative news quality. The incorporation of many social groups and ideologies in reporting is referred to as diversity. Focusing on contemporary and socially significant concerns is what is meant by relevance. To enable people to comprehend societal issues and make wise judgments, accuracy entails supplying accurate and comprehensive information. News must be comprehensible in order for its recipients to understand it. Neutral and balanced reporting is necessary for impartiality. Finally, news must follow ethical guidelines in accordance with ethical norms. According to the study, recipients could distinguish between news sources that varied in variety, impartiality, and relevancy. Nonetheless, they found it difficult to assess news articles’ morality, objectivity, and readability.
Technological advancements and economic pressures significantly influence journalists’ ability to produce “quality journalism”. McManus (1994) argues that “market-driven journalism”, which prioritizes profits and audience appeal over traditional journalistic values, poses a threat to the quality and integrity of news reporting. His book explored the consequences of this shift, including the rise of sensationalism, the decline of investigative journalism, and the increasing influence of corporate interests on news content. McManus supports actions that focus on reducing the negative effects of “market-driven journalism”. To help distinguish “quality journalism” from entertainment, these measures involve improving regulatory frameworks, promoting citizen-oriented journalism, and launching media literacy campaigns. Also, Cohen (2002) demonstrated how the online news industry’s demands force platforms to prioritize material that generates a lot of traffic and advertising funds. Sensationalist and entertainment-focused content frequently follow, overshadowing in-depth and investigative reporting. The chase of profit also brings up serious ethical issues, such as potential biases and lowered journalistic standards. In order to increase engagement and clicks, online news outlets often treat their audience like customers by customizing material to suit widespread preferences.
“Quality journalism” remains the foundation of democracy and the free exchange of information. The fundamental principles of accuracy, independence, fairness, public interest, transparency, and accountability are essential to maintaining an informed and engaged citizenry. However, the challenges journalism faces in the digital age, dilemmas of economic hardship, misinformation, polarization, and ethical dilemmas, threaten its sustainability. In the face of economic, technological, and communicative issues in the so-called “post-truth age” new formats, coverage patterns, and distribution processes have emerged (Meier et al. 2022). To maintain journalistic integrity, society and industry must work together to address these challenges while respecting the principles that underpin “quality journalism”.
2.2. “Viral Journalism”: Characteristics and Trends
Diverging from the exploration of “what does media do to people?” which is central to discussions about “quality journalism” focusing on the impact of media on individuals, we now turn our attention to “what people do with media?” and how they utilize media platforms. In the case of “viral journalism”, people may share content because it provides entertainment, helps them stay informed about current events, allows them to express their opinions, or facilitates social interaction by sparking conversations and debates.
In order to understand better what “viral journalism” is, first, we have to define what virality is. Although there are many definitions, based on the Oxford Dictionary (
Researchers in marketing and advertising conducted some of the earliest studies on viral material, primarily employing emotion studies. According to Jenkins et al. (2013), the phrase “viral marketing” was first used by the “firm Draper Fisher Jurvetson in 1997 to describe Hotmail’s use of advertisements…. to promote its free email service”. In their same study on spreadable media, they assert that if a piece of content has a “perceived social value”, it may go viral (Jenkins et al. 2013), while some academics believe that viral content is just word-of-mouth extended further (Phelps et al. 2004), or also known as “buzz-marketing”.
It appears that the usefulness of the information is one of the components of virality. Berger and Milkman (2013), for instance, speak of the six elements of virality, or STEPPS for brief: social currency, triggers, emotion, public, practical value, and stories. Additionally, Mills (2012) states that for a message to go viral, it must possess some level of likeability, which is defined as “the degree to which the message is stimulating or engaging in some emotional or intellectual way” (Mills 2012, pp. 166–67). Accordingly, the author established four factors—”the spreadability of content based on personal factors, the propagativity of content based on the media type, the integration of multiple media platforms, and the successive reinforcement of messaging”—that serve as generators for viral marketing. This framework is referred to as the SPIN framework.
The “two-step flow” communication model (Katz 1957; Lazarsfeld et al. 1944) connects “buzz-marketing” and the “spreadable” audience attitude toward media consumption with journalism. It claims that influential audience members disseminate information to their contacts and followers. Mediators are important in journalism since so many individuals consume journalism through friends and followers on social media.
Users select sources according to two criteria: those with which they generally agree and those that are “satisfactory” (Nahon and Hemsley 2013). In other words, these intermediaries serve as effective filters, sifting through the noteworthy and entertaining, opinionated, and thought-provoking news that keeps one informed and entertained. People frequently join “interest networks” (Nahon and Hemsley 2013) based on the subjects that interest them, as opposed to merely remaining in the networks because of contacts they have made in real life.
Furthermore, users’ engagement with the material is inconsistent and frequently superficial, which might lead to a “viral state of mind” (Denisova 2016), which refers to audiences with short attention spans who frequently form conclusions based on headlines rather than entire stories. In the digital age, the conventional notion of “incidental news consumption”, which has been researched for decades, is taking on new dimensions. Before the Internet, people would come upon stories they were not looking for but were exposed to via a newspaper or TV newscast. Nowadays, “incidental consumption” refers to discovering the stories while engaging in other online activities such as purchasing, listening to podcasts, or perusing social media feeds (Boczkowski et al. 2018; Mitchelstein et al. 2020; Valeriani and Vaccari 2016). According to Mitchelstein et al. (2020), there is a “continuum” of sporadic news exposure that includes headlines rather than complete stories on private social media platforms like WhatsApp, Telegram, text messages, direct messaging, and so on. “Viral journalism” has potential in this complex media system because it shares content that is engaging and relevant to a wide range of audiences. According to Bebić and Volarević (2016), “viral journalism is a form of online journalism in which the goal is to get as many readers as possible to click on an article and share it on social media”. However, there are a number of complicated processes involved in getting any media text to rank highly in online searches or trends on social media. With decades of trial and error, this sector of journalism has changed, frequently at the cost of professionalism in the process (Denisova 2023).
Also, the rise of digital-native news outlets like BuzzFeed exemplifies the changes in journalistic practices and the impact of “viral journalism”. BuzzFeed is a digital media company well-known for combining news and entertainment content. BuzzFeed was founded in 2006 by Jonah Peretti and John S. Johnson III, with an initial emphasis on social media sharing and viral content. Tandoc and Jenkins (2017) talk about BuzzFeed’s enormous impact on modern journalism. In order to reach a wider audience, BuzzFeed uses a hybrid model that blends new media techniques with conventional journalism, combining serious reporting with entertaining material. It uses analytics and data-driven journalism to customize content for maximal engagement and shareability. As a leader in native advertising, BuzzFeed helps to monetize digital journalism by blending adverts with original content in a seamless manner. The emphasis on producing viral content highlights a change in news values toward audience-driven content. Additionally, BuzzFeed pushes the limits of traditional journalism with its ongoing innovation and experimentation with new formats and platforms. BuzzFeed is a prime example of how journalism has changed by putting an emphasis on viral content and audience interaction, which has completely changed the way traditional news is reported. The industry is impacted by this trend toward “viral journalism” since it prioritizes shareable and engaging content, frequently at the price of more thorough, in-depth reporting. This change is indicative of a larger trend in which media outlets strike a compromise between their journalistic ethics and financial interests. In their analysis of BuzzFeed News and Vice News similarities, Dennis and Sampaio-Dias (2021) pay particular attention to how they employ language when covering elections. Vice News is a digital media company and news division of Vice Media, known for its immersive and unconventional reporting style. Established in 2014, it covers a wide range of subjects, such as politics, social concerns, and world events, frequently emphasizing underreported topics and distinctive viewpoints. Both organizations use emotional language to connect with their young audience. This means talking in an easygoing, relatable, and internet-culture-reflective way, equivalent to having a casual conversation with friends. In order to make political content more approachable and interesting for younger readers, they incorporate subjective, confessional, and individualized modes of expression—all of which are prevalent in social media communication.
“Viral journalism” represents a dynamic and evolving aspect of modern journalism. It leverages digital tools, social media platforms, and engaging storytelling techniques to quickly attract and maintain the attention of a large audience. Features like catchy titles, emotional appeal, and shareable formats contribute to the viral nature of the content. Meanwhile, the “viral journalism” trend highlights the dominance of social media, user-generated content, and the importance of visuals and data-driven storytelling.
Kaur et al. (2020) studied through content analysis the different effects of “viral journalism” on news content, the most important being that hard news is replaced by soft news. In addition, in “viral journalism”, attention shifts to shareable content that attracts readers’ attention, leading to clickbait headlines that often contribute significantly to the spread of fake news.
“Viral journalism” faces challenges in maintaining accuracy and combating misinformation, as the pace of content dissemination can sometimes outpace efforts to verify facts. As the digital landscape continues to evolve, news organizations will need to adapt to these trends and characteristics to engage audiences and maintain journalistic integrity effectively.
2.3. Tensions and Trade-Offs
The coexistence of “quality journalism” and “viral journalism” can create tensions within media organizations and create ethical dilemmas for journalists. Finding the right balance between reaching a wide audience and meeting journalistic standards is an ongoing challenge. Journalists often face the dilemma of choosing between pursuing a story that will attract attention or one that requires careful research and fact-checking. This tension can be illustrated by the pressure to release information quickly in a competitive environment, which can affect accuracy and fairness. The balance between clicks and credibility is at the forefront of discussions in newsrooms around the world, highlighting the need for journalists to navigate this complex landscape cautiously and responsibly. This article explores how “quality journalism” and “viral journalism” coexist and interact, shaping the contemporary media landscape.
In this context Ferrer-Conill and Tandoc (2018) emphasize the critical role that audience-oriented editors play in this context, interpreting metrics to guide editing decisions. These editors, who follow the trend in journalism toward an audience-centric approach, strike a balance between journalistic intuition and data-driven insights. Content development is significantly influenced by engagement, which is mostly defined in metrics such as page visits and social media engagements. This change is consistent with an increasing volume of digital journalism research highlighting the use of analytics to guide editorial decisions (Tandoc and Thomas 2015). Audience-oriented editors negotiate between data and editorial standards, ensuring that journalistic integrity is maintained while catering to audience preferences. In order to balance the conflict between “quality” and “viral” media, this dual role is essential. However, the lack of consistency in those positions among newsrooms suggests that journalism’s use of analytics is still developing. This result aligns with media study conversations regarding the benefits and difficulties brought about by the growing quantification of journalistic practices.
“Quality” and “viral” journalism play a complementary role in the media ecosystem. “Quality journalism” serves as a foundation for delivering trustworthy and informative news, while “viral journalism” amplifies the reach and engagement of these stories. In terms of newsroom routines, “quality journalism” pertains to the creation or production phase of journalism, while “viral journalism” relates to the dissemination or distribution phase of the process. “Quality journalism” informs the public about important events and issues and provides in-depth analysis. It plays an important role in democracy by holding those in power accountable and acting as a check and balance on government and institutions. Although “viral journalism” sometimes prioritizes entertainment and sensationalism, it raises awareness about a variety of topics and engages audiences in ways that “quality journalism” can struggle with.
The coexistence of “quality” and “viral journalism” requires adaptation in newsrooms. To stay relevant and competitive, news organizations must balance traditional journalistic values with the demands of digital and social media platforms. Many newsrooms now have teams dedicated to producing content specifically designed for virality in addition to their main quality journalism units.
Viral press often leads to increased web traffic and advertising revenue. This revenue can help support the operations of news organizations, including their “quality journalism” efforts. Therefore, the coexistence of these approaches can create a symbiotic financial relationship in which the financial benefits of viral content support the production of “quality journalism”. Social media platforms are essential for the coexistence of “quality” and “viral journalism”. “Quality journalism” relies on these platforms for distribution, leveraging their reach to inform the public. “Viral journalism”, on the other hand, actively exploits the viral nature of social media, creating content optimized for sharing and engagement on these platforms.
While “quality journalism” and virality can coexist, they also pose challenges and trade-offs. The need for speed and pressure to go viral can sometimes spread unverified information and sensational content, eroding the principles of “quality journalism”. Finding the right balance between rapid engagement and accurate reporting is a persistent challenge in this coexistence.
“Quality journalism” is built on trust, achieved through a consistent commitment to accuracy, transparency, and objectivity. In contrast, “viral journalism” can be seen as prioritizing clicks and shares over journalistic principles. Finding a balance to maintain public trust while benefiting from the virality of digital content poses a challenge to their overall survival. “Viral journalism” sometimes uses clickbait, sensationalism, and emotional manipulation to attract shares and engagement. While this approach may be effective in spreading the word, it raises ethical questions. The coexistence of “quality journalism” and “viral journalism” requires ongoing discussions and decision-making regarding the industry’s ethical standards. “Quality journalism” is designed to hold the power to account and maintain transparency. “Viral journalism” can sometimes operate without the same level of accountability and transparency, potentially contributing to the spread of misinformation. The coexistence of these approaches highlights the need for vigilant efforts to maintain journalistic integrity.
The concurrence of “quality journalism” and “viral journalism” means news organizations can speak to diverse audiences. “Quality journalism” addresses the need for in-depth, unbiased reporting, while “viral journalism” can attract a broader, more diverse audience by addressing hot topics, important stories, and more.
Thus, the study explores two main research questions:
RQ 1: How do Greek news organizations balance the tension between viral and quality journalism in covering political events?
RQ2: What are the consequences of prioritizing “viral” content over quality in political reporting?
3. Materials and Methods
The main methodological tool for this study is content analysis, which aims at the unveiling of social reality. When conducting content analysis, one approaches a written text to uncovering data that can verify the relation between subjectivity and objectivity.
To illustrate the dynamic between “quality journalism” and “viral journalism” and delve more into its features, we look at the case of Stefanos Kasselakis, which is used as an example to highlight how certain stories “go viral” and what are the effects on the credibility of the content.
“Viral content” is known for attractive headlines containing a question or a series of images. Also, content that evokes a lot of emotion from the reader is more likely to go viral (Berger and Milkman 2013). The ability of these types of features to influence the audiences explains, to a great extent, why so many media outlets have adopted them. Many articles are often written in shorter lengths and sometimes with more humor (Tandoc and Jenkins 2017).
This analysis is an attempt to explain the selection of specific features and their potential influence on readers. As such, it does not permit any generalization of results.
Collection and Analysis: The Case of Stefanos Kasselakis
This study is based on a qualitative analysis of articles from four online media outlets in Greece that referred to Stefanos Kasselakis, the new leader of the Greek political party SYRIZA-Progressive Alliance party, either in their headlines or their news leads.
The sample under analysis is taken from the following sites:
There were two criteria by which the online newspapers listed in Table 1 were selected. The first has to do with the traffic of the websites, and the second is related to the type of funding, whether it is advertising-based or subscription-based media. Regarding traffic, we derived the data from the ranking of the online platform
Stefanos Kasselakis, with no prior political experience in the politics of Greece, crashed with the force of an asteroid on current Greek political and media life. Openly gay, alleged shipowner, American-bred, presumably charismatic, yet previously unknown, he made the huge leap from obscurity to becoming leader of the second largest party, SYRIZA. He has been several times characterized as “Messiah” both from the national media and his political opponents.
The period of analysis was limited to articles published in September 2023, when news about Stefanos Kasselakis and his candidacy for the presidency in the party’s upcoming internal elections that would be held on 17 September 2023, first broke out.
At this point, it is worth mentioning that headlines play a crucial role in news articles. They offer readers context, help them understand the information better, and stimulate the interpretation of the content by triggering relevant background knowledge (Bransford and Johnson 1972; Dor 2003; Ifantidou 2009). Furthermore, among the defining features of clickbait, the headline is considered the most important bait, given its critical significance in the selection of news (Bazaco et al. 2019). According to Chakraborty et al. (2016) and their linguistic analysis, clickbait headlines, as opposed to non-clickbait headlines, tend to have longer sentences that contain both substantive elements (specific references) and functional words (words with ambiguous meanings). In addition, clickbait headlines tend to contain more frequently used words and highly positive language. In particular, they often address the reader directly using first- and second-person pronouns. This is a departure from the third-person perspective commonly found in non-clickbait headlines (Chakraborty et al. 2016).
A total of 1,630 articles from the three media outlets have been analyzed, as insidestory did not publish any content with the aforementioned characteristics. The components analyzed were clickbait headlines and references to the appearance of the social and personal life of Stefanos Kasselakis. The questions that guided the analysis were:
Does the title have clickbait characteristics in terms of word usage, image selections, etc?
Does it contain questions?
Does it contain references to Kasselakis’ personal and social life?
The presentation of the findings is organized across each medium so as to paint a clear picture of how the political economy of each medium and its orientation plays a significant role in the way it addresses issues.
4. Discussion
Before Kasselakis entered the race, his political opponent Achtsioglou had been the clear frontrunner to succeed former Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras, who resigned following SYRIZA’s significant defeat in May’s 2023 elections.
Kasselakis was seen as emblematic of a “post-politics” era, as he ascended to the leadership without engaging in debates or interviews, instead relying on a continuous stream of social media posts featuring his American partner, his gym routines, his dog, and his coffee preferences.
His candidacy sidestepped the normal course of public discussion, using social media platforms to project, even create, a tailored image as he ran a campaign more akin to entertainment than politics, eschewing substance and meaning for the tools of a digital influencer.
Enlightening is the following event. On the night SYRIZA, Greece’s biggest left-wing party, voted for its new leader, Kasselakis’ team ordered pizzas. Kasselakis came down to the lobby with his partner, Tyler McBeth, to collect the pizzas in person. Later, he returned to hand out a few pizzas to the journalists. The pizza delivery story was at the top of Google search results for Kasselakis’ name. The incident is emblematic of his campaign, which catapulted him onto Greece’s political scene over a matter of weeks. He used a mastery of TikTok, Instagram, and X to create an unexpected buzz around his name and his personal life.
The election of Stefanos Kasselakis serves as an ideal case study for examining the prevalence of “viral journalism”. His candidacy and subsequent victory have attracted widespread attention and coverage, showcasing the dynamics of sensationalism within media discourse. By dissecting the media portrayal of Kasselakis through headlines and leads, we can illuminate the factors contributing to the proliferation of viral content in political reporting.
“Viral journalism” often focuses on topics that are timely, sensational, or emotionally compelling, as these tend to garner more attention and shares online. It relies heavily on catchy headlines, striking visuals, and content that evokes strong reactions from readers or viewers. The following section will present the analysis results of newspaper headlines and articles with the tag Stefanos Kasselakis.
Analysis of headlines of this period connected to Kasselakis, fulfill the criteria of emotional appeal, have powerful language and imagery, as well as engagement potential. Media organizations used it as a part of their strategy to catch readers through “a headline that does not respond to traditional journalistic criteria and whose ultimate goal is to keep the reader in the webpage for as long as possible, not to inform” (Orosa et al. 2017, p. 1265). This perspective defines headlines as “stylistic and narrative instruments that function as decoys to induce anticipation and curiosity in the reader so that they click on the headline and continue reading” (Blom and Hansen 2015, p. 87).
4.1. Proto Thema
“Proto Thema” is a Greek Sunday newspaper that was first published on 27 February 2005 and remains the Sunday newspaper with the largest circulation. In January 2008, the
Clickbait headlines appeared as the main style of writing on
Characteristic is the first title in Figure 3: “If Kasselakis looked like Quasimodo would we bother with him?” wrote Vicky Hatzivasiliou on Instagram. We all succumbed to beauty… racism” or the first title in Figure 4 “Video: Kasselakis’ training with Tyler in Spetses”. It becomes evident that Kasselakis’ portrayal hinges on superficial elements such as appearance. This tendency sheds light on a significant factor contributing to the proliferation of viral content in political reporting: the tendency to prioritize sensationalistic aspects over substantive issues. By scrutinizing how Kasselakis is judged based on his appearance or his gym routines, we can uncover the role of superficial narratives in driving the spread of viral content within political discourse.
4.2. iefimerida.gr
The
Continuing our analysis, we note that the second online platform we chose
We can read in the second headline of Figure 6, “The journalists were in a frenzy with Kasselakis because he treated them to a bagel”. Headlines like this, as Palau-Sampio notes, can also be associated with a certain type that “unlike the informative headline, appeals to curiosity with humor, emotion or classic baits like sex” (Palau-Sampio 2016, p. 68). Palau-Sampio puts this phenomenon in relation to infotainment and content trivialization, and associates it with the “viral strategies, developed in the field of marketing (…) an important resource when feeding digital traffic, and the ability of new media to capture advertising” (Palau-Sampio 2016, p. 67). We also have the headline “Kasselakis responds to a homophobic comment” in Figure 7, which again points to Kasselakis’ sexual orientation.
It is clear that there is no in-depth analysis of the events but a simple reproduction of statements and comments made on social media. Several times, it was observed the phenomenon that the name Stefanos Kasselakis is mentioned in the title, but, in fact, the content of the article does not refer to or directly concern him, and this proves once again the pursuit of clicks and high engagement rate. After all, it is quite common in today’s digital landscape for many news organizations to find themselves in a challenging situation, torn between adhering to online trends to attract public attention and make a profit, while maintaining their reputation as trustworthy news sources (Silverman 2015).
4.3. The Press Project
In contrast to the first two online media we studied,
In comparison to the sophisticated clickbait headlines of the period, the articles analyzed for
4.4. Inside Story
The site
Unlike the other three online media, the results we found were completely different when we did the relevant search with the name Stefanos Kasselakis for the same period (September 2023). There was no specific category with articles about Stefanos Kasselakis and the current news about the election. Instead, the results led us to a special category with humorous content through which the person of Stefanos Kasselakis was commented on (see Figure 10). More specifically, this category contained memes whose content criticized the current political situation and what was being discussed about Stefanos Kasselakis and his candidacy as shown in Figure 11. Essentially, it was a reproduction of memes that had been published on other online platforms with small humorous captions—comments.
The way they chose to approach this person and the prevailing situation around it reinforces the profile of this online medium and the way it operates. After all, they themselves state this clearly within their website: “Here you won’t find the news you read elsewhere. We don’t focus on the news of the day. You can get that for free” accessed on 7 April 2024).
The
5. Conclusions
In summary, Kasselakis’ case study reveals factors that greatly affect the nature and quality of information disseminated to the public. The emergence of homogeneity highlights a troubling limitation in the concepts presented, preventing a full understanding of complex issues. This limitation is exacerbated by the relationship between social media and traditional media structures, and online platforms often promote certain issues, potentially to the detriment of others.
6. Key Findings
The findings have not been surprising considering the type of outlets studied and their characteristics. On the one hand, “viral journalism” offers a good way to earn as a news medium for advertising, while on the other hand, if you are looking for loyal readers, then one needs to invest more on credibility. In the hunt for sustainable business models, publishers have to answer the question of ad-based or subscription-based media business models, which is a key one, and accordingly design their content strategy. The most important findings from our analysis are two:
The revenue models seem to be an important factor for “virality”. When they pay for the content, readers expect high quality. So, the content has to meet the expectations of the reader. From our analysis, it became evident that the only outlet with a subscription in our sample (
“Viral” journalism techniques mainly concern the headlines. Therefore the headlines are made as attractive as possible. Additionally, there has been a sharp decline in in-depth analysis in news articles that look at clicks and traffic in the digital realm. Prioritizing emotion and conciseness over critical analysis compromises the integrity and credibility of the information presented to the audience. This trend not only undermines the public’s access to minority opinions but also undermines trust in media organizations. On the other hand, the consideration of target audiences in content production highlights the professional importance of journalism. Tailoring content to the preferences and expectations of a particular demographic can sustain one narrative while marginalizing others, thereby shaping public discourse in predetermined ways.
Furthermore, we can assume that the orientation of news organizations plays an important role in news production, as biases and norms within these organizations influence editorial decisions. These biases can distort information delivery, impose strengthening pre-existing beliefs and ideas, and ignore the use of new ideas. As Silverman (2015) mentioned, certain content labeled as “viral” does not become truly viral until news websites choose to promote it. Also, the influence of different sources of income on news content cannot be ignored. Financial support from institutions can introduce biases and conflicts of interest into editorial decisions, potentially undermining the integrity and objectivity of journalists. Thus, media organizations face a dilemma between adhering to online trends to sustain profitability and upholding high standards to preserve credibility as news sources (Silverman 2015).
In conclusion, a full understanding of media content production requires an analytical examination of the complexities at play. By scrutinizing the impact of product uniformity, social media trends, lack of in-depth research, lack of media channels, target audience perceptions, and revenue streams participants can better understand the modern media ecosystem and the diverse, informative, and reliable media environment.
In a world where the digital landscape dominates the media landscape, there is a need to come up with strategies to bridge the gap between “quality journalism” and “viral journalism”. We discuss ways for news organizations, journalists, and consumers to make healthy choices, promote responsible reporting, and combat the pitfalls of emotion. Recommendations should include a call for transparent sources of information, media literacy for consumers, and the importance of critical thinking in times of information overload. Encouraging responsible sharing on social media and supporting quality independent journalism organizations are also integral parts of this section.
To better understand the implications of this research, future studies should investigate whether the results are applicable to different countries and focus more on business strategies and their link to content.
Conceptualization, I.K. and Z.P.; Methodology, I.K. and Z.P.; Writing—original draft, Z.P.; Writing—review & editing, I.K. and Z.P.; Supervision, I.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Enlarge this image.Figure 1. Screenshot of the website similarweb.com showing the performance of the four online newspapers from August to October 2023.
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. Screenshots of the protothema.gr section with the tag Stefanos Kasselakis.
Enlarge this image.Figure 3. Screenshots of clickbait headlines of the protothema.gr for Stefanos Kasselakis.
Enlarge this image.Figure 4. Screenshots of clickbait headlines of the protothema.gr for Stefanos Kasselakis.
Enlarge this image.Figure 5. Screenshots of clickbait headlines of iefimerida.gr section with the tag Stefanos Kasselakis.
Enlarge this image.Figure 6. Screenshots of clickbait headlines of the iefimerida.gr for Stefanos Kasselakis.
Enlarge this image.Figure 7. Screenshots of clickbait headlines of the iefimerida.gr for Stefanos Kasselakis.
Enlarge this image.Figure 8. Screenshot of the search results of thepressproject.gr about Stefanos Kasselakis.
Enlarge this image.Figure 9. Screenshots of headlines of thepressproject.gr for Stefanos Kasselakis.
Enlarge this image.Figure 10. Screenshot of the search results of insidestory.gr about Stefanos Kasselakis.
Enlarge this image.Figure 11. Screenshot of the special category with memes of insidestory.gr about Stefanos Kasselakis.
Source of articles for analysis.
| Publication | Number of Related Articles |
|---|---|
| | 900 |
| | 700 |
| | 30 |
| | 0 |
References
Al-Rawi, Ahmed. Viral news on social media. Digital Journalism; 2019; 7, pp. 63-79.
Anderson, Chris W. Between creative and quantified audiences: Web metrics and changing patterns of newswork in local US newsrooms. Journalism; 2011; 12, pp. 550-66. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1464884911402451]
Bachmann, Philipp; Eisenegger, Mark; Ingenhoff, Diana. Defining and measuring news media quality: Comparing the content perspective and the audience perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics; 2022; 27, pp. 9-37. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1940161221999666]
Bazaco, Ángela; Redondo, Marta; Sánchez-García, Pilar. Clickbait as a strategy of viral journalism: Conceptualisation and methods. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social; 2019; 74, pp. 94-115. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2019-1323]
Bebić, Domagoj; Volarević, Marija. Viral journalism: The rise of a new form. Medijska Istraživanja: Znanstveno-Stručni Časopis za Novinarstvo i Medije; 2016; 22, pp. 107-26. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.22572/mi.22.2.6]
Berger, Jonah; Milkman, Katherine L. Emotion and virality: What makes online content go viral?. NIM Marketing Intelligence Review; 2013; 5, pp. 18-23. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0022]
Blom, Jonas Nygaard; Hansen, Kenneth Reinecke. Click bait: Forward-reference as lure in online news headlines. Journal of Pragmatics; 2015; 76, pp. 87-100. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.010]
Boczkowski, Pablo J. Digitizing the News: Innovation in Online Newspapers; MIT Press: Cambridge, 2005.
Boczkowski, Pablo J. Technology, monitoring, and imitation in contemporary news work. Communication, Culture & Critique; 2009; 2, pp. 39-59.
Boczkowski, Pablo J.; Mitchelstein, Eugenia; Matassi, Mora. “News comes across when I’m in a moment of leisure”: Understanding the practices of incidental news consumption on social media. New Media & Society; 2018; 20, pp. 3523-39.
Bogart, Leo. Reflections on content quality in newspapers. Newspaper Research Journal; 2004; 25, pp. 40-53.
Bransford, John D.; Johnson, Marcia K. Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior; 1972; 11, pp. 717-26. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80006-9]
Chakraborty, Abhijnan; Paranjape, Bhargavi; Kakarla, Sourya; Ganguly, Niloy. Stop clickbait: Detecting and preventing clickbaits in online news media. Paper presented at 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM); Davis, CA, USA, August 18–21; 2016; pp. 9-16.
Cohen, Elisia L. Online journalism as market-driven journalism. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media; 2002; 46, pp. 532-48.
de la Piscina Martínez, Txema Ramirez; González, María Gorosarri; Yarza, Alazne Aiestaran; Loidi, Beatriz Zabalondo; Maiora, Antxoka Agirre. Periodismo de calidad en tiempos de crisis: Un análisis de la evolución de la prensa europea de referencia (2001–2012). Revista Latina de Comunicación Social; 2014; 3, pp. 2-27. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2014-1011]
Denisova, Anastasia. Memes, Not Her Health, Could Cost Hillary Clinton the US Presidential Race. The Independent; 12 September 2016.
Denisova, Anastasia. Viral journalism. Strategy, tactics and limitations of the fast spread of content on social media: Case study of the United Kingdom quality publications. Journalism; 2023; 24, pp. 1919-37. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14648849221077749]
Dennis, James; Sampaio-Dias, Susana. “Tell the Story as You’d Tell It to Your Friends in a Pub”: Emotional Storytelling in Election Reporting by BuzzFeed News and Vice News. Journalism Studies; 2021; 22, pp. 1608-26.
Deuze, Mark. What is multimedia journalism?. Journalism Studies; 2004; 5, pp. 139-52. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1461670042000211131]
Dor, Daniel. On newspaper headlines as relevance optimizers. Journal of Pragmatics; 2003; 35, pp. 695-721.
Ferrer-Conill, Raul; Tandoc, Edson C., Jr. The audience-oriented editor: Making sense of the audience in the newsroom. Digital Journalism; 2018; 6, pp. 436-53. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1440972]
Himma-Kadakas, Marju; Kõuts, Ragne. Who is willing to pay for online journalistic content?. Media and Communication; 2015; 3, pp. 106-15. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17645/mac.v3i4.345]
Ifantidou, Elly. Newspaper headlines and relevance: Ad hoc concepts in ad hoc contexts. Journal of Pragmatics; 2009; 41, pp. 699-720.
Jenkins, Henry; Ford, Sam; Green, Joshua. Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture; NYU Press: New York, 2013.
Katz, Elihu. The two-step-flow of communication. An up-to-date report on a hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly; 1957; 21, pp. 61-78. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/266687]
Kaur, Sawinder; Kumar, Parteek; Kumaraguru, Ponnurangam. Detecting clickbaits using two-phase hybrid CNN-LSTM biterm model. Expert Systems with Applications; 2020; 151, 113350. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113350]
Kovach, Bill; Rosenstiel, Tom. The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect; Three Rivers Press: New York, 2014.
Lacy, Stephen; Rosenstiel, Tom. Defining and Measuring Quality Journalism; Rutgers School of Communication and Information: New Brunswick, 2015.
Lazarsfeld, Paul F.; Berelson, Bernard; Gaudet, Hazel. The People’s Choice; Columbia University Press: New York, 1944.
McManus, John H. Market-Driven Journalism: Let the Citizen Beware?; 1994; Available online: https://www.amazon.com/Market-Driven-Journalism-Let-Citizen-Beware/dp/0803952538 (accessed on 6 April 2024).
McQuail, Denis. Media Performance: Mass Communication and the Public Interest; 1992; Available online: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/media-performance/book202974 (accessed on 6 April 2024).
McQuail, Denis. McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory; 5th ed. Sage: London, 2005.
Meier, Klaus; Schützeneder, Jonas; Avilés, José Alberto García; Valero-Pastor, José María; Kaltenbrunner, Andy; Lugschitz, Renée; Porlezza, Colin; Ferri, Giulia; Wyss, Vinzenz; Saner, Micro. Examining the Most Relevant Journalism Innovations: A Comparative Analysis of Five European Countries from 2010 to 2020. Journal Media; 2022; 3, pp. 698-714. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia3040046]
Meijer, Irene Costera. The public quality of popular journalism: Developing a normative framework. Journalism Studies; 2001; 2, pp. 189-205. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616700120042079]
Mills, Adam. Virality in Social Media: The SPIN Framework. Journal of Public Affairs; 2012; 12, pp. 162-69. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pa.1418]
Mitchelstein, Eugenia; Boczkowski, Pablo J.; Tenenboim-Weinblatt, Keren; Hayashi, Kaori; Villi, Mikko; Kligler-Vilenchik, Neta. Incidentality on a continuum: A comparative conceptualization of incidental news consumption. Journalism; 2020; 21, pp. 1136-53. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1464884920915355]
Nahon, Karine; Hemsley, Jeff. Going Viral; Polity Press: Cambridge, 2013.
Newman, Nic. Journalism, Media and Technology Trends and Predictions 2024; Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism: Oxford, 2024.
Orosa, Berta García; Santorum, Santiago Gallur; García, Xosé López. El uso del clickbait en cibermedios de los 28 países de la Unión Europea. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social; 2017; 72, pp. 1261-77. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2017-1218]
Palau-Sampio, Dolors. Reference press metamorphosis in the digital context: Clickbait and tabloid strategies in Elpais.com. Communication & Society; 2016; 29, pp. 63-79.
Pavlik, John V. Journalism and New Media; Columbia University Press: New York, 2001.
Phelps, Joseph; Lewis, Regina; Mobilio, Lynne; Perry, David; Raman, Niranjan. Viral Marketing or Electronic Word-of-Mouth Advertising: Examining Consumer Responses and Motivations to Pass along Email. Journal of Advertising Research; 2004; 44, pp. 333-48. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021849904040371]
Picard, Robert G. Measuring Media Content, Quality, and Diversity; Turku School of Economics and Business Administration: Turku, 2000.
Ramírez de la Piscina, Txema; Gorosarri, Maria Gonzalez; Aiestaran, Alazne; Zabalondo, Beatriz; Agirre, Antxoka. Differences between the quality of the printed version and online editions of the European reference press. Journalism; 2015; 16, pp. 768-90. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1464884914540432]
Silverman, Craig. Lies, Damn Lies, and Viral Content. 2015; Available online: https://www.cjr.org/tow_center_reports/craig_silverman_lies_damn_lies_viral_content.php (accessed on 6 April 2024).
Steensen, Steen. What’s stopping them? Towards a grounded theory of innovation in online journalism. Journalism Studies; 2009; 10, pp. 821-36. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616700902975087]
Tandoc, Edson C., Jr.; Jenkins, Joy. The Buzzfeedication of journalism? How traditional news organizations are talking about a new entrant to the journalistic field will surprise you!. Journalism; 2017; 18, pp. 482-500. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1464884915620269]
Tandoc, Edson C., Jr.; Thomas, Ryan J. The ethics of web analytics: Implications of using audience metrics in news construction. Digital Journalism; 2015; 3, pp. 243-58. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.909122]
Touri, Maria; Theodosiadou, Sophia; Kostarella, Ioanna. The internet’s transformative power on journalism culture in Greece: Looking beyond universal professional values. Digital Journalism; 2017; 5, pp. 233-51. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1166062]
Urban, Juliane; Schweiger, Wolfgang. News quality from the recipients’ perspective: Investigating recipients’ ability to judge the normative quality of news. Journalism Studies; 2014; 15, pp. 821-40. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2013.856670]
Valeriani, Augusto; Vaccari, Cristian. Accidental exposure to politics on social media as online participation equalizer in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. New Media & Society; 2016; 18, pp. 1857-74.
Vehkoo, Johanna. What Is Quality Journalism and How It Can Be Saved; Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism: Oxford, 2010; pp. 1-76.
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
; Palla, Zoi