It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Three quarters of all breast cancers express the estrogen receptor (ER, ESR1 gene), which promotes tumor growth and constitutes a direct target for endocrine therapies. ESR1 mutations have been implicated in therapy resistance in metastatic breast cancer, in particular to aromatase inhibitors. ESR1 mutations promote constitutive ER activity and affect other signaling pathways, allowing cancer cells to proliferate by employing mechanisms within and without direct regulation by the ER. Although subjected to extensive genetic and transcriptomic analyses, understanding of protein alterations remains poorly investigated. Towards this, we employed an integrated mass spectrometry based proteomic approach to profile the protein and phosphoprotein differences in breast cancer cell lines expressing the frequent Y537N and Y537S ER mutations. Global proteome analysis revealed enrichment of mitotic and immune signaling pathways in ER mutant cells, while phosphoprotein analysis evidenced enriched activity of proliferation associated kinases, in particular CDKs and mTOR. Integration of protein expression and phosphorylation data revealed pathway-dependent discrepancies (motility vs proliferation) that were observed at varying degrees across mutant and wt ER cells. Additionally, protein expression and phosphorylation patterns, while under different regulation, still recapitulated the estrogen-independent phenotype of ER mutant cells. Our study is the first proteome-centric characterization of ESR1 mutant models, out of which we confirm estrogen independence of ER mutants and reveal the enrichment of immune signaling pathways at the proteomic level.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Lund University, Division of Surgery, Oncology, and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Sweden (GRID:grid.4514.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0930 2361)
2 Imperial College London, Department of Surgery and Cancer, London, UK (GRID:grid.7445.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2113 8111)
3 Lund University, Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, Center for Molecular Protein Science, Lund, Sweden (GRID:grid.4514.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0930 2361); Swedish National Infrastructure for Biological Mass Spectrometry – BioMS, Lund, Sweden (GRID:grid.4514.4)
4 Lund University, Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund, Sweden (GRID:grid.4514.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0930 2361)
5 Lund University, Division of Infection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund, Sweden (GRID:grid.4514.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0930 2361)
6 Lund University, Division of Surgery, Oncology, and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Sweden (GRID:grid.4514.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0930 2361); Skåne University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Lund, Sweden (GRID:grid.411843.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 0623 9987)