Content area

Abstract

Accurately predicting future carbon emissions is of great significance for the government to scientifically promote carbon emission reduction policies. Among the current technologies for forecasting carbon emissions, the most prominent ones are econometric models and deep learning, but few works have systematically compared and analyzed the forecasting performance of the methods. Therefore, the paper makes a comparison for deep learning model, machine learning model, and the econometric model to demonstrate whether deep learning is an efficient method for carbon emission prediction research. In model mechanism, neural network for deep learning refers to an information processing model established by simulating biological neural system, and the model can be further extended through bionic characteristics. So the paper further optimizes the model from the perspective of bionics and proposes an innovative deep learning model based on the memory behavior mechanism of group creatures. Comparison results show that the prediction accuracy of the heuristic neural network is higher than that of the econometric model. Through in-depth analysis, the heuristic neural network is more suitable for predicting future carbon emissions, while the econometric model is more suitable for clarifying the impact of influencing factors on carbon emissions.

Details

Title
Which model is more efficient in carbon emission prediction research? A comparative study of deep learning models, machine learning models, and econometric models
Author
Yao, Xiao 1 ; Zhang, Hong 2 ; Wang, Xiyue 3 ; Jiang, Yadong 3 ; Zhang, Yuxi 1 ; Na, Xiaohong 3 

 Information Department of Hohai University, Changzhou, China (GRID:grid.257065.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1760 3465) 
 Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (GRID:grid.33199.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 0368 7223) 
 Business School of Hohai University, Changzhou, China (GRID:grid.257065.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1760 3465) 
Pages
19500-19515
Publication year
2024
Publication date
Mar 2024
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V.
ISSN
09441344
e-ISSN
16147499
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2955117941
Copyright
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.