Innovative Strategies for Sustainable Dairy Farming in Canada amidst Climate Change

Abstract

In recent years, the Canadian dairy sector has faced escalating challenges due to its significant contribution to greenhouse gas emissions, particularly methane. This paper critically examines a spectrum of innovative techniques aimed at mitigating methane emissions within this sector, scrutinizing their cost-effectiveness, efficiency, compatibility with animal welfare standards, and adherence to both existing and prospective Canadian environmental legislations. The discourse begins with an exhaustive overview of contemporary methane reduction methodologies relevant to dairy farming, followed by a rigorous analysis of their economic feasibility. This includes a detailed cost-benefit analysis, juxtaposed with the efficiency and technological advancements these techniques embody. A pivotal aspect of this examination is the alignment of animal welfare with emission reduction objectives, ensuring that the strategies employed do not compromise the health and well-being of dairy cattle. Furthermore, the paper delves into the legislative landscape of Canada, evaluating the congruence of these techniques with current environmental laws and anticipating future regulatory shifts. Performance indicators for emission reduction are critically assessed, establishing benchmarks tailored to the Canadian context. This is complemented by an exploration of the market potential of these innovations, including factors influencing their adoption and scalability in the market. The analysis culminates with a synthesis of case studies and best practices within Canada, offering insights into successful implementations and drawing lessons for future endeavors. This comprehensive approach not only addresses the immediate environmental and health impacts associated with dairy farming emissions but also significantly contributes to the overarching goal of sustainable development in the agricultural sector. The research presented in this paper holds significant implications for the future of sustainable dairy farming, offering a model for addressing environmental challenges while maintaining economic viability and animal welfare.

1. Introduction

In the context of global environmental challenges, the Canadian dairy industry is at a critical juncture, navigating the dual imperatives of sustainability and productivity. This review presents an in-depth analysis of the contemporary strategies and innovations aimed at reducing the environmental footprint of dairy farming, with a specific focus on mitigating methane emissions and enhancing sustainable practices. Recognizing the dairy sector’s substantial role in contributing to greenhouse gas emissions, particularly methane, our analysis probes into the efficacy of various emission reduction techniques, their alignment with animal welfare, and compliance with evolving environmental regulations.

The structure of this review is meticulously designed to offer a comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted approaches to sustainable dairy farming. We initiate our discourse by examining advanced manure management techniques and their role in emission reduction, underpinning the analysis with current scientific findings and economic considerations. The exploration extends to evaluating the integration of animal welfare into these strategies, ensuring that the pursuit of environmental goals does not compromise the well-being of dairy cattle.

An essential component of this review is the examination of the regulatory landscape in Canada, assessing the compatibility of innovative dairy farming practices with existing and upcoming environmental policies. This includes a critical analysis of performance indicators for emission reduction, tailored to the Canadian dairy sector, and an investigation into the market dynamics that influence the adoption and scalability of these practices.

Furthermore, the review synthesizes key insights from case studies and best practices within the Canadian context, drawing valuable lessons for future endeavors in the realm of sustainable dairy farming. By interweaving theoretical frameworks with empirical evidence, the review aims to provide a clear, coherent narrative that bridges the gap between research and practical application, offering a valuable resource for stakeholders across the dairy industry spectrum. Through this integrative approach, the manuscript aspires to delineate a path towards a more sustainable, efficient, and environmentally conscious dairy farming landscape, addressing both national and global sustainability challenges.

1.1. Climate Change and Dairy Farming

The interplay between climate change and dairy farming presents a multifaceted dynamic, with implications that span both local and global contexts. Globally, the dairy industry faces challenges such as rising temperatures inducing heat stress in cattle, adversely impacting health, milk production, and fertility. This global warming trend also disrupts the consistency of feed crop yields due to altered weather patterns, leading to potential nutritional deficiencies and escalated feed costs. Furthermore, the increasing scarcity of water, a crucial resource for dairy operations, amplifies the necessity for efficient water management. Additionally, a warmer climate escalates the prevalence and range of pests and diseases, necessitating advanced biosecurity and veterinary measures.

At the local level, the effects of climate change on dairy farming are influenced by distinct regional climatic conditions. For instance, in some areas of Canada, increased rainfall may enhance pasture growth, while others grapple with the adversities of drought and heat stress. These diverse local impacts call for tailored adaptation and mitigation strategies, including region-specific water conservation techniques and modifications in barn insulation and heating. The industry’s response to climate change is also shaped by varying economic conditions and governmental policies, which dictate the extent of subsidies for renewable energy and sustainable practices. Conversely, dairy farming significantly contributes to climate change, primarily through methane emissions from enteric fermentation and nitrous oxide from manure management. However, adopting sustainable practices like improved grazing management and soil conservation can enhance carbon sequestration, offsetting some of these emissions and underscoring the sector’s role in mitigating its environmental impact.

In the realm of Canadian agriculture, particularly in dairy farming, the challenge of mitigating emissions is gaining increasing urgency. Anthropogenic activities, including agriculture, contribute significantly to global methane emissions, with ruminants like beef and dairy cattle alone responsible for about 11% of the global methane output [1,2,3]. This environmental challenge is set to intensify with the United Nations projecting a global population surge to 9.8 billion by 2050 and 11.2 billion by 2100, alongside a rising demand for meat and dairy products [4]. In 2021, agriculture accounted for 31% of Canada’s methane emissions, predominantly from beef and dairy cattle [5,6]. The potency of methane as a greenhouse gas, over 28 to 34 times more effective than CO₂ [7,8,9] in warming the atmosphere, emphasizes the need for urgent action in this sector.

1.1.1. The Regional and Local Context of Dairy Farming in Canada

Dairy farming in Canada is a significant agricultural sector with distinctive regional characteristics influenced by local climate, geography, and farming practices. These regional nuances play a crucial role in understanding the sector’s impact on and adaptation to various challenges, including climate change.

1.1.2. Quebec and Ontario: The Canadian Dairy Powerhouses

Home to approximately 41% of Canada’s dairy farms, Quebec’s dairy industry is characterized by smaller, family-run farms. The province is known for its diverse range of dairy products, including fine cheeses. Quebec’s climate, with cold winters and warm summers, necessitates specific farming practices, such as the use of insulated barns and strategic feeding regimes to maintain production year-round. Contributing significantly to Canada’s milk production, Ontario’s dairy farms are typically larger and more commercially oriented. The region benefits from relatively milder weather, allowing for a variety of farming practices, including both indoor and pasture-based systems.

1.1.3. British Columbia: Diverse Climates and Farming Practices

The coastal areas of British Columbia enjoy a temperate climate that supports year-round grazing. However, the interior regions experience colder temperatures, influencing a shift towards more indoor housing for cattle. The province also leads in organic dairy farming and sustainable practices, responding to a strong local demand for organic products.

1.1.4. Prairie Provinces (Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba): Adapting to Extremes

These provinces face more extreme weather, with cold winters and hot summers. Dairy farms here are adapted to these conditions with insulated barns for winter and cooling systems for summer. The focus on technological advancements, such as robotic milking systems, is prominent in these regions.

1.1.5. Atlantic Provinces (New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland and Labrador): Small-Scale Operations

Dairy farming in the Atlantic provinces is characterized by smaller-scale operations. The climate is generally more humid, affecting both cattle housing and pasture management. The proximity to the Atlantic Ocean moderates temperatures but also brings challenges like higher humidity and frequent fog.

1.1.6. Northern Territories (Yukon, Northwest Territories, Nunavut): Limited Dairy Farming

Dairy farming in the northern territories is minimal due to the harsh climatic conditions. The focus in these areas is more on research and adapting practices suitable for extreme cold weather conditions.

1.1.7. Local Adaptations and Innovations

Regional variations in climate impact feed availability. For instance, in the prairie provinces, where growing conditions can be challenging, there is a greater reliance on stored feeds. In regions like British Columbia, water conservation practices are crucial due to periodic drought conditions. In contrast, in Quebec and Ontario, water availability is less of a concern.

Technology Adoption: There is a growing trend of technology adoption across Canada, with automated milking systems and advanced herd management software becoming increasingly popular. However, the extent of adoption varies by region, often influenced by farm size and economic factors.

1.1.8. Economic and Cultural Impact

Dairy farming significantly contributes to the rural economy in Canada. Each region has its own cultural and economic relationship with dairy farming, shaping local economies and communities. Quebec’s artisanal cheese production, for instance, is not just an economic activity but also a cultural identity, while Ontario’s larger-scale operations focus more on efficiency and market reach.

1.1.9. Environmental Practices and Sustainability

Canadian dairy farmers are increasingly adopting sustainable practices, including efficient manure management, reduced use of chemical fertilizers, and implementation of environmentally friendly technologies. The Dairy Farmers of Canada’s proAction initiative is a national program focusing on sustainability and quality, with adherence varying regionally based on specific environmental challenges and resources.

1.2. Exploring Sustainable Agricultural Practices and Methanogenesis in Dairy Farming

Here, we critically examine the multifaceted impacts of nitrogenous emissions from dairy cows, focusing on the intersection of environmental science, agricultural efficiency, and legislative compliance. Methanogenesis in ruminants involves a diverse microbial ecosystem within their specialized digestive system. Methanogens exhibit distinct metabolic pathways, categorized into methylotrophic, hydrogenotrophic, and acetoclastic clades, each playing a significant role in methane production [10,11]. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for developing effective methane emission mitigation strategies. Canada’s commitment to environmental sustainability is evident in its ambitious initiative to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from fertilizers by 30% below 2020 levels by 2030 [12,13]. This target holds particular relevance for dairy farming, a major contributor to nitrogen emissions through manure management, feed production, and fertilizer application.

1.3. Stakeholder Roles and Collaborative Efforts in Emission Reduction

In the complex arena of emission reduction within the dairy sector, a multifaceted array of stakeholders plays pivotal roles, each exerting varying degrees of influence and power over environmental policies and industry practices (Figure 1). The dynamics of this sector are intrinsically linked to the concerted efforts and interactions of these diverse groups, from regulatory bodies to consumer advocacy groups, each contributing to the shaping of a sustainable dairy industry.

At the forefront of this matrix are government agencies and regulatory bodies, wielding paramount power and influence. They are the architects of environmental policies, regulations, and standards that govern the dairy sector’s operational landscape. Their decisions and directives form the legal scaffold within which the entire industry operates, thereby directly influencing emission reduction strategies and compliance requirements. Complementing this regulatory framework, dairy industry associations such as Dairy Farmers of Canada and the Canadian Cattle Association emerge as key influencers, representing the collective voice of dairy farmers and producers. These associations hold sway not only in policy advocacy but also in guiding the practices of their members toward more sustainable approaches. Their lobbying efforts and policy recommendations can significantly impact regulatory outcomes, often serving as a bridge between government intentions and industry capabilities.

Parallel to these entities are environmental non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and advocacy groups. Although they may not possess direct authoritative power, their influence is formidable. Through rigorous research, public campaigns, and advocacy, these groups bring critical environmental issues to the forefront, influencing public opinion and exerting pressure on both the industry and governing bodies to adopt stricter environmental standards. Their role is vital in highlighting the environmental footprint of the dairy sector and advocating for sustainable practices.

In the commercial realm, large Canadian dairy corporations such as Lactanet and Agropur hold substantial clout. Their business decisions—be it adopting innovative, low-emission technologies or spearheading sustainable farming practices—can set industry-wide trends and standards. Their influence extends beyond their immediate operations, impacting the supply chain and consumer choices. Furthermore, these corporations often have the resources to invest in research and development, potentially leading to groundbreaking advancements in emission reduction technologies. Research institutions and universities such as Dalhousie University are the crucibles of innovation, playing a crucial role in developing new technologies and methodologies for emission reduction. The scientific research and technological advancements emanating from these institutions are instrumental in shaping both industry practices and government policies. Their contribution lies not only in technological innovation but also in providing empirical data and analysis that underpin policy decisions and industry standards.

The consumer segment, empowered by awareness and advocacy, has emerged as a force in shaping market dynamics. Consumer choices and preferences have a direct impact on the market, influencing dairy producers to adopt more environmentally friendly practices. Consumer advocacy groups amplify this impact by raising awareness about the environmental and health implications of dairy production, thereby influencing both market trends and policy formulations.

Supply chain partners and vendors, including companies providing feed, equipment, and other essential supplies, also play a significant role. The products and services they offer can directly influence farming practices, steering them towards more sustainable methods. Similarly, investors and financial institutions, through their investment choices, can drive the industry towards sustainability by funding green technologies and sustainable practices or by withdrawing support from operations that fail to meet environmental standards.

On the global stage, international organizations like the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) influence worldwide standards and policies related to agricultural emissions. Their guidelines and recommendations can have far-reaching impacts, trickling down to national policies and industry practices. Additionally, the media and influencers shape public discourse and opinion on environmental issues related to the dairy industry. Their coverage can significantly influence consumer behavior and apply pressure on both industry entities and government bodies.

2. The Agricultural Methane Reduction Challenge and Canada’s Environmental Goals

The Agricultural Methane Reduction Challenge represents Canada’s broader efforts to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050 [14,15,16]. This initiative aims to advance low-cost, scalable practices and technologies to reduce methane emissions, particularly in the cow–calf sector. Canadian herds also play a vital role in preserving carbon in soil and protecting biodiversity, with over 11 million cattle and calves making Canada one of the largest exporters [17,18] of sustainable cattle globally.

The escalating global food demand necessitates a shift toward sustainable agricultural practices, particularly in the dairy sector, to address the dual challenge of meeting nutritional needs while minimizing environmental impacts. Emissions from dairy cattle encompass societal, cultural, and economic dimensions. A key concern is the potential reduction in Canadian farmers’ profitability due to strict emission norms, possibly impacting agricultural production and the sector’s overall health. It is crucial that emission-reduction innovations also uphold animal welfare, necessitating a balance between sustainability and ethical treatment.

Tackling climate change and controlling emissions in the context of dairy cow farming involves a comprehensive and varied approach, examining multiple facets of farm management. This includes aspects such as housing and animal husbandry, where the choice of practices can significantly influence both animal welfare and the farm’s environmental footprint. The role of feeding strategies is also critical, as different feed types and management practices can substantially impact enteric methane production, a key source of greenhouse gas emissions in dairy farming. Bedding choices, floor cleaning methods, and overall barn hygiene practices further contribute to the emission profile, affecting both methane and ammonia release. Equally important is the implementation of effective ventilation and air quality control systems within barns, crucial for maintaining healthy living conditions for dairy cattle while minimizing harmful emissions. Manure management, with its dual role in both emission reduction and soil carbon sequestration, is a key element in achieving a balanced carbon footprint. In pursuing net-zero targets, it is essential to recognize that strategies should extend beyond mere emission control. Efforts must also focus on enhancing carbon capture and storage capabilities, thereby contributing actively to overall climate change mitigation in the dairy sector.

2.1. Freewalk Housing Systems

Freewalk housing systems mark a significant shift towards sustainability in dairy farming, offering dairy cows a more natural and welfare-centric environment. These systems differ from traditional methods by allowing free movement, feeding, and resting for cows, which considerably enhances their physical and mental health [19]. Key to freewalk systems is their emphasis on comfort and free movement, contributing positively to milk production and quality [20,21]. Research [22] indicates that cows in freewalk systems experience fewer health issues, such as lameness and mastitis, common in conventional stall-based housing. Environmentally, freewalk systems offer benefits by promoting natural cow behaviors, leading to a more uniform distribution of manure and effective management, thereby helping in reducing ammonia emissions [23,24].

In Canadian dairy farming, the choice between tie stall and freewalk systems involves weighing animal welfare against productivity and operational complexity. Tie stall systems offer precise control over feeding and milking but restrict cows’ movement and social interactions, potentially affecting their welfare and health [25]. Conversely, freewalk systems, gaining traction in Canada, provide cows with greater freedom, positively impacting their welfare and health. These systems, however, demand advanced management, particularly with the integration of technologies like robotic milkers [26,27].

Environmentally, tie stall systems can concentrate waste, necessitating efficient manure management, but have a smaller footprint. Freewalk systems, while promoting even manure distribution, require more space and resources for construction and maintenance. Economically, tie stall systems typically involve lower initial costs but potentially higher labor expenses, whereas freewalk systems, though initially more expensive, may offer long-term labor cost savings, especially with automation [28].

2.2. Multi-Climate Sheds

Multi-climate sheds, embodying advanced climate-smart technologies, represent an innovative and adaptable approach to modern dairy farming. These specialized structures are adept at adjusting to a range of weather conditions, thereby ensuring an indoor environment that maintains optimal conditions for dairy cattle [21,29]. The incorporation of sophisticated systems for regulating temperature, humidity, and air quality within these sheds is vital for the health and productivity of the cattle. Research has indicated that variations in ambient temperature can significantly influence the metabolic rate of cattle, as well as their feed intake and milk production capabilities [30]. By offering a controlled and stable microclimate, multi-climate sheds play a crucial role in mitigating the physiological stress experienced by cattle due to temperature fluctuations. This not only enhances the overall welfare of the animals but also potentially leads to more consistent and increased dairy yields.

Furthermore, the integration of renewable energy solutions, such as solar panel systems, into the design of multi-climate sheds aligns dairy farm operations with broader environmental objectives. This integration serves a dual purpose: reducing carbon emissions associated with dairy farming and improving the energy efficiency of these operations. The use of renewable energy sources thus offers tangible environmental benefits while also presenting economic advantages in terms of reduced operational costs and potential energy savings. Consequently, multi-climate sheds exemplify a harmonious blend of animal welfare considerations with environmental and economic sustainability in dairy farming.

2.3. Evaluating the Environmental Impact of Innovative Smart Dairy Cow Housing

The burgeoning field of smart dairy cow housing, which extensively employs the Internet of Things (IoT) and sensor technologies, represents a transformative approach to evaluating and mitigating the environmental impact of dairy farming. This integration is particularly evident in advanced housing systems such as freewalk housing systems and multi-climate sheds, where technology-driven solutions are key to sustainable emission management.

The application of sensor technologies in freewalk housing systems is a significant leap forward in promoting natural behaviors and effective waste management in dairy cows. These systems, characterized by their open design, leverage the IoT for optimal environmental control, ensuring better ventilation and thus diminishing harmful gas concentrations, notably methane and ammonia [31,32,33]. The choice of bedding materials in these systems is crucial for absorbing and minimizing emissions. Through the use of sensors, the effectiveness of different materials, such as compost or sand, can be continuously monitored and optimized, enhancing the overall efficiency of emission absorption [34].

Multi-climate sheds showcase the profound impact of the IoT in managing advanced climate control technologies. These sheds utilize sensor networks to meticulously regulate indoor temperatures, directly influencing the cows’ metabolic stress, which is closely linked to methane production during digestion [35,36]. A controlled and stable environment, ensured by real-time data and automated adjustments, contributes to more efficient feed utilization, further reducing methane emissions from enteric fermentation [37].

The integration of these smart housing systems in dairy farming opens up new avenues for sustainability. By harnessing sensor data and IoT capabilities, farmers can achieve a fine balance between optimal farm productivity and reduced environmental footprint. The precise control and monitoring offered by these technologies not only bolster animal welfare but also significantly curtail environmental emissions. In essence, these systems represent a confluence of animal health, environmental stewardship, and technological advancement.

It is imperative that future research delves into the long-term impacts of these smart housing systems, considering their environmental, economic, and social implications. The exploration of advanced data analytics for predictive maintenance, resource optimization, and enhanced decision-making is crucial. Moreover, there is potential for expanding these technologies to other aspects of dairy farming, further consolidating the role of IoT and sensor-based solutions in creating a more sustainable, efficient, and environmentally responsible dairy industry [38,39].

2.4. Advanced Flooring Systems

In the realm of dairy farming, the evolution toward sustainable practices has led to a significant focus on advanced flooring systems. These innovations stand at the forefront of efforts to curb emissions, particularly greenhouse gases and ammonia, which are prevalent in dairy operations. These advanced systems are not only a testament to the dairy industry’s commitment to environmental stewardship but also an embodiment of improved animal welfare standards.

2.5. Low-Emission Floors with Slurry Scrapers

A notable innovation in this space is the integration of slurry scrapers with low-emission floors. This combination significantly enhances manure management, a key factor in the generation of methane and ammonia emissions [40]. The effectiveness of these systems lies in their ability to rapidly remove manure, thus limiting its exposure to air and significantly cutting down on the emission of noxious gases [41,42]. The reduction in ammonia volatilization is particularly notable, as the frequent removal of manure inhibits the enzymatic processes crucial for the transformation of urea in manure into ammonia.

2.6. Compost-Bedded Pack Barns

Compost-bedded pack barns have emerged as a sustainable alternative, marrying animal comfort with environmental friendliness [43]. Utilizing organic materials such as straw or sawdust, these barns employ a regular stirring method to promote aerobic composting. This process is effective in absorbing and breaking down manure, thus mitigating the release of methane and ammonia [44,45]. Additionally, the process contributes to improved herd health and milk quality, as the high temperatures reached during composting reduce pathogen levels.

2.7. Artificial and High-Welfare Floors

The shift towards artificial and high-welfare floors reflects the industry’s growing focus on cow comfort and health. These floors, typically made from rubber or other cushioned materials, significantly reduce the incidence of injuries and lameness [46,47] associated with harder surfaces. Their design also supports effective manure management, as they aid in the separation of manure and urine, essential for reducing ammonia emissions.

2.8. Slatted Floors with Flexible Flaps

Slatted floors with flexible flaps represent an ingenious adaptation in dairy barn flooring. These floors allow for the easy passage of manure while maintaining a comfortable surface for cows [48,49]. This design effectively reduces the accumulation of manure, thus minimizing ammonia emissions. The quick removal of manure via the slats to a storage area below the floor significantly reduces its exposure to air, thereby curbing emissions [50].

2.9. Nanoparticles and Electrolyzed Oxidizing Water

The use of electrolyzed oxidizing water (EOW) in dairy farming is a novel approach that has potential in manure treatment and emission reduction [51,52,53]. The oxidizing properties of the electrolyzed oxidizing water, generated through the electrolysis of water and salt, effectively disrupt the microbial activities [54,55] responsible for gas production, leading to a reduction in ammonia and methane emissions. This contributes to a healthier and more hygienic environment for dairy cows.

Recent scientific investigations [56,57,58] have demonstrated that the incorporation of nanoparticles into water and subsequent application to livestock manure presents a promising strategy for controlling methane emissions. This innovative approach functions by interfacing with and subsequently disrupting the enzymatic activity essential for methane production in manure. The potential of this method lies in its ability to target and modify the biochemical pathways involved in methanogenesis, thereby reducing the overall emission of this potent greenhouse gas from dairy farming operations.

However, while the initial results are promising, several critical aspects need thorough exploration before this technique can be reliably implemented on a large scale in dairy manure management systems. Firstly, the economic feasibility of employing nanoparticles in this context remains uncertain. This includes considerations of the cost-effectiveness of nanoparticle synthesis and application processes, especially when scaled up to meet the demands of large dairy operations. The financial implications of adopting this technology in comparison to traditional manure management methods require a detailed cost-benefit analysis to ensure it is a viable option for widespread adoption.

Furthermore, the biodegradability of these nanoparticles warrants comprehensive investigation. It is crucial to understand the lifecycle and degradation pathways of these materials in an agricultural setting to assess their long-term environmental impact. This includes examining how nanoparticles interact with different components of the manure and soil and their stability and breakdown over time. Lastly, the toxicological effects of nanoparticles, particularly after leaching into the soil and water systems, are a significant concern. It is imperative to conduct extensive research on the potential ecological and health impacts of these nanoparticles, considering their mobility in the environment and possible accumulation in the food chain. Understanding the fate of nanoparticles post-application and their interactions with soil microbiota, plants, and aquatic systems is essential to evaluate the potential risks and ensure the safety of this technology.

2.10. Incorporating Dairy Farmers’ Preferences for Flooring Attributes

Recent research delving into dairy farmers’ preferences for flooring properties reveals a growing emphasis on aspects that enhance animal welfare. A study among Swedish dairy farmers highlighted their preference for flooring attributes such as low slip risk and softness, pointing to a keen awareness of the impact of these features on cow welfare [59]. Additionally, the study found that preferences for less abrasive floors are influenced by factors including gender and the ease of performing tasks on the floor, emphasizing the farmers’ inclination towards solutions that offer both animal welfare benefits and operational efficiency.

The development and adoption of advanced flooring systems in dairy farming are pivotal in the industry’s journey toward sustainability and environmental responsibility. From low-emission floors with slurry scrapers to the cutting-edge use of EOW, these systems underscore the dairy industry’s dedication to reducing emissions while enhancing animal welfare and farm efficiency. As the sector continues to evolve, embracing these advanced systems will be crucial in achieving sustainability goals [60] and diminishing the environmental impact of dairy farming.

2.11. Air Treatment Technologies in Dairy Farming

In the context of dairy farming, managing air quality within barns is crucial for both animal welfare and environmental protection. With the increasing focus on sustainability and emission reduction in agriculture, innovative air treatment technologies have garnered significant attention. These technologies not only aim to improve the air quality (Table 1) inside barns but also contribute to reducing the environmental impact of dairy farming practices.

2.12. Air Scrubbers

Air scrubbers have emerged as an effective solution for cleaning barn air [61,62]. These systems work by drawing in contaminated air and passing it through a series of filters or scrubbing solutions that trap or chemically neutralize pollutants like ammonia, particulate matter, and odor-causing compounds. The scrubbed air is then released back into the barn or expelled outside, significantly reducing the concentration of harmful airborne substances. This not only improves the air quality within the barn but also mitigates the emission of pollutants into the surrounding environment.

2.13. Chemical Air Scrubbers and Natural Ventilation

The integration of chemical air scrubbers with natural ventilation systems represents a comprehensive approach to air quality management in dairy barns [63,64]. Chemical air scrubbers are effective in removing gaseous pollutants through chemical reactions, while natural ventilation provides a continuous supply of fresh air, diluting the concentration of contaminants. This dual approach ensures a balanced and effective air treatment strategy, leveraging the benefits of both mechanical and natural systems.

2.14. Oxidation of Methane

Methane oxidation technologies are increasingly being explored as a means to tackle methane emissions in dairy farming. Methane, a potent greenhouse gas, is a significant byproduct of ruminant digestion and manure management. Oxidation systems utilize catalysts or biological processes to convert methane into less harmful substances like carbon dioxide and water vapor. These systems can be integrated into barn ventilation [65,66] or manure management systems, offering a targeted approach to reducing methane emissions.

2.15. Ionization of Air

Air ionization technology in dairy barns works by generating ions that attach to airborne particles, including pathogens, dust, and other pollutants [67,68]. These charged particles are then attracted to surfaces or filtration systems, effectively removing them from the air. This technology not only improves air quality but also enhances the overall health and well-being of the dairy herd by reducing exposure to harmful airborne contaminants.

2.16. Pit Air Treatment and Air Velocity Optimization in Dairy Barns

Pit air treatment, a critical component in managing emissions from manure storage pits, effectively reduces the release of ammonia and other gases. This approach can be implemented through various techniques, such as biofiltration and chemical treatment processes that actively neutralize or capture these emissions [69,70]. The efficacy of these methods in mitigating gaseous emissions has been substantiated through extensive research, underscoring their role in environmental protection within dairy systems.

In conjunction with pit air treatment, the optimization of air velocity within dairy barns emerges as a pivotal strategy for enhancing overall air quality. Strategic ventilation design, as elucidated in studies by Tomasello et al. [71] and others [72,73], plays a significant role in maintaining a stable and clean environment within barns. By reducing air velocity, the agitation and suspension of dust and particulate matter are minimized, which is crucial for creating a healthier atmosphere for both livestock and farm workers. This approach not only improves the air quality within barns but also contributes to the welfare and productivity of dairy cattle. The integrated application of pit air treatment and air velocity optimization methods, rooted in advanced agricultural engineering and environmental management practices, demonstrate a commitment to sustainable farming and animal welfare.

2.17. Electrostatic Precipitators in Dairy Barns: An Emerging Technology for Dust Control

Electrostatic precipitators, while traditionally recommended for poultry and swine barns, are now being recognized as a potentially transformative technology for dust control in dairy housing systems. This advanced technology functions by utilizing electrical charges to effectively capture fine particulate matter present in the barn air. Once charged, these particles are attracted to and collected on plates or filters, thereby efficiently removing them from the air circulation within the barn [74,75,76,77].

The relevance of this technology in dairy barns is underscored by numerous studies examining air quality in animal indoor environments. Tan and Zhang [74], as well as Ivanišević et al. [77], have highlighted the significance of controlling particulate matter to ensure a healthy indoor environment for livestock. The effectiveness of electrostatic precipitators in achieving this goal lies in their ability to target and remove even the finest dust particles, which are known to pose health risks not only to the animals but also to farm workers. Moreover, research by Islam et al. [75] and Li et al. [76] on aerosol and bacteria concentrations in various types of dairy milking houses indicates the potential benefits of implementing such air purification systems. Electrostatic precipitators could serve as an integral component in ensuring optimal air quality, thereby contributing to improved animal welfare and a healthier working environment. Electrostatic precipitator technology, with its proven efficacy in other livestock housing environments, warrants further exploration and implementation in dairy housing systems.

3. Advanced Manure Management Techniques

In the realm of dairy farming, the implementation of sophisticated manure management techniques has become imperative for mitigating the environmental impacts of agriculture. These methods, evolving through scientific innovation, not only improve farm hygiene and animal health but also play a crucial role in reducing the ecological footprint of dairy operations.

3.1. Acidification of Manure for Ammonia Emission Reduction

The process of manure acidification, where sulfuric or other similar acids are introduced into manure, effectively reduces ammonia emissions, a significant environmental concern in dairy farming. By lowering the pH, this technique inhibits the volatilization process of ammonia, thereby curtailing its release into the atmosphere [78,79,80,81,82]. Moreover, acidified manure presents added benefits for soil health, particularly in enhancing nutrient retention and availability. This dual impact of emission control and soil enrichment exemplifies an integrated approach to sustainable farming practices.

3.2. Aeromix System—Enhancing Microbial Activity in Manure

The Aeromix system, a novel advancement in manure treatment, utilizes aeration and mixing to stimulate aerobic microbial activity. This increased oxygenation leads to an accelerated breakdown of organic matter, effectively diminishing odor and pathogen levels within the manure [83]. Such enhanced decomposition not only renders the manure a more valuable and environmentally friendly fertilizer but also aligns with the principles of sustainable agriculture by minimizing the environmental burden of manure management.

3.3. Automation in Manure Handling—V Scraper and Belt Systems

Adopting automated systems like V scrapers and belts in dairy barns marks a significant technological leap in manure management. These systems automate the removal and transportation of manure, thereby reducing labor costs and improving farm cleanliness. The V scraper system, in particular, ensures a continuous and gentle removal of manure from barn floors, reducing prolonged exposure that could lead to increased emissions. Concurrently, belt systems efficiently transport the collected manure to appropriate storage or treatment facilities [84,85]. This streamlined approach significantly contributes to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and harmful gases, enhancing the overall sustainability of dairy farming operations [86,87].

3.4. Comprehensive Approach to Manure Management

Incorporating a range of manure management strategies, from the Aeromix system to advanced mechanical systems like V scrapers and belts, demonstrates a comprehensive approach to addressing environmental challenges in dairy farming. These systems, integrated with manure acidification practices, reflect the dairy industry’s commitment to environmental stewardship while maintaining operational efficiency [88].

3.5. Enhanced Indoor Manure Treatment Technologies

The adoption of indoor manure treatment technologies is increasingly being recognized as a pivotal element in environmentally responsible dairy farming. These advanced systems, operating within enclosed facilities, significantly mitigate the exposure of manure to the external environment, thereby substantially reducing emissions of key pollutants such as methane, ammonia, and odorous compounds. The efficacy of these technologies in curtailing emissions has been underscored in the recent scientific literature, emphasizing their role in sustainable manure management [89,90,91].

3.6. Diverse Technological Approaches in Manure Treatment

These indoor systems encompass a variety of technological solutions, including but not limited to composting, anaerobic digestion, and mechanical separation. Composting processes facilitate the aerobic breakdown of organic matter, transforming manure into a nutrient-rich soil amendment. Anaerobic digestion, as detailed by Li et al. [89], is particularly effective in converting manure into biogas, a renewable energy source, while concurrently producing effluents rich in nutrients. Mechanical separation techniques further refine the process by segregating solid and liquid fractions, enhancing the utility and application potential of the resulting by-products.

3.7. Integrated Benefits of Indoor Manure Treatment

The implementation of these technologies offers a holistic approach to manure management, effectively transforming a waste product into a suite of valuable resources. The production of biogas not only contributes to renewable energy generation but also aligns with global efforts to transition to a more circular economy. Similarly, the resulting compost and nutrient-rich effluents serve as effective soil amendments, thereby closing the nutrient loop in agricultural systems.

The progression of manure management techniques, particularly the shift towards innovative indoor treatment systems, reflects the dairy sector’s commitment to environmental stewardship and sustainable agricultural practices. This evolution, from traditional methods like manure acidification to modern, technologically advanced systems, embodies a comprehensive approach to minimizing the environmental footprint of dairy farming.

4. Nutritional Strategies for Mitigating Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Dairy Farming

In addressing the challenge of greenhouse gas emissions, particularly methane, from dairy cattle, the implementation of targeted nutritional strategies emerges as a key approach. By modifying the dietary regimen of dairy cattle, these strategies aim to minimize enteric methane production while ensuring no compromise on animal health and productivity. This comprehensive analysis (Table 2) delves into various dietary interventions, evaluating their efficacy in emission reduction and their potential within the context of sustainable dairy farming.

4.1. Methane Inhibitor Feed Supplements: The Efficacy of 3-Nitrooxypropanol

3-Nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP) has been identified as a promising methane inhibitor supplement, targeting the key enzyme responsible for methane production in the rumen, methyl-coenzyme M reductase [92,93,94]. This compound’s action results in a direct reduction of methane emissions from enteric fermentation. Scientific evaluations have demonstrated that 3-NOP can decrease enteric methane production by up to 30%, without negatively impacting animal health or milk production, positioning it as an effective strategy for dairy farms to reduce their environmental footprint while maintaining production levels.

4.2. Tannins as Feed Additives

Tannins, plant-derived compounds, are increasingly recognized for their capacity to reduce enteric methane emissions in dairy cattle [95,96,97,98]. When incorporated into cattle diets, tannins can bind to rumen proteins, thereby minimizing protein degradation and subsequent ammonia formation. This mechanism indirectly influences methanogenic archaea populations, leading to a reduction in methane generation. Additionally, tannins possess antioxidant properties, contributing positively to animal health. However, the dietary inclusion of tannins requires careful management to avoid adverse impacts on feed intake and nutrient assimilation.

4.3. Optimizing Protein Content in Dairy Diets

Regulating the protein content in dairy cattle diets presents a critical strategy for harmonizing nutritional needs with emission control [99,100]. Excessive dietary protein leads to increased nitrogen excretion and higher ammonia emissions. By aligning protein levels with the physiological requirements of cattle, methane production can be effectively reduced, thereby diminishing the environmental impact associated with nitrogen waste.

4.4. Seaweed as a Methane-Reducing Agent

Recent research underscores the potential of specific seaweed species, notably Asparagopsis taxiformis, in curtailing methane emissions from dairy cattle [101,102]. These seaweeds harbor compounds that disrupt the enzymatic pathways involved in rumen methane production. The incorporation of seaweeds into cattle diets, even in small quantities, has yielded significant reductions (up to 50%) in methane emissions, offering a novel, nature-based approach to mitigate this environmental challenge [103,104].

Incorporating specific feed components into dairy cattle diets presents a viable strategy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, particularly methane. These dietary modifications not only contribute to emission control but also enhance overall farm sustainability.

4.5. Inclusion of Red Clover and Other Legumes for Emission Control

Integrating legumes such as red clover into dairy cattle diets has been recognized as an effective approach for mitigating emissions. Legumes, characterized by their high-quality protein content, have been shown to improve rumen fermentation efficiency, leading to a reduction in methane production per unit of feed intake [105,106]. Furthermore, legumes like red clover possess the capability to fix atmospheric nitrogen, diminishing the reliance on synthetic nitrogen fertilizers. This not only reduces the overall greenhouse gas emissions but also contributes to the sustainability of dairy farming systems.

4.6. Nitrate Supplementation for Mitigating Enteric Methane Emissions

The addition of nitrates to cattle feed has emerged as a promising strategy for reducing enteric methane emissions. When included in the diet, nitrates act as an alternative hydrogen sink, diverting hydrogen away from methane production pathways [107]. The ruminal conversion of nitrates to nitrites and subsequently to ammonia facilitates microbial protein synthesis, effectively reducing the availability of hydrogen for methanogens and thereby decreasing methane production. However, careful management is necessary to avert the accumulation of toxic nitrites. When appropriately managed, nitrate supplementation can lead to a significant reduction in methane emissions of up to 20%, without adversely impacting animal health or productivity.

4.7. Role of Linseeds and Oils in Methane Emission Reduction

Incorporating linseeds and oils into the diet of dairy cattle offers another avenue for reducing methane emissions. These additives are rich in unsaturated fatty acids, which are known for their inhibitory effects on the methanogenesis process within the rumen [108]. The fatty acids derived from linseeds and oils can impede the growth and activity of methanogenic archaea, thereby curbing methane production. Moreover, these dietary fats can enhance the energy density of the diet, potentially improving milk production efficiency. It is crucial to maintain a balanced inclusion of fats to prevent negative impacts on rumen fermentation, but moderate inclusion rates have been proven effective in reducing methane emissions.

4.8. Silage Characteristics and Management for Emission Reduction

The role of silage in dairy cattle diets extends beyond mere nutrition; its characteristics and management significantly contribute to emission control strategies. The quality of silage, encompassing its fermentative profile and nutrient content, is a pivotal factor in influencing ruminal fermentation processes. High-quality silage, characterized by optimal fermentation properties, can markedly enhance feed digestibility and efficiency. This improvement in feed utilization can indirectly lead to a reduction in methane production per unit of feed intake, aligning with environmental sustainability goals. Furthermore, efficient silage management aimed at minimizing spoilage and waste plays a crucial role in enhancing overall farm sustainability and reducing emission footprints. Therefore, optimizing silage production and management practices is imperative for mitigating the environmental impact associated with dairy farming.

4.9. Integrating Insects into Dairy Cattle Diets

The integration of insects as a feed ingredient in dairy cattle diets emerges as an innovative and sustainable nutritional approach. Insects, particularly those with high protein and fat content like black soldier fly larvae, offer a viable alternative to traditional protein sources such as soybean meal, which typically has a higher environmental footprint [109,110]. The incorporation of insects into the diet can contribute to a more sustainable feed supply chain, potentially reducing reliance on resource-intensive protein sources. Preliminary studies indicate that insect-based feeds may influence rumen fermentation patterns, potentially leading to decreased methane emissions. However, comprehensive research is required to thoroughly understand the implications of insect-based feeds on dairy cattle nutrition and their subsequent impact on emission profiles [109,110].

4.10. Role of Ionophores and Monensin in Emission Control

Ionophores, including monensin, represent a category of feed additives widely used to enhance feed efficiency and promote animal health in dairy cattle [111,112]. These compounds function by selectively targeting specific microbial populations in the rumen, leading to a reduction in methane production. Monensin, in particular, has been documented to decrease methane emissions by modulating the rumen microbial ecosystem, favoring more efficient microbial communities and diminishing the prevalence of methanogens [113]. While traditionally employed for improving feed conversion and disease prevention, the role of ionophores in reducing methane emissions offers a significant environmental advantage. Nevertheless, the application of ionophores must be judiciously managed to safeguard animal health and welfare, and their usage may be limited in certain dairy production systems, especially those adhering to organic standards.

In addition to the nutritional strategies previously discussed, several other approaches could further augment methane emission reduction efforts in dairy farming. Investigating the influence of dietary fiber on rumen fermentation presents a promising avenue. Incorporating fibrous feeds can modify the rumen microbial ecosystem, potentially reducing methane production.

The role of probiotics and prebiotics in modifying rumen microbiota is another area of interest. These supplements can boost rumen efficiency and overall health, thereby impacting methane output. Similarly, the effects of yeast-based supplements on rumen function offer a pathway for methane reduction. By improving rumen fermentation efficiency, these supplements might contribute to lower methane emissions.

Exploring sustainable protein sources beyond insects, such as algae or single-cell proteins, is crucial. These sources provide essential nutrients while minimizing greenhouse gas emissions. The relationship between forage quality and methane emissions also warrants attention. Enhancing forage digestibility and nutrient content can lead to increased rumen efficiency and, consequently, lower methane emissions per unit of feed intake.

Additionally, the impact of plant-derived additives, like essential oils and saponins, on rumen fermentation and methane production is significant. These additives can alter rumen microbial populations and methane synthesis pathways. Water utilization and quality also play a critical role in dairy cattle’s feed intake and metabolism, indirectly affecting methane emissions. Moreover, different feed processing methods, such as pelleting, grinding, or ensiling, can influence feed digestibility and, in turn, affect the fermentation process in the rumen, impacting methane emissions.

Mootral, a UK-based biotech company, has made significant strides with its Enterix Advanced technology, which has demonstrated a 50% reduction in methane emissions from cows. Suitable for both housed and grazing cattle, this technology utilizes iodoform’s methane-inhibiting properties in combination with active compounds from garlic. This advancement builds upon Mootral’s original technology and offers significant emission reductions without affecting cattle’s dry matter intake and milk yield. Enterix Advanced’s controlled release formulation expands the possibilities for methane mitigation in global animal agriculture, offering a scalable and farmer-friendly solution to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions in dairy farming.

5. Advanced Waste Management in Dairy Farming: The CowToilet and Its Implications for Ammonia Emission Reduction

In the domain of dairy farming, environmental stewardship has increasingly become a focal point, leading to the development and adoption of innovative practices and technologies. Among these, the CowToilet, conceptualized by Henk Hanskamp and featured in The Daily Churn Magazine [114], stands out as a pioneering solution. This technology is designed to strategically collect urine from dairy cows within barn settings, significantly reducing the likelihood of ammonia emission—a critical environmental hazard associated with dairy farming. The CowToilet’s mechanism is adept at segregating urine from feces, thereby preventing the enzymatic conversion of urea present in urine into ammonia, which typically occurs in mixed waste.

The scientific ingenuity behind the CowToilet aligns with the recent behavioral research conducted by Dirksen et al. [115,116]. Their work explores the realm of behavioral conditioning in cattle, specifically focusing on the potential for toilet training as an environmentally beneficial practice. Their research provides compelling evidence that cattle possess the cognitive and physiological capability to control urinary reflexes through learned behavior. This breakthrough suggests that, with appropriate training protocols, cattle can be encouraged to use designated latrines, thereby centralizing and simplifying waste management, and significantly reducing the area of ammonia emissions in open farming conditions.

Furthermore, the integration of reflexive behavior training into the daily routines of cattle suggests remarkable flexibility in bovine behavior and cognition. This adaptability has profound implications for sustainable farming practices, offering a pathway to both environmental conservation and enhanced animal welfare. The application of food rewards as positive reinforcement in the training process illustrates an effective method to modify and control livestock behavior in a manner that aligns with environmental management goals.

In the broader context of dairy farm management, the synergy between advanced technologies like the CowToilet and behavioral interventions such as toilet training represents an innovative and multidimensional approach to addressing the ecological impacts of dairy farming. This combination of technological ingenuity and behavioral science not only contributes to reducing greenhouse gas emissions but also exemplifies a progressive step towards more humane and environmentally conscious animal husbandry practices. As the dairy industry continues to evolve, embracing such integrative solutions (Figure 2) will be crucial in achieving sustainable agricultural ecosystems that are both productive and ecologically responsible.

5.1. Reevaluation of Dry Period Duration in Dairy Cows

The conventional practice in dairy farming dictates a dry period of approximately 60 days between lactation cycles for dairy cows. However, recent studies [117,118] have begun to challenge this traditional approach, indicating the potential benefits of shortening the dry period that extend beyond mere milk production metrics.

El-Hedainy et al. [117] conducted a comprehensive retrospective investigation, highlighting that varying the length of the dry period can significantly influence milk production and lifetime performance traits in subsequent lactations. Their findings suggest that an optimal dry period, particularly in the range of 61–75 days, may offer enhanced lifetime productivity and health benefits in dairy cows. Concurrently, Lim et al. [118] explored the physiological impacts of a non-traditional dry period length, particularly focusing on cows subjected to heat stress. Their study compared traditional 60-day dry periods with no dry period regimes, revealing that omitting the dry period could improve milk production and metabolic status of dairy cows during heat-stressed transition periods.

The implications of these findings are manifold. Firstly, a shorter dry period could potentially enhance post-calving metabolic health in cows, contributing positively to overall fertility and general health. This adjustment in management strategy also has environmental ramifications, particularly concerning the pattern of ammonia emissions throughout the lactation period, an area that warrants further exploration. Moreover, the reduction in the duration of the dry period might correlate with decreased reliance on antibiotics, thus fostering better udder health and mitigating the risk of antibiotic resistance development. This aspect is particularly crucial in the context of sustainable dairy farming practices and animal welfare.

5.2. Integrating Genetic Insights for Addressing Methane Emissions

Contemporary research emphasizes the crucial role of genetics in diminishing methane emissions and bolstering heat tolerance among dairy cattle, a step forward in fostering sustainable dairy farming.

5.3. The Cow Hologenome and Methane Emissions

The study by Gonzalez-Recio et al. [119] examines the complex symbiosis between cows and their rumen microbiota, referred to as the “hologenome”, and its influence on methane production. The research provides heritability estimates for the rumen microbiota composition, varying between 0.05 and 0.40. This variance is contingent upon the microbial taxonomy or gene function. The research identifies host genomic regions connected to the abundance of specific microbial taxa associated with enteric methane production. These discoveries lay the genetic groundwork for developing methodologies to curb methane emissions in dairy cattle, underscoring the necessity for breeding programs to prioritize traits that enhance sustainability and reduce methane emissions.

5.4. The Resilient Dairy Genome Project

The Resilient Dairy Genome Project (RDGP), as elucidated by van Staaveren et al. [120], is an expansive international collaboration aimed at formulating genomic tools to breed more resilient dairy cows. Focusing on traits such as dry matter intake (DMI) and methane emissions (CH₄), the project amalgamates genotypic and phenotypic data across various countries. Despite the complexity of data integration, the RDGP database includes substantial DMI and CH₄ records as of February 2022, highlighting the feasibility of transnational genomic predictions to enhance feed efficiency and diminish greenhouse gas emissions.

5.5. Breeding for Heat Tolerance and Reduced Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Pryce et al. [121] underscore the growing importance of breeding dairy cows for enhanced heat tolerance and reduced methane emissions, in response to global warming. They discuss viable solutions for the derivation of breeding values, drawing examples from Australian breeding initiatives. This strategy accentuates the use of data from both national recording programs and research herds, along with genomic selection, to foster traits enabling dairy cows to adapt to elevated temperatures and contribute to the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions. Collectively, these studies mark significant progress in deciphering the genetic factors influencing crucial traits in dairy cows. Their findings are pivotal in guiding the evolution of sustainable breeding programs that address both environmental challenges and the well-being of dairy cattle.

5.6. Advanced Integration of Real-Time Monitoring and Renewable Energy in Dairy Emission Management

The adoption of real-time monitoring alongside renewable energy sources in dairy farming marks a transformative step towards an ecologically sustainable agricultural paradigm. This multidisciplinary approach, which combines state-of-the-art technological innovations with environmental conservation principles, is critical for the effective management and reduction of emissions in dairy operations.

5.7. Precision Livestock Farming (PLF)

At the forefront of this transformation is precision livestock farming, a modern agricultural practice that leverages advanced technologies such as GPS, sensors, and data analytics. PLF’s real-time monitoring capabilities allow for the meticulous management of various aspects of dairy farming. By accurately monitoring and analyzing data related to animal health, feed intake, and manure management, PLF plays a crucial role in minimizing methane and ammonia emissions, key contributors to climate change. This technology enables farmers to optimize feed composition and digestibility, thereby reducing enteric methane emissions and improving overall farm efficiency [122].

5.8. Technological Advances in Emission Control

The implementation of Internet of Things (IoT) devices and big data analytics in dairy farming has significantly advanced emission control strategies. These technologies facilitate the collection and analysis of comprehensive data sets, encompassing a wide range of farm operations and environmental factors. Through data-driven insights, dairy farmers can implement precise feeding strategies and waste management practices, leading to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, particularly methane from enteric fermentation and ammonia from manure [123].

5.9. Renewable Energy Adoption in Dairy Operations

Transitioning to renewable energy sources, such as solar, wind, and biogas, is a vital strategy for dairy farms to reduce their environmental footprint. Incorporating solar panels and wind turbines for power generation, and harnessing biogas produced from manure for heating and electricity, represents a sustainable shift in energy usage. Despite the initial investment and infrastructural modifications required, the adoption of renewable energy in dairy farming offers substantial long-term environmental and economic benefits, contributing to the sector’s sustainability [124].

5.10. Innovative Bedding Management Practices

Effective management of bedding in dairy barns is an essential aspect of emission control. Implementing cooling systems in bedding areas can significantly decrease the rate of organic matter decomposition, thus reducing methane and ammonia emissions. Moreover, the adoption of automated systems for bedding management enhances farm hygiene and contributes to effective emission management by maintaining a clean and controlled environment for dairy cattle.

6. Techniques and Measures in Relation to Future Legislation

6.1. Navigating the Legislative Terrain for Sustainable Dairy Farming

The regulatory framework concerning greenhouse gas (GHG) and ammonia emissions from dairy farming is undergoing a global tightening, propelled by the imperative to counteract climate change and protect the environment. This legislative shift places a spotlight on agriculture, particularly livestock farming, due to its substantial contributions to GHG emissions, notably methane (CH₄), nitrous oxide (N₂O), and ammonia (NH₃). Globally, nations are actively crafting and implementing policies to regulate agricultural emissions. The European Union’s Green Deal and the Farm to Fork Strategy exemplify this trend, setting rigorous emission reduction targets while fostering sustainable agricultural methodologies [125]. In a similar vein, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) enforces air quality standards that significantly influence emission management in dairy farming [126]. Canadian and New Zealand’s policy frameworks are aligning with global climate commitments, such as the Paris Climate Accord, embedding GHG reduction objectives into their national agendas.

This evolving legislative landscape necessitates that dairy farms not only adapt to these regulatory changes but also embrace innovation. The integration of advanced sustainable practices is vital for maintaining economic viability while meeting environmental compliance.

6.2. The Role of Public Policy in Shaping Sustainable Dairy Farming

Public policies play a pivotal role in steering the dairy industry towards sustainability. These policies encompass various dimensions, from incentivizing emission reduction technologies to supporting research and academia in developing sustainable farming practices. By providing funding for innovation and setting standards for sustainable practices, these policies help bridge the gap between theoretical research and practical application in dairy farming.

For example, Canada’s Agricultural Greenhouse Gases Program (AGGP) promotes the development and adoption of advanced technologies to reduce GHG emissions from agriculture [127]. This program underscores the importance of collaboration between government, academia, and the dairy industry in advancing sustainable farming practices. Similarly, New Zealand’s Sustainable Land Management and Climate Change (SLMACC) research program focuses on developing strategies to mitigate agricultural emissions and adapt to climate change [128].

6.3. Legal Frameworks and Innovation in Dairy Farming

Legal frameworks are crucial in providing a structured approach to sustainable dairy farming. These frameworks not only set out regulations for emission control but also encourage innovation in the sector. The development and implementation of cutting-edge technologies in dairy farming, such as methane digesters and precision agriculture tools, are often driven by these legal requirements.

For instance, the EU’s Innovation Fund, part of its broader Green Deal initiative, is designed to finance innovative low-carbon technologies, including those applicable in agriculture [129]. Such funds enable dairy farmers to invest in new technologies that reduce their environmental impact while enhancing productivity.

The interplay of legislative landscapes, public policies, and legal frameworks forms a comprehensive approach to guiding the dairy industry toward a more sustainable future. These elements work in tandem to ensure that dairy farming practices are not only environmentally sound but also economically viable, setting a global standard for sustainable agricultural practices.

6.4. The Future of Dairy Farming in the Context of Legislative Changes

As environmental policies become more stringent, the dairy industry must continue to innovate and adapt. This will likely involve a combination of strategies (Table 3), including improving farm management practices, adopting new technologies, and possibly restructuring certain aspects of dairy farming to align with environmental goals. The success of these initiatives depends not only on the effectiveness of the technologies and practices themselves but also on the willingness of farmers to adopt them, the availability of financial and technical support, and the alignment of these practices with market demands and consumer preferences. The dairy farming sector is at a critical juncture where the need to reduce GHG and ammonia emissions is not only an environmental imperative but also a legislative requirement. The adoption of innovative practices and compliance with emerging policies will be pivotal in shaping the future of the industry. This dynamic interplay between legislation, technology, and farm management practices will define the path toward a more sustainable and environmentally responsible dairy sector.

6.5. Economic and Regulatory Contexts in Dairy Farming

The dairy farming industry operates within a complex web of economic and regulatory frameworks that dictate its sustainability, profitability, and environmental impact. Understanding and adapting to these shifts is crucial for the industry’s future.

6.6. Understanding and Adapting to Economic and Policy Shifts

In recent years, the dairy sector has faced a multitude of economic challenges, including fluctuating market prices, rising costs of production, and increasing competition both locally and globally. These challenges are further compounded by regulatory shifts aimed at reducing environmental impacts, particularly greenhouse gas emissions and nutrient runoff, which can significantly alter the operational dynamics of dairy farms.

Economic viability remains a central concern for dairy farmers. Factors such as feed costs, labor expenses, and the cost of adopting new technologies or practices directly affect profitability. For example, the adoption of environmentally friendly practices, while beneficial in the long term, often requires significant upfront investment. This investment can be a substantial barrier, particularly for smaller farms. In this context, understanding market trends, leveraging economies of scale, and diversifying income sources become essential strategies for economic sustainability.

On the policy front, dairy farming is increasingly subject to stringent environmental regulations [130]. These policies aim to mitigate the industry’s impact on climate change, water quality, and biodiversity. Regulations may include limits on nutrient runoff, requirements for manure management, and targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions [131]. While these regulations are essential for environmental stewardship, they also require dairy farmers to adapt their practices, often necessitating financial investment and operational changes.

7. Case Studies of Regulatory Compliance and Benefits

7.1. The Netherlands’ Phosphate Reduction Plan

In response to EU regulations on phosphate production, the Netherlands implemented a phosphate reduction plan for dairy farms. This plan required farmers to reduce their cattle numbers or face substantial fines [132,133]. While initially challenging, this regulation led to innovative manure management solutions and nutrient recycling practices, ultimately benefiting both the environment and the farmers. Dairy farms that adapted effectively not only complied with the regulations but also improved their nutrient efficiency, reducing costs associated with fertilizer purchases.

7.2. California’s Dairy Digester Research and Development Program

In California, dairy farms are major contributors to methane emissions. The state’s Dairy Digester Research and Development Program provides financial assistance to dairy producers to implement anaerobic digesters [134]. These systems convert manure into renewable energy, reducing methane emissions. The program not only helps farmers comply with state regulations on emissions [135] but also provides them with an additional income stream through the sale of generated energy and carbon credits.

7.3. New Zealand’s Farm Environment Plans

New Zealand has implemented Farm Environment Plans (FEPs) as part of its effort to improve water quality. FEPs require farmers to undertake assessments of environmental risks and implement plans to manage these risks [136,137]. This approach has led to improved practices in effluent management, riparian planting, and nutrient management, demonstrating that regulatory compliance can drive innovation and efficiency improvements.

7.4. Denmark’s Green Development and Demonstration Program (GUDP)

Denmark’s GUDP supports the development of environmentally friendly agricultural technologies. The program has led to the development of precision farming tools that optimize fertilizer application and reduce nutrient runoff [138]. Farmers who adopted these tools not only complied with environmental regulations but also benefited from reduced fertilizer costs and improved crop yields.

Dairy farming’s economic and regulatory contexts are inextricably linked. Navigating these contexts requires a delicate balance between maintaining economic viability and adhering to environmental regulations. Successful adaptation often involves innovation, investment in sustainable practices, and a proactive approach to regulatory compliance. As the sector moves forward, the ability to adapt to economic and policy shifts will be crucial in ensuring its sustainability, profitability, and environmental stewardship.

8. Lifecycle of Sustainable Dairy Farming

The life cycle of sustainable dairy farming in Canada amidst climate change is a complex and dynamic process, encompassing various stages (Figure 3) that incorporate innovative strategies to enhance sustainability and mitigate environmental impacts.

In the phase of sustainable feed production, the focus is on the eco-friendly cultivation of feed crops. Embracing organic farming practices, this stage is pivotal in reducing the reliance on synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, thereby preserving soil health and lowering greenhouse gas emissions. The integration of climate-resilient crop varieties forms a solid foundation for sustainable dairy operations, ensuring feed security under varying climatic conditions.

Ethical animal husbandry is central to sustainable dairy farming. This stage emphasizes the well-being and health of livestock, which are integral to productivity and sustainability. The adoption of free-range or freewalk systems, high welfare standards, and the selection of breeds adapted to the Canadian climate reduce the environmental footprint of livestock. These practices not only foster animal health but also resonate with the growing consumer demand for ethically produced dairy products.

Eco-friendly milk production is a critical stage where the carbon footprint of milk production is addressed. Utilizing renewable energy sources and optimizing energy and water use in milking processes are key strategies in this stage. By reducing waste and enhancing operational efficiency, this stage contributes significantly to lowering emissions and enhancing the overall environmental performance of dairy farms.

The processing and packaging phase involves the sustainable transformation of milk into various dairy products. This stage is characterized by the use of energy-efficient processing methods and eco-friendly packaging materials. The focus here is not only on reducing the environmental impact of dairy processing but also on minimizing waste generation throughout the supply chain.

In the stage of distribution and market adoption, sustainable distribution practices are crucial. This involves the implementation of green logistics solutions to minimize transportation emissions. The stage also focuses on adapting to market demands for sustainable dairy products, reflecting a shift towards consumer preferences for environmentally friendly products.

The final stage, consumer consumption and waste management, revolves around promoting responsible consumption and effective waste management among consumers. This stage is crucial in educating consumers on the importance of recycling, reducing waste, and fostering a culture of sustainable consumption. It is here that the impact of consumer behavior on the sustainability of the dairy industry is most directly felt.

Throughout these stages, Canadian dairy farming incorporates advanced strategies to address climate change challenges. These include the adoption of methane-reducing feed supplements, the application of precision agriculture technologies, and engagement in carbon offset programs. Moreover, ongoing research and collaborations between farmers, scientists, and policymakers continuously refine sustainable practices, ensuring they remain effective in the face of evolving environmental conditions.

By weaving these stages into a cohesive and integrated system, the Canadian dairy sector demonstrates a holistic approach to sustainability. This methodical approach balances environmental stewardship with economic viability and social responsibility, setting a benchmark for sustainable agricultural practices in the context of climate change.

9. Building Resilience: Climate Adaptation in Dairy Farming

Building resilience in the face of climate change is increasingly crucial for the sustainability of dairy farming. This analysis delves into various adaptation strategies, examining how the dairy sector can enhance its resilience to climatic changes.

Selecting and genetically adapting breeds more suited to heat stress may be a key strategy. Breeds, known for maintaining productivity in warmer climates, that embody traits such as heat tolerance and disease resistance could offer pathways for adaptation to climate change. In the Canadian dairy farming sector, there is a growing emphasis on selecting breeds with intrinsic traits for weather resilience, such as augmented body fat content and denser coats, to provide superior insulation and adaptability in the colder Canadian climate. The focus of breeding programs in Canada is on the enhancement of key traits including tolerance to cold stress, heightened disease resistance, and optimized feed conversion efficiency. These initiatives aim to cultivate dairy breeds that are intrinsically aligned with Canada’s distinct climatic challenges. Concurrently, Canadian genetic research is centered on the development of dairy breeds that exhibit enhanced productivity and sustainability. This is particularly critical in the context of climate variability, which includes the adaptation to the colder temperatures and extreme weather conditions that are characteristic of the Canadian environment.

Illustrative of these breeding endeavors are several innovative programs: A cross-breeding initiative is underway between Holstein cattle, renowned for their superior milk production capabilities, and indigenous Canadian breeds that exhibit greater resistance to cold weather. The objective of this program is to produce a hybrid breed that amalgamates high productivity with increased resilience to the cold Canadian climate. Another program involves the crossbreeding of Ayrshire cattle, known for their robustness, with the Jersey breed, distinguished by its high butterfat milk content. The aim here is to develop a breed that not only thrives in the diverse climatic conditions of Canada but also maintains a high dairy yield. Efforts are also being made to integrate desirable traits from the Brown Swiss breed, noted for its durability and longevity, with local Canadian dairy breeds. The goal of this initiative is to bolster overall herd resilience and productivity, particularly in the face of the varied environmental stressors prevalent in Canada.

Nutritional management also plays a vital role, particularly under heat-stress conditions. Optimizing diets with high-energy, low-fiber content helps maintain rumen efficiency and milk production. Integrating feed additives that improve efficiency and reduce methane emissions is crucial for both adaptation and mitigation efforts. In regions facing water scarcity, effective water management becomes indispensable. Techniques like rainwater harvesting, efficient irrigation, and recycling are critical for ensuring consistent water supply and reducing consumption, with practices like drip irrigation being particularly beneficial for feed crops. Adapting farm infrastructure is another pivotal strategy. This involves designing well-ventilated barns with cooling systems and shades to mitigate heat stress effects, thus preserving animal welfare and productivity.

Diversifying farm operations, such as integrating dairy farming with crop production or renewable energy generation, spreads risk and enhances resilience to climatic shocks. This approach not only creates multiple income streams but also lessens dependence on a single source. Precision agriculture techniques, incorporating sensors, satellite imagery, and data analytics, optimize resource utilization and improve crop and livestock management. These technologies facilitate real-time environmental, health, and resource monitoring, aiding informed decision-making. Implementing climate-informed decision support systems is equally important. These systems, integrating climate forecasts and data, aid farmers in making strategic decisions about planting and harvesting and enable early responses to extreme weather, thereby protecting livestock and crops.

10. Lessons Learned and Pathways Forward

Importance of Localized Strategies: Adaptation strategies need to be localized, taking into account the specific climatic challenges and resource availability of each region. For instance, strategies effective in temperate regions may not be suitable for tropical regions. Tailoring adaptation measures to local conditions is key to their success.

Effective adaptation requires an integrated approach that combines policy support, technological innovation, and knowledge transfer. Policies that provide financial incentives for adopting sustainable practices, along with extension services that disseminate knowledge and technology, are crucial for encouraging climate adaptation.

Incorporating traditional farming knowledge with modern scientific practices can enhance resilience. Traditional practices often embody sustainable and climate-resilient farming techniques that have been refined over generations. Continuous investment in research and development is essential for developing new technologies and practices for climate adaptation. This includes breeding programs for heat-tolerant cattle breeds, the development of climate-resilient feed crops, and innovations in farm management and infrastructure.

Building community resilience is crucial in adapting to climate change. Engaging local communities, fostering collaborations among farmers, and establishing networks for knowledge and resource sharing can significantly enhance collective resilience. Regular monitoring and evaluation of adaptation strategies are necessary to assess their effectiveness and make adjustments as needed. This requires the collection and analysis of data on various indicators, such as livestock productivity, resource use efficiency, and environmental impact.

10.1. Collaborative Efforts toward a Sustainable Dairy Industry

In the quest for a sustainable dairy industry, the significance of collaboration cannot be overstated. The interplay of various stakeholders, from farmers and researchers to policymakers and consumers, creates a synergy essential for achieving sustainability goals. This analysis delves into the dynamics of these collaborations and their impact on fostering a sustainable dairy industry.

Adapting the strategies proposed for sustainable dairy farming to diverse geographic and socio-economic contexts globally requires a multifaceted approach. Each region has its unique set of challenges and resources, and strategies need to be tailored accordingly.

Local Climate Adaptation—Strategies must consider the local climate. For example, in tropical regions, emphasis on heat-tolerant breeds and cooling technologies is crucial, whereas, in colder climates, the focus shifts to breeds with better cold resistance and efficient housing insulation.

Economic Viability—Strategies should align with the economic realities of the region. In developing countries, low-cost, easily implementable solutions like improved grazing practices or basic genetic improvements may be more feasible than high-tech solutions.

Cultural Practices and Traditions—Understanding and integrating local farming traditions and practices can enhance the adoption of sustainable methods. This involves working with local farmers to adapt traditional practices in ways that improve sustainability.

Resource Availability—The availability of resources such as feed, water, and land must be considered. In areas with limited water, strategies might focus on water-efficient practices, while in regions with abundant biomass, biogas production could be a focus.

Government Policies and Support—The effectiveness of these strategies often hinges on government support. This includes subsidies for sustainable practices, research and development funding, and supportive regulatory frameworks.

Education and Training—Providing education and training to farmers about sustainable practices is key. This could involve collaborative efforts between governments, NGOs, and academic institutions.

Technology Transfer and Innovation Sharing—Developed countries can play a crucial role by sharing technology and innovations with developing countries, adapting these technologies to local contexts.

Some examples of successful international collaborations are:

The Global Research Alliance on Agricultural Greenhouse Gases (GRA)—This international network brings together countries committed to finding ways to grow more food without growing greenhouse gas emissions. Projects under GRA have demonstrated varying levels of emissions reductions depending on the intervention. For example, some pasture management techniques under trial have shown potential reductions of up to 20% in methane emissions. The GRA facilitates collaboration and knowledge sharing in research activities across member countries.

The Dairy Sustainability Framework—This global framework brings together dairy stakeholders worldwide to improve the sector’s sustainability. It sets guidelines and shares best practices across various aspects of dairy farming, from environmental to socio-economic factors.

FAO’s Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance (LEAP) Partnership—This is a multi-stakeholder partnership coordinated by the FAO that develops comprehensive guidelines and methodologies for sustainable livestock production systems.

The International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)—ILRI works in collaboration with partners in the Global South on livestock research for development. Its work has significantly contributed to sustainable livestock farming practices, particularly in Africa and Asia.

These collaborations are essential in pooling resources, knowledge, and expertise to address the challenges of sustainable dairy farming globally. They serve as platforms for sharing best practices, innovations, and technologies, thus enhancing the sector’s overall sustainability.

10.2. The Synergy of Stakeholder Collaboration

The dairy industry’s sustainability hinges on the collective efforts of multiple stakeholders, each contributing unique perspectives and resources. Farmers, at the forefront, are essential for implementing sustainable practices on the ground. Their direct engagement with the land and livestock makes them pivotal in adopting and testing new practices that reduce emissions and improve animal welfare.

Researchers play a crucial role in developing innovative technologies and strategies for sustainability. Their work in areas like genetics, nutrition, and farm management lays the groundwork for practical solutions that farmers can adopt. Collaborations between researchers and farmers are particularly effective, as they combine scientific knowledge with practical experience, leading to more applicable and successful sustainable practices.

Policymakers and regulatory bodies are instrumental in shaping the environment within which the dairy industry operates. By setting standards and regulations, they can drive the industry towards more sustainable practices. Policies that incentivize sustainable farming methods or provide support for transitioning to such practices are particularly influential.

Consumer advocacy groups and the wider public also play a significant role. Consumer preferences often drive industry changes, and a growing demand for sustainable and ethically produced dairy products can push the industry towards more environmentally friendly practices. Consumer awareness campaigns and advocacy efforts can raise the profile of sustainability issues, influencing both public opinion and industry practices.

10.3. Impact of Collaborative Efforts on Sustainability

The impact of collaborative efforts in the dairy industry is multifaceted. One significant area is the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, a major concern in dairy farming. Collaborative research into feed supplements, manure management, and breeding for lower-emitting cattle can lead to substantial reductions in emissions.

Another critical area is animal welfare. Collaboration between researchers, farmers, and welfare organizations can lead to the development and implementation of practices that improve the living conditions and health of dairy cattle. Improved animal welfare often correlates with increased productivity and product quality, showcasing the dual benefits of these practices.

Water management is also a key sustainability issue in dairy farming. Collaborations that focus on efficient water use, recycling, and conservation practices can significantly reduce the industry’s water footprint. This is particularly important in areas facing water scarcity or where dairy farming significantly impacts local water resources.

Biodiversity conservation is another area where collaborative efforts can have a positive impact. Practices such as maintaining natural habitats on farmland, implementing biodiversity-friendly farming methods, and protecting local wildlife can enhance the ecological sustainability of dairy farming.

10.4. Challenges and Opportunities in Collaborative Efforts

While the potential of collaboration in achieving sustainability goals is immense, there are also challenges. Aligning the interests and priorities of different stakeholders can be complex, as each group often has different goals and perspectives. Overcoming these differences requires open communication, mutual understanding, and a shared commitment to sustainability goals.

Another challenge is the varying levels of resources and capabilities among stakeholders. Smaller farmers may lack the financial resources or technical know-how to implement certain sustainable practices, necessitating support through policy initiatives, funding, or knowledge transfer programs.

Despite these challenges, the opportunities presented by collaborative efforts in the dairy industry are significant. Through combined expertise, resources, and influence, stakeholders can drive meaningful changes toward a more sustainable dairy industry. As the industry faces increasing pressure to reduce its environmental impact and meet global sustainability targets, collaborative efforts will be more crucial than ever in shaping a sustainable future for dairy farming.

11. Summary and Conclusions

Sustainable dairy farming is emerging as a key player in the global pursuit of environmental conservation, food security, and economic resilience. This comprehensive analysis aims to synthesize key insights from recent advances in this field and outline future directions, particularly focusing on how these practices can be implemented effectively on a global scale.

A significant achievement in sustainable dairy farming is the reduction in greenhouse gases (GHGs) and ammonia emissions. Advanced manure management systems, alongside genetically optimized feed, have been pivotal in reducing emissions effectively. A notable strategy has been the utilization of feed additives like 3-nitrooxypropanol, which has shown considerable success in decreasing enteric methane emissions. Anaerobic digestion techniques have also been effective in converting waste into renewable energy, highlighting the sector’s commitment to sustainable energy sources. The integration of animal welfare into sustainable practices has emerged as a key focus area. Improved housing systems and refined feeding practices have resulted in better welfare standards, which in turn have been linked to enhanced productivity and product quality. This synergy between ethical standards and productivity is a critical aspect of sustainable dairy farming practices.

Efficient water management is increasingly critical, especially in regions facing water scarcity. Techniques such as rainwater harvesting, and the implementation of efficient irrigation systems have shown promise in conserving water while maintaining agricultural productivity. The adoption of precision agriculture technologies and data-driven approaches has revolutionized farm management. The use of real-time monitoring systems has enabled farmers to make informed decisions, optimizing resource use, and improving environmental outcomes. The measurement of greenhouse gas emissions in agricultural settings often involves complex assessments over extended periods to accurately gauge the impact of these interventions. Multi-stakeholder collaborations have proven instrumental in driving sustainability in dairy farming. The intersection of efforts from farmers, researchers, policymakers, and consumers has fostered a conducive environment for innovative solutions, policy frameworks, and market shifts toward sustainable practices.

11.1. Future Prospects in Sustainable Dairy Farming

Future efforts in sustainable dairy farming will likely focus on developing and promoting breeds that are more resilient to climatic stressors and have lower emission profiles. Genetic markers for traits such as feed efficiency and reduced methane emissions are expected to play a significant role in these breeding programs. The dairy sector is poised to expand the use of renewable energy sources, such as solar, wind, and biomass. This transition is essential not only for reducing emissions but also for enhancing energy self-sufficiency and reducing operational costs. Ongoing research into feed supplements and additives that mitigate enteric fermentation and methane emissions is crucial. Exploring alternative feed sources, like insect-based feeds, represents an innovative approach to sustainable dairy farming. As environmental policies continue to evolve, it is imperative for the dairy industry to remain adaptive and proactive. Future policies are likely to emphasize incentives for sustainable practices and penalize non-compliance, necessitating a greater alignment between industry practices and regulatory frameworks. The role of consumers in driving sustainability in the dairy sector is expected to grow. Consumer preferences for environmentally friendly and ethically produced products will increasingly influence industry practices and market dynamics. Developing strategies for adapting to climate change will be essential. This includes diversifying farming systems, implementing climate-resilient infrastructure, and developing decision support systems that utilize climate forecasts.

11.2. Global Perspectives on Sustainable Dairy Farming

There is a growing need for global harmonization of policies and standards to ensure equitable progress and foster international collaboration in sustainable dairy farming practices. Developing and under-developed dairy regions could greatly benefit from technology transfer and knowledge sharing. Collaborations between developed and developing countries are vital to enhance global sustainability in dairy farming. Sustainable practices must be tailored to the specific environmental, economic, and social conditions of each region to ensure their global applicability and effectiveness. Future sustainability efforts should also emphasize the preservation of biodiversity and the enhancement of ecosystem services. This includes maintaining natural habitats and integrating eco-friendly practices into farming systems. Efforts to quantify and reduce the carbon footprint of dairy products are becoming increasingly important. This involves the entire supply chain, from feed production to processing and distribution.

Sustainable dairy farming stands at a transformative crossroads, with significant advancements in emission reduction, animal welfare, resource management, and technological integration. The sector’s future trajectory will depend on continued innovation, global collaboration, and alignment with evolving policies and consumer preferences. As the dairy industry adapts to these dynamics, its role in achieving global sustainability goals and contributing to food security, environmental protection, and economic stability, will be more crucial than ever.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1. Stakeholder influence matrix for emissions reductions in the Canadian Dairy Sector.

Figure 2. Holistic dairy farm management—addressing climate change mitigation and sustainable farming practices.

Figure 3. Lifecycle of Sustainable Dairy Farming—A Journey from Farm to Table.

Table 1

Assessment of Air Treatment Technologies in Canadian Dairy Barns.

Technology Type	Functionality	Emission Control Efficiency	Animal Welfare Impact	Adoption Rate	Cost Implications	Technical Complexity	Maintenance Requirements
Air Scrubbers	Remove airborne contaminants	High	Positive	Moderate	High initial investment	Moderate	Regular cleaning and filter replacement
Chemical Air Scrubber and Natural Ventilation	Chemical pollutant removal and air dilution	High for gases	Positive	Growing	Moderate to High	Moderate	Chemical replenishment and system checks
Methane Oxidation Systems	Convert methane to less harmful gases	High for methane	Neutral	Low	Significant investment	High	Regular monitoring and catalyst replacement
Air Ionization	Charge and remove airborne particles	Moderate	Positive	Emerging	Moderate	Moderate	Periodic maintenance of ion generators
Pit Air Treatment	Treat manure pit emissions	High for ammonia	Positive	Moderate	Moderate	Moderate	Regular system checks and adjustments
Electrostatic Precipitators	Capture fine dust particles	High for particulates	Positive	Low	High initial cost	High	Regular cleaning of collection plates
Biofiltration Systems	Biological degradation of pollutants	Moderate to High	Positive	Emerging	Moderate	Low to Moderate	Regular biofiltermedium replacement
Ventilation Fans	Circulate and refresh barn air	Low direct emission control	Positive	High	Low	Low	Routine maintenance
UV Light Treatment	Inactivate airborne pathogens	Low for GHGs, high for pathogens	Positive	Emerging	Moderate	Moderate	Regular bulb replacement
Heat Recovery Ventilators	Recover heat and improve air quality	Low direct emission control	Positive	Low	Moderate to High	Moderate	Periodic maintenance and cleaning
Climate-Controlled Barns	Maintain optimal indoor climate	Indirect emission control	Highly Positive	Growing	High initial investment	High	Regular system checks and maintenance
Ozone Generators	Oxidize and neutralize odors	Moderate for odors	Caution required	Low	Moderate	Moderate	Periodic ozone generator maintenance
Natural Ventilation Systems	Utilize natural air flow	Low direct emission control	Positive	High	Low	Low	Minimal
Mechanical Ventilation Systems	Controlled air exchange	Moderate	Positive	High	Moderate	Moderate	Regular maintenance and checks
Humidity Control Systems	Regulate barn humidity	Indirect impact on emissions	Positive	Moderate	Moderate to High	Moderate	Regular checks and adjustments

Table 2

Comprehensive Evaluation of Nutritional Strategies for Methane Emission Reduction in Dairy Farming.

Strategy	Effectiveness (% Reduction in Methane)	Animal Health Impact	Scalability	Research Support	Cost Implications	Practicality in Dairy Diets
Methane Inhibitor Supplements (e.g., 3-NOP)	Up to 30%	Generally beneficial	Widely applicable	Well-researched	Significant investment required	Feasible with careful planning
Tannin Additions	Up to 15%, varies with type and amount	Beneficial in controlled quantities	Applicable with limitations	Substantial research	Investment varies based on source	Requires careful integration
Protein Content Optimization	Up to 10%, depending on diet balance	Beneficial when properly balanced	Widely applicable	Strong evidence base	Variable, depending on protein sources	Feasible with nutritional expertise
Seaweed Supplementation (e.g., Asparagopsis taxiformis)	Up to 80% in controlled settings	Ongoing research	Emerging	Developing research	Higher due to sourcing and processing	Challenging due to supply and dosage
Legume Inclusion (e.g., Red Clover)	Up to 20%, depending on diet mix	Generally positive, with dietary balance	Widely applicable	Well-supported by research	Moderate, dependent on local availability	Easily integrated into grazing systems
Nitrate Addition	Up to 20%, with careful management	Requires careful management to avoid toxicity	Moderate applicability	Considerable evidence	Investment varies with nitrate source	Requires close monitoring for safety
Linseed/Oil Usage	Up to 15%, varies with diet composition	Enhances fatty acid profile	Moderate scalability	Substantial evidence	Can be higher, depends on oil type	Integration depends on dietary balance
Adaptive Grazing Practices	Variable, can achieve up to 10%	Generally beneficial	Highly adaptable	Emerging evidence	Lower than intensive methods	Highly feasible, particularly in pasture-based systems
Silage Management and Quality	Up to 10%, depends on silage quality	Positive impact on digestion and nutrient uptake	Highly scalable	Extensive research	Investment varies with silageTechnology	Highly feasible with proper management
Ionophore Usage (e.g., Monensin)	Up to 10%, subject to production system	Mixed, may be restricted in some systems	Limited applicability	Well-established research	Relatively lower cost	Limited in organic or certain dairy systems
Fiber-Based Diet Adjustments	Variable, can achieve up to 10%	Positive for rumen health	Highly scalable	Strong research base	Generally lower than other supplements	Easily implemented with proper dietary planning
Alternative Feed Sources (e.g., Insects)	Under Research	Currently under investigation	Emerging area	In early stages of research	Potentially higher due to production costs	Initial challenges in integration and acceptance

Table 3

Alignment of Dairy Farming Practices with Legislative and Policy Developments in Canada.

Legislative/Policy Initiative	Objectives	Impact on Dairy Farming	Compliance Requirements	Farmer Support Mechanisms	Future Implications	Additional Notes
Greenhouse Gas Emission Policies	Reduce GHG emissions from dairy farms	Requires changes in farm practices to lower emissions	Emission monitoring and reduction targets	Subsidies and incentives for low-emission technology	Shifting towards more sustainable farming methods	Critical for meeting Canada’s climate targets
Nutrient Runoff Regulations	Control and reduce nutrient runoff into water bodies	Mandates eco-friendly nutrient management practices	Nutrient management plans and runoff controls	Training and funding for nutrient management	Greater emphasis on environmental stewardship	Essential for protecting water quality and ecosystems
Animal Welfare Standards	Ensure the welfare and humane treatment of dairy cattle	Requires adoption of welfare-centric farming practices	Standards for housing, feeding, and animal care	Guidance and support for welfare improvements	Enhanced focus on animal health and productivity	Aligns with global animal welfare movements
Renewable Energy Initiatives	Promote the use of renewable energy sources	Encourages use of solar, wind, and biogas systems	Integration of renewable energy systems	Grants and subsidies for renewable energy adoption	Shift towards energy self-sufficiency in farming	Supports Canada’s renewable energy goals
Market Regulations	Regulate market practices and prices for dairy products	Influences production, pricing, and distributionDecisions	Compliance with pricing, quality, and supply regulations	Market support and stabilization programs	Adjustments to market dynamics and farmer income	Affects domestic and international market competitiveness
International Agreements (e.g., Paris Climate Accord)	Align national practices with global climate goals	Necessitates adherence to global emission targets	Meeting internationally set emission reduction goals	Access to international markets and funding	Alignment with global environmental strategies	Critical for global climate change mitigation
Fertilizer Use Policies	Reduce environmental impact of fertilizer use	May limit certain fertilizers, promotes eco-friendly alternatives	Adherence to regulated fertilizer types and usage	Access to eco-friendly fertilizers and training	Increased focus on sustainable agriculture practices	Impacts on soil health and crop productivity
Water Conservation Regulations	Ensure efficient and sustainable water use	Impacts irrigation and water use methods	Implementation of water-saving technologies	Support for efficient irrigation and water management	Enhanced sustainability of water resources in farming	Vital for resource conservation in agriculture
Land Use and Zoning Laws	Manage land use for environmental and economic balance	Influences farm location and expansion decisions	Adherence to land use regulations and permits	Guidance on sustainable land use and expansion	Balanced development and environmental conservation	Balances agricultural needs with environmental concerns
Feed Quality Standards	Ensure high-quality and safe feed for cattle	Affects feed choice and nutrition planning	Compliance with feed quality and safety standards	Access to quality feed and nutritional advice	Improved animal health and product quality	Directly affects cattle health and milk production
Manure Management Guidelines	Implement effective manure management to reduce pollution	Changes in manure storage, treatment, and disposal	Compliance with manure management regulations	Assistance with manure management infrastructure	Reduced environmental impact from manure	Important for nutrient recycling and pollution control
Biosecurity Regulations	Prevent disease spread in dairy herds	Enhances farm biosecurity measures	Implementation of disease prevention protocols	Training and resources for biosecurity	Increased farm resilience against diseases	Essential for maintaining herd health
Dairy Product Labeling and Standards	Standardize dairy product quality and provide consumer information	Affects packaging, labeling, and product information dissemination	Adherence to labeling standards and quality control	Guidance on product standards and labeling requirements	Improved consumer trust and product transparency	Influences consumer choices and market trends

References

1. Livestock Don’t Contribute 14.5% of Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Report. Available online: https://thebreakthrough.org/issues/food-agriculture-environment/livestock-dont-contribute-14-5-of-global-greenhouse-gas-emissions (accessed on 10 November 2023).

2. Bačėninaitė, D.; Džermeikaitė, K.; Antanaitis, R. Global warming and dairy cattle: How to control and reduce methane emission. Animals; 2022; 12, 2687. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12192687] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36230428]

3. Emissions Impossible: Methane Edition, Report. Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy (IATP) and the Changing Markets Foundation. Available online: https://www.iatp.org/emissions-impossible-methane-edition (accessed on 1 October 2023).

4. Siegel, F.R. The Earth’s Human Carrying Capacity: Limitations Assessed, Solutions Proposed; Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021.

5. Fisher, P.T. The ‘Dark Horse’ of Climate Change: Agricultural Methane Governance in the United States and Canada. Report. Available online: https://fordschool.umich.edu/sites/default/files/2022-04/NACP_Fisher_final.pdf (accessed on 30 August 2023).

6. Dobson, S.; Goodday, V.; Winter, J. If it matters, measure it: A review of methane sources and mitigation policy in Canada. Int. Rev. Environ. Resour. Econ.; 2023; 16, pp. 309-429. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1561/101.00000146]

7. Skytt, T.; Nielsen, S.N.; Jonsson, B.G. Global warming potential and absolute global temperature change potential from carbon dioxide and methane fluxes as indicators of regional sustainability–A case study of Jämtland, Sweden. Ecol. Indic.; 2020; 110, 105831. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105831]

8. Liu, S.; Proudman, J.; Mitloehner, F.M. Rethinking methane from animal agriculture. CABI Agric. Biosci.; 2021; 2, 22. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43170-021-00041-y]

9. Black, J.L.; Davison, T.M.; Box, I. Methane emissions from ruminants in Australia: Mitigation potential and applicability of mitigation strategies. Animals; 2021; 11, 951. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11040951] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33805324]

10. Berghuis, B.A.; Yu, F.B.; Schulz, F.; Blainey, P.C.; Woyke, T.; Quake, S.R. Hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis in archaeal phylum Verstraetearchaeota reveals the shared ancestry of all methanogens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2019; 116, pp. 5037-5044. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1815631116] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30814220]

11. Bueno de Mesquita, C.P.; Wu, D.; Tringe, S.G. Methyl-based Methanogenesis: An ecological and genomic review. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.; 2023; 87, e00024-22. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.00024-22] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36692297]

12. Vinco, E.; Morrison, N.; Bourassa, J.; Lhermie, G. Climate policy and Canadian crop production: A qualitative study of farmers’ attitudes and perceptions towards nitrous oxide reductions. J. Clean. Prod.; 2023; 418, 138108. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138108]

13. Davis, M.; Ahiduzzaman, M.; Kumar, A. How will Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions change by 2050? A disaggregated analysis of past and future greenhouse gas emissions using bottom-up energy modelling and Sankey diagrams. Appl. Energy; 2018; 220, pp. 754-786. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.064]

14. Leahy, S.; Clark, H.; Reisinger, A. Challenges and prospects for agricultural greenhouse gas mitigation pathways consistent with the Paris Agreement. Front. Sustain. Food Syst.; 2020; 4, 69. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00069]

15. Nisbet, E.G.; Dlugokencky, E.J.; Fisher, R.E.; France, J.L.; Lowry, D.; Manning, M.R.; Michel, S.E.; Warwick, N.J. Atmospheric methane and nitrous oxide: Challenges alongthe path to Net Zero. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A; 2021; 379, 20200457. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0457] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34565227]

16. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Launches New Agricultural Methane Reduction Challenge. Available online: https://www.canada.ca/en/agriculture-agri-food/news/2023/11/agriculture-and-agri-food-canada-launches-new-agricultural-methane-reduction-challenge.html (accessed on 15 December 2023).

17. Ominski, K.; Gunte, K.; Wittenberg, K.; Legesse, G.; Mengistu, G.; McAllister, T. The role of livestock in sustainable food production systems in Canada. Can. J. Anim. Sci.; 2021; 101, pp. 591-601. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2021-0005]

18. Gabruch, M.; Micheels, E.T. Differences in Production Costs Across Compliance Scenarios for Canadian Cow-Calf Producers Accessing the EU Market. Int. J. Food Syst. Dyn.; 2020; 11, pp. 221-240.

19. Beaver, A.; Weary, D.M.; von Keyserlingk, M.A. Invited review: The welfare of dairy cattle housed in tiestalls compared to less-restrictive housing types: A systematic review. J. Dairy Sci.; 2021; 104, pp. 9383-9417. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19609] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34253364]

20. Erjavec, K.; Klopčič, M. Views of Consumers, Farmers and Stakeholders on Alternative Dairy Cattle Housing Systems. Animals; 2022; 12, 1231. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12101231] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35625077]

21. Galama, P.J.; Ouweltjes, W.; Endres, M.I.; Sprecher, J.R.; Leso, L.; Kuipers, A.; Klopčič, M. Symposium review: Future of housing for dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci.; 2020; 103, pp. 5759-5772. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17214] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32331875]

22. Blanco-Penedo, I.; Ouweltjes, W.; Ofner-Schröck, E.; Brügemann, K.; Emanuelson, U. Symposium review: Animal welfare in free-walk systems in Europe. J. Dairy Sci.; 2020; 103, pp. 5773-5782. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17315] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32089316]

23. Benedičič, J.; Erjavec, K.; Klopčič, M. Environmental sustainability: Farmers’ views of housing systems for cattle. Ital. J. Anim. Sci.; 2022; 21, pp. 18-30. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2021.2005470]

24. Curth-van Middelkoop, J.C.; de Boer, H.C.; Galama, P.J. Characteristics of organic manure from’Freewalk’housing, compared with slurry, and their appreciation by farmers. Proceedings of the Meeting the Future Demands for Grassland Production; Helsinki, Finland, 19–22 October 2020; Volume 25, pp. 686-688.

25. Witkowska, D.; Ponieważ, A. The effect of housing system on disease prevalence and productive lifespan of dairy herds—A case study. Animals; 2022; 12, 1610. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12131610]

26. Gargiulo, J.I.; Eastwood, C.R.; Garcia, S.C.; Lyons, N.A. Dairy farmers with larger herd sizes adopt more precision dairy technologies. J. Dairy Sci.; 2018; 101, pp. 5466-5473. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13324]

27. EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Animal Welfare (AHAW) Nielsen, S.S.; Alvarez, J.; Bicout, D.J.; Calistri, P.; Canali, E.; Drewe, J.A.; Garin-Bastuji, B.; Gonzales Rojas, J.L.; Gortázar Schmidt, C. et al. Welfare of dairy cows. EFSA J.; 2023; 21, e07993. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37200854]

28. Bewley, J.M.; Robertson, L.M.; Eckelkamp, E.A. A 100-Year Review: Lactating dairy cattle housing management. J. Dairy Sci.; 2017; 100, pp. 10418-10431. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13251] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29153173]

29. Kumar, R.; Thakur, A.; Thakur, R.; Dogra, P.K. Livestock shelter management: Climate change perspective. Climate Change and Livestock Production: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 129-140.

30. Liu, J.; Li, L.; Chen, X.; Lu, Y.; Wang, D. Effects of heat stress on body temperature, milk production, and reproduction in dairy cows: A novel idea for monitoring and evaluation of heat stress—A review. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci.; 2019; 32, 1332. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0743] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30744345]

31. Costantino, A.; Fabrizio, E.; Calvet, S. The Role of Climate Control in Monogastric Animal Farming: The Effects on Animal Welfare, Air Emissions, Productivity, Health, and Energy Use. Appl. Sci.; 2021; 11, 9549. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app11209549]

32. Kaur, U.; Malacco, V.M.; Bai, H.; Price, T.P.; Datta, A.; Xin, L.; Sen, S.; Nawrocki, R.A.; Chiu, G.; Sundaram, S. et al. Integration of technologies and systems for precision animal agriculture—A case study on precision dairy farming. J. Anim. Sci.; 2023; 101, skad206. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skad206] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37335911]

33. Qi, F.; Zhao, X.; Shi, Z.; Li, H.; Zhao, W. Environmental Factor Detection and Analysis Technologies in Livestock and Poultry Houses: A Review. Agriculture; 2023; 13, 1489. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081489]

34. Park, G.T.; Kang, H.; Na, Y.; Lee, S. PSIV-6 A real-time monitoring system for composting of livestock manure. J. Anim. Sci.; 2019; 97, (Suppl. S3), pp. 223-224. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz258.455]

35. Bekele, W.; Guinguina, A.; Zegeye, A.; Simachew, A.; Ramin, M. Contemporary methods of measuring and estimating methane emission from ruminants. Methane; 2022; 1, pp. 82-95. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/methane1020008]

36. Zhao, Y.; Nan, X.; Yang, L.; Zheng, S.; Jiang, L.; Xiong, B. A review of enteric methane emission measurement techniques in ruminants. Animals; 2020; 10, 1004. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10061004]

37. Balafoutis, A.; Beck, B.; Fountas, S.; Vangeyte, J.; Van der Wal, T.; Soto, I.; Gómez-Barbero, M.; Barnes, A.; Eory, V. Precision agriculture technologies positively contributing to GHG emissions mitigation, farm productivity and economics. Sustainability; 2017; 9, 1339. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su9081339]

38. Neethirajan, S. Artificial intelligence and sensor technologies in dairy livestock export: Charting a digital transformation. Sensors; 2023; 23, 7045. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23167045] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37631580]

39. Neethirajan, S.; Kemp, B. Digital livestock farming. Sens. Bio-Sens. Res.; 2021; 32, 100408. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsr.2021.100408]

40. Winkel, A.; Bokma, S.; Hol, J.M.G.; Blanken, K. Ammonia Emission of the MeadowFloor CL for Dairy Barns: A Case-Control Study in the Environmental Research Barn of Dairy Campus; Wageningen Livestock Research: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2020; No. 1275

41. Ross, E.G.; Peterson, C.B.; Zhao, Y.; Pan, Y.; Mitloehner, F.M. Manure flushing vs. scraping in dairy freestall lanes reduces gaseous emissions. Sustainability; 2021; 13, 5363. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13105363]

42. Hempel, S.; Janke, D.; Losand, B.; Zeyer, K.; Zähner, M.; Mohn, J.; Amon, T.; Schrade, S. Comparison of Methane Emission Patterns from Dairy Housings with Solid and Slatted Floors at Two Locations. Agronomy; 2022; 12, 381. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020381]

43. Fernández, A.; Mainau, E.; Manteca, X.; Siurana, A.; Castillejos, L. Impacts of compost bedded pack barns on the welfare and comfort of dairy cows. Animals; 2020; 10, 431. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10030431]

44. Biasato, I.; D’Angelo, A.; Bertone, I.; Odore, R.; Bellino, C. Compost bedded-pack barn as an alternative housing system for dairy cattle in Italy: Effects on animal health and welfare and milk and milk product quality. Ital. J. Anim. Sci.; 2019; 18, pp. 1142-1153. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2019.1623095]

45. Emanuelson, U.; Bruegemann, K.; Klopčič, M.; Leso, L.; Ouweltjes, W.; Zentner, A.; Blanco-Penedo, I. Animal health in compost-bedded pack and cubicle dairy barns in Six European countries. Animals; 2022; 12, 396. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12030396]

46. Weerasinghe, W.P.C.G.; Rajapaksha, E.; Gunawardena, W.W.D.A.; Ammunekumbura, I.D.E.M.; Samarakone, T.S. Effect of rubber and concrete flooring on resting behavior, hock injuries, and milk production of primiparous Friesian crossbred dairy cows housed in a free-stall barn in Mid-Country, Sri Lanka. Trop. Anim. Health Prod.; 2021; 53, 447. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02885-y]

47. Herzog, A.; Hörtenhuber, S.; Winckler, C.; Kral, I.; Zollitsch, W. Welfare intervention and environmental impacts of milk production–cradle-to-farm-gate effects of implementing rubber mats in Austrian dairy farms. J. Clean. Prod.; 2020; 277, 123953. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123953]

48. Jensen, M.B.; Proudfoot, K. Welfare at Calving and of the Growing Animals. Cattle Welfare in Dairy and Beef Systems: A New Approach to Global Issues; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023; pp. 265-295.

49. De Oliveira, D.; Barth, K.; Haskell, M.J.; Hillmann, E.; Jensen, M.B.; Johnsen, J.F.; Mejdell, C.; Waiblinger, S.; Ferneborg, S. Methodology for experimental and observational animal studies in cow-calf contact systems. J. Dairy Res.; 2020; 87, (Suppl. S1), pp. 115-121. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022029920000552]

50. Poteko, J.; Zähner, M.; Schrade, S. Effects of housing system, floor type and temperature on ammonia and methane emissions from dairy farming: A meta-analysis. Biosyst. Eng.; 2019; 182, pp. 16-28. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.03.012]

51. Rahman, S.M.E.; Murshed, H.M. Application of Electrolyzed Water on Livestock. Electrolyzed Water in Food: Fundamentals and Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 205-222.

52. Ogunniyi, A.D.; Dandie, C.E.; Ferro, S.; Hall, B.; Drigo, B.; Brunetti, G.; Venter, H.; Myers, B.; Deo, P.; Donner, E. et al. Comparative antibacterial activities of neutral electrolyzed oxidizing water and other chlorine-based sanitizers. Sci. Rep.; 2019; 9, 19955. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56248-7]

53. Wang, X.; Demirci, A.; Graves, R.E.; Puri, V.M. Conventional and emerging clean-in-place methods for the milking systems. Raw Milk; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 91-115.

54. Rebezov, M.; Saeed, K.; Khaliq, A.; Rahman, S.J.U.; Sameed, N.; Semenova, A.; Khayrullin, M.; Dydykin, A.; Abramov, Y.; Thiruvengadam, M. et al. Application of electrolyzed water in the food industry: A review. Appl. Sci.; 2022; 12, 6639. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app12136639]

55. Chen, B.K.; Wang, C.K. Electrolyzed water and its pharmacological activities: A mini-review. Molecules; 2022; 27, 1222. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041222] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35209015]

56. Sarker, N.C.; Rahman, S.; Borhan, M.S.; Rajasekaran, P.; Santra, S.; Ozcan, A. Nanoparticles in mitigating gaseous emissions from liquid dairy manure stored under anaerobic condition. J. Environ. Sci.; 2019; 76, pp. 26-36. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2018.03.014]

57. Qi, L.; Liu, X.; Miao, Y.; Chatzisymeon, E.; Yang, P.; Lu, H.; Pang, L. Response of cattle manure anaerobic digestion to zinc oxide nanoparticles: Methane production, microbial community, and functions. J. Environ. Chem. Eng.; 2021; 9, 106704. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.106704]

58. Khan, S.Z.; Zaidi, A.A.; Naseer, M.N.; AlMohamadi, H. Nanomaterials for biogas augmentation towards renewable and sustainable energy production: A critical review. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.; 2022; 10, 868454. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.868454]

59. Owusu-Sekyere, E.; Hansson, H.; Telezhenko, E. Dairy farmers’ heterogeneous preferences for animal welfare-enhancing flooring properties: A mixed logit approach applied in Sweden. Livest. Sci.; 2021; 250, 104591. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104591]

60. Karlsson, J.O.; Robling, H.; Cederberg, C.; Spörndly, R.; Lindberg, M.; Martiin, C.; Ardfors, E.; Tidåker, P. What can we learn from the past? Tracking sustainability indicators for the Swedish dairy sector over 30 years. Agric. Syst.; 2023; 212, 103779. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103779]

61. Inno-Plus Systems. Exploring Air Scrubber Pros and Cons for Livestock Farms. 2023; Available online: https://inno-plussystems.com/en/air-scrubber-pros-and-cons/ (accessed on 10 November 2023).

62. Rychła, A.; Amon, B.; Hassouna, M.; van der Weerden, T.J.; Winiwarter, W. Costs and effects of measures to reduce ammonia emissions from dairy cattle and pig production: A comparison of country-specific estimations and model calculations. J. Environ. Manag.; 2023; 344, 118678. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118678]

63. Conti, C.; Guarino, M.; Bacenetti, J. Measurements techniques and models to assess odor annoyance: A review. Environ. Int.; 2020; 134, 105261. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105261] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31704563]

64. Cao, T.; Zheng, Y.; Dong, H.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Cong, Q. A new air cleaning technology to synergistically reduce odor and bioaerosol emissions from livestock houses. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.; 2023; 342, 108221. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2022.108221]

65. Bhatia, S.K.; Bhatia, R.K.; Jeon, J.M.; Kumar, G.; Yang, Y.H. Carbon dioxide capture and bioenergy production using biological system–A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.; 2019; 110, pp. 143-158. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.070]

66. Kontovas, C.A. Integration of air quality and climate change policies in shipping: The case of sulphur emissions regulation. Mar. Policy; 2020; 113, 103815. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103815]

67. Islam, M.A.; Ikeguchi, A.; Naide, T. Effectiveness of an air cleaner device in reducing aerosol numbers and airborne bacteria from an enclosed type dairy barn. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.; 2022; 29, pp. 53022-53035. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19514-2]

68. Gohel, R.; Siabbweka, M.; Singh, R.; Thanki, A.A.; Jadeja, U. Sampling, detection, and health impacts of bioaerosols emitted from livestock facilities. Bioaerosols Emission from Anthropogenic Sources; Woodhead Publishing: Thorston, UK, 2024; pp. 141-161.

69. Meyer, D.M.; Heguy, J.; Karle, B.; Robinson, P.H. Characterize Physical and Chemical Properties of Manure in California Dairy Systems to Improve Greenhouse Gas Emission Estimates; California Environmental Protection Agency; California Air Resources Board: Sacramento, CA, USA, 2019.

70. Ambrose, H.W.; Dalby, F.R.; Feilberg, A.; Kofoed, M.V. Additives and methods for the mitigation of methane emission from stored liquid manure. Biosyst. Eng.; 2023; 229, pp. 209-245. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2023.03.015]

71. Tomasello, N.; Valenti, F.; Cascone, G.; Porto, S.M. Improving natural ventilation in renovated free-stall barns for dairy cows: Optimized building solutions by using a validated computational fluid dynamics model. J. Agric. Eng.; 2021; 52, 1. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4081/jae.2021.1135]

72. Guo, L.; Zhao, B.; Jia, Y.; He, F.; Chen, W. Mitigation strategies of air pollutants for mechanical ventilated livestock and poultry housing—A review. Atmos; 2022; 13, 452. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos13030452]

73. Janke, D.; Willink, D.; Ammon, C.; Hempel, S.; Schrade, S.; Demeyer, P.; Hartung, E.; Amon, B.; Ogink, N.; Amon, T. Calculation of ventilation rates and ammonia emissions: Comparison of sampling strategies for a naturally ventilated dairy barn. Biosyst. Eng.; 2020; 198, pp. 15-30. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.07.011]

74. Tan, Z.; Zhang, Y. A review of effects and control methods of particulate matter in animal indoor environments. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc.; 2004; 54, pp. 845-854. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2004.10470950]

75. Islam, M.A.; Ikeguchi, A.; Naide, T. Aerosols and bacteria concentration in different types of Japanese dairy milking houses. Proceedings of the 10th International Livestock Environment Symposium (ILES X); Omaha, NE, USA, 25–27 September 2018; American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers: St. Joseph, MI, USA, 2018; 1.

76. Li, B.; Wang, Y.; Rong, L.; Zheng, W. Research progress on animal environment and welfare. Anim. Res. One Health; 2023; 1, pp. 78-91. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aro2.16]

77. Ivanišević, M.S.; Zoranović, M.S.; Topisirović, G.R.; Jugović, M.A.; Rajs, V.M.; Vejnović, S.M.; Kešelj, K.R. New concept of in/out air quality control in livestock buildings. Therm. Sci.; 2022; 26, pp. 4819-4829. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2298/TSCI220212078I]

78. Mohammed-Nour, A.; Al-Sewailem, M.; El-Naggar, A.H. The influence of alkalization and temperature on ammonia recovery from cow manure and the chemical properties of the effluents. Sustainability; 2019; 11, 2441. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11082441]

79. Fuchs, A.; Dalby, F.R.; Liu, D.; Kai, P.; Feilberg, A. Improved effect of manure acidification technology for gas emission mitigation by substituting sulfuric acid with acetic acid. Clean. Eng. Technol.; 2021; 4, 100263. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2021.100263]

80. Overmeyer, V.; Kube, A.; Clemens, J.; Büscher, W.; Trimborn, M. One-time acidification of slurry: What is the most effective acid and treatment strategy?. Agronomy; 2021; 11, 1319. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11071319]

81. Kavanagh, I.; Burchill, W.; Healy, M.G.; Fenton, O.; Krol, D.J.; Lanigan, G.J. Mitigation of ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from stored cattle slurry using acidifiers and chemical amendments. J. Clean. Prod.; 2019; 237, 117822. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117822]

82. Silva, A.A.; Fangueiro, D.; Carvalho, M. Slurry acidification as a solution to minimize ammonia emissions from the combined application of animal manure and synthetic fertilizer in no-tillage. Agronomy; 2022; 12, 265. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020265]

83. Van Dooren, H.J.C.; Bokma, S.; Zonderland, J.L. Effect van het Aeromix Systeem op Ammoniakemissie in een Melkveestal: Verkennend Onderzoek op Dairy Campus. Wageningen UR Livestock Research (Livestock Research Report 850), 2023, 25. Available online: https://edepot.wur.nl/335747 (accessed on 15 November 2023).

84. Varma, V.S.; Parajuli, R.; Scott, E.; Canter, T.; Lim, T.T.; Popp, J.; Thoma, G. Dairy and swine manure management–Challenges and perspectives for sustainable treatment technology. Sci. Total Environ.; 2021; 778, 146319. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146319]

85. Odmark, I. The Effects of Floor System on Production in Automatic Milking Systems; Second Cycle, A2E. Degree Project Report in Animal Science Deptartment of Animal Nutrition and Management, SLU: Uppsala, Sweden, 2020.

86. Hilgert, J.E.; Herrmann, C.; Petersen, S.O.; Dragoni, F.; Amon, T.; Belik, V.; Ammon, C.; Amon, B. Assessment of the biochemical methane potential of in-house and outdoor stored pig and dairy cow manure by evaluating chemical composition and storage conditions. Waste Manag.; 2023; 168, pp. 14-24. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2023.05.031]

87. Janni, K.; Cortus, E. Common animal production systems and manure storage methods. Animal Manure: Production, Characteristics, Environmental Concerns, and Management; John Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020; Volume 67, pp. 27-43.

88. Fangueiro, D.; Merino, P.; Pantelopoulos, A.; Pereira, J.L.; Amon, B.; Chadwick, D.R. The Implications of Animal Manure Management on Ammonia and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Technology for Environmentally Friendly Livestock Production; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 99-136.

89. Li, Y.; Zhao, J.; Krooneman, J.; Euverink, G.J.W. Strategies to boost anaerobic digestion performance of cow manure: Laboratory achievements and their full-scale application potential. Sci. Total Environ.; 2021; 755, 142940. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142940]

90. Liu, Z.; Wang, X. Manure treatment and utilization in production systems. Animal Agriculture; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 455-467.

91. Dong, R.; Qiao, W.; Guo, J.; Sun, H. Manure treatment and recycling technologies. Circular Economy and Sustainability; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 161-180.

92. Fouts, J.Q.; Honan, M.C.; Roque, B.M.; Tricarico, J.M.; Kebreab, E. Enteric methane mitigation interventions. Transl. Anim. Sci.; 2022; 6, txac041. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txac041]

93. Honan, M.; Feng, X.; Tricarico, J.M.; Kebreab, E. Feed additives as a strategic approach to reduce enteric methane production in cattle: Modes of action, effectiveness and safety. Anim. Prod. Sci.; 2021; 62, pp. 1303-1317. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN20295]

94. Beauchemin, K.A.; Ungerfeld, E.M.; Eckard, R.J.; Wang, M. Fifty years of research on rumen methanogenesis: Lessons learned and future challenges for mitigation. Animal; 2020; 14, pp. s2-s16. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119003100]

95. Aboagye, I.A.; Beauchemin, K.A. Potential of molecular weight and structure of tannins to reduce methane emissions from ruminants: A review. Animals; 2019; 9, 856. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9110856]

96. Ku-Vera, J.C.; Jiménez-Ocampo, R.; Valencia-Salazar, S.S.; Montoya-Flores, M.D.; Molina-Botero, I.C.; Arango, J.; Gómez-Bravo, C.A.; Aguilar-Pérez, C.F.; Solorio-Sánchez, F.J. Role of secondary plant metabolites on enteric methane mitigation in ruminants. Front. Vet. Sci.; 2020; 7, 584. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00584]

97. Cardoso-Gutierrez, E.; Aranda-Aguirre, E.; Robles-Jimenez, L.E.; Castelán-Ortega, O.A.; Chay-Canul, A.J.; Foggi, G.; Angeles-Hernandez, J.C.; Vargas-Bello-Pérez, E.; González-Ronquillo, M. Effect of tannins from tropical plants on methane production from ruminants: A systematic review. Vet. Anim. Sci.; 2021; 14, 100214. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vas.2021.100214]

98. Lileikis, T.; Nainienė, R.; Bliznikas, S.; Uchockis, V. Dietary Ruminant Enteric Methane Mitigation Strategies: Current Findings, Potential Risks and Applicability. Animals; 2023; 13, 2586. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani13162586]

99. Schrade, S.; Zeyer, K.; Mohn, J.; Zähner, M. Effect of diets with different crude protein levels on ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from a naturally ventilated dairy housing. Sci. Total Environ.; 2023; 896, 165027. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165027]

100. Katongole, C.B.; Yan, T. The Effects of Dietary Crude Protein Level on Ammonia Emissions from Slurry from Lactating Holstein-Friesian Cows as Measured in Open-Circuit Respiration Chambers. Animals; 2022; 12, 1243. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12101243]

101. De Bhowmick, G.; Hayes, M. Potential of Seaweeds to Mitigate Production of Greenhouse Gases during Production of Ruminant Proteins. Glob. Chall.; 2023; 7, 2200145. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202200145]

102. Muizelaar, W.; van Duinkerken, G.; Khan, Z.; Dijkstra, J. Evaluation of 3 northwest European seaweed species on enteric methane production and lactational performance of Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci.; 2023; 106, pp. 4622-4633. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-22749]

103. Camer-Pesci, B.; Laird, D.W.; van Keulen, M.; Vadiveloo, A.; Chalmers, M.; Moheimani, N.R. Opportunities of Asparagopsis sp. cultivation to reduce methanogenesis in ruminants: A critical review. Algal Res.; 2023; 76, 103308. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2023.103308]

104. Terry, S.A.; Krüger, A.M.; Lima, P.M.; Gruninger, R.J.; Abbott, D.W.; Beauchemin, K.A. Evaluation of rumen fermentation and microbial adaptation to three red seaweeds using the rumen simulation technique. Animals; 2023; 13, 1643. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani13101643]

105. Chowdhury, M.R.; Wilkinson, R.G.; Sinclair, L.A. Feeding lower-protein diets based on red clover and grass or alfalfa and corn silage does not affect milk production but improves nitrogen use efficiency in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci.; 2023; 106, pp. 1773-1789. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-22607]

106. Hassanat, F.; Benchaar, C. Methane emissions of manure from dairy cows fed red clover-or corn silage-based diets supplemented with linseed oil. J. Dairy Sci.; 2019; 102, pp. 11766-11776. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-16014]

107. Irawan, A.; Jayanegara, A.; Niderkorn, V. Impacts of red clover and sainfoin silages on the performance, nutrient utilization and milk fatty acids profile of ruminants: A meta-analysis. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr.; 2023; [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13853]

108. Sato, Y.; Tominaga, K.; Aoki, H.; Murayama, M.; Oishi, K.; Hirooka, H.; Yoshida, T.; Kumagai, H. Calcium salts of long-chain fatty acids from linseed oil decrease methane production by altering the rumen microbiome in vitro. PLoS ONE; 2020; 15, e0242158. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242158]

109. Matos, J.S.; de Aráujo, L.P.; Allaman, I.B.; Lôbo, I.P.; de Oliva, S.T.; Tavares, T.M.; de Almeida Neto, J.A. Evaluation of the reduction of methane emission in swine and bovine manure treated with black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens L.). Environ. Monit. Assess.; 2021; 193, pp. 1-17. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09252-2]

110. Kahraman, O.; Gülşen, N.; İnal, F.; Alataş, M.S.; İnanç, Z.S.; Ahmed, İ.; Şişman, D.; Küçük, A.E. Comparative Analysis of In Vitro Fermentation Parameters in Total Mixed Rations of Dairy Cows with Varied Levels of Defatted Black Soldier Fly Larvae (Hermetia illucens) as a Substitute for Soybean Meal. Fermentation; 2023; 9, 652. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9070652]

111. Marques, R.D.S.; Cooke, R.F. Effects of ionophores on ruminal function of beef cattle. Animals; 2021; 11, 2871. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11102871]

112. Beck, P.; Biggs, R. Feed Additives for Beef Cattle Production; Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service: Durant, OK, USA, 2022.

113. de Sá Assis, M.C.; Costa, G.R.D.R.; Dias, F.M.C.; da Silva, C.S.; de Lima, J.S.; Torres, T.R.; Silva, D.K.D.A.; de Souza, E.J.O. Can phytogenic additives replace monensin sodium in beef cattle feeding?. Trop. Anim. Health Prod.; 2023; 55, 107. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03522-6]

114. The Daily Churn Magazine. Henk Hanskamp’s Unique CowToilet Is Designed to Capture Cow’s Urine in a Barn. 2020; Available online: https://www.darigold.com/dutch-innovator-designs-unique-toilet-for-cows/ (accessed on 10 August 2023).

115. Dirksen, N.; Langbein, J.; Schrader, L.; Puppe, B.; Elliffe, D.; Siebert, K.; Röttgen, V.; Matthews, L. Learned control of urinary reflexes in cattle to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Curr. Biol.; 2021; 31, pp. R1033-R1034. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.07.011]

116. Dirksen, N.; Langbein, J.; Schrader, L.; Puppe, B.; Elliffe, D.; Siebert, K.; Röttgen, V.; Matthews, L. How can cattle be toilet trained? Incorporating reflexive behaviours into a behavioural chain. Animals; 2020; 10, 1889. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10101889]

117. El-Hedainy, D.K.; Ramadan, R.M.; Saleh, A.A.; Sharaby, M.A.; Rashad, A.M. Retrospective Investigation of The Association Between the Length of Dry Period and Lactation Milk Production and Lifetime Traits During the Subsequent Lactations. J. Adv. Vet. Res.; 2023; 13, pp. 1512-1515.

118. Lim, D.H.; Ki, K.S.; Kim, D.H.; Han, M.; Kim, Y. Effects of dry period length on milk production and physiological responses of heat-stressed dairy cows during the transition period. J. Anim. Sci. Technol.; 2023; 65, 197. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5187/jast.2022.e104]

119. Gonzalez-Recio, O.; Scrobota, N.; López-Paredes, J.; Saborío-Montero, A.; Fernández, A.; de Maturana, E.L.; Villanueva, B.; Goiri, I.; Atxaerandio, R.; Rodríguez-García, A. Diving into the cow hologenome to reduce methane emissions and increase sustainability. Animal; 2023; 17, 100780. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2023.100780]

120. van Staaveren, N.; Oliveira, H.R.; Houlahan, K.; Chud, T.C.; Oliveira Jr, G.A.; Hailemariam, D.; Kistemaker, G.; Miglior, F.; Plastow, G.; Schenkel, F.S. et al. The Resilient Dairy Genome Project–a general overview of methods and objectives related to feed efficiency and methane emissions. J. Dairy Sci.; 2023; 65, 197. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-22951]

121. Pryce, J.E.; Richardson, C.; Cheruiyot, E.; van den Berg, I.; Haile-Mariam, M. Using genetics to combat global warming and improve heat tolerance in dairy cows. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Sustainable Animal Production and Health Current Status and Way Forward; Vienna, Austria, 28 June–2 July 2021; pp. 198-204.

122. Bokde, N.D.; Milkevych, V.; Nielsen, R.K.; Villumsen, T.M.; Sahana, G. A novel approach for anomaly detection in dairy cow gas emission records. Comput. Electron. Agric.; 2023; 214, 108286. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.108286]

123. Berdos, J.I.; Ncho, C.M.; Son, A.R.; Lee, S.S.; Kim, S.H. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emission Estimation for Cattle: Assessing the Potential Role of Real-Time Feed Intake Monitoring. Sustainability; 2023; 15, 14988. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su152014988]

124. Neethirajan, S. AI-Driven Climate Neutrality in Dairy Farming: Benchmarking Emissions for Sustainable Transformation. 2023; Available online: https://osf.io/preprints/osf/4znq5 (accessed on 1 December 2023).

125. Prasad, M.N.V.; Smol, M.; Freitas, H. Achieving sustainable development goals via green deal strategies. Sustainable and Circular Management of Resources and Waste Towards a Green Deal; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 3-23.

126. Feng, T.; Sun, Y.; Shi, Y.; Ma, J.; Feng, C.; Chen, Z. Air pollution control policies and impacts: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.; 2024; 191, 114071. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114071]

127. Hundal, H. Quantifying Aquatic Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential in Riparian Agroforestry Zones. Master’s Thesis; University of Waterloo: Waterloo, ON, Canada, 2023.

128. Cradock-Henry, N.A.; Flood, S.; Buelow, F.; Blackett, P.; Wreford, A. Adaptation Knowledge for New Zealand’s Primary Industries: Known, Not Known and Needed. Clim. Risk Manag.; 2019; 25, 100190. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2019.100190]

129. Andersen, A.S.; Hauggaard-Nielsen, H.; Christensen, T.B.; Hulgaard, L. The European Green Deal and the State of the European Environment. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Socioecological Challenges: Sustainable Transformations Globally and in the EU; Routledge: London, UK, 2023; 72.

130. Lamine, C.; Marsden, T. Unfolding sustainability transitions in food systems: Insights from UK and French trajectories. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2023; 120, e2206231120. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2206231120] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37956274]

131. Thiermann, I.; Bittmann, T. Should I stay or should I go? The impact of nature reserves on the survival and growth of dairy farms. J. Environ. Manag.; 2023; 328, 116993. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116993] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36512949]

132. Oenema, J.; Oenema, O. Intensification of grassland-based dairy production and its impacts on land, nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiencies. Front. Agric. Sci. Eng.; 2021; 8, pp. 130-147. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2020376]

133. Hoekstra, N.J.; Schulte, R.P.O.; Forrestal, P.J.; Hennessy, D.; Krol, D.J.; Lanigan, G.J.; Müller, C.; Shalloo, L.; Wall, D.P.; Richards, K.G. Scenarios to limit environmental nitrogen losses from dairy expansion. Sci. Total Environ.; 2020; 707, 134606. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134606]

134. Mosavi, P. Manure, Methane, and Money: The Anaerobic Digester Disaster in California. Anim. Law Rev.; 2023; 29, 41.

135. O’Malley, J.; Pavlenko, N.; Kim, Y.H. 2030 California Renewable Natural Gas Outlook: Resource Assessment, Market Opportunities, and Environmental Performance. 2023; Available online: https://theicct.org/publication/california-rng-outlook-2030-may23/ (accessed on 15 November 2023).

136. Macintosh, K.; Dairy, N.Z. A Risk Assessment Approach for Prioritising Actions in Farm Environment Plans with Mahinga Kai Values. 2021; Available online: https://ourlandandwater.nz/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/OLW_RPF24_prioritising-actions-in-FEPS_FinalReport.pdf (accessed on 31 August 2023).

137. Zamri, I.H. Reporting and Measuring Environmental Impacts of Dairying: Perceptions and Practices. Thesis, University of Canterbury. 2021; Available online: https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/items/1190619b-53c2-4d6b-bfa7-a656c7d45d31 (accessed on 1 September 2023).

138. Jørgensen, U.; Jensen, S.K.; Ambye-Jensen, M. Coupling the benefits of grassland crops and green biorefining to produce protein, materials and services for the green transition. Grass Forage Sci.; 2022; 77, pp. 295-306. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12594]