1. Introduction
New toxins or toxins that are traditionally known from other regions are emerging in European waters, posing new threats to seafood safety and raising new challenges to authorities and agencies with responsibilities at the official control level. From the list of new toxins and compounds with a potential impact on seafood safety, the occurrence of ciguatoxins (CTXs) is of particular concern.
Ciguatoxins and their precursor metabolites are produced by benthic dinoflagellates of the genera Gambierdiscus and Fukuyoa [1,2]. Originally considered restricted to endemic ciguatera fish poisoning (CFP) regions within the tropical Indo-Pacific and the Caribbean Seas, the occurrence and spread of these dinoflagellates to sub-tropical and temperate regions is now a reality with trends in climate warming seemingly playing a pivotal role [3,4]. Consequently, the effects of climate change have facilitated the colonisation of new areas or enhanced the performance of existing species, and by means of intensified monitoring efforts, toxic dinoflagellates associated with CFP have been detected in subtropical-temperate regions, such as the Canary Islands, Madeira Archipelago, and the Mediterranean Sea [4,5,6,7,8,9].
The epiphytic nature of Gambierdiscus/Fukuyoa spp. makes herbivorous fish and grazers particularly prone to accumulate the toxins. Nevertheless, potent CTX derivatives can also be found in omnivorous species and top predator fish due to toxin biotransformation in metabolic processes that are not yet fully understood [1,2,10].
Although ciguatoxins are recognised as highly potent neurotoxins, they are still poorly regulated, in contrast to the “classic” toxins that have a consistent EU regulation with standard operating procedures expressing the sampling frequency, reference detection methods, and safety limits [11,12]. According to the Regulation (EC) No 853/2004, the fishery products containing ciguatoxins or muscle-paralyzing toxins, must not be placed on the market. This regulation would be sufficient to protect European consumers from the importation of contaminated fish from endemic regions. Still, it is clearly insufficient to control its recent natural occurrence in European waters. Surprisingly, the first known CFP outbreak in the European Union involving fish caught in European waters occurred the same year as the publication of this EU regulation. The outbreak affected five persons after the consumption of a 26 kg longfin yellowtail Seriola rivoliana from the Canary Islands in 2004 [13]. CFP episodes in the Canary Islands (Spain) and then in the Madeira Archipelago (Portugal) [13,14] raised attention concerning the emergence of new marine toxins that were not traditionally monitored by seafood safety authorities.
2. Ciguatera Poisonings in Madeira Archipelago
The first reported outbreak in Portugal dates from 2008 when 11 crew members of a total of 16 persons in a fishing boat reported CFP symptoms after consuming a 30 kg amberjack (Seriola sp.) caught around the Selvagens Islands [14,15]. The symptoms reported by the crew members matched with symptoms previously reported by nature wardens of the natural park of the Selvagens Islands back in 2007. The symptoms, mostly neurologic issues, appeared hours or days after the ingestion, which hindered a clear association with the type of food that caused the poisoning, having initially suspected the supplies taken on the ship from Madeira Island, and renewed only every three weeks when the guards rotated off duty. After the acute outbreak in July 2008, it was noticed that the intoxication of the nature wardens was due to the ingestion of locally caught fish and not subsistence provisions. CP was retrospectively diagnosed in the six wardens who had consumed fish caught locally, including amberjack, parrotfish (Sparisoma cretense), blacktail comber (Serranus atricauda), barred hogfish (Bodianus scrofa), grey triggerfish (Balistes capriscus), and red porgy (Pagrus pagrus) [15]. The duration of the neurological symptoms lasted between 0.5–1.5 months [15]. Also in 2008, CFP symptoms were observed in 20–30 people who consumed lesser amberjack (Seriola rivoliana) purchased in the Canary Islands but captured in the Selvagens Islands [16].
Considering the higher number of CFP cases associated with the consumption of fish captured in the Selvagens Islands, this location is seen as the most relevant ciguatera-prone area in Portugal. In recent years, the Selvagens nature wardens and other inhabitants adapted their diet, which was initially rich in highly nutritional fresh fish, to salted and canned industrial manufactured products. To date, 49 cases of human intoxication have been reported in Portugal (Madeira Island and Selvagens sub-archipelago). This number may be regarded as a low value, suggesting that CFP is not a common intoxication, but ciguatera is not a mandatory notifiable disease in Madeira Archipelago, which certainly leads to several unreported cases.
3. The Particular Case of Selvagens Islands
Considering that most of the CTX-contaminated fish were detected in Selvagens Islands and not in Madeira Island [17,18], it is important to better understand the specificities of this region. Since the CTX-contaminated fish that caused the first CFP in Portugal was captured in the Selvagens Islands [14], and several other CFP cases reported both in Portugal and Spain were associated with fish from these islands [16,17,18], the Selvagens Islands may, in fact, be seen as a hotspot for ciguatera in the European Union: the Selvagens Islands are of volcanic origin and are located between Madeira Island and the Canary Islands, 600 km west from the African coast of Morocco, a highly productive coastal upwelling system [19]. These constitute the oldest marine protected area in Portugal, classified as a nature reserve in 1971 to protect the world’s largest breeding colony of Cory’s shearwater, Calonectris borealis, and other threatened seabird species in the NE Atlantic. The protection area was extended to the maritime area around the islands comprising a total of 95 km2, and delimited by the 200 m depth bathymetry line. Despite this being a protected marine area, some exceptions to the general ban on fisheries in the Selvagens Islands were initially allowed, such as spearfishing and angling; however, after the 2008 outbreak a total ban on fisheries was issued due to the risk of ciguatera poisoning.
Recently, the Madeira Government revised the legal regime of the Selvagens Islands Nature Reserve. Because of the limit of the marine protected area associated with the 200 m bathymetry line can be reached within a few hundred meters from the coastline due to the narrow and steep insular shelf, the marine-protected area was extended up to 12 nautical miles, with a total area of 2677 km2 that includes the entire land area of the Selvagem Grande and Selvagem Pequena islands, and a series of adjacent islets, making it the largest fully protected marine area in Europe and the most intact ecosystem in the North-East Atlantic [20].
A few studies have pointed out that the waters surrounding the Selvagens Islands are home to some of the most well-preserved oceanic habitats and some of the last remaining intact marine ecosystems in the eastern Atlantic. The Selvagens Islands have been designated by the National Geographic Society as one of most pristine ocean sites in existence [21] (Figure 1). The few coastal underwater visual fish censuses that have been carried out to date have indicated an impressive abundance and diversity [22,23]. Friedlander and colleagues [23] reported a fish biomass 3.2 times larger at Selvagens Islands than at Madeira Island, and a biomass of top predators more than 10 times larger. Several commercially important species and ciguatera risk species are more common and of a larger size in the Selvagens Islands than at Madeira Island. The amberjack Seriola dumerili seems to be one of the most important species by weight at Selvagens Islands and S. rivoliana was found to be seven times more abundant in the Selvagens Islands compared to Madeira Island. Barred hogfish (Bodianus scrofa) was 3.4 times more abundant by weight in the Selvagens Islands compared to Madeira Island [23]. In contrast to the heavily populated Madeira or Canary Islands, the Selvagens Islands harbour a well-preserved marine biota where the impacts of human activity and pressures from fisheries pressure are practically non-existent, and where fish may live longer, reach higher sizes, and possibly accumulate higher CTX levels.
4. Occurrence and Distribution of Gambierdiscus
The marine benthic dinoflagellate genus Gambierdiscus was first discovered in the late 1970s in the Gambier Islands, French Polynesia, when it was recognised as the source of ciguatoxins and linked to the recurrent ciguatera food poisoning episodes [24]. The isolate was described as G. toxicus, the type species [25]. The Gambierdiscus genus remained a monotypic taxon for a considerable period of time, but currently, at least 21 Gambierdiscus and 4 Fukuyoa species have been described with the aid of both morphological and molecular marker information [26,27,28,29]. In 1956, Gambierdiscus was first described in the NE Atlantic as Goniodoma, in Cape Verde [30], then proposed by Fraga et al. (2011) [6] as a Gambierdiscus species, and re-described as a new species, G. silvae [31]. Cape Verde comprises the southern islands of the Macaronesia region, an ecozone that also includes the Canary, Madeira, and Azores Archipelagos.
The occurrence and spread of Gambierdiscus species and CFP outbreaks have increased in temperate regions [3,32]. Furthermore, ciguatera-causing dinoflagellate Gambierdiscus and Fukyuoa have been detected in the southern waters of the European Community, such as Canary Islands (Spain) and Madeira Archipelago (Portugal), and in temperate regions of the Mediterranean Sea [6,8,9,31,33,34] (Figure 2).
Only two species have been reported to date for the Portuguese islands of Madeira and Selvagens sub-archipelago, namely G. excentricus and G. australes, respectively, contrasting with the diversity of Gambierdiscus species observed in the Canary Islands, which includes G. australes, G. caribaeus, G. carolinianus, G. excentricus, and G. silvae [26,31,38] (Figure 2). Gambierdiscus australes was reported in seawater, macroalgae and artificial substrate samples from Selvagens Islands [7,9] and G. excentricus from Madeira Island [8] (Figure 3). The first was described from Selvagens Islands by Reverté and colleagues [7] after harvesting them from macroalgae at 0.5–1.5 m deep in the early autumn of 2013. Later in 2018, Godinho and colleagues [9] used mosquito nets, as artificial substrate, to harvest and quantify the Gambierdiscus and other toxic benthic dinoflagellates in both Selvagem Grande and Selvagem Pequena. Again, only G. australes was retrieved at depths from 3 to 7 m. Cell concentration in the artificial substrate reached 1302 cells at 100 cm−2, which is in line with the reports made by Tester and colleagues [39] in Belize and Malaysia, but below the maximum levels reported in the nearby Canary Islands [40]. Both Reverté and colleagues [7] and Tester and colleagues [9] assessed the CTX-like toxicity of G. australes strains isolated from the Selvagens Islands by means of Neuro-2a (N2a) cell-based assays (CBAs). The previously determined values of up to 515 fg equiv. CTX1B. cell−1 and the former did not exceed 83 fg equiv. CTX1B. cell−1. Results from this functional assay may suggest a toxin profile composed of both CTX- and MTX-like compounds. Chemical analysis by liquid chromatography coupled to either low- or high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-MSMS and HRMS) in six G. australes strains from the Balearic Islands (Spain) indicated the presence of maitotoxin-5 (MTX5), 44-methyl gambierone, and gambieric acids C and D, but no CTX precursors were detected [35,41].
On Madeira Island, G. excentricus was first described from formaldehyde preserved samples collected in 2008 along the islands’ southern shore [42]. Subsequent opportunistic sampling was carried out in 2014 in Lido, on the south coast of the Madeira Island, which confirmed the occurrence of G. excentricus after morphological and phylogenetic analysis [8]. More recently, our research group confirmed the presence of G. excentricus on the north coast of Madeira Island, which is heavily exposed to wind-driven wave action and currents, as well as the nearby Desertas Islands and Porto Santo (unpublished data).
While Gambierdiscus strains from the Selvagens Islands were tested for cytotoxicity via the neuroblastoma 2-a (N2a) assay, no data were available for G. excentricus from Madeira Island. However, this species exhibited extremely high toxicity in strains isolated from the Canary Islands [43]. Chemical analysis by LC-HRMS showed that maitotoxin-4 (MTX-4) is the main compound produced by G. excentricus strains from the Canary Islands, Brazil, and the Caribbean Sea [35,44], leading these authors to suggest that MTX4 may be used as a biomarker for G. excentricus. The toxins profile of Gambierdiscus from Portuguese waters remains to be characterised by LC–MS/MS or HRMS.
5. Ciguatoxicity and Ciguatoxins Profile in Seafood
Fish species potentially vectoring CTXs have been captured in Madeira Island and the Selvagens sub-archipelago to assess the risk of CFP (Figure 4). Screening the CTX-like toxicity by N2a cell-based assay (CBA) and toxin determination via sensitive liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry detection (LC–MS/MS), as described in Esteves and colleagues, and Costa and colleagues [45,46], were carried out in recent years. CTXs were mostly found in fish samples from the Selvagens Islands, whilst a few were from Madeira Island (Table 1).
The first poisoning episodes were associated with greater and lesser amberjack (Seriola dumerilli and S. fasciata), and the analysis indicated extremely high levels of up to 40 µg kg−1 by CBA and up to 35 µg kg−1 by LC–MS [14]. Differences between the quantitative results of earlier and more recent studies should be associated with advances in analytical chemistry in recent years. The detection of CTX by LC–MS/MS is complex and requires extensive extraction procedures and sensitive instruments. Accurate quantification is rather difficult due to the lack of analytical standards and lack of data on the toxicological potential of many CTX analogues, mainly of the Caribbean type. The reassessment of CTX toxicity and toxins profile characterisation in the fish (S. fasciata) caught in 2008 which was implicated in human poisonings [47] revealed a toxicity level of 1.4 µg C-CTX1 eq·kg−1, with C-CTX1 the dominant compound, which reached 0.84 µg C-CTX1 kg−1 when quantified by LC–MS/MS [48].
Figure 4Fish species potentially acting as CTX vectors in Selvagens Islands coastal waters. Fish representations were adapted from [49].
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Toxicity levels up to 0.76 µg C-CTX1 kg−1 were recently assessed in red porgy (Pagrus pagrus) from the Selvagens Islands. This fish was analysed after being associated with a CFP episode in the Canary Islands [45,48]. In addition to red porgy, other fish species with intermediate positions in the marine trophic chain, such as zebra seabream (Diplodus cervinus) and barred hogfish (Bodianus scrofa), showed relevant CTX-like toxicity levels of up to 0.75 µg C-CTX1 kg−1 [46]. Screening CTX toxicity by N2a-CBA in a diversity of coastal fish indicated that several species had the potential to act as CTX vectors to humans, which including the parrotfish (Sparisoma cretense), the grey triggerfish (Balistes capriscus), and the blacktail comber (Serranus atricauda), highlighting that ciguatera risk is not exclusively associated with top predators [46].
Until recently, the general consensus on ciguatera suggested that top fish predators are the most ciguateric species, either because potent CTX bioaccumulates in the fish metabolism or because of the lipophilic nature of CTX. However, evidence from both traditional knowledge and modern science, including reports from the Selvagens Islands’ nature wardens, suggests that both omnivore and piscivorous fish are toxic to ciguatera [46].
In addition to the pelagic environment, an opportunistic sampling of benthic organisms including the starfish Ophidiaster ophidianus from the southeast coast of the Madeira Island revealed the presence of mass spectrometry signals and ion fragmentation patterns associated with CTX [50], highlighting the need to further investigate CTX transfer dynamics in bottom-dwelling organisms.
The Caribbean-CTX1 (C-CTX1) was found to be the main compound determined in fish [16,17] which, due to the lack of standards, needed to be further confirmed by high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) [51]. When functional assays, namely the cytotoxicity assay neuroblastoma 2-a (N2a), were used in combination with LC–MS/MS, the presence of C-CTX1 derivatives or other CTX metabolites was suggested [48,52], highlighting the need for deeper analyses and further research to characterise the complete profile of ciguatoxins. As such, several ciguatoxins analogues were identified and quantified in barred hogfish (Bodianus scrofa) by capillary LC-HRMS: 17-hydroxy-50,51-didehy-dro-C-CTX3, C-CTX3/4, 50,51-didehydro-C-CTX3, C-CTX1a, 56-methoxy-C-CTX1, and 17-hydroxy-56-methoxy-C-CTX1 [52].
The dataset of CTX analysis carried out in recent years to fish from the Portuguese coast suggests a moderate-to-high risk of CFP according to the international guidelines and recent research studies. The pioneer studies carried out by Lewis and colleagues during the 1990s investigating the in vivo lethal dose of Pacific and Caribbean CTX indicated a much lower potency compared to the later ones [53], and the US Food and Drug Administration established guidance levels for ciguatoxins, with a ten-fold less conservative level for fish contaminated with Caribbean CTX (0.1 µg C-CTX1 eq. kg−1) than Pacific CTX (0.01 µg P-CTX1 eq. kg−1) [54]. However, recent studies suggest similar potencies between Pacific ciguatoxins and Caribbean congeners, as based on in silico simulations and functional cell studies, such as the N2a-MTT assay and electrophysiological recordings [55]. Further evidence highlighting the need to revise the relative potency of the CTX congeners was raised by a Japanese research group after a series of functional analyses of Pacific CTX congeners [56]. Finally, it is relevant to keep in mind that, most of all, the lack of certified reference standards for the accurate quantification of the toxins in seafood and the poor knowledge of the toxicity potential of each ciguatoxin hampers the evaluation of the risk of ciguatoxins in fish to consumers.
Table 1CTX (μg kg−1) levels detected in fish samples from Portuguese waters.
Species | Common Name | Location of Capture | Weight (kg) | Date | Tissue | N2a-CBA | LC-MSMS/HRMS | Reference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Concentration | Toxins | ||||||||
Seriola rivoliana * | Longfin yellowtail | Selvagens Islands | not specified | 2008 | Flesh | 0.17 µg C-CTX1 eq. kg−1 | Not quantified | C-CTX1 | [16] |
Seriola fasciata * | Lesser amberjack | Selvagens Islands | not specified | 2008 | Flesh | up to 6.23 µg C-CTX1 eq. kg−1 | Not tested | Not tested | [47] |
Seriola sp. * | Amberjack | Selvagens Islands | not specified | 2009 | Flesh | 0.08 µg C-CTX1 eq. kg−1 | Not quantified | C-CTX1 | [16] |
Seriola fasciata ** | Lesser amberjack | Selvagens Islands | 10.0 | March 2009 | Tail muscle | 40.6 µg kg−1 | 35.29 µg kg−1 | CTX-1B at m/z 1111.6, CTX-3C at 1023.5 m/z, CTXs at m/z 1040.6 and 1141.6 | [14] |
Seriola dumerili ** | Greater amberjack | Selvagens Islands | 70.0 | April 2009 | Several tissues (tail, head, ventral, liver) | 37.3–45.1 µg kg−1 | 33.29–54.35 µg kg−1 | [16] | |
Seriola fasciata * | Lesser amberjack | Selvagens Islands | 37.0 | November 2008 | Flesh | 1.4 µg C-CTX1 eq. kg−1 | 0.84 µg C-CTX1 eq. kg−1 | C-CTX1 and three C-CTX congeners of m/z 1157, m/z 1127 and m/z 1123 | [45] |
Gymnothorax unicolor | Brown moray | Selvagens Islands | 1.2 | December 2013 | Flesh | 0.039 µg CTX1B eq. kg−1 | CTX at m/z 1127.6, dihydro-CTX2 analogue at m/z 1115.6 | [57] | |
Muraena augusti | Morey eel | Desertas Islands | 1.7 | November 2013 | Flesh | 0.065 µg CTX1B eq. kg−1 | [57] | ||
Muraena helena | Mediterranean moray | Desertas Islands | 1.3 | November 2013 | Flesh | 0.083 ± 0.014 µg CTX1B eq. kg−1 | [57] | ||
Pagrus pagrus * | Red Porgy | Selvagens Islands | 4.0 | December 2016 | Flesh | Not tested | 0.76 µg C-CTX1 eq. kg−1 | C-CTX1 and a hydroxyl metabolite at m/z 1181.7 | [48] |
Epinephelus marginatus | Dusky grouper | Selvagens Islands | 19.5 | December 2016 | Flesh | Not tested | 0.05 µg C-CTX1 eq. kg−1 | C-CTX1 | [17] |
Mycteroperca fusca | Island grouper | Selvagens Islands | 4.5 | December 2016 | Flesh | Not tested | 0.25 µg C-CTX1 eq. kg−1 | [17] | |
Bodianus scrofa | Barred hogfish | Selvagens Islands | 1.7–0.8 | November 2017 | Flesh | Not tested | 0.11–0.06 µg C-CTX1 eq. kg−1 | [17] | |
Balistes capriscus | Grey triggerfish | Selvagens Islands | 2.0 | November 2017 | Flesh | Not tested | 0.03 µg C-CTX1 eq. kg−1 | [17] | |
Sparisoma cretense | Parrotfish | Selvagens Islands | 0.9–0.4 | September 2018 | Flesh | 0.006–0.04 µg CTX1B eq. kg−1 | <LOQ | [46] | |
Diplodus cervinus | Zebra seabream | Selvagens Islands | 2.8 | September 2018 | Flesh | 0.37 µg CTX1B eq. kg−1 | <LOQ | C-CTXs congeners, C-CTX-1157 | [46] |
Bodianus scrofa | Barred hogfish | Selvagens Islands | 3.0–1.1 | September 2018 | Flesh | 0.04–0.75 µg CTX1B eq. kg−1 | 0.08–0.48 µg C-CTX1 eq. kg−1 | C-CTX1 | [46] |
Balistes capriscus | Grey triggerfish | Selvagens Islands | 2.6–0.6 | September 2018 | Flesh | <LOQ–0.06 µg CTX1B eq. kg−1 | <LOQ–0.09 µg C-CTX1 eq. kg−1 | C-CTX1 | [46] |
Serranus atricauda | Blacktail comber | Selvagens Islands | 0.3–0.2 | September 2018 | Flesh | 0.006–0.02 µg CTX1B eq. kg−1 | <LOQ | [46] | |
Sphyraena viridensis | Yellowmouth barracuda | Selvagens Islands | 6.0–2.2 | September 2018 | Flesh | up to 0.22 µg CTX1B eq. kg−1 | up to 0.14 µg C-CTX1 eq. kg−1 | C-CTX1 | [46] |
* associated with CFP outbreaks in Spain. ** associated with CFP outbreaks in Portugal.
6. Ciguatera Risk Management
Although fish caught in Madeira Island tested negative for CTXs, more extensive sampling is needed to confirm these results, especially considering the recent identification of Gambierdiscus excentricus in the island´s coastal waters [8]. The lower incidence of CFP in the Madeira Archipelago concerning the Selvagens sub-archipelago may be related to the higher fishing pressure. Some authors suggested that fishing for small fish may ‘remove’ CTX from the environment, reducing their transference and bioaccumulation to top predators [58]. To minimise the risk of CFP, and without an international official method for CTX analysis nor certified standards, the Madeira Government forbade the commerce of amberjacks and groupers above 10 kg in the Madeira Archipelago. Regarding the Selvagens Islands, which seems to be the most problematic area for ciguatera, extending the marine protected area to 12 nautical miles, where there is a total ban on fishing activities, would highly reduce the chances of introducing contaminated fish and fish products in the market. With these measures, the Madeira Government aims to protect seafood consumers and to comply with the EU directives that state that fishery products containing ciguatoxins must not be placed on the market [11]. However, the regulations exclusively based on fish weight may be ineffective and counterproductive for the fishing sector [18]. It may also induce illegal capture, commerce, and ultimately the consumption of fish that potentiate unreported and untraceable cases of ciguatera poisoning.
In contrast, in the nearby Macaronesian archipelago of the Canary Islands, the government implemented an official control for ciguatoxins in certain fish species, such as amberjacks (Seriola spp. ≥ 12 kg), dusky grouper (Epinephelus marginatus, ≥12 kg), island grouper (Mycteroperca fusca, ≥7 kg), bluefish (Pomatomus saltatrix, ≥9 kg), and the wahoo (Acanthocybium solandri, ≥35 kg). These fish species, with these weight or above, cannot be placed on the market without a previous negative result by the N2a cell-based assay [59,60]. Finally, ciguatera is a mandatory notifiable disease in the Canary Islands, which allows us to better trace back the contamination of the marine resources or to identify any deviation to the official control contributing to its improvement.
7. Perspectives
HABs are natural phenomena occurring for millions of years causing devastating effects in marine animals over geological timescales [61,62], and ciguatera has been known since the times of the earlier Portuguese and Spanish explorers in the Age of Discovery [63]. Although known for centuries, HABs forecasting remains a challenge and very limited studies have contributed to the prediction of the contamination of marine resources [64,65]. The next frontier in the context of HABs and seafood safety is to incorporate newly available technology and scientific knowledge from multiple disciplines.
Selvagens Islands, which are the southernmost point of Portugal, are here highlighted as a key location for carrying out studies on Gambierdiscus dynamics, the toxin transfer in the coastal food web, and fish toxin metabolism. Studies involving intensive sampling in these remote islands are needed; however, the best strategy for sampling benthic dinoflagellates is still under debate. The use of an artificial substrate has been seen as the best approach for sampling and quantifying benthic dinoflagellates, but it may be technically complex, requiring divers or scuba-divers, and it is time-consuming as it has to be submerged for 24 h [39,40,66]. The identification of the toxic dinoflagellates at the species level also requires complex microscopic analysis, and in the case of Gambierdiscus, should be combined with molecular analysis. Furthermore, the cultivation of Gambierdiscus and Fukuyoa dinoflagellates is slow due to their low growth rates in artificial culture conditions, without favouring genetic and toxin analysis when requiring a certain amount of biomass. The accurate identification and quantification of toxin-production algae species spreading to new areas, their life stages, and toxicity require efforts in terms of molecular techniques and genetics, whilst cell culturing and routine analysis should be implemented to better characterise the risk of CFP (Figure 1). Azores are the only Macaronesian archipelago where Gambierdiscus and or Fukuyoa have not yet been detected. Also, the Portuguese and Spanish peninsular regions are considered free of these species but these have already been reported in the Mediterranean Sea and the Balearic Islands [5,35]. Moreover, molecular signals of Gambierdiscus genetic material were detected throughout the NE Atlantic from the Iberian Peninsula to the Azores by the Tara Oceans expedition [67], indicating that Gambierdiscus can be far more spread in the North Atlantic than previously thought. In fact, LC–MS/MS signals associated with CTX were detected in two starfish species (Ophidiaster ophidianus, Marthasterias glacialis) from the Azores [50], raising suspicions about the spread of toxic dinoflagellates Gambierdiscus/Fukuyoa into these waters.
Finally, advances are needed in screening methods for the fast detection of toxicity in seafood as well as sensitive and selective targeted analytical methods for the accurate determination of Caribbean ciguatoxin contents [68]. The development of biosensors for the detection of toxic Gambierdiscus and/or Fukuyoa dinoflagellate species and toxic fish specimens is of high value for remote islands, such as the Selvagens Islands. A review of the state of the art of biosensors to assess the ciguatera risk has been recently published by Gaiani and colleagues [69]. Of critical importance is the production of the reference material and the availability of standards for Caribbean ciguatoxins [70], essential for the method validation and implementation of the official control. Simultaneously, improved data are needed on the toxicological potency of the different CTXs. Once these tasks are achieved and monitoring programs are implemented in the Madeira Archipelago and other parts of the world, it will be possible to better understand the risk of CFP, the distribution of the ciguatoxins in the environment, and their metabolism by fish species. A comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach fostering collaboration among research institutions, monitoring agencies, fisheries, authorities, healthcare professionals, decision-makers, and the government, is absolutely essential for effective fishery management. Such synergy is pivotal in ensuring accurate risk assessment and safeguarding food security in Portugal.
Conceptualisation, P.R.C., C.C., and N.G.; methodology, all authors; writing—original draft preparation, all authors; writing—review and editing, all authors; project administration, P.R.C.; funding acquisition, P.R.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not Applicable.
Not Applicable.
Not Applicable.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Figure 1. View of the Selvagem Grande (A) and Selvagem Pequena (B), and iconic wildlife animals, such as the Cory’s shearwater Calonectris borealis (C), the greater amberjack Seriola dumerilli (D), and the barred hogfish Bodianus scrofa (E).
Figure 2. Distribution of Gambierdiscus species in the Macaronesia and the Mediterranean Sea, and the location of the Madeira and Selvagens Islands (NE Atlantic) [5,7,8,9,28,35,36,37].
Figure 3. Gambierdiscus collected from the Madeira and Selvagens Islands. Culture concentrate (A), Gambierdiscus sp. isolated from Madeira in light microscopy (scale bar 25 µm) (B), and G. australes isolated from Selvagens Islands (scale bar 10 µm) (C).
References
1. Lewis, R.J.; Holmes, M.J. Origin and Transfer of Toxins Involved in Ciguatera. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Pharmacol. Toxicol. Endocrinol.; 1993; 106, pp. 615-628. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0742-8413(93)90217-9]
2. Mudge, E.M.; Miles, C.O.; Ivanova, L.; Uhlig, S.; James, K.S.; Erdner, D.L.; Fæste, C.K.; McCarron, P.; Robertson, A. Algal Ciguatoxin Identified as Source of Ciguatera Poisoning in the Caribbean. Chemosphere; 2023; 330, 138659. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138659] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37044143]
3. Kibler, S.R.; Tester, P.A.; Kunkel, K.E.; Moore, S.K.; Litaker, R.W. Effects of ocean warming on growth and distribution of dinoflagellates associated with ciguatera fish poisoning in the Caribbean. Ecol. Model.; 2015; 316, pp. 194-210. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.08.020]
4. Chinain, M.; Gatti, C.M.I.; Darius, H.T.; Quod, J.-P.; Tester, P.A. Ciguatera Poisonings: A Global Review of Occurrences and Trends. Harmful Algae; 2021; 102, 101873. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2020.101873] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33875186]
5. Aligizaki, K.; Nikolaidis, G. Morphological identification of two tropical dinoflagellates of the genera Gambierdiscus and Sinophysis in the Mediterranean Sea. J. Biol. Res.-Thessalon.; 2008; 9, pp. 75-82.
6. Fraga, S.; Rodríguez, F.; Caillaud, A.; Diogène, J.; Raho, N.; Zapata, M. Gambierdiscus excentricus sp. nov. (Dinophyceae), a benthic toxic dinoflagellate from the Canary Islands (NE Atlantic Ocean). Harmful Algae; 2011; 11, pp. 10-22. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2011.06.013]
7. Reverté, L.; Toldrà, A.; Andree, K.B.; Fraga, S.; de Falco, G.; Campàs, M.; Diogène, J. Assessment of cytotoxicity in ten strains of Gambierdiscus australes from Macaronesian Islands by neuro-2a cell-based assays. J. Appl. Phycol.; 2018; 30, pp. 2447-2461. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-018-1456-8]
8. Hoppenrath, M.; Kretzschmar, A.L.; Kaufmann, M.J.; Murray, S.A. Morphological and molecular phylogenetic identification and record verification of Gambierdiscus excentricus (Dinophyceae) from Madeira Island (NE Atlantic Ocean). Mar. Biodivers. Rec.; 2019; 12, 16. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41200-019-0175-4]
9. Godinho, L.; Soliño, L.; Churro, C.; Timoteo, V.; Santos, C.; Gouveia, N.; Diogène, J.; Reis Costa, P. Distribution, Identification and Cytotoxicity of Gambierdiscus (Dinophyceae) in the Atlantic Selvagens Islands (Madeira, Portugal): A Ciguatera Gateway to Europe. Eur. J. Phycol.; 2023; 58, pp. 156-168. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2022.2086710]
10. Ikehara, T.; Kuniyoshi, K.; Oshiro, N.; Yasumoto, T. Biooxidation of Ciguatoxins Leads to Species-Specific Toxin Profiles. Toxins; 2017; 9, 205. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins9070205]
11. European Commission. Commission Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for on the hygiene of foodstuffs. Off. J. Eur. Union; 2004; L139, pp. 55-205.
12. European Commission. Commission Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption. Off. J. Eur. Union; 2004; L226, pp. 83-127.
13. Perez-Arellano, J.L.; Luzardo, O.P.; Brito, A.P.; Cabrera, M.H.; Zumbado, M.; Carranza, C.; Angel-Moreno, A.; Dickey, R.W.; Boada, L.D. Ciguatera fish poisoning, Canary Islands. Emerg. Infect. Dis.; 2005; 11, pp. 1981-1982. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1112.050393]
14. Otero, P.; Pérez, S.; Alfonso, A.; Vale, C.; Rodríguez, P.; Gouveia, N.N.; Gouveia, N.; Delgado, J.; Vale, P.; Hirama, M. et al. First toxin profile of ciguateric fish in Madeira Arquipelago (Europe). Anal. Chem.; 2010; 82, pp. 6032-6039. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac100516q] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20557036]
15. Gouveia, N.N.; Vale, P.; Gouveia, N.; Delgado, J. Primeiro registo da ocorrência de episódios do tipo ciguatérico no arquipélago da Madeira. Algas Tóxicas e Biotoxinas nas Águas da Península Ibérica-2009; Costa, P.R.; Botelho, M.J.; Rodrigues, S.M.; Palma, A.S.; Moita, M.T. IPIMAR: Lisboa, Potugal, 2009; pp. 152-157.
16. Boada, L.D.; Zumbado, M.; Luzardo, O.R.; Almeida-Gonzalez, M.; Plakas, S.M.; Granade, H.R.; Abraham, A.; Jester, E.L.E.; Dickey, R.W. Ciguatera fish poisoning on the West Africa Coast: An emerging risk in the Canary Islands (Spain). Toxicon; 2010; 56, pp. 1516-1519. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2010.07.021] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20692274]
17. Costa, P.; Estevez, P.; Castro, D.; Soliño, L.; Gouveia, N.; Santos, C.; Rodrigues, S.; Leao, J.; Gago-Martínez, A. New Insights into the Occurrence and Toxin Profile of Ciguatoxins in Selvagens Islands (Madeira, Portugal). Toxins; 2018; 10, 524. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins10120524] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30544529]
18. Soliño, L.; Costa, P.R. Global Impact of Ciguatoxins and Ciguatera Fish Poisoning on Fish, Fisheries and Consumers. Environ. Res.; 2020; 182, 109111. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109111]
19. Barton, E.D.; Arístegui, J.; Tett, P.; Cantón, M.; García-Braun, J.; Hernández-León, S.; Nykjaer, L.; Almeida, C.; Almunia, J.; Ballesteros, S. et al. The transition zone of the Canary Current upwelling region. Prog. Oceanogr.; 1998; 41, pp. 455-504. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6611(98)00023-8]
20. DLR n.º 8/2022/M. Assembleia Legislativa da Região Autónoma da Madeira, Aprova o Novo Regime Jurídico da Reserva Natural das Ilhas Selvagens. Diário da República n.º 85/2022, Série I de 2022-05-03. pp. 5–14 Available online: https://files.dre.pt/1s/2022/05/08500/0000500014.pdf (accessed on 28 September 2023). (In Portuguese)
21. Friedlander, A.; Ballesteros, E.; Clemente, S.; Estep, A.; Rose, P.; Shepard, M. Marine Biodiversity and Ecosystem Health of Ilhas Selvagens, Portugal; Scientific Report to the Government of Portugal and the Regional Government of Madeira; National Geographic Pristine Seas: Washington, DC, USA, 2016; pp. 1-64.
22. Almada, F.; Abecasis, D.; Villegas-Ríos, D.; Henriques, S.; Pais, M.P.; Batista, M.; Horta e Costa, B.; Martins, J.; Tojeira, I.; Rodrigues, N.V. et al. Ichthyofauna of the Selvagens Islands. Do small coastal areas show high species richness in the northeastern Atlantic?. Mar. Biol. Res.; 2015; 11, pp. 49-61. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17451000.2014.889306]
23. Friedlander, A.M.; Ballesteros, E.; Clemente, S.; Gonçalves, E.J.; Estep, A.; Rose, P.; Sala, E. Contrasts in the Marine Ecosystem of Two Macaronesian Islands: A Comparison between the Remote Selvagens Reserve and Madeira Island. PLoS ONE; 2017; 12, e0187935. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187935]
24. Yasumoto, T.; Nakajima, I.; Bagnis, R.; Adachi, R. Finding of a Dinoflagellate as a Likely Culprit of Ciguatera. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fis.; 1977; 43, pp. 1021-1026. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2331/suisan.43.1021]
25. Adachi, R.; Fukuyo, Y. The Thecal Structure of a Marine Toxic Dinoflagellate Gambierdiscus toxicus gen. et sp. nov. Collected in a Ciguatera-endemic Area. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fis.; 1979; 45, pp. 67-71. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2331/suisan.45.67]
26. Rodríguez, F.; Fraga, S.; Ramilo, I.; Rial, P.; Figueroa, R.I.; Riobó, P.; Bravo, I. Canary Islands (NE Atlantic) as a biodiversity ‘hotspot’ of Gambierdiscus: Implications for future trends of ciguatera in the area. Harmful Algae; 2017; 67, pp. 131-143. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2017.06.009]
27. Larsson, M.E.; Laczka, O.F.; Harwood, D.T.; Lewis, R.J.; Himaya, S.W.A.; Murray, S.A.; Doblin, M.A. Toxicology of Gambierdiscus spp. (Dinophyceae) from Tropical and Temperate Australian Waters. Mar. Drugs; 2018; 16, 7. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/md16010007]
28. Tudó, À.; Gaiani, G.; Varela, M.R.; Tsumuraya, T.; Andree, K.B.; Fernández-Tejedor, M.; Campàs, M.; Diogène, J. Further advance of Gambierdiscus species in the Canary Islands, with the first report of Gambierdiscus belizeanus. Toxins; 2020; 12, 692. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins12110692]
29. Guiry, M.D.; Guiry, G.M. AlgaeBase. World-Wide Electronic Publication; National University of Ireland: Galway, Ireland, 2023; Available online: https://www.algaebase.org (accessed on 28 September 2023).
30. Fraga, S.; Rodríguez, F. Genus Gambierdiscus in the Canary Islands (NE Atlantic Ocean) with description of Gambierdiscus silvae sp. nov., a new potentially toxic epiphytic benthic dinoflagellate. Protist; 2014; 165, pp. 839-853. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2014.09.003]
31. Silva, E.S. Contribution a L’étude du Microplancton de Dakar et des Régions Maritimes Voisines. Bull. Inst. Fr. Afr. Noire. Ser. A Sci. Nat.; 1956; 18, pp. 335-371.
32. Tester, P.A.; Litaker, R.W.; Berdalet, E. Climate Change and Harmful Benthic Microalgae. Harmful Algae; 2020; 91, 101655. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2019.101655] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32057343]
33. Aligizaki, K.; Nikolaidis, G.; Fraga, S. Is Gambierdiscus expanding to new areas?. Harmful Algae News; 2008; 36, pp. 6-7.
34. Rossignoli, A.E.; Tudó, A.; Bravo, I.; Díaz, P.A.; Diogène, J.; Riobó, P. Toxicity Characterisation of Gambierdiscus Species from the Canary Islands. Toxins; 2020; 12, 134. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins12020134]
35. Estevez, P.; Sibat, M.; Leão-Martins, J.M.; Tudó, A.; Rambla-Alegre, M.; Aligizaki, K.; Diogène, J.; Gago-Martinez, A.; Hess, P. Use of Mass Spectrometry to Determine the Diversity of Toxins Produced by Gambierdiscus and Fukuyoa Species from Balearic Islands and Crete (Mediterranean Sea) and the Canary Islands (Northeast Atlantic). Toxins; 2020; 12, 305. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins12050305] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32392808]
36. Gaiani, G.; Cucchi, F.; Toldrà, A.; Andree, K.B.; Rey, M.; Tsumuraya, T.; O’Sullivan, C.K.; Diogène, J.; Campàs, M. Electrochemical Biosensor for the Dual Detection of Gambierdiscus australes and Gambierdiscus excentricus in Field Samples. First Report of G. excentricus in the Balearic Islands. Sci. Total Environ.; 2022; 806, 150915. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150915] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34653452]
37. Aligizaki, K.; Battocchi, C.; Penna, A.; Rodríguez Hernández, F.; Arsenakis, M.; Fraga, S. Diversity of potentially toxic benthic dinoflagellates in southern Europe. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Harmful Algae; Crete, Greece, 1 November 2010.
38. Bravo, I.; Rodriguez, F.; Ramilo, I.; Rial, P.; Fraga, S. Ciguatera-Causing Dinoflagellate Gambierdiscus spp. (Dinophyceae) in a Subtropical Region of North Atlantic Ocean (Canary Islands): Morphological Characterization and Biogeography. Toxins; 2019; 11, 423. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins11070423]
39. Tester, P.A.; Kibler, S.R.; Holland, W.C.; Usup, G.; Vandersea, M.W.; Leaw, C.P.; Teen, L.P.; Larsen, J.; Mohammad-Noor, N.; Faust, M.A. et al. Sampling Harmful Benthic Dinoflagellates: Comparison of Artificial and Natural Substrate Methods. Harmful Algae; 2014; 39, pp. 8-25. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2014.06.009]
40. Fernández-Zabala, J.; Tuya, F.; Amorim, A.; Soler-Onís, E. Benthic Dinoflagellates: Testing the Reliability of the Artificial Substrate Method in the Macaronesian Region. Harmful Algae; 2019; 87, 101634. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2019.101634]
41. Estevez, P.; Castro, D.; Leão-Martins, J.M.; Sibat, M.; Tudó, A.; Dickey, R.; Diogene, J.; Hess, P.; Gago-Martinez, A. Toxicity Screening of a Gambierdiscus australes Strain from the Western Mediterranean Sea and Identification of a Novel Maitotoxin Analogue. Mar. Drugs; 2021; 19, 460. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/md19080460] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34436299]
42. Kaufmann, M.J.; Santos, F.; Maranhão, M. Checklist of Nanno- and Microphytoplankton off Madeira Island (Northeast Atlantic) with Some Historical Notes. Nov. Hedwigia; 2015; 101, pp. 205-232. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1127/nova_hedwigia/2015/0265]
43. Pisapia, F.; Holland, W.C.; Hardison, D.R.; Litaker, R.W.; Fraga, S.; Nishimura, T.; Adachi, M.; Nguyen-Ngoc, L.; Séchet, V.; Amzil, Z. et al. Toxicity Screening of 13 Gambierdiscus Strains Using Neuro-2a and Erythrocyte Lysis Bioassays. Harmful Algae; 2017; 63, pp. 173-183. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2017.02.005]
44. Pisapia, F.; Sibat, M.; Herrenknecht, C.; Lhaute, K.; Gaiani, G.; Ferron, P.-J.; Fessard, V.; Fraga, S.; Nascimento, S.M.; Litaker, R.W. et al. Maitotoxin-4, a Novel MTX Analog Produced by Gambierdiscus excentricus. Mar. Drugs; 2017; 15, 220. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/md15070220]
45. Estevez, P.; Castro, D.; Manuel Leao, J.; Yasumoto, T.; Dickey, R.; Gago-Martinez, A. Implementation of Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry for the Analysis of Ciguatera Fish Poisoning in Contaminated Fish Samples from Atlantic Coasts. Food Chem.; 2019; 280, pp. 8-14. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.12.038] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30642510]
46. Costa, P.R.; Estevez, P.; Soliño, L.; Castro, D.; Rodrigues, S.M.; Timoteo, V.; Leao-Martins, J.M.; Santos, C.; Gouveia, N.; Diogène, J. et al. An Update on Ciguatoxins and CTX-like Toxicity in Fish from Different Trophic Levels of the Selvagens Islands (NE Atlantic, Madeira, Portugal). Toxins; 2021; 13, 580. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins13080580]
47. Caillaud, A.; Eixarch, H.; de la Iglesia, P.; Rodriguez, M.; Dominguez, L.; Andree, K.B.; Diogène, J. Towards the Standardisation of the Neuroblastoma (Neuro-2a) Cell-Based Assay for Ciguatoxin-like Toxicity Detection in Fish: Application to Fish Caught in the Canary Islands. Food Addit. Contam. Part A; 2012; 29, pp. 1000-1010. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2012.660707] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22394180]
48. Estevez, P.; Castro, D.; Pequeño-Valtierra, A.; Leao, J.M.; Vilariño, O.; Diogène, J.; Gago-Martínez, A. An Attempt to Characterize the Ciguatoxin Profile in Seriola Fasciata Causing Ciguatera Fish Poisoning in Macaronesia. Toxins; 2019; 11, 221. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins11040221] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31013948]
49. Carpenter, K.E.; De Angelis, N. Volume 4: Bony Fishes Part 2 (Perciformes to Tetradontiformes) and Sea Turtles. The Living Marine Resources of the Eastern Central Atlantic; FAO Species Identification Guide for Fishery Purposes; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2016; pp. 2343-3124.
50. Silva, M.; Rodriguez, I.; Barreiro, A.; Kaufmann, M.; Neto, A.I.; Hassouani, M.; Sabour, B.; Alfonso, A.; Botana, L.M.; Vasconcelos, V. First Report of Ciguatoxins in Two Starfish Species: Ophidiaster ophidianus and Marthasterias glacialis. Toxins; 2015; 7, pp. 3740-3757. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins7093740] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26402702]
51. Estevez, P.; Sibat, M.; Leão-Martins, J.M.; Reis Costa, P.; Gago-Martínez, A.; Hess, P. Liquid Chromatography Coupled to High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry for the Confirmation of Caribbean Ciguatoxin-1 as the Main Toxin Responsible for Ciguatera Poisoning Caused by Fish from European Atlantic Coasts. Toxins; 2020; 12, 267. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins12040267]
52. Estevez, P.; Oses Prieto, J.; Burlingame, A.; Gago Martinez, A. Characterization of the Ciguatoxin Profile in Fish Samples from the Eastern Atlantic Ocean Using Capillary Liquid Chromatography-High Resolution Mass Spectrometry. Food Chem.; 2023; 418, 135960. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135960]
53. Lewis, R.J.; Sellin, M.; Poli, M.A.; Norton, R.S.; MacLeod, J.K.; Sheil, M.M. Purification and Characterization of Ciguatoxins from Moray Eel (Lycodontis javanicus, Muraenidae). Toxicon; 1991; 29, pp. 1115-1127. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0041-0101(91)90209-A]
54. FDA. Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance. 2022; Available online: https://www.fda.gov/food/seafood-guidance-documents-regulatory-information/fish-and-fishery-products-hazards-and-controls (accessed on 28 September 2023).
55. Raposo-García, S.; Castro, D.; Lence, E.; Estévez, P.; Leão, J.M.; González-Bello, C.; Gago-Martínez, A.; Louzao, M.C.; Vale, C.; Botana, L.M. In Silico Simulations and Functional Cell Studies Evidence Similar Potency and Distinct Binding of Pacific and Caribbean Ciguatoxins. Expo. Health; 2022; 15, pp. 641-660. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12403-022-00513-0]
56. Yokozeki, T.; Hama, Y.; Fujita, K.; Igarashi, T.; Hirama, M.; Tsumuraya, T. Evaluation of Relative Potency of Calibrated Ciguatoxin Congeners by Near-Infrared Fluorescent Receptor Binding and Neuroblastoma Cell-Based Assays. Toxicon; 2023; 230, 107161. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2023.107161]
57. Tudó, À.; Rambla-Alegre, M.; Flores, C.; Sagristà, N.; Aguayo, P.; Reverté, L.; Campàs, M.; Gouveia, N.; Santos, C.; Andree, K.B. et al. Identification of New CTX Analogues in Fish from the Madeira and Selvagens Archipelagos by Neuro-2a CBA and LC-HRMS. Mar. Drugs; 2022; 20, 236. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/md20040236]
58. Lewis, R.J. The changing face of ciguatera. Toxicon; 2001; 39, pp. 97-106. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0041-0101(00)00161-6] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10936626]
59. Sanchez-Henao, J.A.; García-Álvarez, N.; Fernández, A.; Saavedra, P.; Silva Sergent, F.; Padilla, D.; Acosta-Hernández, B.; Martel Suárez, M.; Diogène, J.; Real, F. Predictive Score and Probability of CTX-like Toxicity in Fish Samples from the Official Control of Ciguatera in the Canary Islands. Sci. Total Environ.; 2019; 673, pp. 576-584. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.445] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30999098]
60. Gobierno de Canarias. Guía del Protocolo de Control del Cambio Climático, de las Especies Exóticas y Exóticas Invasoras, y de la Ciguatoxina en los Productos de la Pesca Extractiva en los Puntos de Primera Venta Autorizados en Canarias. 2023; Available online: https://www.gobiernodecanarias.org/cmsgobcan/export/sites/pesca/galerias/doc/control-calidad-productos/Guia-Protocolo-Ciguat.-y-Exoticas-Rev.3.pdf (accessed on 28 September 2023).
61. Castle, J.W.; Rodgers, J.H., Jr. Hypothesis for the role of toxin-producing algae in Phanerozoic mass extinctions based on evidence from the geologic record and modern environments. Environ. Geosci.; 2009; 16, pp. 1-23. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1306/eg.08110808003]
62. Pyenson, N.D.; Gutstein, C.S.; Parham, J.F.; Le Roux, J.P.; Chavarría, C.C.; Little, H.; Metallo, A.; Rossi, V.; Valenzuela-Toro, A.M.; Velez-Juarbe, J. et al. Repeated mass strandings of Miocene marine mammals from Atacama Region of Chile point to sudden death at sea. Proc. Royal Soc. B; 2014; 281, 20133316. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.3316] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24573855]
63. Mullins, M.E. Ciguatera Fish Poisoning in the Age of Discovery and the Age of Enlightenment. Clin. Toxicol.; 2022; 60, pp. 392-396. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2021.1962529]
64. Cruz, R.C.; Costa, P.R.; Vinga, S.; Krippahl, L.; Lopes, M.B. A Review of Recent Machine Learning Advances for Forecasting Harmful Algal Blooms and Shellfish Contamination. J. Mar. Sci. Eng.; 2021; 9, 283. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jmse9030283]
65. Cruz, R.C.; Costa, P.R.; Krippahl, L.; Lopes, M.B. Forecasting Biotoxin Contamination in Mussels across Production Areas of the Portuguese Coast with Artificial Neural Networks. Knowl.-Based Syst.; 2022; 257, 109895. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109895]
66. Parsons, M.L.; Brandt, A.L.; Ellsworth, A.; Leynse, A.K.; Rains, L.K.; Anderson, D.M. Assessing the Use of Artificial Substrates to Monitor Gambierdiscus Populations in the Florida Keys. Harmful Algae; 2017; 68, pp. 52-66. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2017.07.007]
67. MGnify. Amplicon Sequencing of Tara Oceans DNA Samples Corresponding to Size Fractions for Protists. Sampling Event Dataset. 2022; Available online: https://www.gbif.org/dataset/d596fccb-2319-42eb-b13b-986c932780ad (accessed on 4 October 2023).
68. Pottier, I.; Lewis, R.J.; Vernoux, J.-P. Ciguatera Fish Poisoning in the Caribbean Sea and Atlantic Ocean: Reconciling the Multiplicity of Ciguatoxins and Analytical Chemistry Approach for Public Health Safety. Toxins; 2023; 15, 453. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins15070453]
69. Gaiani, G.; Diogène, J.; Campàs, M. Addressing Ciguatera Risk Using Biosensors for the Detection of Gambierdiscus and Ciguatoxins. Biosensors for the Marine Environment; Regan, F.; Hansen, P.D.; Barceló, D. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; Volume 122, [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/698_2022_943]
70. Castro, D.; Estevez, P.; Leao-Martins, J.M.; Dickey, R.W.; García-Álvarez, N.; Real, F.; Costa, P.R.; Gago-Martínez, A. Preparation of Ciguatoxin Reference Materials from Canary Islands (Spain) and Madeira Archipelago (Portugal) Fish. J. Mar. Sci. Eng.; 2022; 10, 835. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jmse10060835]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
The first ciguatera fish poisoning (CFP) in Portugal dates from 2008 when 11 people reported CFP symptoms after consuming a 30 kg amberjack caught around the Selvagens Islands (Madeira Archipelago). Since then, 49 human poisonings have been reported. The emergence of a new threat challenged scientists and regulators, as methods for toxic microalgae analyses and ciguatoxin (CTX) detection were not implemented. To minimise the risk of ciguatera, the Madeira Archipelago authorities interdicted fisheries in Selvagens Islands and banned the capture of amberjacks weighing more than 10 kg in the entire region of Madeira Archipelago. The accurate identification and quantification of the benthic toxin-producing algae species spreading to new areas require efforts in terms of both microscopy and molecular techniques. Two ciguatera-causing dinoflagellates, Gambierdiscus excentricus and Gambierdiscus australes, were identified in the Madeira Island and Selvagens sub-archipelago, respectively. Regarding the CTX analysis (N2a cell-based assay and LC-MS) in fish, the results indicate that the Selvagens Islands are a ciguatera risk area and that fish vectoring CTX are not limited to top predator species. Nevertheless, advances and improvements in screening methods for the fast detection of toxicity in seafood along with certified reference material and sensitive and selective targeted analytical methods for the determination of CTX content are still pending. This study aims to revise the occurrence of ciguatera cases in the Madeira Archipelago since its first detection in 2008, to discuss the risk management strategy that was implemented, and to provide a summary of the available data on the bioaccumulation of CTX in marine fish throughout the marine food web, taking into consideration their ecological significance, ecosystem dynamics, and fisheries relevance.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 IPMA—Portuguese Institute of the Sea and Atmosphere, Rua Alfredo Magalhães Ramalho 6, 1495-165 Lisbon, Portugal;
2 IPMA—Portuguese Institute of the Sea and Atmosphere, Rua Alfredo Magalhães Ramalho 6, 1495-165 Lisbon, Portugal;
3 IPMA—Portuguese Institute of the Sea and Atmosphere, Rua Alfredo Magalhães Ramalho 6, 1495-165 Lisbon, Portugal;
4 Laboratório Regional de Veterinária e Segurança Alimentar, Caminho das Quebradas de Baixo nº 79, S. Martinho, 9000-254 Funchal, Portugal;