It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a global pandemic. Two doses of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) have been shown to be insufficient to protect against variants of concern (VOCs), while viral vector vaccines remain protective against the infection. Herein, we conducted a preliminary study to evaluate the safety and immunity in an adult population who received the conventional 2 dosage-regimen of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine; with an additional intradermal ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 reciprocal dosage (1:5). An Intramuscular ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 booster was also included as a control. Immediate and delayed local reactions were frequently observed in the fractional intradermal boost, but systemic side effects were significantly decreased compared to the conventional intramuscular boost. The anti-RBD-IgG levels, the neutralising function against delta variants, and T cell responses were significantly increased after boosting via both routes. Interestingly, the shorter interval elicited higher immunogenicity compared to the extended interval. Taken together, a reciprocal dosage of intradermal ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 booster reduces systemic adverse reactions and enhances non inferiority humoral and cellular immune responses compared to a full dose of intramuscular boosting. These findings provide for an effective vaccine management during the shortages of vaccine supply.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Prince of Songkla University, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Songkhla, Thailand (GRID:grid.7130.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 1162)
2 Prince of Songkla University, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Songkhla, Thailand (GRID:grid.7130.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 1162)
3 Prince of Songkla University, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Songkhla, Thailand (GRID:grid.7130.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 1162)
4 Prince of Songkla University, Clinical Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Songkhla, Thailand (GRID:grid.7130.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 1162)
5 Ministry of Public Health, Department of Medical Science, Nonthaburi, Thailand (GRID:grid.415836.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 0576 2573)
6 Ministry of Public Health, Institute of Biological Products, Department of Medical Sciences, Nonthaburi, Thailand (GRID:grid.415836.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 0576 2573)
7 Prince of Songkla University, Division of Digital Innovation and Data Analytics, Faculty of Medicine, Songkhla, Thailand (GRID:grid.7130.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 1162)