It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Advances in statistical learning models for prediction have led to broader application across a variety of disciplines, granting generalizations and adaptations that were previously intractable even with advanced computational techniques. Among these is the allowance of correlated data with inherent paneled structure such as longitudinal or clustered data; adjustments which have already begun to be applied to a variety of supervised and unsupervised machine learning methods which had previously focused on cross-sectional data. These modifications have seen rudimentary testing in a number of applied disciplines where correlated data is commonly observed, including medical and clinical research. One field in particular that has garnered interest is Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. As this disorder is characterized by a prolonged and progressive disease course with an extensive variety of potential biomarkers, its feature-dense datasets with repeated patient measures are well suited for applications of machine learning prediction while utilizing longitudinal modifications. While some novel adaptations of longitudinal machine learning methods have already been tested in the realm of Alzheimer’s disease, there has not yet been a comprehensive evaluation to compare these techniques against each other or against widely accepted standards such as traditional inferential techniques like mixed-effects regression. Nor has there been rigorous investigation into how subject-specific effects can impact the error and bias of these predictions and the distinctions which may arise when developing entire temporal profiles as compared to the forecasting of future observations while leveraging previously observed data. This dissertation addresses these deficiencies in the literature by directly comparing a variety of machine learning techniques with longitudinal adaptations against each other and reference standards using a large, multi-study Alzheimer’s disease meta-database as well as assessing the role of subject-specific effects using synthetic data. This study is especially comprehensive, considering both continuous and categorical outcomes as well as differences when generating whole profiles de novo or forecasting of future observations based on prior sequences. With its emphasis on longitudinal data, this study considers not only predictive capacity for unobserved data using population-level characteristics, but also prediction of future observations using a variety of subject-specific effects.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer





