It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
BRAF inhibitors, such as vemurafenib, have shown efficacy in BRAF-mutant melanoma treatment but acquired-resistance invariably develops. Unveiling the potential vulnerabilities associated with vemurafenib resistance could provide rational strategies for combinatorial treatment.
Methods
This work investigates the metabolic characteristics and vulnerabilities of acquired resistance to vemurafenib in three generated BRAF-mutant human melanoma cell clones, analysing metabolic profiles, gene and protein expression in baseline and nutrient withdrawal conditions. Preclinical findings are correlated with gene expression analysis from publicly available clinical datasets.
Results
Two vemurafenib-resistant clones showed dependency on lipid metabolism and increased prostaglandin E2 synthesis and were more responsive to vemurafenib under EGFR inhibition, potentially implicating inflammatory lipid and EGFR signalling in ERK reactivation and vemurafenib resistance. The third resistant clone showed higher pyruvate-carboxylase (PC) activity indicating increased anaplerotic mitochondrial metabolism, concomitant with reduced GLUT-1, increased PC protein expression and survival advantage under nutrient-depleted conditions. Prostaglandin synthase (PTGES) expression was inversely correlated with melanoma patient survival. Increases in PC and PTGES gene expression were observed in some patients following progression on BRAF inhibitors.
Conclusions
Altogether, our data highlight heterogeneity in metabolic adaptations during acquired resistance to vemurafenib in BRAF-mutant melanoma, potentially uncovering key clinically-relevant mechanisms for combinatorial therapeutic targeting.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 The Institute of Cancer Research, London and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, London, UK (GRID:grid.18886.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 1271 4623) ; University of Oxford, Department of Psychiatry, Oxford, UK (GRID:grid.4991.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8948)
2 The Institute of Cancer Research, London and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, London, UK (GRID:grid.18886.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 1271 4623)
3 The Institute of Cancer Research, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, London, UK (GRID:grid.18886.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 1271 4623)