Abstract
This article studies the earnings and practice of depreciation of assets through the two accounting valuation systems: fair value accounting or historical cost accounting. It balances the methods used in each of the two accounting valuation systems: historical cost accounting and fair value accounting.
Many firms that did use value in use to arrive at their asset impairment loss will have declined a net realizable value figure as this would have been reduce than the value in use figure. If the firms had used net realizable value instead of value in use, this would have cause a higher asset impairment charge.
For the firms that use net realizable value for the purposes of determining the asset impairment charge this indicates that their net realizable value is higher than any calculated value in use figure.
In this way, that many firms report using more than one valuation method depending on the type of asset that is impaired and the results become difficult to indicate any conclusions based on the information available, despite the initial observation that value in use appears very used.
I claim that the use of fair value concept may have a different effect on the earnings quality for Romania because of less liquid or inactive markets. In this way, fair values will more probably be estimated by the use of valuation techniques which enables earnings management and could lead to lower quality of reported earnings.
Then, earnings under more fair value-based reporting system have less aggregate quality rankings for firms in Romania. I get the evidence that the extent of more fair-value-based other comprehensive income is negatively related to aggregate earnings quality for firms.
Keywords: historical cost accounting, fair value accounting, valuation, earnings, asset impairment.
1. Introduction
The concept of asset impairment relates closely to that of an asset write-down1.
Elliott and Shaw2 in 1988, Walsh, Craig and Clarke in 1991, Elliott and Hanna in 1996, Jordan and Clarke 2004, Sevin and Schroeder in 2005, Andrews in 2006, Ball and Shivakumar in 2003, Watts in 2003, LaFond and Watts in 2008 claimed that the asset impairment loss recognition is linked to both the issue of earnings management and the principle of conservatism.
Trueman and Titman3 in 1988, Walsh et al in 1991, Bartov in 1993, Basu in 1997, Burgstahler and Dichev in 1997, Healy and Wahlen in 1999, Shaw in 2003, Jordan and Clark in 2004, Sevin and Schroeder in 2005 staed that asset impairment constitutes a form of income smoothing in terms of managing the earnings.
Basu4 in 1997, Ball and Shivakumar in 2003 obtained the fact that in the current financial reporting regime, earnings tends to be skewed towards loss recognition.
1.1. The fair value accounting of earnings qualities
Christensen and Demski5 in 2003, Ronen and Yaari6 in 2008 showed that earnings quality provide valuation relevant information and provide contractingrelevant information. The accounting information have two roles: informativeness and stewardship.
Ronen and Yaari accentuate that informativeness role appeares from investors' demand for information to predict future cash flows and assesses their risk.
In 1990, Watts and Zimmerman showed that he stewardship objective of accounting comes from separation between ownership and management in public companies.
We wonder: Is income growth the result of changing regulations related to asset depreciation testing?
2. The earnings and asset impairment perspective
According to IFRS 13, "Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or to pay in order to transfer a liability from a common transaction between the market participants at the date of the evaluation7."
Nissim8, in 2003, Hitz9, in 2007, Ryan10, in 2008, Fiechter and Meyer11, in 2009, Chen et al.12, in 2010, stated that the estimation of fair value (marking-tomodel) creates opportunities for the exercise of management judgment which can decrease the quality of financial reporting.
Dechow and Schrand, in 2004, define that a highquality reported earnings reflect actual operating performance, indicate further performance.
The majority of the studies on fair value accounting and earnings quality are oriented on developed, market-oriented countries.
Barth13, in 1994, Ahmed and Takeda in 1995, Petroni and Wahlen, in 1995, Eccher et al, in 1996, Venkatachalam in 1996, Park et al., in 1999, Carroll in 2003, Khurana and Kim in 2003, Hassan et al., in 2006, Bhat in 2008, Goh et al., in 2009, Kolev in 2009, Song et al, in 2010, Bischof et al., in 2011, studied fair values of financial assets, while Barth and Clinch14, in 1998, Aboody et al., in 1999, Richard Dietrich et al., in 2000, Easton et al., in 2003, worked on fair values of fixed assets. Moreover, Aboody et al.15, in 1999, in their research, have given the existence of association between the changes in fair values of fixed assets and future operating cash flow and future earnings.
Hill16, in 2009, underlined that the empirical results regarding predictive ability of fair values could not be generalized to more volatile market conditions and more subjective applications of fair value valuation.
Dhaliwal et al.17, in 1998, Biddle and Choi, in 2006, Casta et al., in 2007, Chambers et al, in 2007, Goncharov and Hodgson, in 2008, Kanagaretnam et al., in 2009, Jones and Smith, in 2011, investigated fair value gains and losses through other comprehensive income.
Hitz18, in 2007, pointed that change in fair value consists of an expected and unexpected component, so gains and losses from fair value re measurement could be correlated in time for some assets.
IAS 36 Impairment of Assets19 claims that an asset is impaired when the recoverable amount of the asset is lower than the book value.
Then, recoverable amount is exact as the higher of net realizable value and value in use. In this view, value in use represents the budgeted discounted future cash flows expected from continued use of the asset.
Value in use has been the preponderent disclosed valuation method and this can appear to indicate a high degree of discretionary choice in terms of management's decision of the amount of an asset impairment charge.
Moses20, in 1987, Strong and Meyer, in 1987, Beatty and Weber, in 2006, Cotter et al., in 1998, Zucca and Campbell, in 1992, Beattie et al., in 1994, Francis et al., in 1996, Peek, in 2004, Jordan and Clark, in 2004, Sevin and Schroeder, in 2005, Walsh et al., in 1991, Elliott and Shaw, in 1988 and Riedl, in 2004 outlined that there was a discretionary choice available to firms for fair value measurement to determinate the asset impairment loss.
Using the annual reports of the sample of 94 corporations in U.K., experts has analyzed to assess the preferred method of valuation used in the determination of an asset impairment loss.
Bonbright21, in 1937, claimed that "the valuation method employed in order to arrive at the reported asset impairment loss is important as the decision is based on the deprival value concept".
Barth et al22, in 1995, Bemard et al23, in 1995, Hodder et al.24, in 2006, Plantin et al.25, in 2008, Sole et al.,26 in 2009, Magnan27, in 2009, Sun et al.28, in 2011, emphasized that historical-cost-based reporting does not recognize changes in values until the asset is sold. Some empirical studies almost prove that the move towards fair value accounting leads to increased earnings. Barth, in 1994, underlined that financial statement volatility was not an indication of flawed financial reporting. Barth said that the uncertainty and timing of future cash flow is a complete financial reporting. Barth has found three possible sources of financial statements volatility associated with fair values: inherent volatility, estimation error volatility and mixed measurement volatility.
Practicing of the concept of fair value accounting, it involves recognition of economic losses as well as economic gains and less asymmetry of losses relative to gains29.
Goncharov and Hodgson30, in 2008, have empirically confirmed that unrealized fair value gains (losses) in other comprehensive income. They pointed out that that use of fair value concept may have significantly different effect on the earnings quality for Eastern European countries due to business entities in continental Europe rely to a greater extent on debt capital.
To resume, when analyzing previous research regarding the association between application of fair value accounting and earnings quality measures, we get the following conclusions: there is mixed and inconsistent evidence. There were previous research examines earnings quality using single earnings attributes or a subset of earnings attributes.
Fair value accounting is established by income approach. Then changes in fair values can be stated as gains and losses through net income or other comprehensive income.
Andrew31, in 2009, claimed that the corporations had used net realizable value instead of value in use, this would have produced a higher asset impairment charge and lower reported earnings and asset values then has been stated.
Thus, we examine the influence of fair value gains (losses) through other comprehensive income and through net income on earnings.
Bad news are reflected by conservative earnings more quickly than good news. Thus, historical cost accounting causes timely recognition of losses than gains.
Historical cost accounting causes improves quality of accounting information in the context of corporate governance and loan agreements. Asymmetric recognition of losses relative to gains is defined as conditional conservatism.
3. Conclusions
I agree with Ball and Shivakumar that "defines loss recognition as arbitrary, not contemporaneously related to any particular event due to the arbitrary nature of bias in terms of reporting low book values and incomes unconditionally as a result of being conservative"32.
Many firms that did use value in use to arrive at their asset impairment loss will have declined a net realizable value figure as this would have been reduce than the value in use figure. If the firms had used net realizable value instead of value in use, this would have cause a higher asset impairment charge.
For the firms that use net realizable value for the purposes of determining the asset impairment charge this indicates that their net realizable value is higher than any calculated value in use figure.
In this way, that many firms report using more than one valuation method depending on the type of asset that is impaired and the results become difficult to indicate any conclusions based on the information available, despite the initial observation that value in use appears very used.
I conclude that the use of fair value concept may have a different effect on the earnings quality for Romania because of less liquid or inactive markets. In this way, fair values will more probably be estimated by the use of valuation techniques which enables earnings management and could lead to lower quality of reported earnings. Some empirical findings from research support experts' predictions33.
Then, earnings under more fair value-based reporting system have less aggregate quality rankings for firms in Romania. I get the evidence that the extent of more fair-value-based other comprehensive income is negatively related to aggregate earnings quality for firms.
I noticed that many studies on this topic are realized in common law countries such as US, United Kingdom or Australia and there is few research regarding fair value accounting in countries of Eastern Europe.
1 Alciatore, M., Dee, C. G., Easton, P., Spear, N., 'Asset write-downs: A decade of research', Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 17, ., (1998) pp.1-39.
2 Elliott, J., A., Shaw, W., H., 'Write-Offs as Accounting Procedures to Manage Perceptions,' Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 26, Supplement, (1988) pp. 91-119.
3 Trueman, B., Titman, S., 'An Explanation for Accounting Income Smoothing,' Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 26 (Supplement), (1988) pp. 127-139.
4 Basu, S., 'The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings,' Journal of Accounting and Economics, Volume 24, Issue 1, (1997) pp. 3-37.
5 Christensen, J. A., Demski, J. S., Accounting theory: an information content perspective: McGraw-Hill/Irwin (2003).
6 Ronen, J., Yaari, V., Earnings Management: Emerging Insights in Theory, Practice and Research Springer (2008).
7 IASB, IFRS 13 Fair ValueMeasurement, (2011) http://www.ifrs.org/IFRSs/Documents/IFRS13.pdf ACCA, Policy Paper on Fair Value. www. accaglobal. com/economy.
8 Nissim, D., Reliability of banks' fair value disclosure for loans. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 20 (4) (2003) pp. 355-384.
9 Hitz, J.-M., The decision usefulness of fair value accounting-a theoretical perspective. European Accounting Review 16 (2) (2007) pp. 323-362.
10 Ryan, S. G., Fair value accounting: understanding the issues raised by the credit crunch, White Paper prepared for the Council of Institutional Investors (2008).
11 Fiechter, P., and C. Meyer. 2009. Big bath accounting using fair value measurement discretion during the financial crisis: Mimeo.
12 Chen, F., Lam, K., Smieliauskas, W., Ye, M., Fair value measurements and auditor versus management conservatism Evidence from the banking industry Working paper, University of Toronto, (2010).
13 Barth, M. E., Fair value accounting: Evidence from investment securities and the market valuation of banks. Accounting Review (2000) pp. 1-25.
14 Barth, M. E., Clinch, G., Revalued financial, tangible, and intangible assets: Associations with share prices and non-market-based value estimates, Journal of Accounting Research 36, (1998) pp. 199-233.
15 Aboody, D., Barth, M. E., R. Kasznik., Revaluations of fixed assets and future firm performance: Evidence from the UK. Journal of Accounting and Economics 26 (1) (1999) pp. 149-178.
16 Hill, M. S., Fair value earnings as a predictor of future cash flows, Working paper, University of Alabama (2009).
17 Dhaliwal, D., Subramanyam, K., Trezevant, R., Is comprehensive income superior to net income as a measure of firm performance? Journal of Accounting and Economics 26 (1) (1999) pp. 43-67.
18 Hitz, J.-M., The decision usefulness of fair value accounting-a theoretical perspective. European Accounting Review 16 (2) (2007) p. 351.
19 IASB, International Financial Standard 13 - Fair Value Measurement, edited by I. A. S. C. Foundation. London IASB (2011).
20 Moses, O. D., 'Income Smoothing and Incentives: Empirical Tests Using Accounting Changes' The Accounting Review , Vol. 62, No. 2, (1987) pp. 358-377.
21 Bonbright, J.C., The Valuation of Property, McGraw-Hill (1937).
22 Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R., Wahlen, J. M., Fair value accounting: Effects on banks' earnings volatility, regulatory capital, and value of contractual cash flows, Journal of Banking and Finance 19 (3) (1995) pp. 577-605.
23 Bernard, V. L.,. Merton, R. C ., Palepu. K. G., Mark-to-market accounting for banks and thrifts: Lessons from the Danish Experience Journal of Accounting Research 33 (1) (1995) pp. 1-32.
24 Hodder, L. D., Hopkins, P. E., Wahlen, J. M., Risk-relevance of fair-value income measures for commercial banks, The Accounting Review 81 (2) (2006) pp. 337-375.
25 Plantin, G., Sapra, H., Shin, H. S., Marking-to-Market: Panacea or Pandora's Box? Journal of Accounting Research 46 (2) (2008) pp. 435-460.
26 Sole, J., Novoa, A., Scarlata, J. G., Procyclicality and fair value accounting. Vol. 9 (2009) International Monetary Fund.
27 Magnan, M. L., Fair Value Accounting and the Financial Crisis: Messenger or Contributor? Accounting perspectives 8 (3) (2009) pp. 189-213.
28 Sun, P., Liu, X., Cao, Y., Research on the Income Volatility of Listed Banks in China: Based on the Fair Value Measurement, International Business Research 4 (3) (2011) pp. 228.
29 Basu, S., 'The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings,' Journal of Accounting and Economics, Volume 24, Issue 1, (1997) pp. 3-37.
30 Goncharov, I., Hodgson, A., Comprehensive Income In Europe: Valuation, Prediction And Conservative Issues Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica 1 (10) (2008).
31 Andrews, R., Fair Value, earnings management and asset impairment: The impact of a change in the regulatory environment, Procedía Economics and Finance 2 ( 2012 ) pp. 16 - 25.
32 Ball, R., Shivakumar, L., Earnings quality in UK private firms: comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39 (1) (2005) pp. 83-128.
33Šodana, S., The impact of fair value accounting on earnings quality in eastern European countries, Procedia Economics and Finance 32 (2015) pp. 1769 - 1786.
References
* Aboody, D., Barth, M. E., R. Kasznik., Revaluations of fixed assets and future firm performance: Evidence from the UK. Journal of Accounting and Economics 26 (1) (1999) pp. 149-178
* Accounting Standards Board, 'Financial Reporting Standard 11, Impairment of Assets,' London, ASB (1998)
* Ahmed, A. S., Takeda, C., Stock market valuation of gains and losses on commercial banks' investment securities An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20 (2) (1995) pp. 207-225
* Alciatore, M., Dee, C. G., Easton, P., Spear, N., 'Asset write-downs: A decade of research', Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 17, ., (1998) pp.1-39
* Allen, F., Carletti, E., Mark-to-market accounting and liquidity pricing. Journal of Accounting and Economics 45 (2) (2008) pp. 358-378
* Andrews, R., Fair Value, earnings management and asset impairment: The impact of a change in the regulatory environment, Procedía Economics and Finance 2 ( 2012 ) pp. 16 - 25
* Ball, R., Shivakumar, L., Earnings quality in UK private firms: comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39 (1) (2005) pp. 83-128
* Barth, M. E., Fair value accounting: Evidence from investment securities and the market valuation of banks. Accounting Review Vol. 69 No. 1 (1994) pp. 1-25
* Barth, M. E., Clinch, G., Revalued financial, tangible, and intangible assets: Associations with share prices and non-market-based value estimates, Journal of Accounting Research 36, (1998) pp. 199-233
* Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R., Wahlen, J. M., Fair value accounting: Effects on banks' earnings volatility, regulatory capital, and value of contractual cash flows, Journal of Banking and Finance 19 (3) (1995) pp. 577-605
* Bartov, E., 'The Timing of Asset Sales and Earnings Manipulation,' The Accounting Review, Vol. 68, No. 4 (1993) pp. 840-855
* Basu, S., 'The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings,' Journal of Accounting and Economics, Volume 24, Issue 1, (1997) pp. 3-37
* Beattie, V., Brown, S., Ewers, D., John, B., Manson, S., Thomas, D. And Turner, M., 'Extraordinary items and incomes smoothing: A positive accounting approach,' Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol. 21, Iss. 6, (1994) pp. 791-811
* Beatty, A., Weber, J., 'Accounting Discretion in Fair Value Estimates: An Examination of SFAS 142 Goodwill Impairments,' Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 44 No. 2, (2006) pp. 257-288
* Bernard, V. L.,. Merton, R. C ., Palepu. K. G., Mark-to-market accounting for banks and thrifts: Lessons from the Danish experience. Journal of Accounting Research 33 (1) (1995) pp. 1-32
* Bhat, G., Risk relevance of fair value gains and losses, and the impact of disclosure and corporate governance. Available at SSRN 1094183 (2008)
* Biddle, G. C., Choi, J.-H., Is comprehensive income useful? Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 2 (1) (2006) pp. 1-32
* Bischof, J., Daske, H., Gebhardt, G., Fair value accounting and the business model of banks. Paper read at IAAER international conference Accounting Renaissance, Universita Ca'Foscari, Venezia (2011)
* Bonbright, J.C., The Valuation of Property, McGraw-Hill (1937)
* Burgstahler, D., and Dichev, I,. 'Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses,' Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 24, Iss. 1, (1997) pp. 99-126
* Cairns, D., 'The Use of Fair Value in IFRS', Accounting in Europe, Vol. 3, No. 1, (2006) pp. 5 - 22
* Carroll, T. J., Linsmeier, T. J., Petroni, K. R., The reliability of fair value versus historical cost information: Evidence from closedend mutual funds. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 18 (1) (2003) pp. 1-24
* Casta, J.-F., Ramond, O., Lin, S., Value relevance of comprehensive income and its components Evidence from major European capital markets (2007)
* CFA Institute, A Comprehensive Business Reporting Model: Financial Reporting for Investors. Charlottesville, VA (2005) CFA
* Chambers, D., Linsmeier, T. J., Shakespeare, C., Sougiannis, T., An evaluation of SFAS No. 130 comprehensive income disclosures. Review of Accounting Studies 12 (4) (2007) pp. 557-593
* Chen, F., Lam, K., Smieliauskas, W., Ye, M., Fair value measurements and auditor versus management conservatism Evidence from the banking industry Working paper, University of Toronto, (2010)
* Choi, J.-H., Das, S., Zang, Y., Comprehensive Income, Future Earnings, and Market Mispricing (2007)
* Christensen, J. A., Demski, J. S., Accounting theory: an information content perspective: McGrawHill/Irwin (2003)
* Cotter, J., Stokes, D., Wyatt, A., 'An analysis of factors influencing asset writedowns,' Accounting and Finance, Vol. 38, (1998) pp. 157-179
* Dechow, P., Ge, W., Schrand, C., Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50 (2) (2010) pp. 344-401
* Dechow, P. M., Schrand, C. M., (2004) Earnings quality
* DeFond, M. L., Earnings quality research: advances, challenges and future research. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50 (2) (2010) pp. 402-409
* Dhaliwal, D., Subramanyam, K., Trezevant, R., Is comprehensive income superior to net income as a measure of firm performance? Journal of Accounting and Economics 26 (1) (1999) pp. 43-67
* Easton, P., H., Eddey, P., H., Harris, T., S., 'An Investigation of Revaluations of Tangible Long-Lived Assets,' Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 31 Supplement 1993, (1993) pp. 1-38
* Eccher, E. A., Ramesh, K., Thiagarajan, S. R., Fair value disclosures by bank holding companies. Journal of Accounting and Economics 22 (1) (1996) pp. 79-117
* Elliott, J., A., Shaw, W., H., 'Write-Offs as Accounting Procedures to Manage Perceptions,' Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 26, Supplement, (1988) pp. 91-119
* Goh, B. W., Ng, J. , Yong, K. O., Market pricing of banks 'fair value assets reported under SFAS 157 during the 2008 Economic Crisis (2009) Document de travail disponible å l'adresse Internet suivante: http://papers. ssrn. com/sol3/papers. cfm
* Goncharov, I., Hodgson, A., Comprehensive Income In Europe: Valuation, Prediction And Conservative Issues Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica 1 (10) (2008)
* Fiechter, P., Meyer. C., Big bath accounting using fair value measurement discretion during the financial crisis: Mimeo (2009)
* Healy, P., Wahlen, J., M., 'A Review of the Earnings Management Literature and Its Implications for Standard Setting,' Accounting Horizons, Vol. 13 No. 4, (1999) pp. 365-383
* Hill, M. S., Fair value earnings as a predictor of future cash flows, Working paper, University of Alabama (2009)
* Hitz, J.-M., The decision usefulness of fair value accounting-a theoretical perspective. European Accounting Review 16 (2) (2007) pp. 323-362
* Hodder, L. D., Hopkins, P. E., Wahlen, J. M., Risk-relevance of fair-value income measures for commercial banks, The Accounting Review 81 (2) (2006) pp. 337-375
* Hung, M., Accounting standards and value relevance of financial statements: An international analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30 (3) (2000) 401-420
* IASB, International Financial Standard 13 - Fair Value Measurement, edited by I. A. S. C. Foundation. London IASB (2011)
* IASB International Accounting Standards Board, (2006), 'Fair Value Measurements,' Discussion Paper, London, IASB
* International Accounting Standards Board (2004) 'International Accounting Standard 36, Impairment of Assets, Revised,' London
* Jarva, H., 'Do Firms Manage Fair Value Estimates? An Examination of SFAS 142 Goodwill Impairments,' Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 36, Iss. 9, (2009) pp. 1059-1086
* Jones, D. A., Smith, K. J., Comparing the value relevance, predictive value, and persistence of other comprehensive income and special items. The Accounting Review 86 (6) (2011) pp. 2047-2073
* Jordan, C., Clark, S., "Big bath earnings management: the case of goodwill impairment under SFAS No. 142", Journal of Applied Business Research, Vol. 20, No. 2, (2004) pp 63-70
* Kanagaretnam, K., Mathieu, R., Shehata, M., Usefulness of comprehensive income reporting in Canada. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 28 (4) (2009) 349-365
* Khurana, I. K., Kim, M.-S., Relative value relevance of historical cost vs. fair value: Evidence from bank holding companies, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 22 (1) (2003) 19-42
* Kolev, K., Do Investors Perceive Marking-to-model as Marking-to-myth? Early Evidence from FAS 157 Disclosure, New York University, (2009) Graduate School of Business Administration
* LaFond, R., Watts, R. L., 'The Information Role of Conservatism,' The Accounting Review, Vol. 83, No 2, (2008) pp. 447-478
* Landsman, W. R., 'Is fair value accounting information relevant and reliable? Evidence from capital market research' Accounting and Business Research Special Issue: International Accounting Policy Forum. (2007) pp. 19-30
* Magnan, M. L., Fair Value Accounting and the Financial Crisis: Messenger or Contributor? Accounting perspectives 8 (3) (2009) pp. 189-213
* Moses, O. D., 'Income Smoothing and Incentives: Empirical Tests Using Accounting Changes' The Accounting Review , Vol. 62, No. 2, (1987) pp. 358-377
* Nissim, D., Reliability of banks' fair value disclosure for loans. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 20 (4) (2003) pp. 355-384
* Park, M. S., Park, T., Ro, B. T., Fair value disclosures for investment securities and bank equity: evidence from SFAS No. 115. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 14 (3) (1999) pp. 347-370
* Peek, E., 'The Use of Discretionary Provisions in Earnings Management: Evidence from The Netherlands,' Journal of International Accounting Research, Vol. 3, Iss. 2, (2004) pp. 27-43
* Petroni, K. R., Wahlen, J. M., Fair values of equity and debt securities and share prices of property-liability insurers. Journal of Risk and Insurance (1995) 719-737
* Plantin, G., Sapra, H., Shin, H. S., Marking-to-Market: Panacea or Pandora's Box? Journal of Accounting Research 46 (2) (2008) pp. 435-460
* Richard Dietrich, J., Harris, M. S., Muller Ш, K. A., The reliability of investment property fair value estimates. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30 (2) (2000) 125-158
* Ronen, J., Yaari, V., Earnings Management: Emerging Insights in Theory, Practice and Research Springer (2008)
* Ryan, S. G., Fair value accounting: understanding the issues raised by the credit crunch, White Paper prepared for the Council of Institutional Investors (2008)
* Schervish, M.J., "P Values: What They Are and What They Are Not," The American Statistician, Vol. 50 , Iss. 3, (1996) pp. 203-206
* Sevin, S., Schroeder, R., 'Earnings management: evidence from SFAS No. 142 reporting,' Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 20, Iss. 1, (2004) pp. 47-54
* Shaw, K., W., 'Corporate disclosure quality, earnings smoothing, and earnings' timeliness,' Journal of Business Research, Vol. 56, (2003) pp. 1043- 1050
* Sole, J., Novoa, A., Scarlata, J. G., Procyclicality and fair value accounting. Vol. 9 (2009) International Monetary Fund
* Song, C. J., Thomas, W. B., Yi, H., Value relevance of FAS No. 157 fair value hierarchy information and the impact of corporate governance mechanisms. The Accounting Review 85 (4) (2010) pp. 1375-1410
* Stefan-Duicu, V.M., Stefan-Duicu, A., Professional judgment of the financial analyst in the context of normative and positive theories of accounting directed by the economic resilience. From Person to Society, (2014) p.1003
* Stefan-Duicu, V.M., Stefan-Duicu, A., Economic and Social Mutations-Interacting with the Subject and Paradigms of Management Sciences. Ovidius University Annals, Series Economic Sciences, id(1) (2013)
* Strong, J., Meyer, J., 'Asset write-downs: Managerial incentives and security returns,' Journal of Finance, July, (1987) pp. 643-661
* Sun, P., Liu, X., Cao, Y., Research on the Income Volatility of Listed Banks in China: Based on the Fair Value Measurement, International Business Research 4 (3) (2011) pp. 228
* Sodana, S., The impact of fair value accounting on earnings quality in eastern European countries, Procedía Economics and Finance 32 (2015) pp. 1769 - 1786
* Trueman, B., Titman, S., 'An Explanation for Accounting Income Smoothing,' Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 26 (Supplement), (1988) pp. 127-139
* Venkatachalam, M., Value-relevance of banks' derivatives disclosures, Journal of Accounting and Economics 22 (1) (1996) pp. 327-355
* Walsh, P., R. Craig, F. Clarke, 'Big Bath Accounting Using Extraordinary Items Adjustments: Australian Empirical Evidence,' Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 18, No. 2, (1991) pp. 173-189
* Watts, R. L., 'Conservatism in accounting part I: Explanations and implications', Accounting Horizons, Vol 17, Iss 3; (2003) pp. 207-221
* Watts, R. S., Zimmerman, J. L., 'Towards a Positive Theory of the Determination of Accounting Standards,' The Accounting Review, Vol. LIII, No. 1, (1978) pp. 112-134
* Watts, R. L., Zimmerman, J. L., Positive accounting theory: a ten year perspective, Accounting Review, (1990) 131-156
* Zijl, T., Whittington, G., 'Deprival value and fair value: a reinterpretation and a reconciliation,' Accounting and Business Research. Vol. 36. No. 2. (2006) pp. 121-130
* Zucca, L., Campbell, D., 'A closer look at discretionary write downs of impaired assets,' Accounting Horizons, September, (1992) pp. 30-41
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2018. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
This article studies the earnings and practice of depreciation of assets through the two accounting valuation systems: fair value accounting or historical cost accounting. It balances the methods used in each of the two accounting valuation systems: historical cost accounting and fair value accounting. Many firms that did use value in use to arrive at their asset impairment loss will have declined a net realizable value figure as this would have been reduce than the value in use figure. If the firms had used net realizable value instead of value in use, this would have cause a higher asset impairment charge. For the firms that use net realizable value for the purposes of determining the asset impairment charge this indicates that their net realizable value is higher than any calculated value in use figure. In this way, that many firms report using more than one valuation method depending on the type of asset that is impaired and the results become difficult to indicate any conclusions based on the information available, despite the initial observation that value in use appears very used. I claim that the use of fair value concept may have a different effect on the earnings quality for Romania because of less liquid or inactive markets. In this way, fair values will more probably be estimated by the use of valuation techniques which enables earnings management and could lead to lower quality of reported earnings. Then, earnings under more fair value-based reporting system have less aggregate quality rankings for firms in Romania. I get the evidence that the extent of more fair-value-based other comprehensive income is negatively related to aggregate earnings quality for firms.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 PhD Candidate, Faculty of Economic Sciences, "Valahia" University of Târgovişte (e-mail: [email protected])