It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Aim
Multiple studies affirm that Bystander CPR (BCPR) improves outcomes in Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA). This study investigates age and other factors in affecting BCPR rates in Singapore.
Method
Data was extracted from the national cardiac arrest registry. OHCA cases in Singapore conveyed via emergency medical services from April 2010–December 2015 were included. Zipcodes of arrest location, census data from 2010–2015 and planning areas were used for geospatial analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to investigate the association between patient demographics and pre-hospital data with BCPR.
Results
8955 cases were split into 3 groups: Paediatric (Age 0–10 years; n=107), Young (Age 11–65 years; n=3979), Old (Age>65 years; n=4869). Compared to the Old, Paediatric and Young patients had higher rates of BCPR (OR 3.997, 95% CI: 2.567 to 6.224; OR 1.133, 95% CI: 1.027 to 1.249). Non-traumatic arrest (OR 2.550, 95% CI: 1.743 to 3.731) and Witnessed arrest (OR 1.267, 95% CI: 1.157 to 1.387), positively associated with BCPR, while arrest in residential location (OR 0.655, 95% CI: 0.441 to 0.973) negatively associated with BCPR. Of the OHCA in residential locations, patients in neighbourhoods with younger population were more likely to receive BCPR (OR 1.242, 95% CI: 1.061 to 1.453) compared to older neighbourhoods. There was no association with gender and major race groups, and univariate analysis showed no difference in BCPR rates between family bystanders and other layperson bystanders.
Conclusion
Older patients, residential arrests and older neighbourhoods were associated with lower rates of BCPR. Public education and training programs can be targeted to these populations to improve BCPR rates.
Conflict of interest
None
Funding
This study was supported by grants from National Medical Research Council, Clinician Scientist Award, Singapore (NMRC/CSA/024/2010 and NMRC/CSA/0049/2013), Ministry of Health, Health Services Research Grant, Singapore (HSRG/0021/2012) and Duke-NUS Khoo Research Student Award (Duke-NUS-KRSA/2013/0001).
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer




